I am having an issue, I am new to SQL query work, but I have a query that runs and display employees and all their addresses history, but I have found that staff have been missing checking off the indicator for if the employee has mailing address. The addresses are stored in a table that has a reference to the employee id. How would I display results for a specific employee if no "2" value for mailing is found. The address table contains previous addresses and billing address flags, "1" and "3"?
In the addelement table
type_add_id|type_add_desc
1 |Billing
2 |Mailing
3 |Previous
Query
SELECT
addelement.type_add_desc
,address.street
,employee.name
FROM
address
INNER JOIN addelement
ON address.type_add_id = addelement.type_add_id
INNER JOIN employee
ON address.refid = employee.refid
order by employee.name
This will get you a list of employees that do not have a mailing address. Note that we start with all employees, outer join to the addresses, but constrain to not only match the employee, but also to be of the desired type of address. The WHERE clause then removes records from the resulting recordset where there is a value.
SELECT
employee.name
FROM
employee
LEFT OUTER JOIN address ON address.refid = employee.refid AND address.type_add_id = 2
WHERE
address.type_add_id IS NULL
Change the hardcoded integer in the JOIN to search out each of the desired types of addresses.
I think you should look at this http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/e30116/1 and tell me what you think.
If the "2" is not there, it will simply give you the result of the other addresses.
Perhaps you'll make sense of this query easier than the one with a left join. It an also be confusing to understand why the filtering condition on the join must be with the join and not in the where clause. It'll be good for you to understand that eventually though if you continue learning SQL.
select *
from employee e
where not exists (
select 1
from address a
where a.refid = e.refid and a.type_add_id = 2
)
Many people seem to object to subqueries because their platforms don't optimize them well or because they see it as a crutch in using SQL. I suppose in a sense I am offering it here as an equivalent solution to help ramp up your understanding but either way I see nothing wrong with taking advantage of in and not in as a natural way of expression the solution.
This should return your employee #100 with all the addresses stored, even if employee has not address (any type).
select e.name, ad.type_add_desc, a.street
from employee e
left outer join address a on
e.refid = a.refid
left outer join addelement ad on
a.type_add_id = ad.type_add_id
where e.refid = 100
order by e.name;
To return rows that haven't a row relationship in other table you should use OUTER JOIN.
Related
I have a query with joins that is not using the index that would be the best match and I am looking for help to correct this.
I have the following query:
select
equipment.name,purchaselines.description,contacts.name,vendors.accountNumber
from purchaselines
left join vendors on vendors.id = purchaselines.vendorId
left join contacts on contacts.id = vendors.contactId
left join equipment on equipment.id = purchaselines.equipmentId
where contacts.id = 12345
The table purchaselines has an index on the column vendorId, which is the proper index to use. When the query is run, I know the value of contacts.id which is joined to vendors.contactId which is joined to purchaselines.vendorId.
What is the proper way to run this query? Currently, no index is used on the table purchaselines.
If you are intending to query a specific contact, I would put THAT first since that is the primary basis. Additionally, you had left-joins to the other tables (vendors, contacts, equipment). So by having a WHERE clause to the CONTACTS table forces the equation to become an INNER JOIN, thus REQUIRING.
That said, I would try to rewrite the query as (also using aliases for simplified readability of longer table names)
select
equipment.name,
purchaselines.description,
contacts.name,
vendors.accountNumber
from
contacts c
join vendors v
on c.id = v.contactid
join purchaselines pl
on v.id = pl.vendorid
join equipment e
on pl.equipmentid = e.id
where
c.id = 12345
Also notice the indentation of the JOINs helps readability (IMO) to see how/where each table gets to the next in a more hierarchical manner. They are all regular inner JOIN context.
So, the customer ID will be the first / fastest, then to vendors by that contact ID which should optimize the join to that. Then, I would expect the purchase lines to have an index on vendorid optimizing that. And finally, the equipment table on ITs PK.
FEEDBACK Basic JOIN clarification.
JOIN is just the explicit statement of how two tables are related. By listing them left-side and right-side and the join condition showing on what relationship is between them is all.
Now, in your data example, each table is subsequently nested under the one prior. It is quite common though that one table may link to multiple other tables. For example an employee. A customer could have an ethnicity ID linking to an ethnicity lookup table, but also, a job position id also linking to a job position lookup table. That might look something like
select
e.name,
eth.ethnicity,
jp.jobPosition
from
employee e
join ethnicitiy eth
on e.ethnicityid = eth.id
join jobPosition jp
on e.jobPositionID = jp.id
Notice here that both ethnicity and jobPosition are at the same hierarchical level to the employee table scenario. If, for example, you wanted to further apply conditions that you only wanted certain types of employees, you can just add your logical additional conditions directly at the location of the join such as
join jobPosition jp
on e.jobPositionID = jp.id
AND jp.jobPosition = 'Manager'
This would get you a list of only those employees who are managers. You do not need to explictily add a WHERE condition if you already include it directly at the JOIN/ON criteria. This helps keeping the table-specific criteria at the join if you ever find yourself needing LEFT JOINs.
I have a table with Customers which includes their contact person in the helpdesk. I have another table that lists all vacancies of the helpdesk employees - if they are currently sick or on vacation etc.
I need to get the helpdesk contact and the start/end time of their vacation IF there is an entry.
I currently have this (simplified):
SELECT *
FROM dbo.Customers, dbo.Projects, dbo.Vacations
WHERE ($Phone = dbo.Customers.Phone)
AND dbo.Customers.CustomerID = dbo.Projects.CustomerID
AND dbo.Projects.HDContactID = dbo.Vacations.HDContactID
So if there is a vacation listed in the Vacations table, it works fine, but if there is no vacation at all, this will not return anything - what i want is that if there is no vacation, it simply returns the other data, and ignores the missing data (returns NULL, doesn't return anything, not important)
In any case, I need to get the Customers and Project data, even if the query can't find an entry in the Vacations table. How would I do this? I pretty new to SQL and couldn't find a similar question on this site
EDIT: I'm using SQL Server, currently using HeidiSQL
Try below query:
SELECT * FROM dbo.Customers, dbo.Projects
left join dbo.Vacations on dbo.Projects.HDContactID = dbo.Vacations.HDContactID
WHERE ($Phone = dbo.Customers.Phone)
AND dbo.Customers.CustomerID = dbo.Projects.CustomerID
Use left join as mentioned by #Flying Thunder,
Example of the left join:
SELECT country.country_name_eng, city.city_name, customer.customer_name
FROM customer
LEFT JOIN city ON customer.city_id = city.id
LEFT JOIN country ON city.country_id = country.id;
You can find a nice guide for the joins and SQL here:
https://www.sqlshack.com/learn-sql-join-multiple-tables/
You should be using LEFT JOIN. In fact, you should never be using commas in the FROM clause. That is just archaic syntax and closes the powerful world of JOINs from your queries.
I also recommend using table aliases that are abbreviations of table names. The best are abbreviations for the table names:
SELECT *
FROM dbo.Customers c LEFT JOIN
dbo.Projects p
ON c.CustomerID = p.CustomerID LEFT JOIN
dbo.Vacations v
ON p.HDContactID = v.HDContactID
WHERE c.Phone = $Phone;
Have you try this to skip vacation record if not present like this:
SELECT * FROM dbo.Customers, dbo.Projects, dbo.Vacations
WHERE ($Phone = dbo.Customers.Phone)
AND dbo.Customers.CustomerID = dbo.Projects.CustomerID
AND (dbo.Vacations.HDContactID IS NULL OR dbo.Projects.HDContactID = dbo.Vacations.HDContactID)
What my issue is:
I am constantly returning multiple values when I don't expect to. I am attempting to get a specific climate, determined by the state, county, and country.
What I've tried:
The code given below. I am unsure as to what is wrong with it specifically. I do know that it is returning multiple values. But why? I specify that STATE_ABBREVIATION = PROV_TERR_STATE_LOC and with the inner joins that I do, shouldn't that create rows that are similar except for their different CLIMATE_IDs?
SELECT
...<code>...
(SELECT locations.CLIMATE_ID
FROM REF_CLIMATE_LOCATION locations, SED_BANK_TST.dbo.STATIONS stations
INNER JOIN REF_STATE states ON STATE_ID = states.STATE_ID
INNER JOIN REF_COUNTY counties ON COUNTY_ID = counties.COUNTY_ID
INNER JOIN REF_COUNTRY countries ON COUNTRY_ID = countries.COUNTRY_ID
WHERE STATE_ABBREVIATION = PROV_TERR_STATE_LOC) AS CLIMATE_ID
...<more code>...
FROM SED_BANK_TST.dbo.STATIONS stations
I've been at this for hours, looking up different questions on SO, but I cannot figure out how to make this subquery return a single value.
All those inner joins don't reduce the result set if the IDs you're testing exist in the REF tables. Apart from that you're doing a Cartesian product between locations and stations (which may be an old fashioned inner join because of the where clause).
You'll only get a single row if you only have a single row in the locations table that matches a single row in the stations table under the condition that STATE_ABBREVIATION = PROV_TERR_STATE_LOC
Your JOINs show a hierarchy of locations: Country->State->County, but your WHERE clause only limits by the state abbreviation. By joining the county you'll get one record for every county in that state. You CAN limit your results by taking the TOP 1 of the results, but you need to be very careful that that's really what you want. If you're looking for a specific county, you'll need to include that in the WHERE clause. You get some control with the TOP 1 in that it will give the top 1 based on an ORDER BY clause. I.e., if you want the most recently added, use:
SELECT TOP 1 [whatever] ORDER BY [DateCreated] DESC;
For your subquery, you can do something like this:
SELECT TOP 1
locations.CLIMATE_ID
FROM REF_CLIMATE_LOCATION locations ,
SED_BANK_TST.dbo.STATIONS stations
INNER JOIN REF_STATE states ON STATE_ID = states.STATE_ID
INNER JOIN REF_COUNTY counties ON COUNTY_ID = counties.COUNTY_ID
INNER JOIN REF_COUNTRY countries ON COUNTRY_ID = countries.COUNTRY_ID
WHERE STATE_ABBREVIATION = PROV_TERR_STATE_LOC
Just be sure to either add an ORDER BY at the end or be okay with it choosing the TOP 1 based on the "natural order" on the tables.
If you are expecting to have a single value on your sub-query, probably you need to use DISTINCT. The best way to see it is you run your sub-query separately and see the result. If you need to include other columns from the tables you used, you may do so to check what makes your result have multiple rows.
You can also use MAX() or MIN() or TOP 1 to get a single value on the sub-query but this is dependent to the logic you want to achieve for locations.CLIMATE_ID. You need to answer the question, "How is it related to the rest of the columns retrieved?"
I am trying to use a second SELECT to get some ID, then use that ID in a second SELECT and I have no idea how.
SELECT Employee.Name
FROM Emplyee, Employment
WHERE x = Employment.DistributionID
(SELECT Distribution.DistributionID FROM Distribution
WHERE Distribution.Location = 'California') AS x
This post got long, but here is a short "tip"
While the syntax of my select is bad, the logic is not. I need that "x" somehow. Thus the second select is the most important. Then I have to use that "x" within the first select. I just don't know how
/Tip
This is the only thing I could imagine, I'm very new at Sql, I think I need a book before practicing, but now that I've started I'd like to finish my small program.
EDIT:
Ok I looked up joins, still don't get it
SELECT Employee.Name
FROM Emplyee, Employment
WHERE x = Employment.DistributionID
LEFT JOIN Distribution ON
(SELECT Distribution.DistributionID FROM Distribution
WHERE Distribution.Location = 'California') AS x
Get error msg at AS and Left
I use name to find ID from upper red, I use the ID I find FROM upper red in lower table. Then I match the ID I find with Green. I use Green ID to find corresponding Name
I have California as output data from C#. I want to use California to find the DistributionID. I use the DistributionID to find the EmployeeID. I use EmployeeID to find Name
My logic:
Parameter: Distribution.Name (from C#)
Find DistributionID that has Distribution.Name
Look in Employment WHERE given DistributionID
reveals Employees that I am looking for (BY ID)
Use that ID to find Name
return Name
Tables:
NOTE: In this example picture the Employee repeats because of the select, they are in fact singular
In "Locatie" (middle table) is Location, I get location (again) from C#, I use California as an example. I need to find the ID first and foremost!
Sory they are not in english, but here are the create tables:
Try this:
SELECT angajati.Nume
FROM angajati
JOIN angajari ON angajati.AngajatID = angajari.AngajatID
JOIN distribuire ON angajari.distribuireid = distribuire.distribuireid
WHERE distribuire.locatie = 'california'
As you have a table mapping employees to their distribution locations, you just need to join that one in the middle to create the mapping. You can use variables if you like for the WHERE clause so that you can call this as a stored procedure or whatever you need from the output of your C# code.
Try this solution:
DECLARE #pLocatie VARCHAR(40)='Alba'; -- p=parameter
SELECT a.AngajatID, a.Nume
FROM Angajati a
JOIN Angajari j ON a.AngajatID=j.AngajatID
JOIN Distribuire d ON j.DistribuireID=d.DistribuireID
WHERE d.Locatie=#pLocatie
You should add an unique key on Angajari table (Employment) thus:
ALTER TABLE Angajari
ADD CONSTRAINT IUN_Angajari_AngajatID_DistribuireID UNIQUE (AngajatUD, DistribuireID);
This will prevent duplicated (AngajatID, DistribuireID).
I don't know how you are connecting Emplyee(sic?) and Employment, but you want to use a join to connect two tables and in the join specify how the tables are related. Joins usually look best when they have aliases so you don't have to repeat the entire table name. The following query will get you all the information from both Employment and Distribution tables where the distribution location is equal to california. You can join employee to employment to get name as well.
SELECT *
FROM Employment e
JOIN Distribution d on d.DistributionID = e.DistributionID
WHERE d.Location = 'California'
This will return the contents of both tables. To select particular records use the alias.[Col_Name] separated by a comma in the select statement, like d.DistributionID to return the DistributionID from the Distribution Table
Say you have these tables:
PHARMACY(**___id_pharmacy___**, name, addr, tel)
PHARMACIST(**___Insurance_number___**, name, surname, qualification, **id_pharmacy**)
SELLS(**___id_pharmacy___**, **___name___**, price)
DRUG(**___Name___**, chem_formula, **id_druggistshop**)
DRUGGISTSHOP(**___id_druggistshop___**, name, address)
I think this will be more specific.
So, I'm trying to construct an SQL statement, in which I will fetch the data from id_pharmacy and name FROM PHARMACY, the insurance_number, name, and surname columns from PHARMACIST, for all the pharmacies that sell the drug called Kronol.
And that's basically it. I know I'm missing the relationships in the code I wrote previously.
Note: Those column names which have underscores left and right to them are underlined(Primary keys).
The query you've written won't work in any DBMS that I know of.
You'll most likely want to use some combination of JOINs.
Since the exact schema isn't provided, consider this pseudo code, but hopefully it will get you on the right track.
SELECT PH.Ph_Number, PH.Name, PHCL.Ins_Number, PHCL.Name, PHCL.Surname
FROM PH
INNER JOIN PHCL ON PHCL.PH_Number = PH.Ph_Number
INNER JOIN MLIST ON MLIST.PH_Number = PH.PH_Number
WHERE MLIST.Name = "Andy"
I've obviously assumed some relationships between tables that may or may not exist, but hopefully this will be pretty close. The UNION operator won't work because you're selecting different columns and a different number of columns from the various tables. This is the wrong approach all together for what you're trying to do. It's also worth mentioning that a LEFT JOIN may or may not be a better option for you, depending on the exact requirements you're trying to meet.
Ok, try this query:
SELECT A.id_pharmacy, A.name AS PharmacyName, B.Insurance_number,
B.name AS PharmacistName, B.surname AS PharmacistSurname
FROM PHARMACY A
LEFT JOIN PHARMACIST B
ON A.id_pharmacy = B.id_pharmacy
WHERE A.id_pharmacy IN (SELECT id_pharmacy FROM SELLS WHERE name = 'Kronol')