I am using Windows installer xml and now my project moves to Team Services.
However, my Paths wont work anymore and I need to update my setup.
On the local build machine I used this hardlink: C:\Projects\Solution\Project\bin\Release\Assembly.dll
My Question: What is the best way to build 4 projects and then run a 5th project, which uses the assemblies in the bin/release directory?
Add a reference to the project and then use $(var.Project.TargetPath) instead of the hardlink (or $(var.Project.TargetDir)Assembly.dll). The references will add dependencies on those projects to the wixproj which means they all must be build before the wixproj so all the binaries will exist. All the projects should be included in the same solution as the wixproj.
Here's a resource for all the automatically defined compile time variables you can use http://wixtoolset.org/documentation/manual/v3/votive/votive_project_references.html
Alternatively if you can't do it this way you can define the variables in the <DefineConstants> of the wixproj. It would be something like "ProjectDir=$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)..\Project\bin\Release\" and then in your wix component where you are using the SourceDir hardlink you would use SourceDir=$(var.ProjectDir)Assembly.dll
All of this stuff is taking advantage of MSBuild. It takes a long time to wrap your head around how MSBuild works but it is definitely worth it if you will be using Visual Studio to build all your projects.
Related
I want to build a project with a particular named Build Configuration, let's call it Conf-A.
This is running as an MSBuild step on TeamCity. When the build runs, it spits out:
The OutputPath property is not set for project ... You may be seeing this message because you are trying to build a project without a solution file, and have specified a non-default Configuration or Platform that doesn't exist for this project.
This project is part of a hulking great solution we load on our dev machines.
The error makes sense for my situation, since I'm building just the proj file, but I don't want to use the solution file since I'm trying break-up this monolithic app.
I want the build-server to treat this project as it's own component, even if for the moment it is part of a solution and has references to other projects (assemblies) in the solution.
Must I build this via a solution file?
I could potentially copy the solution file and prune off all the other projects that are not required, but that's more complexity.
(Maybe the error is a red-herring).
you dont need to build a sln. Its like the error says. You just havent specified a value for the variable OutputPath in your msbuild. You can add it to your files or you can pass it in at the cmd line - msbuild someproj.proj /p:OutputPath=C:\notallovermydrive
I am in the process of learning WIX all thanks to MS for removing such a nice tool (vdproj) from the latest versions of visual studio.
I have come to know that I can add my files (and dlls) to distribute in WIX using that tag. It is OK. But in vdproj it was very easy to add all files. I just need to right click in file view, and select 'add project output'. This was enough to add dozen of files that were required for my application. In visual studio 2012, and using WIX 3.7, what options do I have to automatically list all those dlls that are required by my application?
There is no automatic method that could be written that wouldn't require you to remove some items and redirect some items to other folders. In the simple case, you wouldn't need an automatic method anyway.
In your WiX Setup project, add a reference to each project you want to include the output from. In the properties for a reference, set Harvest to True and Project Output Groups as desired.
Because project harvesting doesn't work in some corner cases, it is disabled by default. You must enable it in your project file. (See the references.)
Build and you will have ComponentGroups generated for your harvested projects. The script file is in the obj folder (since it's not a file you want to keep in source control).
For example, for the project ConsoleApplication1, add a ConsoleApplication1.Binaries ComponentGroupRef to a Feature. By default, all such components are placed into INSTALLFOLDER. If you want them elsewhere, you can change the ItemGroup metatdata or one of the properties that affect the HavestProjects target.
Unless you have many project references that change often, there is no need to automate this.
References: WiX.chm
HarvestProjects Target
Using Project References and Variables
I would like to create a setup project based on WiX which does the following (as well as creating the installation package):
callable from msbuild running on a CI build server (Hudson)
take a version number from some asset in either the setup project or the main assembly
take the current build number from the CI system
create a full product version number [version].[build] such as 1.3.432
store this value in an asset (e.g. the main assembly) is such a way that it can be read out at run time and displayed on the splash window
I have tried a number of approaches and googled a lot but have not found a workable solution. Can anyone help?
The WiX toolset does this by creating a version.cs, a version.h and a version.wxi during the MSBuild then including those files in all the projects. That way our executable can print out their version when you run something like candle.exe -? and all of the bundles and .msi packages have their versions set correctly.
You can see how we do this in tools\WixBuild.Version.targets (here). It would straight forward to override the properties in WixBuild.Version.targets with properties passed via the command-line to MSBuild via Hudson if you wanted.
I am using MSbuild to create a deployment package (simply copying various files from the projects in my solution to different folders) I would like the root folder to be of the format
DeploymentPackage2.3.4.5ForRelease
How can I get MSbuild to put the Assembly number in the folder name automatically?
EDIT:
The solution has a great deal of projects in it (too many really) they all get their version number from a SharedAssemblyInfo.cs file that is manually updated but in the fullness of time will pick up the svn build number (but that is a job for later)
I am building using an external .bat file that calls a custom written .targets/.proj setup that simply calls msbuild on the .sln of the solution.
The 'create package' step I am trying to create happens after a succesful build and will eventually be run by our CI framework, however I would like to be able to run it locally too.
I have created a "CreatePackage" target that does the copying that I want, however it is currently into a fixed folder. I need the folder name to reflect the AssemblyVersion of one of the final dll's.
If there is a better way then I want to know about it... but I am going to use this I think
MSBuild Task to read version of dll
Ok, so I've got a somewhat complicated problem with my build environment that I'm trying to deal with.
I have a solution file that contains multiple C# projects which is built by a NAnt script calling MSBuild - passing MSBuild the name of the solution file and a path to copy the binaries to. This is because I want my automated build environment (CruiseControl.Net) to create a folder named after the revision of each build - this way I can easily go back to previous binaries for any reason.
So idealy I have a folder layout like this
c:\build\nightly\rev1
c:\build\nightly\rev2
c:\build\nightly\rev3
...
c:\build\nightly\rev10
etc.
The problem that's arisen is I recently added the latest version of the Unity IoC container to my project, checking it directly out of MS's online SVN repository. What's happening is I have a Silverlight 3 project that references the Silverlight version of Unity but I also have other projects (namely my Unit testing project) that reference the standard (non-Silverlight) version of Unity.
So what happens is since MSBuild is dumping everything into one single folder the Silverlight version of the Unity assembly is overwriting the non-Silverlight version because they have the exact same assembly file name.
Then when CruistControl runs my unit tests they fail because they don't have the proper dependencies available anymore (they try to load the Silverlight specific Unity assembly which obviously doesn't work).
So what I want to do is:
keep my desired output directory
structure (folder\revision)
I don't want to have to manually edit
every single proj file I have as this
is error prone when adding new
projects to the solution
Idealy I would like MSBuild to put everything into a folder structure similar to this:
nightly\revision1\project1
nightly\revision1\project2
nightly\revision1\project3
...
nightly\revision2\project1
nightly\revision2\project2
nightly\revision2\project3
etc
I can't modify the Unity project to give it a different file name because it comes from another SVN repository I cannot commit changes to. I found a similar question posted here and the suggested solution was to use a "master" MSBuild file that used a custom task to extract all the project file names out of the solution then loop over each one building them. I tried that but it doesn't build them in the order of their dependencies, so it fails for my project.
Help?
Firstly I would always have the build server delete the old working copy and check out a fresh copy to avoid any problems with stale artifacts from the previous build.
Next I would have nant or msbuild build the solutions as before with the artifacts from each build going to their local working output folders.
After that I'd move the artifacts from their working paths to their output paths, this shouldn't require digging through the project files since you can just tell msbuild/nant to copy working\project1\bin\release\**\*.* to artifacts\project1\.
The script that does this should ideally be stored along with the source with the main file, e.g. build.nant or build.proj in top level of the trunk.
For third party libraries I would simple include the DLLs directory in your repository. Nothing worse than writing some code and having a third party dependency break your build because of changes on their end.
Simply document the versions of the libraries you are using, and if you must update them, you'll have a better sense of what breaks the build before you even check it in.
Also, doesn't CC.Net automatically handle the providing of releases based on revision? I'm using TeamCity and it keeps a copy of the artifacts of every build.
I highly recommend reading JP Boodhoo's Automating Builds with NAnt blog series. That's been my starting point and have made lots of changes for my own taste. I also highly recommend checking out the builds of many open sources projects for examples. I've learned a lot from the builds of the Castle/Nhibernate/Rhino-Tools stack.