How to use onWithOptions in Elm 0.17? - elm

I have an application where I'm selecting some statuses. Initially, I had a code like this
div
[ classList
[ onClick (SelectStatus (Just status)) ]
But at some moment, I need to stop event propagation. I found that there is an onWithOptions function but I don't know how to use it. Especially what's the Decoder parameter for. I rewrite it to this form but I'm still getting some errors.
div
[ onWithOptions "click" { stopPropagation = True, preventDefault = False } keyCode (SelectStatus (Just status))
This is the error message
Function `onWithOptions` is expecting 3 arguments, but was given 4.
Maybe you forgot some parentheses? Or a comma?at line 171 col 11

Your link is pointing to an obsolete package as of Elm 0.17. Here is the correct version: http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-lang/html/1.1.0/Html-Events#onWithOptions
I think this would give you the functionality you're after:
onWithOptions "click" { stopPropagation = True, preventDefault = False } (Json.succeed (SelectStatus (Just status)))

Related

Is it possible to use two objects: Force and Multiple in Cypress Test?

I am using cypress test to check all the buttons in the page whether they can be clicked or not.
I have used this line of code:
cy.get('button').click({ force: true }).should('have.attr', 'href')
and gives error
CypressError: cy.click() can only be called on a single element. Your
subject contained 5 elements. Pass { multiple: true } if you want to
serially click each element.
After that changed code with:
cy.get('button').click({ multiple: true }).should('have.attr', 'href')
and got another error
CypressError: Timed out retrying: cy.click() failed because this
element is not visible:
...
This element
''
is not visible because it has CSS property: 'display: none'
Fix this problem, or use {force: true} to disable error checking.
https://on.cypress.io/element-cannot-be-interacted-with
Is there any way to use both object to solve the problem?
This should work (I don't have a situation to test it when both needed, but it doesn't result in an error):
cy.get('button')
.click({ multiple: true, force: true })
.should('have.attr', 'href')
Here is a generic way of doing it -
cy.get('button').each(($btn) => {
if ($btn.hasClass('disabled')) {
// logic to deal with disabled button
}
else {
// click button or do whatever
cy.wrap($btn).should('have.attr', 'href').click();
}
})
each will help you loop through every button, whatever may be the count. This allows you to not worry about force clicking an element (button in this case).

Using preventDefault in Elm

How do I use preventDefault in elm? Say on a keyboard event:
keyDown keyCode model =
case keyCode of
13 -> -- Enter key
model
if we don't want the default behaviour?
Html.Events has methods for it, but I don't understand how to use it in practice.
This answer is obsolete with Elm 0.19
Learn how to use Html.Events.on, then it becomes obvious.
myInput =
input
[ on "keydown" (Json.map KeyInput keyCode)]
[]
becomes...
myInputWithOptions =
input
[ onWithOptions "keydown" options (Json.map KeyInput keyCode)]
[]
options =
{ stopPropagation = True
, preventDefault = True
}
(Here, message constructor KeyInput
is defined as: type Msg = KeyInput Int)
#Tosh has shown how to stop event propagation and prevent default behaviour in his answer.
If your specific case is to prevent default behaviour only on Enter but not on any other keys, this is currently not possible in Elm—you'll have to resort to Ports and JS.
You can now use the library elm-community/html-extra for that, it provides you the onClickPreventDefault and onClickStopPropagation functions.

How to enable openOnClick for a Dojo/Dijit Tree and still call onClick function

I want to be able to both select the folder node label to expand the tree while also calling the onClick function for the tree. I've set the openOnClick property of the tree equal to true which will enable the tree to expand when the node label is selected however then the onClick function is never called.
My code looks like this...
tree = new Tree({
model: treeModel,
openOnClick : true, // This prevents onClick function from firing
onClick: function(item, node, event){
// this function is never called because openOnClick is enabled
alert("This message will never appear");
},
}, "tree");
I need both openOnClick and onClick to work. I am using dojo 1.9
Any ideas???
After digging through the dijit/Tree.js source code here was the solution I came up with.
tree = new Tree({
model: treeModel,
// openOnClick : false, // Don't set openOnClick equal to true
onClick: function(item, node, event){
alert("This message will NOW appear!!!");
this._onExpandoClick({node: node}); // This will expand the node
},
}, "tree");
The logic in the Tree.js file checks the openOnClick value and based on its value will either expand the node or call the onClick function. I'm still not sure why the two functions are exclusive from one another.
Does anyone know why this is?

Hiding a series by default in a spider plot

I have a spider plot in using the graphing library of Dojo defined like this:
require([
"dojox/charting/Chart",
"dojox/charting/themes/Claro",
"dojox/charting/plot2d/Spider",
"dojox/charting/action2d/Tooltip",
"dojox/charting/widget/SelectableLegend",
"dojox/charting/axis2d/Default"
], function (Chart, theme, Spider, Tooltip, Legend, Default) {
var chart = new Chart(element).setTheme(theme).addPlot("default", {
type: Spider,
radius: 200,
fontColor: "black",
labelOffset: "-20"
});
var colors = ["blue", "red", "green", "yellow", "purple", "orange", "teal",
"maroon", "olive", "lime", "aqua", "fuchsia"];
$.each(factors, function (index, factor) {
chart.addAxis(factor.name, {
type: Default,
min: factor.min,
max: factor.max
});
});
$.each(presets, function (pIndex, preset) {
var data = [];
$.each(factors, function (fIndex, factor) {
data[factor.name] = preset.values[fIndex];
});
chart.addSeries(preset.short, data, {
fill: colors[pIndex % colors.length]
});
});
new Tooltip(chart, "default");
chart.render();
new Legend({
chart: chart,
horizontal: false
}, $(element).next(".legend")[0]);
});
I add a series for every member of an array called presets and I use a selectable legend that lets the user turn them on or off as they want. However, what I can't seem to find in the docs is how to start a series in the unselected, not visible state? What I ideally want to do is cap the number of series visible when the page loads because in some cases I have up to 14 presets and it just looks a mess until the user deselects a bunch. So I'd like to have, say, every preset above the first 5 be hidden at the start.
Here's a crude fiddle I've knocked to demonstrate. What I want is to have some of the series unselected when the plot is first displayed.
Update: I tried adding this after adding my series:
var checkboxes = $(".dijitCheckBoxInput").each((index, elem) => {
if (index > 4) {
elem.click();
}
});
Which works, but seems very fragile. If they change the class assigned to checkboxes, it'll break. Also, it prohibits me using more than one set of dojo checkboxes because I don't have a good way to tell the difference. (Note, the IDs of the checkboxes added by the SelectableLegend are dijit_form_CheckBox_0, dijit_form_CheckBox_1, etc, which also gives no useful information as to what they are related to). I thought I might be able to use the legend placeholder div as a way to select the descendant checkboxes, but it appears that Dojo replaces the placeholder entirely with a table.
i looked into the dojo code and found the area in which the shapes are toggled on & off whitin the SelectableLegend.js :
var legendCheckBox = query(".dijitCheckBox", legend)[0];
hub.connect(legendCheckBox, "onclick", this, function(e){
this._toggle(shapes, i, legend.vanished, originalDyn, seriesName, plotName);
legend.vanished = !legend.vanished;
e.stopPropagation();
});
The toggling process is very complex and is based on many local attributes:
_toggle: function(shapes, index, isOff, dyn, seriesName, plotName){
arrayUtil.forEach(shapes, function(shape, i){
var startFill = dyn.fills[i],
endFill = this._getTransitionFill(plotName),
startStroke = dyn.strokes[i],
endStroke = this.transitionStroke;
if(startFill){
if(endFill && (typeof startFill == "string" || startFill instanceof Color)){
fx.animateFill({
shape: shape,
color: {
start: isOff ? endFill : startFill,
end: isOff ? startFill : endFill
}
}).play();
}else{
shape.setFill(isOff ? startFill : endFill);
}
}
if(startStroke && !this.outline){
shape.setStroke(isOff ? startStroke : endStroke);
}
}, this);
}
I tried also checking & unchecking the dijit/form/Checkbox in a legend manually, but that does not trigger the _toggle function in any case, even if you do a render() / fullrender() on the chart.
With that in mind it seems that there is no other possibilty to toggle the series on and off than by firing the onclick events manually.
To make your code less fragile, you could access the Checkbox widgets within the legend manually using:
query(".dijitCheckBox", legend); // Should deliver an array containing
the widgets.
and triggering the onclick event on them. Their keynumber in the array should correspond to the order the series where added...
Dojo is a fine piece of work, please dont stop working with it !
dojox/charting/Series has an attribute called dirty which according to the API docs is a "flag indicating whether or not this element needs to be rendered".
Alternately, if you are limiting the display of some series you can write a separate interface for adding them. For example, loop over the first 5. Then create a select box or list of check boxes with all entries and an onchange event that calls chart.addSeries.
Keeping a reference to each series you create will allow you to later call destroy() or destroyRecursive() on it if the user no longer wishes it displayed.
So while ideally you could toggle the display of these series, the worst case senerio is that you just add, destroy, and read based on some user input.
Using a templated widget will allow you to keep this interface and the chart tightly linked and support reuse.
BTW, consider using "dojo/_base/array" and "dojo/query" in place of the jquery
I think i've got it !
I found another way to access the checkboxes ! It's the same way dojo uses internally to connect the "toggle code" to the onclick event. First take a look at this from SelectableLegend.js (Lines 150 - 156):
// toggle action
var legendCheckBox = query(".dijitCheckBox", legend)[0];
hub.connect(legendCheckBox, "onclick", this, function(e){
this._toggle(shapes, i, legend.vanished, originalDyn, seriesName, plotName);
legend.vanished = !legend.vanished;
e.stopPropagation();
});
It looks like they use the ".dijitCheckBox" class to find the checkbox dom element and connect to it using dojo/connect. Now based on that, i made this function:
function toggleSeries (legend,num) {
dojo.query("*",legend.legends[num])[0].click();
dijit.findWidgets(legend.legends[num])[0]._onClick(); }
It doesn't use any class definition (because of the *) and it accesses the areas where the checkboxes are from within the SelectableLegend. It needs the SelectableLegend and the number of the series you want to deactivate as parameters. Here the jsfiddle example with this function & hiding all 4 of your series with it:
http://jsfiddle.net/luciancd/92Dzv/17/
Also please notice the "onDomReady" Option in jsfiddle, without it: doesnt work in IE.
And the ready function within the code !
Lucian
I have updated your code http://jsfiddle.net/92Dzv/18/
Here is the key to toogle.
dom.byId(le._cbs[0].id).click();
dom.byId(le._cbs[2].id).click();
Choose the index of your legend and set to _cbs.
By this way le._cbs[0].id you will get the real id of checkbox (that inside in the widget) and then just use click()
Note : le is came from here.
var le = new Legend({
chart: chart,
horizontal: false
}, legend);

Using dijit.InlineEditBox with dijit.form.Select

I'm trying to use a dijit.form.Select as the editor for my dijit.InlineEditBox. Two problems / unexpected behavior seem to occur:
Inconsistently, the InLineEditBox doesn't have the initial value set as selected
Consistently, after selecting a choice, the value that should be hidden is shown instead of the label.
The width isn't set to 130px
Here's working code: http://jsfiddle.net/mimercha/Vuet8/7/
The jist
<span dojoType="dijit.InlineEditBox" editor="dijit.form.Select"
editorParams="{
options: [
{label:'None',value:'none'},
{label:'Student',value:'stu'},
{label:'Professor',value:'prof',selected:true},
],
style:'width:1000px;',
}"
editorStyle="width: 1000px;"
>
</span>
Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Okay, after a few MORE hours struggling with the mess that is dijit.InlineEditBox, I think I have the solution to the remaining issue (#2).
EDIT: My first solution to #2 is still flawed; the implementation at http://jsfiddle.net/kfranqueiro/Vuet8/10/ will never return the actual internal value when get('value') is called.
EDIT #2: I've revamped the solution so that value still retains the real (hidden) value, keeping displayedValue separate. See if this works better:
http://jsfiddle.net/kfranqueiro/Vuet8/13/
First, to recap for those who weren't on IRC:
Issue #1 was happening due to value not being properly set as a top-level property of the InlineEditBox itself; it didn't pick it up properly from the wrapped widget.
Issue #3 was happening due to some pretty crazy logic that InlineEditBox executes to try to resolve styles. Turns out though that InlineEditBox makes setting width particularly easy by also exposing it as a top-level numeric attribute. (Though IINM you can also specify a percentage as a string e.g. "50%")
Now, issue #2...that was the killer. The problem is, while InlineEditBox seems to have some logic to account for widgets that have a displayedValue attribute, that logic is sometimes wrong (it expects a displayedValue property to actually exist on the widget, which isn't necessarily the case), and other times missing entirely (when the InlineEditBox initializes). I've worked around those as best I could in my own dojo.declared extensions to InlineEditBox and the internal widget it uses, _InlineEditor - since generally it's a good idea to leave the original distribution untouched.
It's not pretty (neither is the underlying code I dug through to understand and come up with this), but it seems to be doing its job.
But man, this was rather interesting. And potentially pertinent to my interests as well, as we have used this widget in our UIs as well, and will be using it more in the future.
Let me know if anything backfires.
hm...
<span dojoType="dijit.InlineEditBox" editor="dijit.form.Select"
editorParams="{
options: [
{label:'None',value:'none'},
{label:'Student',value:'stu'},
{label:'Professor',value:'prof',selected:true},**<<<<** and this comma is for?
],
style:'width:1000px;',**<<<<** and this comma is for?
}"
editorStyle="width: 1000px;"
>
</span>
Also, when using dijit.form.Select, selected value is not attr "selected" but value.
And if you enter prof inside <span ...blah > prof </span> than your proper selected option will be selected ;)
Dijit select checks for VALUE, not attr.
This may be fixed in recent Dojo - see http://bugs.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/15141 - but using 1.7.3 I found this worked:
In my app directory, at the same level as dojo, dijit and dojox, I created a file InlineSelectBox.js which extends InlineEditBox with code to set the HTML on the associated domNode from the value of the Dijit, and which wires up that code to the onChange() event:
define(["dijit/InlineEditBox",
"dijit/form/Select",
"dojo/on",
"dojo/_base/declare",
"dojo/_base/array"
],
function(InlineEditBox, Select, on, declare, array){
return declare(InlineEditBox, {
_setLabel: function() {
array.some(this.editorParams.options, function(option, i){
if (option.value == this.value) {
this.domNode.innerHTML = option.label;
return true;
}
return false;
}, this);
},
postMixInProperties: function(){
this.inherited(arguments);
this.connect(this, "onChange", "_setLabel");
},
postCreate: function(){
this.inherited(arguments);
this._setLabel();
}
});
});
Then, in my view script:
require(["dojo/ready",
"app/InlineSelectBox",
"dijit/form/Select"
],
function(ready, InlineSelectBox, Select){
ready(function(){
// Add code to set the options array
var options = [];
// Add code to set the initial value
var initialValue = '';
var inlineSelect = new InlineSelectBox({
editor: Select,
editorParams: {options: options},
autoSave: true,
value: initialValue
}, "domNodeToAttachTo");
});
});
I was dealing with this situation a few months ago, and not finding a resolution i made my own algorithm.
I put a div with an event on Onclick that build programatically a Filtering Select on that div with the store i want to use.
function create(id,value){
var name = dojo.byId(id).innerHTML;
dojo.byId(id).parentNode.innerHTML = '<div id="select"></div>';
new dijit.form.FilteringSelect({
store: store,
autoComplete: true,
invalidMessage:"Invalid Selection",
style: "width: 80px;",
onBlur: function(){ },
onChange: function(){ },
required: true,
value: value,
disabled: false,
searchAttr: "name",
id: "status"+id,
name: "status"
},"select");
dijit.byId('status'+id).focus();
}
I used the onBlur event to destroy the widget and the onchange to save by xhr the new value.
The focus is below because the onBlur was not working properly.
note: the function is not complete.