Undo "Update" statement in SQL Server 2005 - sql-server-2005

I'm using SQL Server 2005 with FULL recovery model. I accidentally executed the UPDATE statement without specify the condition using WHERE clause.
UPDATE TABLE
SET Column1 = 'All'
Now all Column1 values are set to 'All'. And I need to undo the column1 values to the previous values.
Any idea?
ps:: I executed the UPDATE on 27-02-2016 and I have backup file that is on 21-02-2016.
Thanks.

If you don't commit it, you can do Rollback

Related

##ROWCOUNT check not detecting zero row count

I have a SQL Server Stored Procedure (using SQL Server 2008 R2) where it performs several different table updates. When rows have been updated I want to record information in an Audit table.
Here is my pseudo code:
UPDATE tblName SET flag = 'Y' WHERE flag = 'N'
IF ##ROWCOUNT > 0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO auditTable...etc
END
Unfortunately, even when zero rows are updated it still records the action in the audit table.
Note: There are no related triggers on the table being updated.
Any ideas why this could be happening?
Any statement that is executed in T-SQL will set the ##rowcount, even the if statement, so the general rule is to capture the value in the statement following the statement you're interested in.
So after
update table set ....
you want
Select #mycount = ##Rowcount
Then you use this value to do your flow control or messages.
As the docs state, even a simple variable assignment will set the ##rowcount to 1.
This is why it's important in this case that if you want people to diagnose the problem then you need to provide the actual code, not pseudo code.

is insert into.. select statement transactional?

do i need to use transaction to provide all or not proposition for the following insert process?
INSERT INTO table1 ( column1 , column2)
SELECT col1, col2
FROM table2
expecting average row-count from table2 is around 150 and target database is ms sql server 2008 r2.
No, you don't need to. A single SQL statement is already in a transaction by default so there is no way that you will partually insert results or that results will be meanwhile moderated by another transaction. The fact that 2 tables are involved doesn't change the fact that a single SQL statement is used.
As your simple insert will not needed.
By default sqlserver manage this thing and at the end commit whatever you did.
If you explicitly want when multiple statement executed of insert/update or when you want to parent/child inserted in single unit of work, then you use transaction as
tran
declare #parentId int =0;
insert statement ---parent
set #parentId= ##identity
insert statement --child entry
values ( #parentId,...)
If ##ERROR > 0 then
ROLLBACK
else
COMMIT
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/4451/SQL-Server-Transactions-and-Error-Handling
or you can use try catch block as c# in sqlserver side too.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms175976.aspx

update error and rollback transaction

I have 3 tables ticket_addresses,tickets,['2014nosec add']. I want to update this ticket_addresses table but unfortunately i have run this query and it updated the entire table where the column ta_address_2 with '.'.
my doubt is my query is wrong because the from table ['2014nosec add'] is different from the update table and it does not have ta-address-2 column on it should give me an error because the from table is not the in the list.
is there any way to rollback the update query as i have not used it as transaction . I am using sql server managament studio.
update
ticket_addresses set ta_address_2 = '.'
FROM ['2014nosec add'] inner join tickets ------> I think this is wrong here.. it should be ticket_addresses table(right)
on ['2014nosec add'].[PCN] = tickets.t_reference
where ta_address_2 = ''
and ta_address_1 <> ' ' and t_camera_ticket = '-1'
and
convert (datetime,t_date_time_issued,101) between convert(datetime,'2014/04/15',101) and convert (datetime,'2014/06/06',101)
By default SQL Server using "Autocommit" mode for transaction management. So you can't rollback this query because it already commited.

SQL Server 2000 - Update rows and return updated rows

I am wondering how to rewrite the following SQL Server 2005/2008 script for SQL Server 2000 which didn't have OUTPUT yet.
Basically, I would like to update rows and return the updated rows without creating deadlocks.
Thanks in advance!
UPDATE TABLE
SET Locked = 1
OUTPUT INSERTED.*
WHERE Locked = 0
You can't in SQL Server 2000 cleanly
What you can do is use a transaction and some lock hints to prevent a race condition. Your main problem is 2 processes accessing the same row(s), not a deadlock. See SQL Server Process Queue Race Condition for more, please.
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SELECT * FROM TABLE WITH (ROWLOCK, READPAST, UPDLOCK) WHERE Locked = 0
UPDATE TABLE
SET Locked = 1
WHERE Locked = 0
COMMIT TRANSACTION
I haven't tried this, but you could also try a SELECT in an UPDATE trigger from INSERTED.

How can I do a BEFORE UPDATED trigger with sql server?

I'm using Sqlserver express and I can't do before updated trigger. There's a other way to do that?
MSSQL does not support BEFORE triggers. The closest you have is INSTEAD OF triggers but their behavior is different to that of BEFORE triggers in MySQL.
You can learn more about them here, and note that INSTEAD OF triggers "Specifies that the trigger is executed instead of the triggering SQL statement, thus overriding the actions of the triggering statements." Thus, actions on the update may not take place if the trigger is not properly written/handled. Cascading actions are also affected.
You may instead want to use a different approach to what you are trying to achieve.
It is true that there aren't "before triggers" in MSSQL. However, you could still track the changes that were made on the table, by using the "inserted" and "deleted" tables together. When an update causes the trigger to fire, the "inserted" table stores the new values and the "deleted" table stores the old values. Once having this info, you could relatively easy simulate the "before trigger" behaviour.
Can't be sure if this applied to SQL Server Express, but you can still access the "before" data even if your trigger is happening AFTER the update. You need to read the data from either the deleted or inserted table that is created on the fly when the table is changed. This is essentially what #Stamen says, but I still needed to explore further to understand that (helpful!) answer.
The deleted table stores copies of the affected rows during DELETE and
UPDATE statements. During the execution of a DELETE or UPDATE
statement, rows are deleted from the trigger table and transferred to
the deleted table...
The inserted table stores copies of the affected rows during INSERT
and UPDATE statements. During an insert or update transaction, new
rows are added to both the inserted table and the trigger table...
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191300.aspx
So you can create your trigger to read data from one of those tables, e.g.
CREATE TRIGGER <TriggerName> ON <TableName>
AFTER UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO <HistoryTable> ( <columns...>, DateChanged )
SELECT <columns...>, getdate()
FROM deleted;
END;
My example is based on the one here:
http://www.seemoredata.com/en/showthread.php?134-Example-of-BEFORE-UPDATE-trigger-in-Sql-Server-good-for-Type-2-dimension-table-updates
sql-server triggers
T-SQL supports only AFTER and INSTEAD OF triggers, it does not feature a BEFORE trigger, as found in some other RDBMSs.
I believe you will want to use an INSTEAD OF trigger.
All "normal" triggers in SQL Server are "AFTER ..." triggers. There are no "BEFORE ..." triggers.
To do something before an update, check out INSTEAD OF UPDATE Triggers.
To do a BEFORE UPDATE in SQL Server I use a trick. I do a false update of the record (UPDATE Table SET Field = Field), in such way I get the previous image of the record.
Remember that when you use an instead trigger, it will not commit the insert unless you specifically tell it to in the trigger. Instead of really means do this instead of what you normally do, so none of the normal insert actions would happen.
Full example:
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trig_020_Original_010_010_Gamechanger]
ON [dbo].[T_Original]
AFTER UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE #Old_Gamechanger int;
DECLARE #New_Gamechanger int;
-- Insert statements for trigger here
SELECT #Old_Gamechanger = Gamechanger from DELETED;
SELECT #New_Gamechanger = Gamechanger from INSERTED;
IF #Old_Gamechanger != #New_Gamechanger
BEGIN
INSERT INTO [dbo].T_History(ChangeDate, Reason, Callcenter_ID, Old_Gamechanger, New_Gamechanger)
SELECT GETDATE(), 'Time for a change', Callcenter_ID, #Old_Gamechanger, #New_Gamechanger
FROM deleted
;
END
END
The updated or deleted values are stored in DELETED. we can get it by the below method in trigger
Full example,
CREATE TRIGGER PRODUCT_UPDATE ON PRODUCTS
FOR UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #PRODUCT_NAME_OLD VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE #PRODUCT_NAME_NEW VARCHAR(100)
SELECT #PRODUCT_NAME_OLD = product_name from DELETED
SELECT #PRODUCT_NAME_NEW = product_name from INSERTED
END