As read here Can a raw Lucene index be loaded by Solr? Lucene indexes can be imported into Solr. This works well when the Solr server is not running (creating a Solr core folder structure in the data folder with all the needed configuration files) but it does not work when the Solr server is up and running.
Is there any call (via rest endpoint or java api) to tell Solr to re-scan the data folder?
You want to generate an index with lucene (outsite solr) and insert this to solr without restart.
You must not change the index-folder directly. But you can create a new core which point to the already build index folder and switch/swap the core with the (outdated) old one. Or you can merge the new index-Folder in the old core.
All this can be done by the solrj admin api.
e.g. create:
CoreAdminRequest.Create req = new CoreAdminRequest.Create();
req.setConfigName(configName);
req.setSchemaName(schemaName);
req.setDataDir(dataDir);
req.setCoreName(coreName);
req.setInstanceDir(instanceDir);
req.setIsTransient(true);
req.setIsLoadOnStartup(false); // <= unless its productive core.
return req.process(adminServer);
e.g. the swap:
CoreAdminRequest request = new CoreAdminRequest();
request.setAction(CoreAdminAction.SWAP);
request.setCoreName(coreName1);
request.setOtherCoreName(coreName2);
request.process(solrClient);
For SolrCloud use the first "create" approach with the collections api and use alias instead of swap.
e.g. the alias:
CollectionAdminRequest.CreateAlias req = new CollectionAdminRequest.CreateAlias();
req.setAliasedCollections(coreName);
req.setAliasName(aliasName);
return req.process(solrClient);
Related
With (the latest) lucene 8.7 is it possible to open a .cfs compound index file generated by lucene 2.2 of around 2009, in a legacy application that I cannot modify, with lucene utility "Luke" ?
or alternatively could it be possibile to generate the .idx file for Luke from the .cfs ?
the .cfs was generated by compass on top of lucene 2.2, not by lucene directly
Is it possible to use a compass generated index containing :
_b.cfs
segments.gen
segments_d
possibly with solr ?
are there any examples how to open a file based .cfs index with compass anywhere ?
the conversion tool won't work because the index version is too old :
from lucene\build\demo :
java -cp ../core/lucene-core-8.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar;../backward-codecs/lucene-backward-codecs-8.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar org.apache.lucene.index.IndexUpgrader -verbose path_of_old_index
and the searchfiles demo :
java -classpath ../core/lucene-core-8.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar;../queryparser/lucene-queryparser-8.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar;./lucene-demo-8.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar org.apache.lucene.demo.SearchFiles -index path_of_old_index
both fail with :
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFormatTooOldException: Format version is not supported
This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 6.0 and later.
Is is possible to use an old index with lucene somehow ? how to use the old "codec" ?
also from lucene.net if possible ?
current lucene 8.7 yields an index containing these files :
segments_1
write.lock
_0.cfe
_0.cfs
_0.si
==========================================================================
update : amazingly it seems to open that very old format index with lucene.net v. 3.0.3 from nuget !
this seems to work in order to extract all terms from the index :
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Globalization;
using Lucene.Net.Analysis.Standard;
using Lucene.Net.Documents;
using Lucene.Net.Index;
using Lucene.Net.QueryParsers;
using Lucene.Net.Search;
using Lucene.Net.Store;
using Version = Lucene.Net.Util.Version;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
var reader = IndexReader.Open(FSDirectory.Open("C:\\Temp\\ftsemib_opzioni\\v210126135604\\index\\search_0"), true);
Console.WriteLine("number of documents: "+reader.NumDocs() + "\n");
Console.ReadLine();
TermEnum terms = reader.Terms();
while (terms.Next())
{
Term term = terms.Term;
String termField = term.Field;
String termText = term.Text;
int frequency = reader.DocFreq(term);
Console.WriteLine(termField +" "+termText);
}
var fieldNames = reader.GetFieldNames(IndexReader.FieldOption.ALL);
int numFields = fieldNames.Count;
Console.WriteLine("number of fields: " + numFields + "\n");
for (IEnumerator<String> iter = fieldNames.GetEnumerator(); iter.MoveNext();)
{
String fieldName = iter.Current;
Console.WriteLine("field: " + fieldName);
}
reader.Close();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
out of curiosity could it be possible to find out what index version it is ?
are there any examples of (old) compass with file system based index ?
Unfortunately you can't use an old Codec to access index files from Lucene 2.2. This is because codecs were introduced in Lucene 4.0. Prior to that the code for reading and writing files of the index was not grouped together into a codec but rather was just inherently part of the overall Lucene Library.
So in version of Lucene prior to 4.0 there is no codec, just file reading and writing code baked into the library. It would be very difficult to track down all that code and to create a codec that could be plugged into a modern version of Lucene. It's not an impossible task, but it require an Expert Lucene developer and a large amount of effort (ie an extremely expensive endeavor).
In light of all that, the answer to this SO question may be of some use: How to upgrade lucene files from 2.2 to 4.3.1
Update
Your best bet would be to use an old 3.x copy of java lucene or the Lucene.net ver 3.0.3 to open the index, then add and commit one doc (which will create a 2nd segment) and do a Optimize which will cause the two segments to be merged into one new segment. The new segment will be a version 3 segment. Then you can use Lucene.Net 4.8 Beta or a Java Lucene 4.X to do the same thing (but Commit was renamed ForceMerge starting in ver 4) again to convert the index to a 4.x index.
Then you can use the current java version of Lucene 8.x to do this once more to move the index all the way up to 8 since the current version of Java Lucene has codecs reaching all the way back to 5.0 see: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs
However if you do receive the error again that you reported:
This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 6.0 and later.
then you will have to play this game one more cycle with a version 6.x Java Lucene to get from a 5.x index to a 6.x index. :-)
These are great guides for migrating between the different versions of NuGet package:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/Azure.Storage.Blobs_12.6.0/sdk/storage/Azure.Storage.Blobs/README.md
https://elcamino.cloud/articles/2020-03-30-azure-storage-blobs-net-sdk-v12-upgrade-guide-and-tips.html
However I am struggling to migrate the following concepts in my code:
// Return if a directory exists:
container.GetDirectoryReference(path).ListBlobs().Any();
where GetDirectoryReference is not understood and there appears to be no direct translation.
Also, the concept of a CloudBlobDirectory does not appear to have made it into Azure.Storage.Blobs e.g.
private static long GetDirectorySize(CloudBlobDirectory directoryBlob) {
long size = 0;
foreach (var blobItem in directoryBlob.ListBlobs()) {
if (blobItem is BlobClient)
size += ((BlobClient) blobItem).GetProperties().Value.ContentLength;
if (blobItem is CloudBlobDirectory)
size += GetDirectorySize((CloudBlobDirectory) blobItem);
}
return size;
}
where CloudBlobDirectory does not appear anywhere in the API.
There's no such thing as physical directories or folders in Azure Blob Storage. The directories you sometimes see are part of the blob (e.g. folder1/folder2/file1.txt). The List Blobs requests allows you to add a prefix and delimiter in a call, which are used by the Azure Portal and Azure Data Explorer to create a visualization of folders. As example prefix folder1/ and delimiter / would allow you to see the content as if folder1 was opened.
That's exactly what happens in your code. The GetDirectoryReference() adds a prefix. The ListBlobs() fires a request and Any() checks if any items return.
For V12 the command that'll allow you to do the same would be GetBlobsByHierarchy and its async version. In your particular case where you only want to know if any blobs exist in the directory a GetBlobs with prefix would also suffice.
Symfony2 was looking so promising, powerful and flexible. So we were going to use Symfony2 + mongodb for one of our projects. But it appeared too slow (Apache/2.2.25 + PHP/5.4.20). Currently the app is pretty simple. but I have noticed that the httpd.exe lads CPU up to 28% when some simple page is loaded. The page is quite lite - just user profile info and the list of his posts. I even can't imagine how hundreds of users can be served (not even talking about numbers like 100k users) if performance will not be much better.
For instance the CPU load is 2% when opening the heavy 'products' page of ActivationCloud account (which fetches a good amount of data) (PHP+Smarty+SQL).
After taking a look on Xdebug output, I have found that a gret deal of time 20% is utilized by ClassLoader->loadClass(...) - 265 calls
After performing the following steps:
*generated class map
php composer.phar dump-autoload --optimize
*installed and enabled APC
[APC]
extension=php_apc.dll
apc.enabled=1
apc.shm_segments=1
;32M per WordPress install
apc.shm_size=128M
;Relative to the number of cached files (you may need to
watch your stats for a day or two to find out a good number)
apc.num_files_hint=7000
;Relative to the size of WordPress
apc.user_entries_hint=4096
;The number of seconds a cache entry is allowed to idle
in a slot before APC dumps the cache
apc.ttl=7200
apc.user_ttl=7200
apc.gc_ttl=3600
;Setting this to 0 will give you the best performance, as APC will
;not have to check the IO for changes. However, you must clear
;the APC cache to recompile already cached files. If you are still
;developing, updating your site daily in WP-ADMIN, and running W3TC
;set this to 1
apc.stat=1
;This MUST be 0, WP can have errors otherwise!
apc.include_once_override=0
;Only set to 1 while debugging
apc.enable_cli=0
;Allow 2 seconds after a file is created before
it is cached to prevent users from seeing half-written/weird pages
apc.file_update_protection=2
;Leave at 2M or lower. WordPress does't have any file sizes close to 2M
apc.max_file_size=2M
;Ignore files
apc.filters = "/var/www/apc.php"
apc.cache_by_default=1
apc.use_request_time=1
apc.slam_defense=0
apc.mmap_file_mask=/var/www/temp/apc.XXXXXX
apc.stat_ctime=0
apc.canonicalize=1
apc.write_lock=1
apc.report_autofilter=0
apc.rfc1867=0
apc.rfc1867_prefix =upload_
apc.rfc1867_name=APC_UPLOAD_PROGRESS
apc.rfc1867_freq=0
apc.rfc1867_ttl=3600
apc.lazy_classes=0
apc.lazy_functions=0
expected a miracle after it but it did not happen.
*enabled APC class loader - in Symfony\web\app.php uncommented
/*
$loader = new ApcClassLoader('sf2', $loader);
$loader->register(true);
*/
The ClassLoader->loadClass(...) got better 'Self' is 11 instead of 21
Frankly speaking I was shocked by what I saw in xdebug :( a lot of repetitive calls like Container->get(...) -317 calls, DocumentManager->getClassMeataData(...) - 301 calls. Totally more than 2k of function calls. Hard to believe that.
These bundles are installed:
class AppKernel extends Kernel
{
public function registerBundles()
{
$bundles = array(
new Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\FrameworkBundle(),
new Symfony\Bundle\SecurityBundle\SecurityBundle(),
new Symfony\Bundle\TwigBundle\TwigBundle(),
new Symfony\Bundle\MonologBundle\MonologBundle(),
new Symfony\Bundle\SwiftmailerBundle\SwiftmailerBundle(),
new Symfony\Bundle\AsseticBundle\AsseticBundle(),
new Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\DoctrineBundle(),
new Doctrine\Bundle\MongoDBBundle\DoctrineMongoDBBundle(),
new Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\SensioFrameworkExtraBundle(),
new HWI\Bundle\OAuthBundle\HWIOAuthBundle(),
new Knp\Bundle\MenuBundle\KnpMenuBundle(),
... our bundles ...
);
if (in_array($this->getEnvironment(), array('dev', 'test'))) {
$bundles[] = new Symfony\Bundle\WebProfilerBundle\WebProfilerBundle();
$bundles[] = new Sensio\Bundle\DistributionBundle\SensioDistributionBundle();
$bundles[] = new Sensio\Bundle\GeneratorBundle\SensioGeneratorBundle();
}
return $bundles;
}
It was sad to find that Symfony2 got one of the worst benchmark results among others php frameworks http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r8&hw=i7&test=json&l=sg
At the same time Francois Zaninotto said in his blog http://symfony.com/blog/who-really-uses-symfony that Yahoo uses Symfony2 for the bookmarks service, tried some apps form the list http://trac.symfony-project.org/wiki/ApplicationsDevelopedWithSymfony - they are not looking slow also on Quora http://www.quora.com/Who-is-using-Symfony2-in-production its spoken that dailymotion is using it as well.
How to make the performance acceptable?
Got Symfony working x10 faster after adding the
realpath_cache_size = 4096k
to php.ini
First you should use linux (you mentioned https.exe so I think you are using windows). Than you should use nginx instead of apache and php-5.5 with fpm instead of mod_php. Opcache instead of apc (by the way apc.stat should be turned off). Doctrine caches should be turned on and than you should use http caching wherever you can. (You can view packagist's code for some hints.)
I am using SolrJ for indexing my data. I am updating the Synonym.txt file dynamically but Solr server is not getting the latest changes from Synonym.txt file, my previous question is how to update synonym.txt file dynamically?
So I have to reload/restart the Solr core programatically...
so how can I do that...?
thanks in advance...
The following code should be what you're looking for:
CoreAdminRequest adminRequest = new CoreAdminRequest();
adminRequest.setAction(CoreAdminAction.RELOAD);
CoreAdminResponse adminResponse = adminRequest.process(new HttpSolrServer(solrUrl));
NamedList<NamedList<Object>> coreStatus = adminResponse.getCoreStatus();
SolrJ contains a static convenience method for that in CoreAdminRequest class:
reloadCore("<YOUR_CORE_NAME>", solrClient)
I use Hibernate search for full text search in my web application. I have button for index creation in admin panel. I do it by this code:
fullTextSession.createIndexer()
.purgeAllOnStart(true)
.optimizeAfterPurge(true)
.optimizeOnFinish(true)
.batchSizeToLoadObjects( 25 )
.threadsToLoadObjects( 5 )
.threadsForSubsequentFetching( 20 )
.startAndWait();
If index was build correctly and then I push this button again old index files still on disk and program creates new index. And so on. Can you help me remove old index files before creating new?
I do a similar thing but only when I shut my app down do I remove the indexes and then I set them up again on startup.
Have you tried calling purgeAll() instead of purgeAllOnStart()? That is what I call on app shutdown and it works. To be safe, after I purge the indexes I actually delete my index directory and all files / folders it contains from disk as well.