construct select query from two tables in zend - sql

I'm new to zend 1.12 and I want to construct the following query, please advice:
SELECT tbl_user.first_name, tbl_user.last_name, tbl_user.email, tbl_user_group.group_id
FROM `tbl_user`, `tbl_user_group`
WHERE `organization_id` = 5
AND tbl_user.user_id = tbl_user_group.user_id
AND tbl_user_group.group_id = 11

Try this (not tested):
$select = $db->select()
->from(array('tu' => 'tbl_user'),
array('first_name', 'last_name', 'email'))
->join(array('tug' => 'tbl_user_group'),
'tu.user_id = tug.user_id',
array('group_id'))
->where('tu.organization_id = ?', 5)
->where('tug.group_id = ?', 11);

Related

Combine two queries in linq

I have two linq queries as follows:
GroupNamesWithCorrespondingEffects
= new ObservableCollection<GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect>(
from g in db.Groups
select new GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect
{
GroupID = g.GroupID,
GroupName = g.GroupName,
CorrespondingEffect = g.Master_Effects.Effect
}
);
GroupNamesWithCorrespondingEffects
= new ObservableCollection<GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect>
(GroupNamesWithCorrespondingEffects.
Where(u => !GetAllChildren(25).
Select(x => x.GroupID).
Contains(u.GroupID)).ToList());
Now how can I combine these two queries?
You can pass directly this to the constructor of the ObservableCollection:
from g in groups
let g = select new GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect
{
GroupID = g.GroupID,
GroupName = g.GroupName,
CorrespondingEffect = g.Master_Effects.Effect
}
where !GetAllChildren(25)
.Select(x => x.GroupID)
.Contains(g.GroupID)
select g
I'm not sure if EF is able to compose the first and the second part (I can't remember from the top of my head if Contains is resolved in an IN clause, my EF is a bit rusty), but you were not doing that anyway, so the effect is the same as yours. If it is able to compose, then this way you are getting a more efficient execution.
If you don't mind mixing SQL-style and extension method syntax, you can do this:
GroupNamesWithCorrespondingEffects
= new ObservableCollection<GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect>(
(from g in groups
select new GroupNameWithCorrespondingEffect
{ GroupID = g.GroupID,
GroupName = g.GroupName,
CorrespondingEffect = g.Master_Effects.Effect
})
.Where(u => !GetAllChildren(25)
.Select(x => x.GroupID)
.Contains(u.GroupID))
.ToList());

Counting one item per ID (query) using JoinInner

This is my tag table:
post_id tag topic
1 picture entertainment
1 camera entertainment
1 mobile technology
2 cable technology
This is my SQL right now (Using Zend Framework):
$select = $db->select();
$select->from(array('t' => 'tags'), array('count(*)', 't.topic'))
->joinInner(array('p' => 'posts'),'p.post_id = t.post_id')
->where('p.status = ?', self::STATUS_LIVE)
->where('t.topic= ?', $options);
return $db->fetchOne($select);
I want to count topics, selecting just one per id. In this case it will be:
entertainment: 1
technology: 2
My result right now is:
entertainment: 2
technology: 2
This is the solution:
$select = $db->select();
$select->from(array('t' => new Zend_Db_Expr('(SELECT post_id,topic FROM tags group by post_id,topic)')), array('count(*)', 't.topic'))
->joinInner(array('p' => 'posts'), 'p.post_id = t.post_id', array())
->where('p.status = ?', self::STATUS_LIVE)
->where('t.topic= ?', $options)
->group("t.topic");
return $db->fetchOne($select);
You can use this query :
SELECT COUNT(*),topic FROM (SELECT post_id,topic FROM tags GROUP BY post_id,topic) t GROUP BY topic;
Same query in zend :
$select = $db->select();
$select->from(array('t' => new Zend_Db_Expr('(SELECT post_id,topic FROM tags group by post_id,topic)')), array('count(*)', 't.topic'))
->group("t.topic");
$db->fetchAll($select);

Rails Arel equivalent of this complex sql query

Here is the original logic
(scrape_datas = ScrapeData.find(
:all, :conditions =>
"artist_status = 'NOT_FOUND'
AND blacklisted = 1
AND extracted = 0
and not EXISTS(
SELECT * FROM artist_name_suggestions where original = artist_name
)
I've been able to split up the first part better
scrape_datas = ScrapeData.where(
:artist_status => 'NOT_FOUND',
:blacklisted => 1,
:extracted => 0
)
Although having issues getting the "and not EXISTS" query into the mix
and not EXISTS(
SELECT * FROM artist_name_suggestions where original = artist_name
)
Thanks!
Firstly you can extract simple scopes:
scope :not_found, where(:artist_status => 'NOT_FOUND')
scope :blacklisted, where(:blacklisted => 1)
scope :extracted, where(:extracted => 0)
Then add a query method (assume artist_name is a column of scrape_datas):
def self.no_suggestions
scrape_datas = ScrapeData.arel_table
suggestions = ArtistNameSuggestion.arel_table
where(ArtistNameSuggestion.where(
suggestions[:original].eq(scrape_datas[:artist_name])
).exists.not)
end
Now you can do something like this:
ScrapeData.not_found.blacklisted.extracted.no_suggestions

SQL to Entity Framework Count Group-By

I need to translate this SQL statement to a Linq-Entity query...
SELECT name, count(name) FROM people
GROUP by name
Query syntax
var query = from p in context.People
group p by p.name into g
select new
{
name = g.Key,
count = g.Count()
};
Method syntax
var query = context.People
.GroupBy(p => p.name)
.Select(g => new { name = g.Key, count = g.Count() });
Edit: EF Core 2.1 finally supports GroupBy
But always look out in the console / log for messages. If you see a notification that your query could not be converted to SQL and will be evaluated locally then you may need to rewrite it.
Entity Framework 7 (now renamed to Entity Framework Core 1.0 / 2.0) does not yet support GroupBy() for translation to GROUP BY in generated SQL (even in the final 1.0 release it won't). Any grouping logic will run on the client side, which could cause a lot of data to be loaded.
Eventually code written like this will automagically start using GROUP BY, but for now you need to be very cautious if loading your whole un-grouped dataset into memory will cause performance issues.
For scenarios where this is a deal-breaker you will have to write the SQL by hand and execute it through EF.
If in doubt fire up Sql Profiler and see what is generated - which you should probably be doing anyway.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/05/16/announcing-entity-framework-core-rc2
A useful extension is to collect the results in a Dictionary for fast lookup (e.g. in a loop):
var resultDict = _dbContext.Projects
.Where(p => p.Status == ProjectStatus.Active)
.GroupBy(f => f.Country)
.Select(g => new { country = g.Key, count = g.Count() })
.ToDictionary(k => k.country, i => i.count);
Originally found here:
http://www.snippetsource.net/Snippet/140/groupby-and-count-with-ef-in-c
Here are simple examples of group-by in .NET Core 2.1:
var query = this.DbContext.Notifications
.Where(n => n.Sent == false)
.GroupBy(n => new { n.AppUserId })
.Select(g => new { AppUserId = g.Key, Count = g.Count() });
var query2 = from n in this.DbContext.Notifications
where n.Sent == false
group n by n.AppUserId into g
select new { id = g.Key, Count = g.Count()};
Both of these translate to:
SELECT [n].[AppUserId], COUNT(*) AS [Count]
FROM [Notifications] AS [n]
WHERE [n].[Sent] = 0
GROUP BY [n].[AppUserId]
with EF 6.2 it worked for me
var query = context.People
.GroupBy(p => new {p.name})
.Select(g => new { name = g.Key.name, count = g.Count() });

Conditions with And Or statements

I got this figured out. Here is the solution:
'conditions'=>array(
'OR' => array(
array('EavAttribute.attribute_code'=>'lastname'),
array('EavAttribute.attribute_code'=>'firstname')
),
'AND' => array(
array('UserEntityVarchar.entity_id'=>$id)
)
)
I am trying to convert this query into a cakephp query and I am having a bit of trouble with the conditions. No matter how I format the conditions, I always end up with the second query below.
Any help with this is greatly appreciated.
This is the query I am trying to replicate:
SELECT
`UserEntityVarchar`.`value_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`attribute_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`entity_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`value`,
`EavAttribute`.`attribute_code`
FROM
`user_entity_varchars` AS `UserEntityVarchar`
LEFT JOIN `eav_attributes` AS `EavAttribute` ON(
`UserEntityVarchar`.`attribute_id` = `EavAttribute`.`attribute_id`)
WHERE
(UserEntityVarchar.entity_id = 1 AND
EavAttribute.attribute_code = 'firstname') OR
(UserEntityVarchar.entity_id = 1 AND
EavAttribute.attribute_code = 'lastname')
This is the query I keep getting no matter how I format my condition:
SELECT
`UserEntityVarchar`.`value_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`attribute_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`entity_id`,
`UserEntityVarchar`.`value`,
`EavAttribute`.`attribute_code`
FROM
`user_entity_varchars` AS `UserEntityVarchar`
LEFT JOIN `eav_attributes` AS `EavAttribute` ON(
`UserEntityVarchar`.`attribute_id` = `EavAttribute`.`attribute_id`)
WHERE
((`UserEntityVarchar`.`entity_id` = 1)
AND
(`EavAttribute`.`attribute_code` = 'firstname'))
AND
((`UserEntityVarchar`.`entity_id` = 1)
AND
(`EavAttribute`.`attribute_code` = 'lastname'))
This is the condition that I am using:
'conditions'=>array(
array(
array('UserEntityVarchar.entity_id'=>$id),
array('AND ' => array('EavAttribute.attribute_code'=>'firstname'))
),
array('OR' =>
array('UserEntityVarchar.entity_id'=>$id),
array('AND ' => array('EavAttribute.attribute_code'=>'firstname'))
)
)
You should be able to do it like this:
$this->Model->find('all', array('conditions' => array('OR' => array(
array('UserEntityVarchar.entity_id' => 1,
'EavAttribute.attribute_code' => 'firstname'),
array('UserEntityVarchar.entity_id' => 1,
'EavAttribute.attribute_code' => 'lastname')))));