Setup port mirorring on Sonos speakers [closed] - sonos

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like to capture the traffic sent by a Sonos speaker (to troubleshoot streaming issues).
I've found one way to do this but it's a bit cumbersome: I plug the Sonos speaker via an ethernet to usb adapter to my PC, share the PC connection and then capture on that interface.
It's limited to one speaker and if the speaker has ever been configured to use the WiFi, it seems that it uses WiFi even plugged that way (and I don't capture anything).
What's the detailed setup to use port mirorring to do this? I'd like to compare the two solutions and don't know much about port mirorring setup.
Thanks!

I would recommend getting yourself a network hub to plug Sonos and the computer into and capture from that.

Related

Raspberry Pi 4 doesn't boot when attaching camera [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I am having problem connecting the camera module to my Raspberry Pi 4. The PI is working just fine, but when I attach the camera to the module, it just doesn't boot.
What might be causing this?
So you have a successfully booting system then after physically connecting the camera it will not boot?
First, double check the camera is connected properly. Meaning the blue side of the connections are facing the right way (i.e. blue side facing the USB ports on the RPi itself and facing the front of the camera on the camera module connection). A quick search found this post containing pictures, that is usually the issue. If that fails, consider options within the config.txt file on the /boot partition. Reference for config.txt.
One of the config options that gets added automatically when adding the camera interface via raspi-config is start_x=1 Camera entries within config.txt are described here. Be sure that you have enough memory configured (i.e. gpu_mem=128, though increasing that is probably a good idea if you're doing a lot with the GPU (motion detection, etc.). But the physical connection is most likely the culprit.

Reverse engineering a network interface [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
not sure if this is the right place to ask such a question - if not, perhaps you can direct me to the right place?
I've recently purchased a walking treadmill for my standing desk. It has a standalone control panel, connected to the base via an exposed LAN port. The panel has a few drawbacks (it's huge, has awkward and noisy buttons, no pause/return) and I wonder if I could write something very simple to control the treadmill from my PC instead. I imagine I'd need an ethernet splitter and something for network snooping to see the payload from button clicks? I've never done anything like this, so any pointers would be much appreciated. Thanks all!
1st: Be sure that the port is a compliant ethernet port to avoid damage of your equipment.
A cheap setup to analyze traffic between two devices is the use of a ethernethub or a switch which can be configured to broadcast all trafic and a pc with an ethernetsniffer. An alterntive to an hub could be two bridged ethernetcards on a pc.
A common, free and feature rich sniffer is whireshark.

USB Y Cable - Does it only split the power or also the data? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Does an USB-Y-Cable (often found for USB 3.0 devices, for better backwards compatibility/faster speed?) like the following just splits the power or also the data? The second USB-male-plug has a thinner cable, so I think something is missing there.
I didn't find an answer on google.
Power only. There is no way for two devices to signal serially without a hub. It is however possible to have a very small hub. So, unless your "y" splitter is also a two port hub; It's power only.

Connect three monitors to the same workstation [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an Nvidia Quadro 600 card in my workstation and was curious if there was any way I could use three monitors with the card without using external graphics hardware (Matrox display2go et al.). It has 1 Dual Link DVI-I port and 1 DisplayPort port. I'm using two monitors, one with each port but I would like to have a third one.
Is that possible somehow?
Thanks
You can. I have seen some thin client concept which connects through an ethernet cord. Monitor gets a power adapter, just like for mobile. I have seen this setup with a D-link manufacturer.. But it in fact works for any machine.
This is the solution to connect the third monitor: http://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-External-Video-Monitor-Adapter/dp/B0086359SG/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1388206061&sr=1-2&keywords=usb+3.0+to+dvi
I have plenty of USB 3.0 so that is the best option.
Thank you anyway

creating dual ethernet connections with separate ip via usb [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
is it possible to set 2 separate ip addresses on a laptop by adding a USB network adaptor?
And if so, which one would you recommend?
Thanks!
You can have as more as network interfaces you want, I don't understand which one would you recommend part, but if I understood correctly I mean, if I suggest USB network adapter at all or not.
USB network adapters are restricted to USB speed, so if you have high speed internet and you want to use it with USB network adapter, it's not possible. I'm talking about 1GB, I think maximum speed you can get from USB network adapter is 300 MBits.