I am trying to create a pre-configured MSI file for WinZip Courier 6 (latest version) within a CMD script (eventually deploying on SCCM).
The main MSI property to turn off automatic zipping is "AlwaysZipAttachments" which it set to "0".
Now according to the official WinZip Courier site, the "0" value only allows the User to be able to turn the feature off!
So this does not completely turn auto zipping off!
Has anybody came across a solution to turn auto zipping off through with editing/adding registry keys, or adding an MSI property to the MSI Courier file?
I hope this is clear.
Thank you very much
REG_SENDITEM Default=1, auto zipping of attachments is on; off=0
You should use REG_SENDITEM instead...
Related
What is the standard way to handle web.config files during major upgrade.I'm aware how the unversioned files are handled during upgrade,the file will not be replaced if the file has been modified by the user.
Is there a way to deal with the scenario where in there are new entries added to config file bundled with the latest installer that needs to be installed,and also retain the existing entries modified by the user during major upgrade in Wix.
The simple solution that a lot of my customers have liked is to not put user data in the web.config. Instead we use the AppSettings#file and ConnectionStrings#ConfigSource elements to specify an override file and keep the user data there. What MSI doesn't know about it won't tamper with. Now you don't have to be an MSI component rules wizard.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228154(v=vs.85).aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.configuration.sectioninformation.configsource(v=vs.100).aspx
I know the question is for Wix, but just wanted to point out how much time commercial tools can save in such scenarios.
For example, using Advanced Installer you can read and load into an MSI property any XML values and then use the XML Files updater to write dynamic content in the files, at install(upgrade) time. (check the videos at the end of each article for a quicker overview)
Disclaimer: I work on the team building Advanced Installer.
Set the component to always overwrite and write a custom action to add the needed information to the config file.
The only way that seems possible is a custom action to merge the entries in the new file into the existing file, because you want data from the existing a new files. You would also need the upgrade scheduled late (after InstallExecute) so that the upgrade isn't an uninstall of the old product followed by an install of the new product.
If you are doing an upgrade (the WIX_UPGRADE_DETECTED property will be set by a MajorUpgrade element), so update the existing file, otherwise install the new one.
There might be a way to express the updates as an Xml transform, so something in the WiX util:xml tools might help do an update.
I am working on an installer with WiX which takes a "name" input from the user using a textbox in a dialog. This name will be used to name the product that i am installing.
But, i am not able to set the product name dynamically during install. Even if i use a custom action, the registry entry is getting created with the static name that i have provided earlier. This is ultimately leading to inconsistency.
Can anyone please help me regarding this?
This cannot be done in a custom action. It's true that you can set the ProductName property in a custom action (such as a type 51) early in the install and that will indeed change the name in the UI, but it will NOT change the name of the installed product - it will remain the same as the original value. For example, enumerating installed products will return the original name.
So the only good way to do this is to modify the ProductName in the MSI file before you launch it. You would have a launching program that modifies the MSI file and then installs it. The MSI file is a database that can be modified in the Property table to change the value of ProductName. This example will give you the general idea:
How do I add/update a property inside an MSI from the command-line?
but basically you open the open the database (MsiOpenDatabase or equivalent) then MsiOpenView with a SQL such as:
"UPDATE Property SET Property.Value = 'Your variable' WHERE Property.Property = 'CurrentProductName' "
then MsiViewExecute and close handles etc. Details depend on your preferred coding language environment.
This is not an ideal solution because if your MSI file is digitally signed you have tampered with it and it is no longer correct.
Another way is to generate a transform file, based on altering a copy of the MSI file. If you make a copy of the MSI file, and then do the alteration of ProductName as above you can then do an MsiDatabaseGenerateTransform() call which will generate a transform file, a .mst file, the difference between the two MSI files. You then install the original unaltered MSI file with a command line that includes TRANSFORMS=[the .mst file] which will update the ProductName and start the install.
None of this is very easy because Windows Installer products are not designed to have dynamic product names. Maybe historically and before Windows Installer setups this was more practical, but not in MSI setups.
Installers of previous versions of our software include a Component File that was NOT marked with Permanent="Yes". Now, we wish to read the pre-upgrade contents of this file during the upgrade process, which will overwrite the file with different contents. Is there a good way to do this?
It would help if you said exactly what you were doing that would cause the file to be overwritten. Some major upgrades (is that what you're doing?) will do a complete uninstall of the product first, followed by a complete install of the newer product. If that's the situation then use a custom action sequenced before RemoveExistingProducts to back up the file somewhere so that your application can retrieve the content, or get the content you need before it's ovewritten.
If you are doing a major upgrade sequenced later (such as afterInstallExecute) or you are doing a patch then it is by no means certain that the file will be overwritten because file overwrite rules will not replace a file that has been updated since it was installed. If the application altered the file then this type of upgrade will not overwrite it:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa370531(v=vs.85).aspx
Or in the case that the file is unchanged since it was installed, change the dates so it appears to be modified, as described here:
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/astebner/2013/05/23/updating-the-last-modified-time-to-prevent-windows-installer-from-updating-an-unversioned-file/
It's also not clear that Permanent=yes is what you want anyway - that would glue the file to the system forever. You may be thinking of NeverOverwrite, but it's typically not required if the app changes the files, and easier to decide at upgrade time (by changing dates) instead of committing to NeverOverwrite when it's sometimes unclear what the product may need in the future.
A comment refers to retrieving the previous version of the product during the upgrade. There are a number of ways to do this:
If you know the ProductCode of the previous version, MsiGetProductInfo (and equivalents in script etc) will return product version values or strings:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa370130(v=vs.85).aspx
Or if you'd rather not hardcode the value, MsiEnumProducts passing the UpgradeCode will return a list of installed ProductCodes. This technique is most useful if you have your own bootstrapper or UI where you want to show the user the current installed version.
In a WiX major upgrade the associated property (WIX_UPGRADE_DETECTED) is a list of the ProductCodes detected (usually a list of one) so you can use that to get the version of the product being upgraded. In a small vbscript example, something like:
set installer = CreateObject("WindowsInstaller.Installer")
and:
prodversionstring = installer.productinfo(WIX_UPGRADE_DETECTED, "VersionString")
will get you close.
Assuming this file is a configuration file such as an XML file, I find this is just a tough area of Windows Installer. You ship file version 1, the end user modifies certain attributes and then you ship file version 2 to which you want to preserve those customizations.
The problem is this is a very complex merge. It works somewhat OK if you only care about 1-2 attributes but if the answer is I need to preserve all of it then you are stuck between losing all the customizations or not getting the changes from version 2 of the file.
You could write extensive custom actions to do all this during the installer but I propose there is a better way: Have 2 files.
1 file that is owned by the installer and can always be safely overwritten and 1 file that is owned by the application that overrides are stored in. Think of it like a transformation file. The installer doesn't know about this file so it never overwrites or deletes it. (The very definition of user data from an MSI perspective.)
For example the .NET framework Web.Config schema AppSettings element has a file attribute that was designed to support this nicely.
Specifies a relative path to an external file containing custom
application configuration settings. The specified file contains the
same kind of settings that are specified in the , , and
elements and uses the same key/value pair format as those
elements. The path specified is relative to the main configuration
file. For a Windows Forms application, this would be the binary folder
(such as /bin/debug), not the location of the application
configuration file. For Web Forms applications, the path is relative
to the application root, where the web.config file is located.
Note that the runtime ignores the attribute if the specified file can
not be found.
I have created a WIX msi for one of our products which works really well. The product is a Word addin and at upgrade/uninstall the msi automatically checks if Word is open (ie. my assemblies are currently locked in execution) and if it is, then it comes up with the Files In Use dialog.
The only improvement I would like to make is at installation time. I would like to check whether word is open and force close before install. It would be great to do so, using the same Files In Use UI. Is there an easy way to do this?
I have also created a custom bootstrapper (unmanaged), using the sample code from the toolset. Overall this is really good too, however I have real problems when upgrading/uninstalling. Ideally, I don’t want to DisplayInternalUI but I would like the Files In Use to pop up when necessary. Is this possible?
The feature request 4382 was implemented and is available in v3.10.0.1726. Set ShowFilesInUse to yes in the WixStandardBootstrapperApplication element.
I have a question whether what i am trying to do is doable, and if the answer is yes how to do it.
I am new to the wix and have been doing some reading on how dynamically to include a folder to an installer and eventually i were able to do a task in nant that uses heat.exe to generate wxs file and latter adding newly generated wxs file to light and candle tasks. This allowed me to add the content of a folder to the msi and subsequently have that folder and its content to be installed.
My problem starts at the point where the folder that i am adding to the msi contains files that has their names already localized (this is a requirement).
When i am adding a file to the directory structure that has its name in Russian for example which is not 1252 codepage i am getting the error:
[exec] ......Templates.wxs(65) : error LGHT0311 : A string was
provided with characters that are not available in the specified
database code page '1252'. Either change these characters to ones that
exist in the database's code page, or update the database's code page
by modifying one of the following attributes: Product/#Codepage,
Module/#Codepage, Patch/#Codepage, PatchCreation/#Codepage, or
WixLocalization/#Codepage.
I tried to set Product/#Codepage to 65001 (UTF-8) however that did not solve the problem.
Eventually what i want to do is to have an ability to add a folder and its content to installer and someone else latter add any number of files that has their names localized into that folder. This way whenever the build runs and subsequent creation of msi happens, msi would contain that folder and its content.
Thank you very much in advance.
This is what WiX.chm says about setting the code page of the MSI database:
You can set this to a valid Windows code page by integer like 1252, or
by web name like Windows-1252. UTF-7 and UTF-8 are not officially
supported because of user interface issues. Unicode is not supported.
As long as you are going to have files named in different languages, that is, File table won't fit into a single Windows code page, you have very little choice. UTF-8 is said to be not officially supported, and this leaves a place for a hope.
If you set the CodePage attribute of the Product element to UTF-8, it will build successfully. And you can install/uninstall the resulting MSI with no problem. I have played a bit with it, and didn't face with any "interface issues" mentioned in that warning above.
Furthermore, I've googled the topic a bit, and found out that InstallShield allows setting the MSI database code page to UTF-8, which is reflected in their docs (search for 'utf-8' on that page). They have more to say about the potential interface issues:
However, some scenarios result in user interface issues. For example,
if an end user specifies the /qb command-line option or uninstalls the
product from Add or Remove Programs, Windows Installer uses very small
fonts to display the user interface text in a UTF-8 database.
They also want to stay on the safe side, hence this setting is false by default (no UTF-8, just ASCII).
So, finally, what would I do in your situation?
if that's a strict requirement to the installation package, use UTF-8 as code page
test all possible scenarios (install / uninstall / repair / upgrade / etc.) on all possible combinations related to localization (English OS, non-English OS, various combinations of current culture and culture UI)
if you face with those ghost "interface issues", show those to your stakeholders, decide whether this is what you can live with and publish known issues if you do
otherwise, recycle this idea and just thank your life for an opportunity to level-up your skills in this area :)
Hope this helps.