Extract and concatenate the same field from multiple records in big query - google-bigquery

I would like to be able to extract one field from multiple records from within a single table. For example, assuming I have a schema as follows
userId, eventTimestamp, theField
And what I want to do is be able to concatenate all instances of the field 'theField' together into a single string for a given userId ordered by eventTimestamp. And for an extra wrinkle, lets say I only want to include the first fiftiest oldest records.
My first attempt was to try something like:
SELECT
userId,
eventTimestamp,
LEAD(theField,0) OVER (PARTITION BY userId ORDER BY eventTimestamp) AS step0,
LEAD(theField,1) OVER (PARTITION BY userId ORDER BY eventTimestamp) AS step1,
....,
LEAD(theField,50) OVER (PARTITION BY userId ORDER BY eventTimestamp) AS step50,
And then the next step was to wrap that first step up in another SELECT statement as follows:
SELECT userId, eventTimestamp, CONCAT(STRING(step0), STRING(step1),...,STRING(step50)) as concatenatedString
FROM [whateverDataset.whateverTable],
GROUP BY
userId, eventTimestamp
This approach doesn't work though because if I have more than 50 steps (which I do), then I end up getting multiple rows for each of those outer SELECT statements, basically N-50 rows, where N = the total number of records for a particular userId. A 'solution' to this would be to have a HAVING statement in the inner SELECT statement to limit itself to only reporting the first 50 records, but overall this seems like a rather cumbersome solution. In non-BigQuery variants of SQL the GROUP_CONCAT seems to be a good way to go forward, but it either doesn't work here or I lack the creativity to get it to work. Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Brad

For BigQuery Legacy SQL:
SELECT
userid, GROUP_CONCAT(theField) AS Fields
FROM (
SELECT
userid, eventTimestamp, theField,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY userid ORDER BY eventTimestamp DESC) AS pos
FROM YourTable
ORDER BY eventTimestamp
)
WHERE pos < 51
GROUP BY userid
Please note: inner ORDER BY does not guarantee the order of theField in GROUP_CONCAT. But, so far, in all practical cases I see the order is carrying. So, test carefuly
For BigQuery Standard SQL:
Don't forget to uncheck Use Legacy SQL checkbox under Show Options
SELECT
userid,
(SELECT STRING_AGG(fields) FROM t.fields) AS fields
FROM (
SELECT
userid,
ARRAY(SELECT theField FROM t.fields ORDER BY eventTimestamp) fields
FROM (
SELECT
userid,
ARRAY_AGG(STRUCT(theField, eventTimestamp)) fields
FROM (
SELECT
userid,
eventTimestamp,
theField,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY userid ORDER BY eventTimestamp DESC) AS pos
FROM YourTable
)
WHERE pos < 51
GROUP BY userid
) t
) t

Related

I need first 2 occurrences of duplicate id in the output(image attached) using sql

want first 2 occurrence of duplicate ID'S in the output, desired output in image attached.
Please help
I'm not sure what you meant by "1st occurrence" because sql select queries are unorder unless you specified the order. So I'm assuming you are using alphabetical ordering on the emails.
SELECT t.id, t.email, t.state_code FROM (
SELECT id, email, state_code,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(partition by id ORDER BY email desc) as cnt
FROM testdb
group by id, email, state_code
) as t
WHERE t.cnt <= 2
db fiddle link

Find the second largest value with Groupings

In SQL Server, I am attempting to pull the second latest NOTE_ENTRY_DT_TIME (items highlighted in screenshot). With the query written below it still pulls the latest date (I believe it's because of the grouping but the grouping is required to join later). What is the best method to achieve this?
SELECT
hop.ACCOUNT_ID,
MAX(hop.NOTE_ENTRY_DT_TIME) AS latest_noteid
FROM
NOTES hop
WHERE
hop.GEN_YN IS NULL
AND hop.NOTE_ENTRY_DT_TIME < (SELECT MAX(hope.NOTE_ENTRY_DT_TIME)
FROM NOTES hope
WHERE hop.GEN_YN IS NULL)
GROUP BY
hop.ACCOUNT_ID
Data sample in the table:
One of the "easier" ways to get the Nth row in a group is to use a CTE and ROW_NUMBER:
WITH CTE AS(
SELECT Account_ID,
Note_Entry_Dt_Time,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY AccountID ORDER BY Note_Entry_Dt_Time DESC) AS RN
FROM dbo.YourTable)
SELECT Account_ID,
Note_Entry_Dt_Time
FROM CTE
WHERE RN = 2;
Of course, if an ACCOUNT_ID only has 1 row, then it will not be returned in the result set.
The OP's statement "The row will not always be 2." from the comments conflicts with their statement "I am attempting to pull the second latest NOTE_ENTRY_DT_TIME" in the question. At a best guess, this means that the OP has rows with the same date, that could be the "latest" date. If so, then would simply need to replace ROW_NUMBER with DENSE_RANK. Their sampple data, however, doesn't suggest this is the case.
You can use window functions:
select *
from (
select
n.*,
row_number() over(partition by account_id order by note_entry_dt_time desc) rn
from notes n
) t
where rn = 2

Ambiguous column name using row_number() without alias

I'm trying to implement pagination in a query that is built using information from a view, and I need to use the row_number() function over a column when I don't know which table it is from.
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID, row_number() over (ORDER BY
ID desc) as row_number FROM class, user
) out_q WHERE row_number > #startrow ORDER BY row_number
The problem is that I only have the result column name (ID or USERID) that came from a previous query. If I execute this query, it will raise the error 'Ambiguous column name "ID"'. Is there a way to specify that I'm referencing the column ID that is being selected and not from a different table?
Is it possible to specify an alias to the query result itself?
I have already tried the following,
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (
SELECT *, row_number() over (ORDER BY ID desc) as row_number FROM(
SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID FROM class, user
) in_q
) out_q WHERE row_number > #startrow ORDER BY row_number
It works, but the SGBD gets confused on which query plan it has to use, because of the small row goal present in the outer query and the big set of results returned by the inner query, when #startrow is a small number, the query executes in less than one second, when it is a big number the query takes minutes to execute.
Your problem is the id in the row_number itself. If you want a stable sort, then include both ids:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID,
row_number() over (ORDER BY class.ID desc, user.id) as row_number
FROM class CROSS JOIN user
) out_q
WHERE row_number > #startrow
ORDER BY row_number;
I assume the cartesian product is intentional. Sometimes, this indicates an error in the query. In general, I would advise you to avoid using commas in the from clause. If you do want a cartesian product, then be explicit by using CROSS JOIN.
You could try using the option you already tried, then use the OPTIMIZE FOR hint.
OPTION ( OPTIMIZE FOR (#startrow = 100000) );
See a description of the hint in MSDN docs here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181714.aspx.

Over clause in SQL Server

I have the following query
select * from
(
SELECT distinct
rx.patid
,rx.fillDate
,rx.scriptEndDate
,MAX(datediff(day, rx.filldate, rx.scriptenddate)) AS longestScript
,rx.drugClass
,COUNT(rx.drugName) over(partition by rx.patid,rx.fillDate,rx.drugclass) as distinctFamilies
FROM [I 3 SCI control].dbo.rx
where rx.drugClass in ('h3a','h6h','h4b','h2f','h2s','j7c','h2e')
GROUP BY rx.patid, rx.fillDate, rx.scriptEndDate,rx.drugName,rx.drugClass
) r
order by distinctFamilies desc
which produces results that look like
This should mean that between the two dates in the table the patID that there should be 5 unique drug names. However, when I run the following query:
select distinct *
from rx
where patid = 1358801781 and fillDate between '2008-10-17' and '2008-11-16' and drugClass='H4B'
I have a result set returned that looks like
You can see that while there are in fact five rows returned for the second query between the dates of 2008-10-17 and 2009-01-15, there are only three unique names. I've tried various ways of modifying the over clause, all with different levels of non-success. How can I alter my query so that I only find unique drugNames within the timeframe specified for each row?
Taking a shot at it:
SELECT DISTINCT
patid,
fillDate,
scriptEndDate,
MAX(DATEDIFF(day, fillDate, scriptEndDate)) AS longestScript,
drugClass,
MAX(rn) OVER(PARTITION BY patid, fillDate, drugClass) as distinctFamilies
FROM (
SELECT patid, fillDate, scriptEndDate, drugClass,rx.drugName,
DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY patid, fillDate, drugClass ORDER BY drugName) as rn
FROM [I 3 SCI control].dbo.rx
WHERE drugClass IN ('h3a','h6h','h4b','h2f','h2s','j7c','h2e')
)x
GROUP BY x.patid, x.fillDate, x.scriptEndDate,x.drugName,x.drugClass,x.rn
ORDER BY distinctFamilies DESC
Not sure if DISTINCT is really necessary - left it in since you've used it.

How do I use ROW_NUMBER()?

I want to use the ROW_NUMBER() to get...
To get the max(ROW_NUMBER()) --> Or i guess this would also be the count of all rows
I tried doing:
SELECT max(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId)) FROM Users
but it didn't seem to work...
To get ROW_NUMBER() using a given piece of information, ie. if I have a name and I want to know what row the name came from.
I assume it would be something similar to what I tried for #1
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) From Users WHERE UserName='Joe'
but this didn't work either...
Any Ideas?
For the first question, why not just use?
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM myTable
to get the count.
And for the second question, the primary key of the row is what should be used to identify a particular row. Don't try and use the row number for that.
If you returned Row_Number() in your main query,
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order by Id) AS RowNumber, Field1, Field2, Field3
FROM User
Then when you want to go 5 rows back then you can take the current row number and use the following query to determine the row with currentrow -5
SELECT us.Id
FROM (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id) AS Row, Id
FROM User ) us
WHERE Row = CurrentRow - 5
Though I agree with others that you could use count() to get the total number of rows, here is how you can use the row_count():
To get the total no of rows:
with temp as (
select row_number() over (order by id) as rownum
from table_name
)
select max(rownum) from temp
To get the row numbers where name is Matt:
with temp as (
select name, row_number() over (order by id) as rownum
from table_name
)
select rownum from temp where name like 'Matt'
You can further use min(rownum) or max(rownum) to get the first or last row for Matt respectively.
These were very simple implementations of row_number(). You can use it for more complex grouping. Check out my response on Advanced grouping without using a sub query
If you need to return the table's total row count, you can use an alternative way to the SELECT COUNT(*) statement.
Because SELECT COUNT(*) makes a full table scan to return the row count, it can take very long time for a large table. You can use the sysindexes system table instead in this case. There is a ROWS column that contains the total row count for each table in your database. You can use the following select statement:
SELECT rows FROM sysindexes WHERE id = OBJECT_ID('table_name') AND indid < 2
This will drastically reduce the time your query takes.
You can use this for get first record where has clause
SELECT TOP(1) * , ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) AS rownum
FROM Users
WHERE UserName = 'Joe'
ORDER BY rownum ASC
ROW_NUMBER() returns a unique number for each row starting with 1. You can easily use this by simply writing:
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 'Column_Name' DESC) as ROW_NUMBER
May not be related to the question here. But I found it could be useful when using ROW_NUMBER -
SELECT *,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT 100)) AS Any_ID
FROM #Any_Table
select
Ml.Hid,
ml.blockid,
row_number() over (partition by ml.blockid order by Ml.Hid desc) as rownumber,
H.HNAME
from MIT_LeadBechmarkHamletwise ML
join [MT.HAMLE] h on ML.Hid=h.HID
SELECT num, UserName FROM
(SELECT UserName, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) AS num
From Users) AS numbered
WHERE UserName='Joe'
You can use Row_Number for limit query result.
Example:
SELECT * FROM (
select row_number() OVER (order by createtime desc) AS ROWINDEX,*
from TABLENAME ) TB
WHERE TB.ROWINDEX between 0 and 10
--
With above query, I will get PAGE 1 of results from TABLENAME.
If you absolutely want to use ROW_NUMBER for this (instead of count(*)) you can always use:
SELECT TOP 1 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM USERS
ORDER BY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id) DESC
Need to create virtual table by using WITH table AS, which is mention in given Query.
By using this virtual table, you can perform CRUD operation w.r.t row_number.
QUERY:
WITH table AS
-
(SELECT row_number() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) rn, * FROM Users)
-
SELECT * FROM table WHERE UserName='Joe'
-
You can use INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE in last sentence by in spite of SELECT.
SQL Row_Number() function is to sort and assign an order number to data rows in related record set. So it is used to number rows, for example to identify the top 10 rows which have the highest order amount or identify the order of each customer which is the highest amount, etc.
If you want to sort the dataset and number each row by seperating them into categories we use Row_Number() with Partition By clause. For example, sorting orders of each customer within itself where the dataset contains all orders, etc.
SELECT
SalesOrderNumber,
CustomerId,
SubTotal,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY CustomerId ORDER BY SubTotal DESC) rn
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
But as I understand you want to calculate the number of rows of grouped by a column. To visualize the requirement, if you want to see the count of all orders of the related customer as a seperate column besides order info, you can use COUNT() aggregation function with Partition By clause
For example,
SELECT
SalesOrderNumber,
CustomerId,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY CustomerId) CustomerOrderCount
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
This query:
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY UserId) From Users WHERE UserName='Joe'
will return all rows where the UserName is 'Joe' UNLESS you have no UserName='Joe'
They will be listed in order of UserID and the row_number field will start with 1 and increment however many rows contain UserName='Joe'
If it does not work for you then your WHERE command has an issue OR there is no UserID in the table. Check spelling for both fields UserID and UserName.