I have a quick question about the use of execute sp_executesql
Without going into too much details of my code that's current causing an error, i'm more interested in the different methods I could use to build the EXECUTE SP_EXECUTESQL statement
Within my STOR_PROC, I have the following (with #tTableName & #tVar as parameters being passed in)
DECLARE #strSQL nVARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE #parmDef nVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE #outDef nVARCHAR(100)
SET #strSQL = N'SELECT #nTotalOut = sum(r.TOT_SALES) FROM #tTableName
--this procedure is actually in a loop, as I need to provided total sales
--from multiple years and sales data per year is stored in its own individual table
--(ie: #tTableName = '2015_Sales_Data', '2014_Sales_Data', etc, etc)
SET #parmDef = N'#nTotalOut int output'
set #outDef = N'#nTotalOut=' + #tVar + ' OUTPUT'
execute sp_executesql #strSQL, #parmDef, #outDef
the reason why I need to dynamically define #outDef is because for each iteration, I need to store the total sales into its own variable (so #tVar will hold the actual variable names, ie: #nTotal2015, #nTotal2014, #nTotal2013, etc, etc)
At the end when this loop is done, I can do a
SELECT #nTotal2015, #nTotal2014, #nTotal2013
and display the total sales per year in 1 row
PROBLEM:
when I run my store procedure, I'm getting the following error:
Error converting data type nvarchar to int.
I've tried many different workarounds before I decided to post here, but at the end, I would like to know if i can build the EXECUTE SP_EXECUTESQL statement with dynamical variables
One thing to note: If i hardcoded the output parameter to:
execute sp_executesql #strSQL, #parmDef, #n2015Total=#n2015Total OUTPUT
then it works!
Any suggestions?
Too long for a comment.
Run the code using a single variable and stash the value in a temporary table.
declare #Totals table (year int, total decimal(18, 6));
. . .
execute sp_executesql #strSQL, #parmDef, #outDef;
insert into #Totals(year, total)
select #year, #total;
This assumes that you have a #year variable among the variables being processed.
Related
Is it possible in SQL to use a variable to store query.
For example to save time when subquery is used multiple times inside the main query.
Example:
DECLARE #my_query as varchar(250) = select x from my_table where my_table = y.your_table
SELECT
a,b,c,(#my_query),d,e,f
FROM my_table_1
Is it possible in SQL to use a variable to store query.
Depend on your definition of "query". If you mean store the text which we use to execute the command, then the answer is YES. If you mean an object type query, then the answer is not - since there is no data type that fit this.
What I mean is that a variable can store a value which is string. The string can be any query command that you want. Therefore, you can store for example the text "select col1,col2 from table1".
Next you need to ask how can we use this text in order to execute it as part of a query, which is done using dynamic query.
We can execute a text of a query using the build-in stored procedure sp_executesql, which is build for such needs.
For example:
-- DECLARE VARIABLE
DECLARE #MyQuery NVARCHAR(MAX)
-- SET the value of the variable
SET #MyQuery = 'SELECT ''Yes I can'''
-- Executing a dynamic query
EXECUTE sp_executesql #MyQuery
Here is another example which look more close to your question:
-- First let's create a table
CREATE TABLE T(ID INT)
INSERT T(ID) VALUES (1),(2)
GO
-- And here is what you sked about:
-- DECLARE VARIABLE
DECLARE #MyQuery NVARCHAR(MAX)
-- SET the value of the variable
SET #MyQuery = 'select ID from T where ID = ''1'''
-- Let's combine the text to a full query now
DECLARE #FullQuery NVARCHAR(MAX)
SET #FullQuery = '
SELECT
ID,(' + #MyQuery + ')
FROM T
'
PRINT #FullQuery
-- Executing a dynamic query
EXECUTE sp_executesql #FullQuery
NOTE! Your specific sample of query will return error, which is not related to the question "Is it possible in SQL to use a variable to store query". This is a result of the "query" is not well formatted.
Important! It is HIGHLY recommended to read the document about this stored procedure and learn a bit more of the options it provides us.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/system-stored-procedures/sp-executesql-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15
I'm creating a report using sql scripts through management studio and I'm getting the error " Must Declare the scalar variable "#Account". I've been reading other similar questions on this portal but they are related to c#
I'm currently trying to reduce the code on the script so I decided to put a sql script into a variable because depending on a condition the where condition will change. Below is an example of the code
Declare #Account int = 1 , #SQL varchar(max)=''
Select #SQL = N'Select ColumnA,ColumnB, ColumnC from Table1 where ColumnA =1'
if #Account IS NULL
Begin
exec(#SQL)
end
--Here is where the error is hapening
else
begin
--This is the line causing the error
Select #SQL = #SQL + 'AND ColumnB=#Account"
exec(#SQL)
end
If I type manually the value of the variable next to "ColumnB=" it works but the account number will be selected by the user executing the script. I'm thinking on maybe building a temp table to capture the variable value and then do a sub query on the where condition but maybe the solution to this error may be more easier
You want sp_executesql:
select #SQL = #SQL + 'AND ColumnB=#Account';
exec sp_executesql #SQL, N'#Account int', #Account=#Account;
This is how you pass parameters into a dynamic SQL statement in SQL Server. I strongly recommend that you only use sp_executesql to execute SQL statements -- even when you don't have parameters. Using it makes it easy to implement parameters when you need them.
You are passing in '#Account' into the #SQL variable -- the underlying EXEC cannot see that variable.
One way of fixing this would instead be to do this:
Select #SQL = #SQL + 'AND ColumnB=' + CAST(#Account as varchar)
We have a process that updates certain tables based on a parameter passed in, specifically a certain state. I know organizationally this problem would be eliminated by using a single table for this data, but that is not an option -- this isn't my database.
To update these tables, we run a stored procedure. The only issue is that there was a stored procedure for each state, and this made code updates horrible. In order to minimize the amount of code needing to be maintained, we wanted to move towards a single stored procedure that takes in a state parameter, and updates the correct tables. We wanted this without 50 If statements, so the only way I could think to do this was to save the SQL code as text, and then execute the string. IE:
SET #SSQL = 'UPDATE TBL_' + #STATE +' SET BLAH = FOO'
EXEC #SSQL;
I was wondering if there was a way to do this without using strings to update the correct tables based on that parameter. These stored procedures are thousands of lines long.
Thanks all!
Instead save entire script as SQL text and execute it, just update the required table using like code below as where you need and rest continue as it is
EXEC('UPDATE TBL_' + #STATE +' SET BLAH = FOO')
You could, indeed, use dynamic SQL (the exec function) - but with long, complex stored procedures, that can indeed be horrible.
When faced with a similar problem many years ago, we created the stored procedures by running a sort of "mail-merge". We'd write the procedure to work against a single table, then replace the table names with variables and used a PHP script to output a stored procedure for each table by storing the table names in a CSV file.
You could replicate that in any scripting language of your choice - it took about a day to get this to work. It had the added benefit of allowing us to easily store the stored proc templates in source code control.
You can safely use sp_executesql which is fairly more appropriate than a simple EXEC command. To do so, even with input and output parameters :
DECLARE #sql nvarchar(4000),
#tablename nvarchar(4000) = 'YOUR_TABLE_NAME',
#params nvarchar(4000),
#count int
SELECT #sql =
N' UPDATE ' + #tablename +
N' SET Bar = #Foo;' +
N' SELECT #count = ##rowcount'
SELECT #params =
N'#Foo int, ' +
N'#count int OUTPUT'
EXEC sp_executesql #sql, #params, 2, #count OUTPUT
SELECT #count [Row(s) updated]
I encourage you reading the related part of the article mentionned here.
I'm currently having trouble writing a stored procedure and setting the value of a variable of type int to the results of a select statement with a variable as the tablename. I've looked at old threads and tried multiple methods, but no luck. If I'm not getting an error regarding the tablename, I end up getting an error with a variable conversion issue. I've been working on this for too long and any help would be appreciated. Below is a portion of my code. Thanks
DECLARE #BATCHNUMBER VARCHAR --value set in earlier code
DECLARE #ETABLE VARCHAR(50); --the table name
DECLARE #FIRSTDOCID INT;
SET #ETABLE = 'tablename_' + #BATCHNUMBER; --CREATE FIRST TABLE NAME
SELECT #FIRSTDOCID = MIN(D0CID) FROM #ETABLE
The error I get is: Must declare the table variable "#ETABLE"
You are trying to select from a VARCHAR, not a table. The only way to make this work is by using Dynamic SQL.
DECLARE #SQL NVARCHAR(250);
SET #SQL = 'SELECT #OUTPUT = MIN(D0CID) FROM ' + QuoteName(#ETABLE);
EXEC sp_executeSql #SQL, N'#output INT OUTPUT', #FIRSTDOCID OUTPUT;
SELECT #FIRSTDOCID;
However, I would not suggest using Dynamic SQL as this often leads to SQL injection.
You'll probably have to do something like use exec if you're dynamically building the query:
SET #QUERY = "SELECT" + ...etc.
exec(#QUERY)
Since ETABLE is a varchar, and not, as expected, a 'table variable'.
#RowFrom int
#RowTo int
are both Global Input Params for the Stored Procedure, and since I am compiling the SQL query inside the Stored Procedure with T-SQL then using Exec(#sqlstatement) at the end of the stored procedure to show the result, it gives me this error when I try to use the #RowFrom or #RowTo inside the #sqlstatement variable that is executed.. it works fine otherwise.. please help.
"Must declare the scalar variable "#RowFrom"."
Also, I tried including the following in the #sqlstatement variable:
'Declare #Rt int'
'SET #Rt = ' + #RowTo
but #RowTo still doesn't pass its value to #Rt and generates an error.
You can't concatenate an int to a string. Instead of:
SET #sql = N'DECLARE #Rt int; SET #Rt = ' + #RowTo;
You need:
SET #sql = N'DECLARE #Rt int; SET #Rt = ' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(12), #RowTo);
To help illustrate what's happening here. Let's say #RowTo = 5.
DECLARE #RowTo int;
SET #RowTo = 5;
DECLARE #sql nvarchar(max);
SET #sql = N'SELECT ' + CONVERT(varchar(12), #RowTo) + ' * 5';
EXEC sys.sp_executesql #sql;
In order to build that into a string (even if ultimately it will be a number), I need to convert it. But as you can see, the number is still treated as a number when it's executed. The answer is 25, right?
In your case you can use proper parameterization rather than use concatenation which, if you get into that habit, you will expose yourself to SQL injection at some point (see this and this:
SET #sql = #sql + ' WHERE RowNum BETWEEN #RowFrom AND #RowTo;';
EXEC sys.sp_executesql #sql,
N'#RowFrom int, #RowTo int',
#RowFrom, #RowTo;
You can also get this error message if a variable is declared before a GOand referenced after it.
See this question and this workaround.
Just FYI, I know this is an old post, but depending on the database COLLATION settings you can get this error on a statement like this,
SET #sql = #Sql + ' WHERE RowNum BETWEEN #RowFrom AND #RowTo;';
if for example you typo the S in the
SET #sql = #***S***ql
sorry to spin off the answers already posted here, but this is an actual instance of the error reported.
Note also that the error will not display the capital S in the message, I am not sure why, but I think it is because the
Set #sql =
is on the left of the equal sign.
Sometimes, if you have a 'GO' statement written after the usage of the variable, and if you try to use it after that, it throws such error. Try removing 'GO' statement if you have any.
This is most likely not an answer to the issue itself, but this question pops up as first result when searching for Sql declare scalar variable hence I want to share a possible solution to this error.
In my case this error was caused by the use of ; after a SQL statement. Just remove it and the error will be gone.
I guess the cause is the same as #IronSean already posted in a comment above:
it's worth noting that using GO (or in this case ;) causes a new branch where declared variables aren't visible past the statement.
For example:
DECLARE #id int
SET #id = 78
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Id = #var; <-- remove this character to avoid the error message
SELECT * FROM AnotherTable WHERE MyTableId = #var
Just adding what fixed it for me, where misspelling is the suspect as per this MSDN blog...
When splitting SQL strings over multiple lines, check that that you are comma separating your SQL string from your parameters (and not trying to concatenate them!) and not missing any spaces at the end of each split line. Not rocket science but hope I save someone a headache.
For example:
db.TableName.SqlQuery(
"SELECT Id, Timestamp, User " +
"FROM dbo.TableName " +
"WHERE Timestamp >= #from " +
"AND Timestamp <= #till;" + [USE COMMA NOT CONCATENATE!]
new SqlParameter("from", from),
new SqlParameter("till", till)),
.ToListAsync()
.Result;
Case Sensitivity will cause this problem, too.
#MyVariable and #myvariable are the same variables in SQL Server Man. Studio and will work. However, these variables will result in a "Must declare the scalar variable "#MyVariable" in Visual Studio (C#) due to case-sensitivity differences.
Just an answer for future me (maybe it helps someone else too!). If you try to run something like this in the query editor:
USE [Dbo]
GO
DECLARE #RC int
EXECUTE #RC = [dbo].[SomeStoredProcedure]
2018
,0
,'arg3'
GO
SELECT month, SUM(weight) AS weight, SUM(amount) AS amount
FROM SomeTable AS e
WHERE year = #year AND type = 'M'
And you get the error:
Must declare the scalar variable "#year"
That's because you are trying to run a bunch of code that includes BOTH the stored procedure execution AND the query below it (!). Just highlight the one you want to run or delete/comment out the one you are not interested in.
If someone else comes across this question while no solution here made my sql file working, here's what my mistake was:
I have been exporting the contents of my database via the 'Generate Script' command of Microsofts' Server Management Studio and then doing some operations afterwards while inserting the generated data in another instance.
Due to the generated export, there have been a bunch of "GO" statements in the sql file.
What I didn't know was that variables declared at the top of a file aren't accessible as far as a GO statement is executed. Therefore I had to remove the GO statements in my sql file and the error "Must declare the scalar variable xy" was gone!
As stated in https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/language-elements/sql-server-utilities-statements-go?view=sql-server-ver16 , the scope of a user-defined variable is batch dependent .
--This will produce the error
GO
DECLARE #MyVariable int;
SET #MyVariable = 1;
GO --new batch of code
SELECT #MyVariable--CAST(#MyVariable AS
int);
GO
--This will not produce the error
GO
DECLARE #MyVariable int;
SET #MyVariable = 1;
SELECT #MyVariable--CAST(#MyVariable AS int);
GO
We get the same error when we try to pass a variable inside a dynamic SQL:
GO
DECLARE #ColumnName VARCHAR(100),
#SQL NVARCHAR(MAX);
SET #ColumnName = 'FirstName';
EXECUTE ('SELECT [Title],#ColumnName FROM Person.Person');
GO
--In the case above #ColumnName is nowhere to be found, therefore we can either do:
EXECUTE ('SELECT [Title],' +#ColumnName+ ' FROM Person.Person');
or
GO
DECLARE #ColumnName VARCHAR(100),
#SQL NVARCHAR(MAX);
SET #ColumnName = 'FirstName';
SET #SQL = 'SELECT ' + #ColumnName + ' FROM Person.Person';
EXEC sys.sp_executesql #SQL
GO
Give a 'GO' after the end statement and select all the statements then execute