I'm experiencing trouble returning a query to return all columns within a table but limited to the DATE-data-type "enroll_date" column containing '30-Jan-07'; the closest solution is with the below query but neither data is displayed nor the entire workbook-just the column-which leads me to believe that this is not just an issue with approach but perhaps a formatting issue as well.
SELECT TO_DATE(enroll_date, 'DD-MM-YY')
FROM student.enrollment
WHERE enroll_date= '30-Jan-07';
Again, I need to display all columns but only rows only specific to the date '30-Jan-07'. I'm sure a nested solution is ideal and somehow the right solution, but unfortunately my chops aren't there yet but I'm working on it! :D
UPDATE
Please see attached screenshot of output. The query/solution should retrieve all columns and rows enclosed within the red-rectangle mark-up-thank you!
One possible problem is that the date column has a time component (this is hidden in SQL). One method is to use trunc():
SELECT e.*
FROM student.enrollment e
WHERE TRUNC(e.enroll_date) = DATE '2007-01-30';
You can specify whichever columns you want in the following query:
SELECT col1, col2, col3, ...
FROM student.enrollment
WHERE TO_CHAR(enroll_date, 'DD-MON-YY') = '30-JAN-07';
Related
Is it possible to group and the following data in pgsql:
(TL;DR: Note the similar target entries for the two print_names qz.M2 and qz.M1)
print_name
target
qz.R
q3zA
qz.S
NULL
qz.M1
q2zA
qz.M1
q1zA
qz.M2
q2zA
qz.M2
q1zA
in such a way that the distinct values of target are still in the result while the doubling of qz.M* is avoided.
The result desired would therefore be:
print_name
target
qz.R
q3zA
qz.S
NULL
qz.M1
q2zA
qz.M2
q1zA
I tried:
SELECT min(target) FROM Table GROUP BY print_name;
However, this of course only yields one of two entries in target.
Thank you for your help!
I dont think this is achievable without casing specific print_name if you want consistent answer.
SELECT t.print_name
FROM Table t
CASE
WHEN t.print_name = 'qz.M1' THEN max(t.target)
WHEN t.print_name = 'qz.M2' THEN min(t.target)
ELSE t.target END as Target
GROUP BY t.print_name
Your desired results would seem to indicate just a simple aggregate:
select print_name, Max(target) target
from t
group by print_name
Note your sample data does not include any reliable method or sorting, max() will be based on string ordering.
I am currently working on an access database where we collect customers feedback.
I have one table with the following structure and data :
And I want to display the following result :
Indeed, what I want is a MS Access Request that displays, for every date value in my table, the amount of records that matches the same date on the column "date_import" (2nd column of the result) and the amount of records that matches this criteria on the column "date_answered" (3rd column of the result).
I have no idea how to do this since all the subqueries should be aware of each other.
Has anyone ever faced this issue and might be able to help me ?
Thanks in advance,
P.S. : I'm using the 2016 version of MS Access but I'm pretty sure what I'm trying to do is also achievable in previous versions of Access, this is what I added several tags.
Hmmm . . . I think this will work:
select dte, sum(is_contact), sum(is_answer)
from (select date_import as dte, 1 as is_contact, 0 as is_answer
from t
union all
select date_answers, 0 as is_contact, 1 as is_answer
from t
) t
group by dte;
Not all versions of MS Access allow union all in the FROM clause. If that is a problem, you can create a view and then select from the view.
Correction - I only need to Pick the WORK value every result set in the column will contain comma seperated values like below..
"SICK 0.08, WORK 0.08" or "SICK 0.08,WORK 0.08"
I only need to pick WORK 0.08 from this.
I am quite new to SQL
I am using the following script to get some results;
select Work.Work_summary, Work.emp_id
from Work
all work fine. but the first column has values like the following :
WORK 08.57, SICK 08.56 (Some columns)
SICK 07.80, WORK 06.80 , OT 02.00 (Some columns)
How can i only retrieve the column with only the WORK% value, if there is no WORK value the results shall be empty.
select Work_summary, emp_id
from Work
where Work_summary like '%WORK%'
This will return the rows in the Work table where Work_summary column contains the word WORK. See the documentation for more details.
Contains is faster than like.
SELECT Work_summary, emp_id FROM Work WHERE CONTAINS(Work_summary, 'WORK');
then use: this will give only the result where work summary contains work content.
select Work.Work_summary, Work.emp_id
from Work where contains(work.Work_summary ,'work');
select replace(Work_summary,",","") as work_summary
from Work
where upper(Work_summary) like '%WORK%'
I am using SQL server 2005, querying with Web Developer 2010, and the min function appears to be returning more than one value (for each ID returned, see below). Ideally I would like it to just return the one for each ID.
SELECT Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
MIN(Production.WorksOrderOperations.OperationNumber) AS Expr1,
Production.Resources.ResourceCode,
Production.Resources.ResourceDescription,
Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.PartNumber,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedQuantity,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedSetTime,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedRunTime
FROM Production.WorksOrderOperations
INNER JOIN Production.Resources
ON Production.WorksOrderOperations.ResourceID = Production.Resources.ResourceID
INNER JOIN Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View
ON Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber = Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.WorksOrderNumber
WHERE Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber IN
( SELECT WorksOrderNumber
FROM Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View AS WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View_1
WHERE (WorksOrderSuffixStatus = 'Proposed'))
AND Production.Resources.ResourceCode IN ('1303', '1604')
GROUP BY Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
Production.Resources.ResourceCode,
Production.Resources.ResourceDescription,
Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.PartNumber,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedQuantity,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedSetTime,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedRunTime
If you can get your head around it, I am selecting certain columns from multiple tables where the WorksOrderNumber is also contained within a subquery, and numerous other conditions.
Result set looks a little like this, have blurred out irrelevant data.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/5UFIp.png (Wouldn't let me embed image).
The highlighted rows are NOT supposed to be there, I cannot explicitly filter them out, as this result set will be updated daily and it is likely to happen with a different record.
I have tried casting and converting the OperationNumber to numerous other data types, varchar type returns '100' instead of the '30'. Also tried searching search engines, no one seems to have the same problem.
I did not structure the tables (they're horribly normalised), and it is not possible to restructure them.
Any ideas appreciated, many thanks.
The MIN function returns the minimum within the group.
If you want the minimum for each ID you need to get group on just ID.
I assume that by "ID" you are referring to Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber.
You can add this as a "table" in your SQL:
(SELECT Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
MIN(Production.WorksOrderOperations.OperationNumber)
FROM Production.WorksOrderOperations
GROUP BY Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber)
I'm having trouble with Microsoft Access 2003, it's complaining about this statement:
select cardnr
from change
where year(date)<2009
group by cardnr
having max(time+date) = (time+date) and cardto='VIP'
What I want to do is, for every distinct cardnr in the table change, to find the row with the latest (time+date) that is before year 2009, and then just select the rows with cardto='VIP'.
This validator says it's OK, Access says it's not OK.
This is the message I get: "you tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression 'max(time+date)=time+date and cardto='VIP' and cardnr=' as part of an aggregate function."
Could someone please explain what I'm doing wrong and the right way to do it? Thanks
Note: The field and table names are translated and do not collide with any reserved words, I have no trouble with the names.
Try to think of it like this - HAVING is applied after the aggregation is done.
Therefore it can not compare to unaggregated expressions (neither for time+date, nor for cardto).
However, to get the last (principle is the same for getting rows related to other aggregated functions as weel) time and date you can do something like:
SELECT cardnr
FROM change main
WHERE time+date IN (SELECT MAX(time+date)
FROM change sub
WHERE sub.cardnr = main.cardnr AND
year(date)<2009
AND cardto='VIP')
(assuming that date part on your time field is the same for all the records; having two fields for date/time is not in your best interest and also using reserved words for field names can backfire in certain cases)
It works because the subquery is filtered only on the records that you are interested in from the outer query.
Applying the same year(date)<200 and cardto='VIP' to the outer query can improve performance further.