I am connecting my controller PC to a Pica8 white switch via the Management port. I can SSH into the switch and ping the controller PC, however I cant ping the hosts through the standard ports. I have created a bridge of the first four ports and have successfully pinged from host to host after I installed a flow that allowed it.
My question is, is there some kind of mechanism separating the controller port from all of the data ports, I would think I should be able to ping from the switch to the hosts.
I'm not sure this answers your question, but before pinging the management port I believe you need to set an IP for it via the console port.
I use minicom per the instructions located here. However, I am using the RJ45 to DB9 adapter cable -> USB Serial port connection. That looks like so.
Unfortunately, that creates a problem with minicom, since the instructions tell you to simply power up the switch and observe the received data. There is actually a little more to it than that. You have to configure minicom's serial port. Fortunately, there is a tech blog that I found very helpful. If you follow the provided instructions, it will walk you through changing ports. Once you modify the port that minicom is listening on (For me it is Port /dev/ttyUSB0), you should be able to configure your management port.
Related
We have a system that implements reverse ssh tunnel to enable remote port forwarding.
This enables to expose devices on local network via a Public IP.
However, we're achieving this by a static port allocation, i.e. We've mapped Serial No.s of devices to Ports and each time a request comes to our server with Serial No. , we forward it to the designated port.
Obviously this design isn't scalable and we want to replace it with dynamic port allocation, such that the server itself takes care of allocating the port and freeing it once the device goes offline.
It'd be great to have suggestions on how this can be achieved.
Thanks in anticipation and apologies for my lack of knowledge in case I didn't explain it better (I'm new to this)
This can be solved by using a ssh command script in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on your server.
command="reverse_server.py" ssh-rsa <publicKey>
First, a client has to connect to the script and send it's own serial (in my case a use the MAC-adress of one NIC).
The server looks into a database and tell the assigned port number or creates a new one for an unknown serial.
In the next step, the client can connect, using the reported port number as reverse port.
Btw. You should add some logic to monitor and recreate the tunnel if it disconnects or get stuck.
I'd like to use a server between two machines (with no static IP). The only IP known to me is the server's IP address. I'd like to build/use a system that listens to 2 different ports within the server and whatever is received from localhost:portA is sent to localhost:portB and vise versa. Consequently, both machines (with java apps) can communicate through the server in the middle.
Please what is the best solution to do this. I'm working on linux system and I thought of using an SSH java API (hudson / ganymed-ssh-2) to build a port forwarding server application.
Some issue:
1) determining the size of the data transmitted to buffer read or not to forward it to the other port.
2)The speed of reading/writing bytes.
If you can use ssh protocol you can tunnel local or remote ports (this need support on server side). You can also think about an OpenSSH VPN (take a look on ssh -w option, this will create a real VPN (TUN/TAP device is required). ).
You can use the the ssh program. Take a look at the -L and -R options specifically.
Could someone please help me to configure UDP in web server to accept connection from GPRS mobile device. The GPRS mobile device will send data packets which i need to write as a file in web server to process a web page. Please help.
i need to know the following:
1) How to configure UDP in web server
2) How can a GPRS mobile device get connected to the server using UDP
3) Write the data packets to a txt file
Please help.
A "web server" usually means am "http-server", which is a process listening for incoming "http"-requests.
Now http is a protocol that is standardized to be accessed via TCP/IP port 80.
Therefore most webserver implementations will implement a TCP/IP server that listens to port 80 by default. Usually you can change the port if need be, but usually you cannot change the transport layer to e.g. UDP.
Therefore it might not really be possible to make your "web-server" react on UDP packets.
If, however, by "web server" you mean a host accesible on the internet (that eventually might happen to run an http-daemon), you might have more luck: simply run a small server-application on that machine that listens to incoming UDP traffic on a given port, and do "something" with it (e.g. forward it to an http-daemon to display the current location)
Answers to your 3 questions:
Creating a small application listening on UDP-traffic:
a trivial server could be:
`netcat -l -u -p 8888`
This will create a UDP-server listening on port 8888, using netcat.
Whatever client connects to your server, everything that the client sends to the server will be output via stdout, and you can talk back to the client via stdin.
You shouldn't use netcat in a production environment; but it is a good and simple tool to check whether a connetion can be established and whether the protocol works.
In production, you will probably want to use a "real" UDP-server, e.g. by writing your own in the language of your choice.
How to make your gprs device talk to your server? This is impossible to answer without knowing more about the device, it's OS and the software installed that produces the data and is supposed to send it to the.
netcat -l -u -p 8888 > myfile.txt
Hi i am creating server/client application using .net.Sockets something like cybercafe software.
Im following this example on codeproject Simple Socket Chat Program
there is no problem i run it on local pc. But when i run the client in the other pc in network i got a problem.
says :
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
I tried to use netstat -a on cmd and i found out that the portnumbers of all the p.c on our network always changes.
Is there any way to do it without using portnumber and just hostname or ipaddress only.
I need help...
Thanks in Regards
First, the random port numbers under Local Address in netstat are done so that everything gets a unique local port.
Also, a port is necessary for sockets.
The problem you are having is most likely because the firewall where your server software is located is blocking that port. For Windows 7 (and presumably Vista), you can unblock the port by running WF.msc, going to Inbound Rules on the left, clicking New Rule on the right, and adding a new program or port rule. The rest of the steps should be self-explanatory.
I created a vb .net app and basically it connects to the server (my brother's computer at his house) and sends messages. The problem I'm having is, we both have routers. The only way I'v gotten all of this to work, is by both of us connecting ppeo broadband and then our ips work, otherwise the "real ip" is used for all the pcs in my house. How can I connect tcp to him wothout him having to connect broadband. Because to connect broadband he needs to be connected to an ethernet port, so then he cannot be wireless.
Thanks
I don't know what you mean by "connect broadband", but if the computers are not on the same local network, and you have a NAT router in between, you will either have to connect them via a VPN (like Hamachi for example) or configure port forwarding on both sides on the routers.
See: How do you get Java sockets working with public IPs?
Some routers also have "Dynamic Port Forwarding", where if you are using, say port 8084 for your traffic, both your and your brother set your routers to dynamic port forward port 8084.
The router then listens for client computers connecting across port 8084, and when it sees that traffic, it will route traffic across that port to the client computer that first requested it.
Another popular "NAT-traversal" technology is UPnP. See this SO question and associated article for more information on how to use .NET to control UPnP. Again, router hardware must support it and be configured to use UPnP.
Edit: Untested, but you could try also to use and IPv6 tunneling software such as the one from go6 to create a public IP. This is like VPN, but one-sided, and less private.
Rather than router configuration, you could use a VPN. Hamachi is free and easy.