I have 4 to 5 Builds on TFS problem is each Build has 1000+ variables, so all i want is there any xml or any other file so i just import my variables or any other possibles solution without writing variables in each build.
Answer will be highly appreciated.
Yes, you can use PowerShell script to do this if you are talking about the variables in vNext build.
You can create a PowerShell script with following command:
Write-Host "vso[task.setvariable variable=testvar;]testvalue"
This will create a "testvar" variable with "testvalue" filled. Then you can use it in the later build steps by entering $(testvar).
Related
I have a folder in TFS which has SQL Scripts. At the moment I am manually adding a comment and updating a version number inside the comment every time i make a change and check it back it. This works however was hoping there might be a better way. Is there a way to automate this in TFS?
I have read the following article
Version control project files
do i have to go through such a process for simple .sql files? Are there any other simple ways.
There are a few ways you can do this:
Create an automated build in TFS and write a custom build step / PowerShell script to parse the appropriate SQL scripts, read the version, increment it, and store the new version by either checking in the updated file or a local store
Use a database project (part of SQL Server Data Tools) which will output a DACPAC. Inside the database project, you can set the version as specified here. This stores the version in the project file. If you update your TFS build number to be digits only, you can then update the project file to set that value to match the build using a custom build task. For example, if your build number was yyyy.m.d.R where R is the number of times that build was run today (TFS manages that - it's the revision variable). Or, you could set the the <DacVersion> tag to something like 2.1.0.0 and your build replaces the last digit with yyyymmddr.
I'd recommend using a database project. It's pretty easy to create a new database project off an existing database.
The first way mentioned by Jacob above can achieve that if you just want to incremental the version number of the script/folder, just create a CI build definition.
Actually you can just enable Label sources and set the Label format with predefined environment variables such as $(build.buildNumber), and set without publish any artifacts during build process.
Thus, it will automatically trigger the CI build when you check in files, and the source (SQL Script /folder) will be labeled with the incremental number.
Then you can find the specific versions with the label.
I am creating a deployment in Bamboo. I have some variables set up under the deployment plan. How can I access these from a Gradle script? There is an arguments input (that I guess I would use something like variable=${bamboo.variable} in there, but I cant work out how to get them to go through to the script (at the moment just doing something like prinln varible to get them out). How can I do this?
As far as I know, Bamboo exports all it's variable into the build environment. In that case, you can get any variable within the script as follows:
System.getenv('bamboo.variable')
Alternatively, you may pass it into the build as build script parameter, like so:
-Pvariable=${bamboo.variable}
and then you can get it within a script as a project property:
println variable
I have the following variables defined:
Now once a build is complete (the last step in the build process), I want to update the VersionRevision variable, basically increment it.
So I'm looking for an API I can call from C# and create a console application or a powershell script to edit the build definition (if I have to do this)?
You can use VSTS Rest API to update the variable value in Build Definition. Both Console Application and Powershell Script is OK for this.
If I understand correctly, you want to get these build variables and them assignment them as your version number.
After the build completes, update and increment the VersionRevision. It's not a good way and seems not available to achieve it.
In TFS build there is a $(Rev:.r) which means
Use $(Rev:.rr) to ensure that every completed build has a unique name.
When a build is completed, if nothing else in the build number has
changed, the Rev integer value is incremented by one.
Source: Specify general build definition settings
To version your assemblies you could just add an powershell script in your build definition, detail ways to achieve please follow this link from MSDN: Version your assemblies
And usually we only define and assignment variables with the Major and Minor version. If you want to change the value of them. You may need manually edit the build definition.
More related link about how to manage version numbers as part of your vNext builds.
vNext Build Awesomeness – Managing Version Numbers
Generate custom build numbers in TFS Build vNext
I tried the following in MSBuild Arguments but this didn't work out.
/t:Build;Publish /p:SqlPublishProfilePath=McMData1.local.publish.xml
/p:SqlPublishProfilePath McMData1.local.publish.xml
You can only specify one SqlPublishProfilePath value. You can create another msbuild command task to publish another database project separately or create another build definition.
Also, you could make the database properties inside the xml file command line driven , but you can still only specify one .xml file and have one deployment.
my build process with TFS 2010 should perform different task one after the other like:
Build 1st project in solution
Execute MSBuild via command line (to publish the project)
Execute a 3rd party tool via command line (to obfuscate the binaries)
Build a 2nd project in the solution (an InstallShield project)
How can I achieve this? I can define several project in the Build Definition but how can I invoke several command line task between these build steps? And the MSBuildArguments in the Build Definition: Are these arguments for every msbuild call for each project/solution?
Thanks
Konrad
At first, you need to add in your build definition the distinct *.*proj instead of one big *.sln - or (even better) construct more than one *.sln & order them to get build in the build definition. So you could organize a Project1.sln, Project2.sln etc that are only used from the Build.
In addition to that, you would have to make changes in the build process template to get this.By default you get something like that, that executes each set project/solution within a bigger foreach:
A good way would be to enhance this as a sequence, where all your custom action are set as InvokeProcess activities:
Obviously, you would have to insert here a flow control, so that Publish & Dotfuscator execute the first time (where Project1.sln gets build), while ISDEV executes the second time (where Project2.sln gets build). In the sample below I used a switch & packed Publish & Dotfuscator in a new Sequence.
Finally, you would have to have a counter of some sort. The most immediate option is to set a new Int32 Variable with default == 1 and increase it by hand during execution. In the sample below this is done in the lower Assign:
This final override of Complie the Project, along with a changed Build Definition should get what you 're after.
The team build definition takes a list of sln's and msbuild project files. You can put simply split your InstallShield project out into it's own solution ( most developers won't have a copy of InstallShield anyways likely ) and write an msbuild targets file for steps 2 and 3. Then just tell your build definition to build solution 1, the targets file and solution 2.
You could also choose to put the stuff in the targets file in a postbuild event for one of the projects in solution 1.
I wouldn't do this in workflow.