Not sure if this is the right forum for this question, if not please let me know.
To my understanding the LAI number for cell modems is the concatinated version of the 3-digit MCC plus the 2- or 3- digit MNC. Now my question is a two parter:
Am I correct in my assumption that the LAI is the concatinated version of the MCC and MNC?
If I am correct, how is the number broken up? For example, if we have two LAI numbers, "123456" and "78910" how would they be broken down into the MCC and MNC?
The MCC is always the first three digits in the LAI. This means that in the given examples:
MCC = 123
MNC = 456
and
MCC = 789
MNC = 10
Related
I'm trying to create a new column called 'team'. In the image below you see different type of codes. The first number of the code is the team someone's in, IF the number consists out of 3 characters. E.G: 315 = team 3, 240 = team 2, and 3300 = NULL.
In the image below you can see my data flow so far and the expression I have tried, but doesn't work.
You forget parenthesis () in your regex :
Try :
^([0-9]{3})$
Demo
The following regex within DB2 SQL works pretty well to get extra elements out of an address (i.e. not the street name or number). Limiting myself to two cases (UNIT or GATE) to keep my example simple, where HAD1 is the field containing the first line of a street address:
select HAD1,
regexp_substr(HAD1,'(UNITS?|GATES?)\s[0-9A-Z]{1,}')
from ECH
where regexp_like(HAD1,'(UNIT|GATE)')
and length(trim(HAD1)) > 12
I get this:
Ship To REGEXP_SUBSTR
Address
Line 1
UNIT 4, 117 MONTGOMORIE RD UNIT 4
END OF WAINUI RD, HIGHGATE -
UNIT 3, 37 TE ROTO DRIVE UNIT 3
GATE 6 52 MAHIA ROAD GATE 6
UNIT B 11 LANGSTONE LANE UNIT B
ASHBURTON FITTINGS GATE 2 GATE 2
GOODS: PLACEMAKERS - WESTGATE -
UNIT 3, 37 TE ROTO DRIVE UNIT 3
ASHBURTON FITTINGS GATE 2 GATE 2
SH 8A TARRAS-LUGGATE HIGHWAY GATE HIGHWAY
Which is very encouraging. It correctly didn't pick up HIGHGATE or WESTGATE because they weren't followed by a space then something else.
But it did pick up LUGGATE (last line), which I don't want. So, I'd like to be able to include that my text strings are not preceded by any character.
As you may guess I'm an absolute beginner with regex, so thank you for your patience.
Edit
Now I have my most excellent regex like so:
\b(GATE|LEVEL|DOOR|UNITS?)\s[\dA-Z]{1,}
Using it over a larger data set I notice the occasional unwanted match where, for instance, GATE is followed by an ordinary English word:
THE THIRD GATE ON THE LEFT = GATE ON
The gates, levels, doors and units that I'm looking for will always be followed by one of the following: (a) A number of up to 6 digits (b) One letter (c) A number and one letter, possibly with a dash
Examples:
UNIT 7A
GATE 6
GATE 31113
UNIT B
LEVEL B2
LEVEL 2B
UNIT D06
So, my follow up question is, can I limit the number of letters in second part of the expression to 0 or 1, but allow up to six digits.
I've played around with the numbers in curly brackets but they seem to affect only how many characters are returned rather than how many characters must be present.
I have this integer. A = 100002 of 6 digits and i want to add 2 extra 0 in the middle so it can be a integer of 8 digits.
Result = 10000002
how can i do it?
You can split your number up into two parts, the left and the right side. Then add the zeros to the left side and put back the right side.
100002 -> 100 [left side] 002 [right side]
Dim number As Integer = 100002
Dim rightSide As Integer = number Mod 1000
Dim leftSide As Integer = number - rightSide
leftSide *= 100 ' Add zeros
Dim newNumber As Integer = leftSide + rightSide
With this, 123456 will become 12300456.
There are lots of different ways to answer this, meaning that your question is likely not specific enough to get the answer you want. For example, the_lotus's answer is of course correct (and a more practical solution, too). However, this solution will also yield the result you specify in the simplest possible manner, by subtracting 2, multiplying by 100, and adding 2 again:
Result = (A - 2) * 100 + 2
Since both of these very different methods solve the problem you have posed, it follows that you might want to pose the problem a bit more carefully. For example, if you want to work with numbers other than 100002 (which you haven't said that you do), this solution of course won't allow that. If you want a solution that applies to numbers with other than six digits, the_lotus's solution won't allow that in all cases, either.
I have a google spreadsheet for my gaming information. It contains 2 sheets - one for monster information, another for team.
Monster information sheet contains the attack value, defend value, and the mana cost of monsters. It's almost like a database of monsters that I can summon.
Team sheet does the following:
Asks for the amount of mana I currently have.
Computes a list of up to 5 monsters that I can summon (it can be less than 5).
Each monster has their own mana cost, therefore total mana cost mustn't exceed the amount of mana I have given in point 1.
The tabulated list should give me a team that have the highest combined attack value. It does not matter how many monsters are summoned. Each monster cannot be summoned twice though.
I have been thinking of using query() function so that I can make use of SQL statements. (so that I can hopefully retrieve the tabulated list directly)
Sample: Monster Info
A B C D
1 Monster Attack Defense Cost
2 MonA 1200 1200 35
3 MonB 1400 1300 50
... ...
Sample: Team
A B C D
1 Mana 120
2
3 Attack Team
4 Monster Attack Cost Total Attack
5 MonB 1400 50 1400
6 MonA 1200 35 2600
7 ... ...
I have these formula in "Team" sheet
A5: =query('Monster Info'!$A$:$D,"SELECT A,B,D ORDER BY B DESC LIMIT 5")
B5: =CONTINUE(A5, 1, 2)
C5: =CONTINUE(A5, 1, 3)
D5: =C5
A6: =CONTINUE(A5, 2, 1)
B6: =CONTINUE(A5, 2, 2)
C6: =CONTINUE(A5, 2, 3)
D6: =D5+C6
That only gets the 5 best attack monsters, regardless of the mana cost consideration. How do I do that such that it takes consideration of both attack value and mana cost value? There is another problem shown in the example below:
Example: (simplified version, without defense value etc)
Monster Attack Cost
MonA 1400 50
MonB 1200 35
MonC 1100 30
MonD 900 25
MonE 500 20
MonF 400 15
MonG 350 10
MonH 250 5
If I have 160 mana, then the obvious team is A+B+C+D+E (5100 Attack).
If I have 150 mana, it becomes A+B+C+D+G (4950 Attack).
If I have 140 mana, it becomes A+B+C+D (4600 Attack).
If I have 130 mana, it becomes B+C+D+E+F (4100 Attack using 125 mana) or A+B+C+F (4100 Attack using all 130 mana).
If I have 120 mana, it becomes B+C+D+E+G (4050 Attack).
If I have 110 mana, it becomes B+C+D+F+H (3850 Attack).
As you can see, there isn't really a pattern within the results.
Any expert willing to share their insights on this?
I've played with the problem for an hour and I only have a workaround here. Your problem seems to be a standard linear programming task which should can easily be solved by a "Solver" software. There used to be a so called "Solver" in google spreadsheet, but unfortunately it was removed from the newest version. If you are not insisting on Google solution, you should try it in one of the Solver-supported spreadsheet manager softwares.
I tried MS Office (it has a Solver add-in, installation guide: http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/excel-help/load-the-solver-add-in-HP010342660.aspx).
Before you run the solver, you should prepare your original dataset a bit, with helper columns and cells.
Add a new column next to the "Cost" column (let's assume it is column "D"), and under it put each row either 0, or 1. This column will tell you if a monster is selected to the attack team or not.
Add two more columns ("E" and "F" respectively). These columns will be products of the Attack and of the Cost respectively. So you should write a function to the E2 cell: =b2*d2, and for the F2 cell: =c2*d2. With this way if a monster is selected (which is told by the D column, remember), the appropriate E and F cells will be non zero values, aotherwise they will be 0.
Create a SUM row under the last row, and create a summarizing function for the D,E,F columns respectively. So in my spreadsheet D10 cell gets its value like this: =sum(d2:d9), and so on.
I created a spreadsheet to show these steps: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_7XRlupEEwat3CthSSz8h_yJ44MysK9hMsj0ijPEn18/edit?usp=sharing
Remember to copy this worksheet to an MS Office worksheet, before you start the Solver.
Now, you are ready to start the Solver. (Data menu, Solver in MS Office). You can see a video here on using the Solver: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oyc0k9kiD7o
It's not that hard as it looks like, but for this case I'll describe what to write where:
Set Objective: you should select the "E10" cell, as that represents the sum of all the attack points.
Check "Max" radiobutton as we would like to maximize the value of the attacks.
By Changing variable cells: Select the "d2:d9" interval as those cells are representing whether a monster is selected or not. The solver will try to adjust these values (0, or 1) in order to maximise the sum attack.
Subject to the Contraints: Here we should add some constraints. Click on the Add button, and then:
First we should ensure that d2:d9 are all binary values. So "Cell reference" should be "d2:d9" and from the dropdown menu, select "bin" as binary.
Another constraint should be that the sum of the selected monsters should not exceed 5. So select the cell where the sum of the selected monsters is represented (D10) and add "<=" and the value "5"
Finally we cannot use more manna that we have, so select the cell in which you store the sum of used manna (F2), and "<=", and add the whole amount of manna we can spend in my case it's in the I2 cell).
Done. It should work, in my case it worked at least.
Hope it helps anyway.
I'm trying to emulate a function in SQL that a client has produced in Excel. In effect, they have a unique, 10-digit numeric value (VARCHAR) as the primary key in one of their enterprise database systems. Within another database, they require a unique, 5-digit alphanumeric identifier. They want that 5-digit alphanumeric value to be a representation of the 10-digit number. So what they did in excel was to split the 10-digit number into pairs, then convert each of those pairs into a hexadecimal value, then stitch them back together.
The EXCEL equation is:
=IF(VALUE(MID(A2,1,4))>0,DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,3,2)))&DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,5,2)))&DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,7,2)))&DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,9,2))),DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,5,2)))&DEC2HEX(VALUE(MID(A2,7,2)))&DEC2HEX((VALUE(MID(A2,9,2)))))
I need the SQL equivalent of this. Of course, should someone out there know a better way to accomplish their goal of "a 5-digit alphanumeric identifier" based off the 10-digit number, I'm all ears.
ADDED 8/2/2011
First of all, thank you to everyone for the replies. Nice to see folks willing to help and even enjoying it! Based on all the responses, I'm apt to tell my client they're intent is sound, only their method is off kilter. I'd also like to recommend a solution. So the challenge remains, just modified slightly:
CHALLENGE: Within SQL, take a 10 digit, unique NUMERIC string and represent it ALPHANUMERICALLY in as few characters as possible. The resulting string must also be unique.
Note that the first 3-4 characters in the 10-digit string are likely to be zeros, and that they could be stripped to shorten the resulting alphanumeric string. Not required, but perhaps helpful.
This problem is inherently impossible. You have a 10 digit numeric value that you want to convert to a 5 digit alphanumeric value. Since there are 10 numeric characters, this means that there are 10^10 = 10 000 000 000 unique values for your 10 digit number. Since there are 36 alphanumeric characters (26 letters + 10 numbers), there are 36^5 = 60 466 176 unique values for your 5 digit number. You cannot map a set of 10 billion elements into a set with around 60 million.
Now, lets take a closer look at what your client's code is doing:
So what they did in excel was to split the 10-digit number into pairs, then convert each of those pairs into a hexadecimal value, then stitch them back together.
This isn't 100% accurate. The excel code never uses the first 2 digits, but performs this operation on the remaining 8. There are two main problems with this algorithm which may not be intuitively obvious:
Two 10 digit numbers can map to the same 5 digit number. Consider the numbers 1000000117 and 1000001701. The last four digits of 1000000117 get mapped to 1 11, where the last four digits of 1000001701 get mapped to 11 1. This causes both to map to 00111.
The 5 digit number may not even end up being 5 digits! For example, 1000001616 gets mapped to 001010.
So, what is a possible solution? Well, if you don't care if that 5 digit number is unique or not, in MySQL you can use something like:
hex(<NUMERIC VALUE> % 0xFFFFF)
The log of 10^10 base 2 is 33.219280948874
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(2)
33.219280948874
> = 2 ^ 33.21928
9999993422.9114
So, it takes 34 bits to represent this number. In hex this will take 34/4 = 8.5 characters, much more than 5.
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(16)
8.3048202372184
The Excel macro is ignoring the first 4 (or 6) characters of the 10 character string.
You could try encoding in base 36 instead of 16. This will get you to 7 characters or less.
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(36)
6.4254860446923
The popular base 64 encoding will get you to 6 characters
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(64)
5.5365468248123
Even Ascii85 encoding won't get you down to 5.
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(85)
5.1829075929158
You need base 100 to get to 5 characters
> return math.log(10 ^ 10) / math.log(100)
5
There aren't 100 printable ASCII characters, so this is not going to work, as zkhr explained as well, unless you're willing to go beyond ASCII.
I found your question interesting (although I don't claim to know the answer) - I googled a bit for you out of interest and found this which may help you http://dpatrickcaldwell.blogspot.com/2009/05/converting-decimal-to-hexadecimal-with.html