I have a distinct list of part numbers from one table. It is basically a table that contains a record of all the company's part numbers. I want to add columns that will pull data from different tables but only pertaining to the part number on that row of the distinct part list.
For example: if I have part A, B, C from the unique part list I want to add columns for Purchase quantity, repair quantity, loan quantity, etc... from three totally unique tables.
So it's almost like I need 3 subqueries that will sum of that data from the different tables for each part.
Can anybody steer me in the direction of how to do this? Please and thank you so much!
One method is correlated subqueries. Something like this:
select p.*,
(select count(*)
from purchases pu
where pu.part_id = p.part_id
) as num_purchases,
(select count(*)
from repairs r
where r.part_id = p.part_id
) as num_repairs,
(select count(*)
from loans l
where l.part_id = p.part_id
) as num_loans
from parts p;
Another option is joins with aggregation before the join. Or lateral joins (which are quite similar to correlated subqueries).
I have a table called orderItems which has two columns, quantity and unit price.It also has a foreign key ordernumber in that very table.
I have another table called ordergroup with primary key ordernumber, which contains SavedTotal column which is the order total based on quantity * unit price for all order item rows that reference that ordernumber.
Now what i struggle with is the sql query that can get all order items based on a certain ordernumber and calculate the total cost.
I have managed to do the multiplication but i am missing the SUM, here is my sql query(based on SQL Server) so far.
UPDATE OrderGroupNew
set OrderGroupNew.SavedTotal = OrderItemNew.UnitPrice*OrderItemNew.QUANTITY
FROM OrderItemNew
inner join OrderGroupNew on OrderItemNew.OrderNumber=OrderGroupNew.OrderNumber
any help is appreciated
UPDATE OrderGroupNew
SET SavedTotal = (
SELECT SUM(UnitPrice * Quantity)
FROM OrderItemNew
WHERE OrderNumber = OrderGroupNew.OrderNumber
)
You can use a TVP as well :
;With o as (
select OrderItemNew.OrderNumber as OrderNumber,
SUM(OrderItemNew.UnitPrice*OrderItemNew.QUANTITY) as OrderSum
Group by OrderItemNew.OrderNumber)
UPDATE OrderGroupNew
set OrderGroupNew.SavedTotal = o.OrderSum
FROM o
INNER JOIN OrderGroupNew on o.OrderNumber=OrderGroupNew.OrderNumber
Well the 1st answer is correct too. Choose the best in term of performance :) (dont know which will be the best, to be honest ! )
My SQL statements are not returning any results. I am using the table that are on the www.w3schools.com web site. I want to have all of the customer IDS in my Customers table match all of the CustomerIDS in the Orders table. The SQL statement works that it goes through the table and checks every CustomerID to every Orders.CustomersID and when it finds a match doesn't it return that record.
Question: Why does the SQL not return the row when both customerIDS are equal because there are values that will return true?
SQL Statement:
SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE Customers.CustomersID = Orders.CustomersID;
One last thought: What is the best free SQL database that can be downloaded without a lot of hassle for home use?
Try this:
SELECT Customers.*
FROM Customers
JOIN Orders ON Customers.CustomerID = Orders.CustomerID;
If you just want customers that have orders then use:
SELECT *
FROM Customers
WHERE CustomerID IN
(SELECT CustomerID FROM Orders)
If you use a JOIN you may get multiple records per customer (if the customer has multiple orders). You can solve that with DISTINCT but IMHO a IN clause is cleaner (and likely faster)
You need a query like this: SELECT *
FROM Customers c
INNER JOIN Orders o on c.CustomerID = o.CustomerID;
w3schools is a very bad resource.
Selecting the best database is a bad question for stackoverflow. But the answer is PostgreSQL. (And lots of other DBMSs would fit the bill for you as well.)
It wont let me upload image but columns are OrderID, CustomerName, CustomerAddress, ProductNumber, SellDate, ProductDescription
I am trying to teach myself SQL. Could someone please help me identify a few things?
1) I want to write a SQL statement that retrieves the customer name and address of the customer that placed order 7.
Is this right?
Select CustomerName, Address
From Order
Where OrderID = ‘7’
2)Next I want to write an SQL statement that adds a new order to the Order table.
Is this right?
INSERT INTO order(OrderID, CustomerName, CustomerAddress, ProductNumber, SellDate, ProductDescription)
VALUES (8, 'Ben C', '12 Kents Road', 01/15/2012, Clay :));
3) What is wrong with this data model and how would you redesign it? I really need help here. Does it need to be sorted? How could I describe a new high level design?
4) How would I move this data from an old model to a new model?
5)Using the new data model, I need to write a JOIN that retrieves the customer name and address of the customer that placed order 7. I have not gotten here yet because I am not sure why the old data model is bad.
First, you need to answer a question:
Can a customer place more than one order? If your answer is 'yes', would you like to have a customer catalog?
In this scenario, you need to normalize your database. First of all, you need to separate the data into logical sets; in this case, Customers, Products and Orders... I will asume that an order can have one or more products.
Then, design your tables (I will use MySQL style for the code):
Your customers catalog:
create table tbl_customers (
customerId int not null primary key,
customerName varchar(100),
customerAdress varchar(200)
);
Your products catalog:
create table tbl_products (
productNumber int not null primary key,
productName varchar(100),
);
Your orders catalog:
create table tbl_orders (
orderId int not null primary key,
orderDate date,
customerId int unsigned not null
);
For each order, you will need to know how many 'units' of which products you will be ordering:
create table tbl_orders_products (
orderProductId int not null primary key,
orderId int not null,
productNumber int not null,
units int,
);
After this, you will populate your tables with your data, and then you can perform whichever query fits you.
A few notes:
tbl_orders is related with tbl_customers... your customer's data will have to be inserted in tbl_customers before he can place an order.
Before you insert the order's details, you will need to create the order
Before you insert the order's details, you will need to populate tbl_products
This is just a way to solve it.
Hope this helps you
Now, if you want to move to this model, you have some work to do:
Populate your products catalog: insert into tbl_products values (1,'productA'), (2, 'productB'), ...
Populate your customers catalog
Then you can start placing your orders. I'll asume that you have the following customers:
customerId | customerName | customerAdress
---------------------------------------------
1 | John Doe | 31 elm street
2 | Jane Doe | 1223 park street
... and products:
productNumber | productName
------------------------------
1000 | Pencil
2000 | Paper clip
3000 | Bottled water
Now, placing an order is a two-step process: first, create the order record, and then insert the order details:
The order (Customer John Doe): insert into tbl_orders values (1, '2012-10-17', 1);
The order details (one pencil, ten paper clips): insert into tbl_orders_products values (1, 1, 1000, 1), (2, 1, 2000, 10);
Now, to select the customer for order seven (as stated in your question), you can use the following query:
select c.*
from tbl_customers as c
inner join tbl_orders as o on c.customerId = o.customerId
where o.orderId = 7;
This is just a start point. You should look for good books or online tutorials (w3 tutorials can be a good online 'place' to start).
Although I don't quite like MS Access, it's a good program to learn the basics of sql, and there're a lot of books and learning resources for it. Note: I don't like Access, and I don't mean to advertise it, but it might be a good learning tool.
First you need to normalise, there 's a lot of stuff around that, but loads of tutorials that try and take some common sense and make it really obscure
Looking at your column names I see three tables
Customers(CustomerID, CustomerName, CustomerAddress)
CustomerOrders(OrderID, CustomerID, SellDate, ProductNumber) Try not to name your tables and columns and such the same as Sql keywords.
Products(ProductNumber, ProductDescription)
Normalisation says things like, you should be able to uniquely identify any records in the table, you had that with OrderId. When I split the tables up I added CustomerID, because you could have more than one customer with the same name.
Another simple rule is in your structure, if you had more than one order for a customer, you would be storing their name and address more than once, which is wasteful, but the real problem, is what if that customer changes address? How do you find which rows to change, you could do Where name = "Fred" and Address = "Here", but you don't know if you have more than one customer called Fred with an address of Here.
So you first query would be a join
Select Customers.CustomerName,Customers.CustomerAddress From Customers
Inner join CustomerOrders On Customers.CustomerID = CustomerOrders.CustomerID
Where CustomerOrders.OrderID = 7
Or if you want to skip past learning joins for now, you could do it with two queries
Select CustomerID From CustomerOrders Where OrderID = 7
then
Select CustomerName,CustomerAddress From Customers Where CustomerID = ?
You should be using joins, but you might find sub-query a little easier to get your head round. You can do both queries at once with
Select CustomerID From CustomerOrders
Where CustomerID In (Select CustomerID From CustomerOrders Where OrderID = 7)
Don't know far you've got with sql table creation, but Primary and Foreign keys is two things to look at. That will let you put some rules in the database. A primary Key on CustomerOrders will stop you having two orders with the same ID, which would be bad.
A foreign Key would stop you creating a CustomerOrder for a customer that did not exist, and one to products for a product that doesn't.
Assuming you went down that route and you were looking to write an application to order things.
You'd probably have a function to maintain Customers which would add them with something like
Insert Into Customers(CustomerID,CustomerName,CustomerAddress) Values(1,'Fred Bloggs','England')
And one For Products
Insert Into Products(ProductNumber,ProductDescription) Values(1,'A thingamabob')
Then you'd choose a customer, so you have it's id, select a product so you have it's number, so you don't need to mess with CustomerName, CustomerAddress or ProductDescription
and
Insert Into CustomerOrders(OrderID,CustomerID,ProductNumber,SellDate) Values(1,1,1,'20121017')
Note the date format, if you are going to pass dates as strings to sql, (another topic this) do them in YYYYMMDD, when you get them back out with a select, you'll get them in the format your machine/database is set up for which in your case seems to be mm/dd/yyyy. The problem is I deduced that because I know there are only twelve months in the year. (One of the things that makes me a senior dev :) If your example selldate had been 1/5/2012, I'd have read that as the 1st May, because I'm configured for English. Avoid that ambiguity at all costs it will reach out and hurt you on a regular basis.
PS the way you did it 1/15/2012 would be treated as a mathematical expression as in 1 divided by 15 ...
So the reason you couldn't write a join is basically you only had one table. Join is join one table to another. Well actually it's a bit more complex than that, but that's a good way past where you are in the learning curve.
As for moving the data, be quicker to start again I should think. Unlikely you have created two different customers with the same name, but the queries to move the data, would have to take into account that you could have.
To move the data, assuming CustomerID is an Identity (Autonumber) column
Something like
Insert into Customers(CustomerName,CustomerAddress)
Select Distinct CustomerName,CustomerAddress From [Order]
Would do the job for Customers.
Then for products
Insert into Products(ProductDescription)
Select Distinct ProductDescription From [Order]
Then
Insert into CustomerOrders(OrderID,CustomerID,ProductNumber,SellDate)
Select old.OrderID,c.CustomerID,p.ProductNumber,old.SellDate
From [Order] old
Inner Join Products p On p.ProductDesription = old.ProductDescription
Inner Join Customers c On c.CustomerName = old.CustomerName And c.CustomerAddress = old.CustomerAddress
might do CustomerOrders I think
A simple tip. When modelling a data solution, try to write down simple sentences that describe the scenario. For example (ok, it is just a basic one):
An order is made up of many order lines
An order line refers a product
A customer create many orders
Here, the nouns describe the entities of your scenario. Then, for each entity, try to describe its property:
An order is characterized by a unique serial number, a date, a total. It refers a customer.
An order line refers to a product, and is characterized by a quantity, a unit price, a sub total
A customer....
An so on.
Well, in your model you roughly have to create a table for each entity. The table fields are taken from the property of each entity. For each field remeber to define the proper data type.
Ok, this is NOT a modelling tutorial, but it is a starting point, just to approach the solution.
I have a table B with cids and cities. I also have a table C that has these cids with extra information. I want to list all the cids in table C that are associated with ALL appearances of a given city in Table B.
My current solution relies on counting the number of times the given city appears in Table B and selecting only the cids that appear that many times. I don't know all the SQL syntax yet, but is there a way to select for this kind of pattern?
My current solution:
SELECT Agents.aid
FROM Agents, Customers, Orders
WHERE (Customers.city='Duluth')
AND (Agents.aid = Orders.aid)
AND (Customers.cid = Orders.cid)
GROUP BY Agents.aid
HAVING count(Agents.aid) > 1
It only works because I know right now with the HAVING statement.
Thanks for the help. I wasn't sure how to google this problem, since it's pretty specific.
EDIT: I'm pinpointing my problem a bit. I need to know how to determine if EVERY row in a table has a certain value for a field. Declaring a variable and counting the rows in a sub-selection and filtering out my results by IDs that appear that many times works, but It's really ugly.
There HAS to be a way to do this without explicitly count()ing rows. I hope.
Not an answer to your question, but a general improvement.
I'd recommend using JOIN syntax to join your tables together.
This would change your query to be:
SELECT Agents.aid
FROM Agents
INNER JOIN Orders
ON Agents.aid = Orders.aid
INNER JOIN Customers
ON Customers.cid = Orders.cid
WHERE Customers.city='Duluth'
GROUP BY Agents.aid
HAVING count(Agents.aid) > 1
What variant of SQL are you using?
To start with, you can (and should) use JOIN instead of doing it in the WHERE clause, e.g.,
select Agents.aid
from Agents
join Orders on Agents.aid = Orders.aid
join Customers on Customers.cid = Orders.cid
where Customers.city = 'Duluth'
group by Agents.aid
having count(Agents.aid) > 1
After that, I'm afraid I might be a little lost. Using the table names in your example query, what (in English, not pseudocode) are you trying to retrieve? For example, I think your sample query is retrieving the PK for all Agents that have been involved in at least 2 Orders involving Customers in Duluth.
Also, some table definitions for Agents, Orders, and Customers might help (then again, they might be irrelevant).
I'm not sure if I understood you problem, but I think the following query is what you want:
SELECT *
FROM customers b
INNER JOIN orders c USING (cid)
WHERE b.city = 'Duluth'
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM customers b2
WHERE b2.city = b.city
AND b2.cid <> cid);
Probably you will need some indexes on these columns.