I have a software project running in IBM Websphere 8.5.5. It needs to lookup the JTA TransactionManager from the application server. Currently it uses the com.ibm.ws.Transaction.TransactionManagerFactory class, and then calls getTransactionManager() on that.
My question is this: Is it legitimate to do this in IBM Websphere 8.5? It seems there are newer interfaces around (e.g. UOWManager). However, I haven't been able to find any documentation on the use of com.ibm.ws.Transaction.TransactionManagerFactory beyond Websphere 5. It doesn't say anywhere that it can be used. It doesn't say anywhere that it shouldn't be used either.
So does com.ibm.ws.Transaction.TransactionManagerFactory still work, albeit old-fashioned? Or is it problematic and shouldn't be used?
(I haven't seen the code fail so far, but this might mean either a) it works properly, or b) we just haven't hit the right test cases!)
com.ibm.ws.Transaction.TransactionManagerFactory is considered a product internal and is therefore not supported by application use (that is why it isn't documented). The UOWManager is supported and should support the key use cases people ask for TransactionManager access for. Without knowing what the use case is I can't provide better advice.
Related
I wrote an application in a JS-based framework called Titanium. This framework doesn't have some functions, so I'm bundling autohotkeys, and using STDIN/STDOUT to connect the two. Autohotkeys has a cool function DllCall which allows to interconect with the operating system and should help me close the gap between the JS-based framework and the missing functionality.
To give you an example, Titanium allows me to bind to a specific port. But if I bind to 0 and let the OS pick a free port (as it should), it will work, but there's no way to tell which port it actually bound to.
Now since I come from web applications, DLLs are new to me; so I have a few questions:
Is there like a big doc with all the DLLs and all their methods?
How do I know if some methods are dependent on some services? I mean I've heard some rely on RPCs, COM, COM+, WMIs, etc. which a user can turn off and if it does, these methods won't work. Is there also a place where I can get more info on this?
Are there any off-the-shelf DLLs, with their methods, which I can trust that they will work 100% from XP up to 7?
Are there any access permissions I should know about? Are they documented.
If you also come from web programming, is there anything else I should be aware about?
Thank you very much.
You can find a (mostly) complete documentation of all Windows API functions (which reside in DLLs) either online on MSDN or offline using the documentation from the Windows SDK.
For example look at the documentation for SHGetSpecialFolderPath. There you can find various information, like the DLL (shell32.dll), any prerequisites (min. IE 4) and the platform availablity. (min. Windows 2000) Also security considerations are documented.
All API functions are documented more or less in this manner. A good starting point is the Windows Developer Reference. From there you can browse through the many API functions.
Basically the answer to every question is that you should search MSDN for the functions or APIs you are interested in and read the documentation there:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms123401.aspx
They document which operating systems the functions are available in so it should be easy to write something that works in Windows XP and up.
I've been told, that a Twisted-based library Ampoule is a great way to create a pool of processes that are executed on different computers. However there is no docs for that and Ampoule's examples also don't make it any clear.
I'd be totally happy with interface similar to stdlib multiprocessing.Pool.map()
Could you supply an example, please?
Ampoule is not natively capable of multi-host operation. Since it uses AMP with strictly defined interactions between the parent and child processes, you could certainly imagine extending it to support multi-host operation. However, you must still solve the problem of connecting to another host (perhaps via SSH using Twisted Conch) and deploying the necessary Python libraries to it for it to be able to execute the tasks you wish to assign to it.
Where can I find the code for creating an online rebol console like the one here ?
http://tryrebol.esperconsultancy.nl/
Update: for the sandbox system on the server, can't Rebol manage it itself with some security wrapper and its security options ?
As for console itself, I don't know Ruby so I don't want to use TryRuby and why would I need it ? Can't I mimic Rebol console itself by "remoting" it somehow ? Why RT or Esper Consultancy can't make an opensource version ? There's no value in keeping it closed source. Rebol needs to prove it's more open than in the past.
In my opinion, you should aim higher with something like the already open-sourced Try Ruby. You'd type in expressions and it would guide you. Their showcase site is at tryruby.org and is fairly slick.
I modified TryRuby to work with Rebol and it wound up looking like this:
But I'm not going to run it on my server because I didn't want to belabor the necessary sandboxing/etc. or protections against someone running an infinite loop. I can give you what I've got so far if you want it.
I started a tutorial script here that no one seemed interested in helping me with, so I wandered off to other tasks:
http://www.rebol.net/wiki/Interactive_tutorial_script
I'm not sure what exactly you want. You mention you want a remote REBOL shell instead of a tutoring setup, but that's what the Try REBOL site is. There are several reasons it's not open source:
It's in heavy development. I'm currently changing the code regularly.
So it's not in a release state. Preparing it for release, documenting and publishing it would take a lot of extra work, as with most projects.
It's written in my CMS that's also in heavy development. Even if the Try REBOL site were open source, it wouldn't run. The CMS is not planned to be open sourced soon.
It's not meant as a generic REBOL remoting tool, but as a one-off demo site. If that site is running, what's the use of more of them?
As others have answered, there are many generic solutions for remoting that you could use. Also, most parts of the Try REBOL site are readily available as open source:
Syllable Server, produced and published by us.
The Cheyenne web server.
The HTML source of the web client can be viewed, including my simple JavaScript command service bus.
Syllable Server is an essential part of the site, as the sandboxing is not done with REBOL facilities (except some extra limits in the R3 backend), but with standard Linux facilities.
A truly air tight (do I mean silica tight?) sandbox is close to impossible with R2.
R3 (still in alpha) is looking a lot more promising. The deep technical discussions in flight right now (see Cure code and AltME/REBOL3 Proposals regarding unwinds and protect and even occasionally mentioning sandboxes should lead to an excellent sandbox capability.
Right now, the big advance R3 has that makes Kaj's tryREBOL possible is R3's secure policy settings which make it possible (with some careful wrapper code) to construct an alpha/demo sandbox.
To answer your precise question("where can I find code...", you could try asking Kaj for his :)
I'm new to StackOverflow. I'm not sure if this is going to end up as a reply to your comment, or as a new answer.
The somewhat common idea that any project can be open sourced and contributed to by others is a naive view. In the case of my Try REBOL site, it makes no sense. It's not just in heavy development; it's written in a CMS that's also in heavy development. Basically noone could contribute to it at this point, because I'm the only one who knows my CMS. Or in any case its newest features, which I develop by developing Try REBOL, and other example sites. So developing Try REBOL means developing the CMS at the same time, and by definition, I'm the only one who can do that.
More generally, my projects are bleeding edge, innovative technology with a strong vision. The vision is mine, and to teach it to others, I have to build it to show how I intended it to work. So there's a catch 22: to enable others to contribute, I have to finish my projects first, because people typically don't understand them until I show them how they work.
There certainly are other projects where mass contribution makes more sense. Still, only the top projects get the contributors. We found that out the hard way. We created Syllable Desktop and Syllable Server with surrounding infrastructure for contributions. These are fairly classic, well understood operating systems that many people could work on in parallel. However, despite years of begging, we get very few contributions.
So, if you feel a burning need to contribute to our projects, please pick one of the many tasks in Syllable to execute. :-)
I've picked up a project that needs to import some (old) JBI components that were developed using ServiceMix about three years ago. I need to bring these into to a modern GlassFish environment. So far, it's not very clear what or how I should do it. Any tips or pointers?
My worst case scenario is to wrap the JBI component call in a POJO class, stripping out the ServiceMix bits, to see if that will at least get the gears spinning again.
I note elsewhere, that the JBI code in ServiceMix is not apparently JBI certified. So maybe that might be an indication this may be a non-sequitur.
TIA!
Andrew
I would think and re-think and then re-think once more before moving or importing anything into open esb. OpenESB project has basically been left without funding since Oracle bought Sun.
I did one better. I wrote my own data flow processing system from scratch. Everything else available was just too heavyweight and complex.
My new system, code named LightRail, works great. All connectivity is component driven and defined through a single JSON configuration file. All processing and flow control is handled through a single BeanShell script.
I've already deployed 10 different data flows in the last 10 months, connecting to IMAP, SFTP, FTP, Files and a database or two. Life is good again...
Andrew
In the bad old days of interactive console applications, Don Libes created a tool called Expect, which enabled you to write Tcl scripts that interacted with these applications, much as a user would. Expect had two tremendous benefits:
It was possible to script interactions that otherwise would have had to be repeated by hand, tediously. A classic example was dialup Internet access hell (from the days before PPP).
It was possible to write scripts to test one's own interactive applications, programmatically, as part of a regression suite.
Today most interactive applications are on the web, not on the console. Hence my question: is there any tool that provides the ability to interact with web pages and web forms programmatically, much as Expect provides the ability to interact with console applications programmatically?
(The closest thing I am aware of is Chickenfoot.)
You might be looking for Selenium
I've used Selenium RC in conjunction with Python to drive web page interactions programmatically. This has allowed me to write pretty extensive user tests in which forms and inputs are driven and their results are measured.
Check out the Selenium IDE on Firefox (as mentioned above). It allows you to record tests in the browser and play them back, either using the IDE itself, or the Remote Control app.
Perl Mechanize works pretty well for this exact issue.
HTTPS and some authentication issues are tricky at times. I will be posting couple questions about those in the future.
I did a ton of Expect work in a former life and always thought Don Libes' Expect book was one of the best-written and most enlightening technical books I'd ever seen.
Hands down I would say that Perl's WWW::Mechanize library is what you want. I note above that you were having trouble finding documentation. There is good documentation for it! Look up the module's distribution on search.cpan.org and see what all is packaged with it. There's a FAQ, Cookbook with examples, etc. Plus I've always been able to get help on the web. If you can't get it here, try at use.perl.org or perlmonks.org. WWW::Mechanize's author, Andy Lester, is present on Stack Overflow. (He's also an all around friendly and helpful guy.)
I believe WWW::Mechanize also has a program that is analogous to Expect's autoexpect program: you set up a proxy process running this program as a server, point your browser to it as a proxy, perform the actions you want to automate, and then the proxy program gives you a WWW::Mechanize program for you to use as a base for your project. (If it works like autoexpect, you will certainly want to make modifications from there.)
As mentioned above, WWW::Mechanize is a browser (to be more exact, it is a web client or http client) that happens to be programmable. The last time I looked, there was even work in progress to make it support JavaScript.
In addition to Selenium, if you're doing the Ruby/Rails thing, there's Webrat.