I have different albums, the contents of which I want to show in lightgallery.
My initial call goes like :
$('.dlCms_c_Carousel').lightGallery({
dynamic : true ,
dynamicEl : dlThis.LGDynEl ,
thumbnail : true ,
mode : 'lg-fade' ,
});
This works perfect, but then, when opening another album, I want the one or the other way to refresh such that the new content of dynamicEl is shown.
Is there a way to do it ?
I was trying a
$('.dlCms_c_Carousel').data("lightGallery").destroy(true)
before, but that messed up. I.e. there seemed to be some functionality, but it looked like the lightbox lost some styling and wasn't opaque any more.
Any hints ?
I'm using Waypoint.js for infinite scrolling with lightgallery.
The solution that I found for dynamic refresh was:
var gallery = $(".infinite-container").lightGallery({
selector: '.item'
});
var infinite = new Waypoint.Infinite({
element: document.querySelector('.infinite-container'),
onAfterPageLoad: () => {
gallery.data('lightGallery').destroy(true);
gallery = $(".infinite-container").lightGallery({
selector: '.item'
});
}
});
From my experience, the object returned from the lightgallery initialization has to be used on the destroy.
Hope it helps.
Related
This was originally posted on discuss.emberjs.com. See:
http://discuss.emberjs.com/t/what-is-the-proper-use-of-store-filter-store-find-for-infinite-scrolling/3798/2
but that site seems to get worse and worse as far as quality of content these days so I'm hoping StackOverflow can rescue me.
Intent: Build a page in ember with ember-data implementing infinite scrolling.
Background Knowledge: Based on the emberjs.com api docs on ember-data, specifically the store.filter and store.find methods ( see: http://emberjs.com/api/data/classes/DS.Store.html#method_filter ) I should be able to set the model hook of a route to the promise of a store filter operation. The response of the promise should be a filtered record array which is a an array of items from the store filtered by a filter function which is suppose to be constantly updated whenever new items are pushed into the store. By combining this with the store.find method which will push items into the store, the filteredRecordArray should automatically update with the new items thus updating the model and resulting in new items showing on the page.
For instance, assume we have a Questions Route, Controller and a model of type Question.
App.QuestionsRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function (urlParams) {
return this.get('store').filter('question', function (q) {
return true;
});
}
});
Then we have a controller with some method that will call store.find, this could be triggered by some event/action whether it be detecting scroll events or the user explicitly clicking to load more, regardless this method would be called to load more questions.
Example:
App.QuestionsController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
...
loadMore: function (offset) {
return this.get('store').find('question', { skip: currentOffset});
}
...
});
And the template to render the items:
...
{{#each question in controller}}
{{question.title}}
{{/each}}
...
Notice, that with this method we do NOT have to add a function to the store.find promise which explicitly calls this.get('model').pushObjects(questions); In fact, trying to do that once you have already returned a filter record array to the model does not work. Either we manage the content of the model manually, or we let ember-data do the work and I would very much like to let Ember-data do the work.
This is is a very clean API; however, it does not seem to work they way I've written it. Based on the documentation I cannot see anything wrong.
Using the Ember-Inspector tool from chrome I can see that the new questions from the second find call are loaded into the store under the 'question' type but the page does not refresh until I change routes and come back. It seems like the is simply a problem with observers, which made me think that this would be a bug in Ember-Data, but I didn't want to jump to conclusions like that until I asked to see if I'm using Ember-Data as intended.
If someone doesn't know exactly what is wrong but knows how to use store.push/pushMany to recreate this scenario in a jsbin that would also help too. I'm just not familiar with how to use the lower level methods on the store.
Help is much appreciated.
I just made this pattern work for myself, but in the "traditional" way, i.e. without using store.filter().
I managed the "loadMore" part in the router itself :
actions: {
loadMore: function () {
var model = this.controller.get('model'), route = this;
if (!this.get('loading')) {
this.set('loading', true);
this.store.find('question', {offset: model.get('length')}).then(function (records) {
model.addObjects(records);
route.set('loading', false);
});
}
}
}
Since you already tried the traditional way (from what I see in your post on discuss), it seems that the key part is to use addObjects() instead of pushObjects() as you did.
For the records, here is the relevant part of my view to trigger the loadMore action:
didInsertElement: function() {
var controller = this.get('controller');
$(window).on('scroll', function() {
if ($(window).scrollTop() > $(document).height() - ($(window).height()*2)) {
controller.send('loadMore');
}
});
},
willDestroyElement: function() {
$(window).off('scroll');
}
I am now looking to move the loading property to the controller so that I get a nice loader for the user.
I am rather new to sencha touch, I've done a lot of research and tutorials to learn the basics but now that I am experimenting I have run into a problem that I can't figure out.
I have a basic DataList which gets its data from a store which displays in a xtemplate.
Within this template I have created a member function which requires store field data to be parsed as a parameter.
I would like to make a thumbnail image (that's source is pulled from the store) execute the member function on click/tap.
I can't find any information on this within the docs, does anyone know the best way to go about this?
Here is a code example (pulled from docs as I can't access my actual code right now).
var tpl = new Ext.XTemplate(
'<p>Name: {name}</p>'
{
tapFunction: function(name){
alert(name);
}
}
);
tpl.overwrite(panel.body, data);
I want to make the paragraph clickable which will then execute the tapFunction() member function and pass the {name} variable.
Doing something like onclick="{[this.tapFunction(values.name)]} " does not seem to work.
I think functions in template are executed as soon as the view is rendered so I don't think this is the proper solution.
What I would do in your case is :
Add a unique class to your < p > tag
tpl : '<p class="my-p-tag">{name}</p>'
Detect the itemtap event on the list
In your dataview controller, you add an tap event listener on your list.
refs: {
myList: 'WHATEVER_REFERENCE_MATCHES_YOUR_LIST'
},
control: {
myList: {
itemtap: 'listItemTap'
}
}
Check if the target of the tap is the < p > tag
To do so, implement your listItemTap function like so :
listItemTap: function(list,index,target,record,e){
var node = e.target;
if (node.className && node.className.indexOf('my-p-tag') > -1) {
console.log(record.get('name'));
}
}
Hope this helps
I'm trying to work on the "different permissions based on workflow state" issue but I'm struggling with the fact that it seems impossible to get the id of the current object 'at any time' that is necessary in order to get the permission of that object. What I mean is that I manage to get it from the client state following jquery bbq docs like:
$.bbq.getState().id
BUT it looks like this is doable only AFTER a complete page load. I investigated this by placing some alert in the main view events, like:
openerp.web.PageView = openerp.web.PageView.extend({
on_loaded: function(data) {
this._super(data);
alert('page load ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
do_show: function() {
this._super();
alert('page show ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
reload: function() {
this._super();
alert('page reload ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
on_record_loaded: function(record) {
this._super(record);
alert('record loaded ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
}
});
and I found that when you open the page view (by clicking on an item in a search view, for instance) you get always "undefined".
Then, you get it into "reload" and "on_record_loaded" when passing from an object to another using paged navigation. And then, you miss it again when you click on the "edit" button.
In the form view I successfully got it only on the 1st load because it seems that some caching is in-place. So that, if I place a pdb into web client's fields_view_get and I do this into the form "init_view":
var ids = [];
if ($.bbq.getState().id){
ids = [parseInt($.bbq.getState().id)];
}
console.log(ids);
return this.rpc("/web/view/load", {
"model": this.model,
"view_id": this.view_id,
"view_type": "form",
toolbar: this.options.sidebar,
context: context,
ids: ids,
}, this.on_loaded);
I get it only the 1st time that the page gets loaded. The same happen if I take ids from
this.dataset.ids
I looked anywhere at the core web module and I can't find a proper API for this and it looks weird (above all on dataset) that we don't have a proper way for getting/working on the current record/s. Even the context and the session do not have any information about that.
Probably I should store this into the view itself on 1st load...
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
try:
this.view.datarecord.id
OpenERP 7 in form view:
debugged using google chrome
Try the combination of the
this.dataset.ids and this.dataset.index
like
curr_id = this.dataset.ids[this.dataset.index]
this might solve your problem.
I am designing an app in sencha touch2. I have a panel object in my JS file. I need to dynamically set the text/html for this component. The store for this component is defined at the application level. Following is the thing I worked out:
Ext.define('class_name',{
....
config : {
pnlObj : null,
...
}
initialize : function() {
this.config.pnlObj = Ext.create('Ext.Panel');
var store = Ext.data.Storemanager.lookup('some_store');
store.on('load',this.loadStore,this);
this.setItems([{
//some items here
{
flex : 2,
// id : 'somepnl',
config : this.config.pnlObj
}
}]);
},
loadStore : function(store, rec) {
var text = rec.get('text');
var panel = this.config.pnlObj;
// var panel = Ext.getCmp('somepanl');
panel.setHtml(text);
}
});
When I inspect the inspect the element using Firebug console, I can find the panel added there. But I am not able to set the html dynamically. no html text is set there. I tried adding it using panel.add() & panel.setItems() method which doesn't work. If I give an id to that panel(somepanel here) and try to access it using Ext.getCmp('smpanel') then in that case it works fine. I have found that using Ext.getCmp() is not a good practice and want to avoid it as it might somewhere break my code in the future.
I guess the way I am instantiating the panel object is creating some issue. Can someone suggest the best way of doing it?
The recommended way to manipulate your components in Sencha Touch 2 is using controller, through refs and control configs. For example, your panel has a config like this: xtype:'myPanel', then in your controller:
refs: {
myPanel: 'myPanel'
}
control:{
myPanel: {
on_an_event: 'set_html_for_my_panel'
}
}
Lastly, define your function:
set_html_for_my_panel: function()
{
this.getMyPanel().setHtml('my_updated_html');
}
P/S: Behind the scene, Sencha Touch 2 uses Ext.ComponentQuery for refs in controllers
somewhat of a javascript novice here.
I'm trying to create this: http://i.imgur.com/LXFzy.png from the Spotify UI Guidelines.
Basically a 64x64 album cover with an appropriate sized play button.
This is what I have so far:
function DataSource(playlist) {
this.count = function() {
return playlist.length;
}
// make node with cover, trackname, artistname
this.makeNode = function(track_num) {
var t = playlist.data.getTrack(track_num);
// console.log(t);
var li = new dom.Element('li');
//generate cover image with play/pause button
var track = m.Track.fromURI(t.uri, function(a) {
var trackPlayer = new v.Player();
trackPlayer.track;
trackPlayer.context = a;
dom.inject(trackPlayer.node, li, 'top')
});
//track name
var trackName = new dom.Element('p', {
className: 'track',
text: t.name
});
//artist name
var artistName = new dom.Element('p', {
className: 'artist',
text: t.artists[0].name
});
dom.adopt(li, trackName, artistName);
return li;
}
}
This datasource function feeds into a pager function later in the code. This code generates image, artist name and track name just fine except I can't seem to get the image to be 64x64 without overriding with my own css. I'm sure there is a way to set this in javascript since the core Spotify CSS files include a class for it however I'm at a loss at how to do it.
Also the play button renders but gives an error in the console that the track has no method 'get' when I click on it. How am I suppose to know it needs a get? Is there some way I can see this player function so I know what I'm doing wrong with it?
Any help would be greatly appreciated, I'm sure it'll help droves of people too as there is no documentation anywhere I can find on how to do this.
Check the code here: https://github.com/ptrwtts/kitchensink/blob/master/js/player.js
The kitchensink app displays a lot of the Spotify Apps API functionality
For the playback button, I know that it doesn't seem to actually work for single tracks used as the context. It really only works if you use either an Artist, Album, or Playlist context. Not sure why that is.