I'm currently learning SQL and I'm having trouble with a procedure of mine. The procedure should calculate the average of a column called 'INDICE_METABO_PAT'. The information I need is in 3-4 different tables. Then when I do have the average calculated, I update a table to set this average to the corresponding entries. Here is the procedure. Note that everything else in my .sql file works : inserts, updates, selects, views, etc.
create or replace Procedure SP_UPDATE_INDICE_METABO_DV (P_NO_ETUDE in number)
is
V_SOMME number := 0;
V_NBPATIENT number := 0;
V_NO_ETUDE number := P_NO_ETUDE;
cursor curseur is
select PATIENT.INDICE_EFFICACITE_METABO_PAT
from ETUDE, DROGUE_VARIANT, ETUDE_PATIENT, PATIENT
where ETUDE.NO_DROGUE = DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_DROGUE
and ETUDE.NO_VAR_GEN = DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_VAR_GEN
and V_NO_ETUDE = ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_ETUDE
and ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_PATIENT = PATIENT.NO_PATIENT;
begin
open curseur;
fetch curseur into V_SOMME;
V_NBPATIENT := V_NBPATIENT + 1;
exit when curseur%NOTFOUND;
update DROGUE_VARIANT
set INDICE_EFFICACITE_METABO_DV = V_SOMME / V_NBPATIENT
where exists(select * from ETUDE, DROGUE_VARIANT, ETUDE_PATIENT, PATIENT
where ETUDE.NO_DROGUE = DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_DROGUE
and ETUDE.NO_VAR_GEN = DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_VAR_GEN
and V_NO_ETUDE = ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_ETUDE
and ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_PATIENT = PATIENT.NO_PATIENT);
end SP_UPDATE_INDICE_METABO_DV;
/
I'm getting an error : Procedure compiled , error check compiler log.
But I can't open the compiler log, and when my friend opens it, it points to weird places, like my create tables and such.
This is school stuff by the way, so it'll be nice if you could give an insight instead of a direct solution. Thanks alot.
Thanks alot in advance for your kind help !
To see the error you can do show errors after your procedure creation statement, or you can query the user_errors or all_errors views.
That will show something like:
LINE/COL ERROR
-------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
20/4 PLS-00376: illegal EXIT/CONTINUE statement; it must appear inside a loop
20/4 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
You mentioned that when you checked the complier log, which shows the same information, "it points to weird places". Presumably you're looking at line 20 in your script. But this message is referring to line 20 of the PL/SQL code block, which is the exit when curseur%NOTFOUND;, which makes sense for the error message.
And as the message also says, and as #ammoQ said in a comment, that should be in a loop. If you're trying to manually calculate the average in a procedure as an exercise, instead of using the built-in aggregation functions, then you need to loop over all of the rows from your cursor:
open curseur;
loop
fetch curseur into V_SOMME;
exit when curseur%NOTFOUND;
V_NBPATIENT := V_NBPATIENT + 1;
end loop;
close curseur;
But as you'll quickly realise, you'll end up with the v_somme variable having the last value retrieved, not the sum of all the values. You need a separate variable keep to track of the sum - fetch each value into a variable, and add that to your running total, all within the loop. But as requested, not giving a complete solution.
As you're starting out you should really use ANSI join syntax, not the old from/where syntax you have now. It's a shame that is still being taught. So your cursor query should be something like:
select PATIENT.INDICE_EFFICACITE_METABO_PAT
from ETUDE_PATIENT
join ETUDE
-- missing on clause !
join DROGUE_VARIANT
on DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_DROGUE = ETUDE.NO_DROGUE
and DROGUE_VARIANT.NO_VAR_GEN = ETUDE.NO_VAR_GEN
join PATIENT
on PATIENT.NO_PATIENT = ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_PATIENT
where ETUDE_PATIENT.NO_ETUDE = P_NO_ETUDE;
... which shows you that you are missing a join condition between ETUDE_PATIENT and ETUDE - it's unlikely you want a cartesian product, and it's much easier to spot that missing join using this syntax than with what you had.
You need to look at your update statement carefully too, particularly the exists clause. That will basically always return true if the cursor found anything, so it will update every row in DROGUE_VARIANT with your calculated average, which presumably isn't what you want.
There is no correlation between the rows in the table you're updating and the subquery in that clause - the DROGUE_VARIANT in the subquery is independent of the DROGUE_VARIANT you're updating. By which I mean, it's the same table, obviously; but the update and the subquery are looking at the table separately and so are looking at different rows. It also has the same missing join condition as the cursor query.
Related
This is my first time learning cursors. I have two tables: drink d and cart c. They both contain a common primary key where c.did = d.did. (where did = drink id). I'm trying to take the teatype from joining both rows so that I can update the stock of the teatype. For example, if it returns:
-----------
| teatype|
-----------
Oolong
Green Tea
Oolong
Then I would loop through that record so that I can update the stock of that specific teatype in the other table tea which contains the columns, stock where the teatype = the teatype of the cursor.
The issue I'm running into is not knowing how to correctly implement the cursor so that it can get looped through to update the stock. I've run into issues saying theres a syntax error ar or near end or at if. I've looked all over the web but can't find the correct resources.
I've tried putting the procedural statements within a function but that didn't help. It seems like I'm not on the right track and don't know how to approach this problem. My code is the following and I'm trying to run it in a PostgresSQL server.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo()
RETURNS VOID AS $$
DECLARE
tea_type RECORD;
TeaCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT teatype FROM cart c
JOIN drink d ON c.did = d.did;
Begin
OPEN TeaCursor;
LOOP
FETCH from TeaCursor into tea_type;
exit when tea_type = null;
UPDATE tea t
SET stock = stock - 1
WHERE t.type = tea_type.teatype;
end if;
END LOOP;
close TeaCursor;
End;
$$LANGUAGE sql stable;
I should expect something like UPDATE 1 or something that would say it has succesfully decremented the stock for that specific teatype. Instead I keep getting an error as such:
psql:test.sql:27: ERROR: syntax error at or near "RECORD"
LINE 5: tea_type RECORD;
You declared the function as LANGUAGE sql when really it is LANGUAGE plpgsql.
When inserting a lot number into a table we are counting the number times the base number exists, and adding a -## to the end of the new number based on that count.
I have stripped out most the logic (we check for other things as well). I also am aware of the logic flaw here that would skip -1.
-- Function: stone._lsuniqueid()
-- DROP FUNCTION stone._lsuniqueid();
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION stone._lsuniqueid()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
_count INTEGER;
BEGIN
-- Obtain the number of occurences of this new ls_number
SELECT COUNT(ls_number) into _count
FROM ls
WHERE ls_number LIKE CAST(NEW.ls_number || '%' AS text);
-- Allow new ls_numbers to be entered as is, otherwise add "-#{count + 1}"
-- to the end of the ls_number
if _count > 0 THEN
NEW.ls_number = NEW.ls_number || '-' || CAST(_count + 1 AS text);
END IF;
RETURN NEW;
END
$BODY$
INSERT INTO ls VALUES (NEXTVAL('ls_ls_id_seq'),7285,UPPER('20151012'));
--> Query returned successfully: one row affected, 391 ms execution time.
The count query is plenty fast
SELECT COUNT(ls_number)
FROM ls
WHERE ls_number LIKE CAST('20151012' || '%' AS text);
--> 19ms
For comparison I tried a similar trigger, but ran the count against a different table with same amount of rows, and similar query time.
SELECT COUNT(lsdetail_id)
FROM lsdetail
WHERE lsdetail_id > 2433308
--> 20ms
Running the same insert with the count running against a different table returns the result 20 times faster.
INSERT INTO ls VALUES (NEXTVAL('ls_ls_id_seq'),7285,UPPER('20151012'));
--> Query returned successfully: one row affected, 20 ms execution time.
The ls table has about 2.5 million rows
I've tried a couple of different things and the issue seems to be when selecting from the same table I'm inserting into.
I would like to know why this happening, but I would also be open to a better way to create "sub-lot" numbers.
Thanks!
Found the answer here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27705.1150381444#sss.pgh.pa.us
Re: How to analyze function performance
"Mindaugas" writes:
Is it possible to somehow analyze function performance? E.g. we are using function cleanup() which takes obviously too much time to execute but I have problems trying to figure what is slowing things down.
When I explain analyze function lines step by step it show quite acceptable performance.
--
Are you sure you are "explain analyze"ing the same queries the function
is really doing? You have to account for the fact that what plpgsql is
issuing is parameterized queries, and sometimes that limits the
planner's ability to pick a good plan. For instance, if you have
declare x int;
begin
...
for r in select * from foo where key = x loop ...
then what is really getting planned and executed is "select * from foo
where key = $1" --- every plpgsql variable gets replaced by a parameter
symbol "$n". You can model this for EXPLAIN purposes with a prepared
statement:
prepare p1(int) as select * from foo where key = $1;
explain analyze execute p1(42);
If you find out that a particular query really sucks when parameterized,
you can work around this by using EXECUTE to force the query to be
planned afresh on each use with literal constants instead of parameters:
Then I looked into this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/plpgsql-statements.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-EXECUTING-DYN
39.5.4. Executing Dynamic Commands
Oftentimes you will want to generate dynamic commands inside your PL/pgSQL functions, that is, commands that will involve different tables or different data types each time they are executed. PL/pgSQL's normal attempts to cache plans for commands (as discussed in Section 39.10.2) will not work in such scenarios. To handle this sort of problem, the EXECUTE statement is provided:
EXECUTE 'SELECT count(*) FROM mytable WHERE inserted_by = $1 AND inserted <= $2'
INTO c
USING checked_user, checked_date;
--
So in the end it was a matter of updating count select to this:
EXECUTE 'SELECT COALESCE(COUNT(ls_number), 0) FROM ls WHERE ls_number LIKE $1 || ''%'';'
INTO _count
USING NEW.ls_number;
I just tripped over an answer to a problem I was having with a PL/SQL variable not being recognized by a function and I was hoping someone could explain to me why my solution worked and what is happening "underneath the hood".
Background
As part of an optimization project, I am trying to collect metrics on individual SQL scripts within a Stored Procedure. The Stored Proc that I am dissecting has an In-type date parameter that I need to define in order to run each individual SQL Script:
CREATE OR REPLACE myStoredProc (DATE_IN DATE, ERROR_OUT OUT VARCHAR2)
IS
BEGIN
--Truncate Temp Tables
--6 Individual SQL Scripts
EXCEPTION
--Error Handling
END;
To run each script individually, I decided to just drop each SQL statement into a PL/SQL block and feed the DATE_IN parameter in as a variable:
DECLARE
DATE_IN DATE := TO_DATE('16-JUL-2014','DD-MON-RR');
BEGIN
--Place individual script here
END;
The Problem
This approach worked fine for a couple of the queries that referred to this DATE_IN variable but one query with a reference to an outside function which takes DATE_IN as a parameter started throwing an ORA-00904 error:
DECLARE
DATE_IN DATE := TO_DATE('16-JUL-2014','DD-MON-RR');
BEGIN
insert into temp_table
SELECT table1.field1,
table1.field2,
table2.fieldA,
MyFunction(table1.field1, DATE_IN) --This was the problem line
FROM
table1,
table2
WHERE EXISTS (inner query)
AND table1.keys = table2.keys
AND table2.date <= DATE_IN
END;
Solution
At the advice of another Developer, I was able to get around this error by adding a colon (:) in front of the DATE_IN variable that I was passing into the function so that the problem line read MyFunction(table1.field1, :DATE_IN). As soon as I did that, my error disappeared and I was able to run the query without issue.
I was happy for the result but the other Developer wasn't able to explain why it was needed, only that it was necessary to call any functions or other stored procs from a PL/SQL statement. I assume this has something to do with scope but I would like to get a better explanation as to why this colon was necessary for the function to see the variable.
Questions
I've tried to do a little research looking over Oracle documentation on parameters, variables, binding/declaring and constants but my research has only given me more questions:
After reading up on variables, I now question if that is the correct term for what I have been using (since I didn't actually use the VARIABLE command and I'm passing in a date - which is not an allowable data type). If my DATE_IN DATE := statement is not a variable, then what is it?
Why were the rest of my references to DATE_IN recognized by the compiler but passing the value to the function was out of scope?
What exactly is the colon (:) doing here? Is this turning that into a bind variable?
Thanks in advance. I appreciate any guidance you can provide!
----------------------------------EDIT--------------------------------------
I was asked to provide additional information. My Db version is 11G, 11.2.0.2.0. The query that I was able to reproduce this error is below.
DECLARE
EXTRACT_DT_IN DATE := TO_DATE('16-JUL-2014','DD-MON-RR');
BEGIN
--This begins the pre-optimized query that I'm testing
insert into AELI_COV_TMP_2_OPT
SELECT /*+ ordered use_nl(CM MAMT) INDEX (CM CSMB_CSMB2_UK) INDEX (MAMT (MBAM_CSMB_FK_I) */
CM.CASE_MBR_KEY
,CM.pyrl_no
,MAMT.AMT
,MAMT.FREQ_CD
,MAMT.HOURS
,aeli$cov_pdtodt(CM.CASE_MBR_KEY, EXTRACT_DT_IN)
FROM
CASE_MEMBERS CM
,MEMBER_AMOUNTS MAMT
WHERE EXISTS (select /*+ INDEX(SDEF SLRY_BCAT_FK_I) */
'x'
from SALARY_DEF SDEF
where SDEF.CASE_KEY = CM.CASE_KEY
AND SDEF.TYP_CD = '04'
AND SDEF.SLRY_KEY = MAMT.SLRY_KEY)
AND CM.CASE_MBR_KEY = MAMT.CASE_MBR_KEY
AND MAMT.STAT_CD = '00'
AND (MAMT.xpir_dt is null or MAMT.xpir_dt > EXTRACT_DT_IN)
AND MAMT.eff_dt <= EXTRACT_DT_IN;
--This ends the pre-optimized query that I'm testing
END;
Here is the error I'm encountering when trying to run an Explain Plan on this statement. I am able to get past this error if I remove reference to line 13 or I add a colon (:) to the EXTRACT_DT_IN on that line.
----------------------EDIT 2-------------------
Here is the function signature of aeli$.cov_pdtodt. (I've replaced the owner for security reasons).
CREATE OR REPLACE function __owner__.aeli$cov_pdtodt
(CASE_MBR_KEY_IN IN NUMBER, EXTRACT_EFF_DT_IN DATE)
RETURN DATE IS
PDTODT DATE;
Your anonymous block is fine as it is, as long as you execute the whole block. If you try to execute just the insert, or its select, as a standalone command then it will indeed fail with ORA-00904.
That isn't quite a scope problem, it's a context problem. You're trying to refer to a PL/SQL variable in an SQL context, and that is never going to work.
In a PL/SQL context this would work:
declare
some_var dual.dummy%type := 'X';
begin
insert into some_table
select dummy from dual where dummy = some_var;
end;
/
... because the insert has access to the PL/SQL some_var.
In an SQL context this will error:
select * from dual where dummy = some_var;
... because it's looking for a column called SOME_VAR, and there isn't one.
If you do this instead:
select * from dual where dummy = :some_var;
... the some_var is now a client-managed bind variable. If you execute that you'll either be prompted for the bind value, or given a not-all-variables-bound error, or bind-variable-not-declared, or similar, depending on your client.
If you only do an explain plan of that though, e.g. with
set auto trace traceonly explain
select * from dual where dummy = :some_var;
... then the bind variable doesn't necessarily have to be populated for the plan to be calculated. Some clients may still complain and want a bind value, but the parser would be OK with it - enough to produce a plan anyway. Though not able to take advantage of bind variable peeking or histograms etc.
For example, SQL Developer happily produces a plan for your original sample query if both references are turned into bind variables, just the insert ... part of the block is selected, and you press Explain Plan (F10).
I'm not sure what you read, but you're mixed up on a few things here.
Your DATE_IN is a variable. You don't need to type 'VARIABLE' anywhere to declare a variable, all you need is the name of the variable and the datatype.
All of the below are legitimate variables in PL/SQL (although poorly named).
variable_1 NUMBER;
variable_2 VARCHAR2(100);
variable_3 DATE;
It's hard to tell what you're doing in your code without seeing it all. Do you have two DATE_IN variables declared within the same block? Is DATE_IN the name of a column in your table?
If you have a column named DATE_IN in table1 or table2, that's likely your problem. Oracle doesn't know if you want to use your variable or your column, and it will always default to the column name. Your function would be expecting a DATE and receiving a column, hence the error.
I've created one table "Meta_Data_Table_Names" where I inserted forty eight table names in the MetaTableName column. And there is another column to provide Row count with corresponding table name.
I wanted to fetch the table name from “Meta_Data_Table_Names” and execute SELECT Query sequentially through Loop for validation purpose.
Whenever, I execute from TOAD , It’s throwing an error:
Table or view does not exist.
Do we need to make a place holder for 'Meta_name' which can be scanned? Or any particular syntax to read the value during Query?
DECLARE
CURSOR c1 IS SELECT MetaTableName FROM Meta_Data_Table_Names;
CURSOR c2 IS SELECT ROW_COUNT FROM Meta_Data_Table_Names;
Meta_name Meta_Data_Table_Names.MetaTableName%TYPE;
Count_num Meta_Data_Table_Names.ROW_COUNT%TYPE;
BEGIN
OPEN c1;
OPEN c2;
FOR i IN 1..48 LOOP
FETCH c1 INTO Meta_name;
FETCH c2 INTO Count_num;
IF (Count_num > 2000)
THEN
SELECT * FROM Meta_Name X
MINUS
SELECT * from ASFNCWK07.Meta_Name#NCDV.US.ORACLE.COM Y
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM ASFNCWK07.Meta_Name#NCDV.US.ORACLE.COM Y
MINUS
SELECT * FROM Meta_Name X;
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('No Validation is required');
END IF;
END LOOP;
END;
Oracle does not allow you to do queries with dynamic table names, i.e. if the table name is not known at compile time. Do do that, you need Dynamic SQL, which is a bit too broad to go into here.
There are a number of problems with your code.
Firstly, we cannot use variable names in normal SQL: for this we need dynamic SQL. For instance:
execute immediate 'select 1 from '|| Meta_Name || into n;
There are a lot of subtleties when working with dynamic SQL: the PL/SQL documentation devotes a whole chapter to it. Find out more.
Secondly, when executing SQL in PL/SQL, we need need to provide a target variable. This must match the projection of the executed query. When selecting a whole row the %ROWTYPE keyword is useful. Again the documentation covers this: find out more. Which leads to ...
Thirdly, because you're working with dynamic SQL and you don't know in advance which tables will be in scope, you can't easily declare target variables. This means you'll need to use ref cursors and/or Type 4 dynamic SQL techniques. Yikes! Read Adrian Billington's excellent blog article here.
Lastly (I think), the UNION ALL in your query doesn't allow you to identify which rows are missing from where. Perhaps that doesn't matter.
Using HSQL 2.2.5 I need to shudder process one row at a time in a stored procedure, so I thought the "Iterated FOR" statement might do the trick for me. Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to make it work. It's supposed to look something like:
FOR SELECT somestuff FROM sometable DO
some random SQL statements
END FOR;
That leaves off a bit of the syntax, but it's close enough for now.
The problem seems to be that the statements inside the loop never execute. I've verified that my SELECT statement does indeed return something.
So let's get concrete. When I execute this stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE b()
MODIFIES SQL DATA
BEGIN ATOMIC
DECLARE count_var INTEGER;
SET count_var = 0;
WHILE count_var < 10 DO
INSERT INTO TTP2 VALUES(count_var);
SET count_var = count_var + 1;
END WHILE;
END;
I get 10 rows inserted into table TTP2, with values 0 through 9. (TTP2 has just one column defined, of type INTEGER.)
But when I substitute a FOR statement for the WHILE like so:
CREATE PROCEDURE c()
MODIFIES SQL DATA
BEGIN ATOMIC
DECLARE count_var INTEGER;
SET count_var = 0;
FOR SELECT id FROM ttp_by_session FETCH 10 ROWS ONLY DO
INSERT INTO TTP2 VALUES(count_var);
SET count_var = count_var + 1;
END FOR;
END;
I get nothing inserted into TTP2. (I have verified that the SELECT statement returns 10 rows, one column of integers.)
When I leave the FETCH clause off I still get no results. ttp_by_session is a view, but the same thing happens with a bare table.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks for the help.
This works fine with the latest version of HSQLDB. Try with the 2.3.0 release candidate snapshot from the HSQLDB web site.
When the FOR statement was initially added about two years ago, it had limited functionality. The functionality was extended in later versions.