I seem to be having problem getting a certain query to work. I know I'm so close. Here's a copy of my er diagram
I think I am so close to achieving what I want to do with this code, only I get invalid identifier when trying to run it. I think its because the practice is being changed somehow after joining, as I am only getting invalid identifier on row 5?
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname, practice.practice_name, practice.practice_city
from staff
join practice on staff.practiceid = practice.practiceid
MINUS
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname, practice.practice_name, practice.practice_city
from staff
where role = 'GP';
Basically I'm trying to use the minus construct to find practices which do not employ a GP and include some information such as the CITY and practice_address.
I can use the minus construct to find out how many staff do not have the role of GP like so:
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname
from staff
MINUS
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname
from staff
where role = 'GP';
where I get the results:
STAFFID STAFF_FIRS STAFF_SURN
__________ __________ __________
8 NYSSA THORNTON
9 MONA BRADSHAW
10 GLORIA PENA
I'm struggling to use the join with the minus construct to get information about the GP's practice address and city etc.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
The second select, after the minus, is referring to columns from the practice table - but it doesn't join to it:
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname,
practice.practice_name, practice.practice_city
from staff
join practice on staff.practiceid = practice.practiceid
MINUS
SELECT staffid, staff_firstname, staff_surname,
practice.practice_name, practice.practice_city
from staff
join practice on staff.practiceid = practice.practiceid
where role = 'GP';
That isn't going to give you what you want though, it will just remove the rows for staff that are GPs, not all trace of practices that have any GPs - non-GP staff at all practices will still be shown.
if you don't want the remaining staff details you only need to include the columns from the practice table in the select lists, and the minus would then give you what you want (and Gordon Linoff has shown two alternatives to minus in that case). If you do want the remaining staff details then you can use a not-exists clause rather than a minus - something like:
select s.staffid, s.staff_firstname, s.staff_surname,
p.practice_name, p.practice_city
from staff s
join practice p on s.practiceid = p.practiceid
where not exists (
select 1
from staff s2
where s2.practice_id = p.practice_id
and s2.role = 'GP
);
This is similar to Gordon's second query but has an extra join to staff for the details. Again, if you don't want those, use Gordon's simpler query.
You could also use an aggregate check, or could probably do something with an analytic function if you've learned abput those, to save having to hit the tables twice.
Your original query only operates on the level of "staff", not "practice". I would be inclined to solve this using aggregation:
select p.practice_name, p.practice_city
from staff s join
practice p
on s.practiceid = p.practiceid
group by p.practice_name, p.practice_city
having sum(case when s.role = 'GP' then 1 else 0 end) = 0;
Or, even better:
select p.*
from practice p
where not exists (select 1
from staff s
where s.practiceid = p.practiceid and s.role = 'GP'
);
I think this is the simplest and most direct interpretation of your question.
Related
Find Melbourne VIP level 4 customers’ first name, last name who have hired the vehicle model as “Ranger ” at least 2 times in database. You write three different queries: one is using operator EXISTS and the other one is using operator IN. The third query with the main filter criteria in FROM clause of the main query or filter criteria in the sub-query. Find one with the better performance.
I Have tried this query;
SELECT c_fname, c_fname FROM rental WHERE
EXISTS(SELECT c_id FROM customer WHERE c_city = 'Melbourne' AND customer.vip_level = '4')
AND EXISTS (SELECT vehicle_reg FROM vehicle WHERE v_model = 'Ranger')
HAVING COUNT(c_id)>=2 GROUP BY c_lname, c_fname;
I am getting error: SQL Error: ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here
00934. 00000 - "group function is not allowed here"
can anyone help me with this question. really struggled to get this done?
You are selecting from the wrong subject table as Rental does not have c_fname or c_lname columns.
You want to "Find Melbourne VIP level 4 customers’ first name, last name" which would be in the customer table:
SELECT c_fname,
c_lname
FROM customer
WHERE c_city = 'Melbourne'
AND vip_level = 4;
Then you want to add an additional filter "who have hired the vehicle model as “Ranger ” at least 2 times in database". That requires you to use EXISTS (for the answer for the first query) and you need to correlate between the outer-query and the sub-query; once you have done that then you do not need a GROUP BY clause and you are aggregating over the entire result set of the sub-query and can just use a HAVING clause.
SELECT c_fname,
c_lname
FROM customer c
WHERE c_city = 'Melbourne'
AND vip_level = 4
AND EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM rental r
INNER JOIN vehicle v
ON (r.vehicle_reg = v.vehicle_reg)
WHERE c.c_id = r.c_id
AND v.v_model = 'Ranger'
HAVING COUNT(*) >= 2
);
Then you need to write the same query using IN instead of EXISTS and the same query a third time using JOIN conditions instead of IN or EXISTS and, finally, you need to compare the performance of all three queries.
I am trying to get all the lessons of the students that have a grade that contains a certain term.
The orange relations are the relevant relations:
The query:
SELECT
tg.nhsColor AS cellColor,
tg.nhsTgradeName AS LessonName,
lsons.nhsLessonID AS LessonID,
lsons.nhsTgradeID AS TgradeID,
lsons.nhsDay AS nhsDay,
lsons.nhsHour AS nhsHour,
tg.nhsTeacherID AS TeacherID
FROM
nhsTeacherGrades AS tg,
nhsLessons AS lsons,
nhsLearnGroups,
nhsMembers AS mem,
nhsGrades AS grd
WHERE
tg.nhsTgradeID = lsons.nhsTgradeID
AND nhsLearnGroups.nhsTgradeID = tg.nhsTgradeID
AND mem.nhsUserID = nhsLearnGroups.nhsStudentID
AND mem.nhsGradeID = grd.nhsGradeID
AND grd.nhsGradeName LIKE '%"+gradePart+"%'
The query works, yet, i get the same lesson twice from this query.
You can get duplicates for at least two reasons:
the same lessons can occur in different teacher grades followed by a certain student
different students can follow the same teacher grade
The following (untested) nested SQL could solve this. It gets the teacher grade ID of each lesson and checks which of these have at least one viable student linked to it:
SELECT tg.nhsColor AS cellColor,
tg.nhsTgradeName AS LessonName,
lsons.nhsLessonID AS LessonID,
lsons.nhsTgradeID AS TgradeID,
lsons.nhsDay AS nhsDay,
lsons.nhsHour AS nhsHour,
tg.nhsTeacherID AS TeacherID
FROM nhsLessons AS lsons
INNER JOIN nhsTeacherGrades AS tg
ON tg.nhsTgradeID = lsons.nhsTgradeID
WHERE tg.nhsTgradeID IN (
SELECT grp.nhsTgradeID
FROM (nhsLearnGroups grp
INNER JOIN nhsMembers AS mem
ON mem.nhsUserID = grp.nhsStudentID)
INNER JOIN nhsGrades AS grd
ON mem.nhsGradeID = grd.nhsGradeID
WHERE grd.nhsGradeName LIKE '%"+gradePart+"%'
)
Note that I used the JOIN syntax, which is considered better practice than placing join conditions in the WHERE clause. MS Access is quite pesky about using parentheses in the JOIN clauses, so you might need to play with those a bit to make it work.
I believe a lot of people have already asked this question as I have read all the topic from here. But the Problem is I have 3 related tables instead of 2 and I'm not sure how to code for that
I have a table: tbl_Instruments, tbl_Record and tbl_Cal_By.
tbl_Instruments has all the instruments information including their ID.
tbl_Cal_By has the information for whoever is calibrating the tool.
tbl_Records has all the instruments Records and their Calibration date. It inherits the ID from tbl_Instruments as Inst_ID and the Name from tbl_Cal_By as Name_ABBR.
tbl_Instruments: ID, Type
tbl_Cal_By: Cal_ID, Name_ABBR
tbl_Records: Record_ID, Inst_ID, Cal_Date, Name_ABBR
Here is my code.
SELECT tbl_Records.Inst_ID
,tbl_Instruments.Type
,Max(tbl_Records.Cal_Date) AS MaxOfCal_Date
,tbl_Cal_By.Name_ABBR
FROM tbl_Cal_By
RIGHT JOIN (
tbl_Instruments INNER JOIN tbl_Records ON tbl_Instruments.ID = tbl_Records.Inst_ID
) ON tbl_Cal_By.ID = tbl_Records.BY
GROUP BY tbl_Records.Inst_ID
,tbl_Instruments.Type
,tbl_Cal_By.Name_ABBR;
Desired result:
Any help will be appreciated!
You can do this in several methods, one of the is exists :
SELECT tbl_Records.Inst_ID
,tbl_Instruments.Type
,tbl_Records.Cal_Date AS MaxOfCal_Date
,tbl_Cal_By.Name_ABBR
FROM tbl_Cal_By
RIGHT JOIN (
tbl_Instruments INNER JOIN tbl_Records ON tbl_Instruments.ID = tbl_Records.Inst_ID
) ON tbl_Cal_By.ID = tbl_Records.BY
WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM tbl_Records t
WHERE t.Inst_ID = tbl_Instruments.ID
AND t.Cal_date > tbl_Records.Cal_Date)
I'm not entirely sure about access syntax and aliases.. so maybe you will have to adjust it a little bit - like alias the first tbl_records so it will recognize it, or maybe it will work..
I am fairly new in Access and SQL programming. I am trying to do the following:
Sum(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.Amount) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
and group by year even when there is no amount in some of the years. I would like to have these years listed as well for a report with charts. I'm not certain if this is possible, but every bit of help is appreciated.
My code so far is as follows:
SELECT
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId,
Base_CustomerT.Customer,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid,
Sum(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.Amount) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
Base_CustomerT
INNER JOIN (
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
INNER JOIN SO_SalesOrderT
ON SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.SalesOrderId = SO_SalesOrderT.SalesOrderId
) ON Base_CustomerT.CustomerId = SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId
GROUP BY
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
SO_SalesOrderT.CustomerId,
Base_CustomerT.Customer,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid,
SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.PaymentType,
Base_CustomerT.IsActive
HAVING
(((SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.PaymentType)=1)
AND ((Base_CustomerT.IsActive)=Yes))
ORDER BY
Base_CustomerT.SalesRep,
Base_CustomerT.Customer;
You need another table with all years listed -- you can create this on the fly or have one in the db... join from that. So if you had a table called alltheyears with a column called y that just listed the years then you could use code like this:
WITH minmax as
(
select min(year(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) as minyear,
max(year(SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) as maxyear)
from SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
), yearsused as
(
select y
from alltheyears, minmax
where alltheyears.y >= minyear and alltheyears.y <= maxyear
)
select *
from yearsused
join ( -- your query above goes here! -- ) T
ON year(T.SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.DatePaid) = yearsused.y
You need a data source that will provide the year numbers. You cannot manufacture them out of thin air. Supposing you had a table Interesting_year with a single column year, populated, say, with every distinct integer between 2000 and 2050, you could do something like this:
SELECT
base.SalesRep,
base.CustomerId,
base.Customer,
base.year,
Sum(NZ(data.Amount)) AS [Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
(SELECT * FROM Base_CustomerT INNER JOIN Year) AS base
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT * FROM
SO_SalesOrderT
INNER JOIN SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT
ON (SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT.SalesOrderId = SO_SalesOrderT.SalesOrderId)
) AS data
ON ((base.CustomerId = data.CustomerId)
AND (base.year = Year(data.DatePaid))),
WHERE
(data.PaymentType = 1)
AND (base.IsActive = Yes)
AND (base.year BETWEEN
(SELECT Min(year(DatePaid) FROM SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT)
AND (SELECT Max(year(DatePaid) FROM SO_SalesOrderPaymentHistoryLineT))
GROUP BY
base.SalesRep,
base.CustomerId,
base.Customer,
base.year,
ORDER BY
base.SalesRep,
base.Customer;
Note the following:
The revised query first forms the Cartesian product of BaseCustomerT with Interesting_year in order to have base customer data associated with each year (this is sometimes called a CROSS JOIN, but it's the same thing as an INNER JOIN with no join predicate, which is what Access requires)
In order to have result rows for years with no payments, you must perform an outer join (in this case a LEFT JOIN). Where a (base customer, year) combination has no associated orders, the rest of the columns of the join result will be NULL.
I'm selecting the CustomerId from Base_CustomerT because you would sometimes get a NULL if you selected from SO_SalesOrderT as in the starting query
I'm using the Access Nz() function to convert NULL payment amounts to 0 (from rows corresponding to years with no payments)
I converted your HAVING clause to a WHERE clause. That's semantically equivalent in this particular case, and it will be more efficient because the WHERE filter is applied before groups are formed, and because it allows some columns to be omitted from the GROUP BY clause.
Following Hogan's example, I filter out data for years outside the overall range covered by your data. Alternatively, you could achieve the same effect without that filter condition and its subqueries by ensuring that table Intersting_year contains only the year numbers for which you want results.
Update: modified the query to a different, but logically equivalent "something like this" that I hope Access will like better. Aside from adding a bunch of parentheses, the main difference is making both the left and the right operand of the LEFT JOIN into a subquery. That's consistent with the consensus recommendation for resolving Access "ambiguous outer join" errors.
Thank you John for your help. I found a solution which works for me. It looks quiet different but I learned a lot out of it. If you are interested here is how it looks now.
SELECT DISTINCTROW
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.SalesRep,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.Customer,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear,
CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
FROM
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ
LEFT JOIN CustomerPaymentPerYearQ
ON (Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear = CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[RevenueYear])
AND (Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId = CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.CustomerId)
GROUP BY
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.SalesRep,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.CustomerId,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.Customer,
Base_Customer_RevenueYearQ.RevenueYear,
CustomerPaymentPerYearQ.[Sum Of PaymentPerYear]
;
The query I'm running in DB2
select yrb_customer.name,
yrb_customer.city,
CASE count(*) WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE count(*) END as #UniClubs
from yrb_member, yrb_customer
where yrb_member.cid = yrb_customer.cid and yrb_member.club like '%Club%'
group by yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city order by count(*)
Shows me people which are part of clubs which has the word 'Club' in it, and it shows how many such clubs they are part of (#UniClubs) along with their name and City. However for students who are not part of such a club, I would still like for them to show up but just have 0 instead of them being hidden which is what's happening right now. I cannot get this functionality with count(*). Can somebody shed some light? I can explain further if the above is not clear enough.
I'm not familiar with DB2 so I'm taking a stab in the dark, but try this:
select yrb_customer.name,
yrb_customer.city,
CASE WHEN yrb_member.club like '%Club% THEN count(*) ELSE 0 END as #UniClubs
from yrb_member, yrb_customer
where yrb_member.cid = yrb_customer.cid
group by yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city order by count(*)
Basically you don't want to filter for %Club% in your WHERE clause because you want ALL rows to come back.
You're going to want a LEFT JOIN:
SELECT yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city,
COUNT(yrb_member.club) as clubCount
FROM yrb_customer
LEFT JOIN yrb_member
ON yrb_member.cid = yrb_customer.cid
AND yrb_member.club LIKE '%Club%
GROUP BY yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city
ORDER BY clubCount
Also, if the tuple (yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city) is unique (or is supposed to be - are you counting all students with the same name as the same person?), you might get better performance out of the following:
SELECT yrb_customer.name, yrb_customer.city,
COALESCE(club.count, 0)
FROM yrb_customer
LEFT JOIN (SELECT cid, COUNT(*) as count
FROM yrb_member
WHERE club LIKE '%Club%
GROUP BY cid) club
ON club.cid = yrb_customer.cid
ORDER BY club.count
The reason that your original results were being hidden was because in your original query, you have an implicit inner join, which of course requires matching rows. The implicit-join syntax (comma-separated FROM clause) is great for inner (regular) joins, but is terrible for left-joins, which is what you really needed. The use of the implicit-join syntax (and certain types of related filtering in the WHERE clause) is considered deprecated.