I ask because after long searchs, I did not find a clear answer :
- I need qmake for QT5
- I want it in the sdk generated by yocto
- I don't succed to add it
I try to : add meta-toolchain-qt5 or qttools without success.
Where should I find it ?
(and Yes I have to stay on this old DORA distribution)
Thanks a lot !
I have found the solution (perhaps its was clear for you :-) )
To add the QT toolchain in your global toolchain, in your image file (eg image_types_yourimage.bbclass), add this inherit populate_sdk_qt5
Add inherit populate_sdk_qt5 to your image recipe (see an example),
Generate your image: bitbake your-image
Generate your specialized SDK: bitbake your-image -c do_populate_sdk
Find your special SDK at tmp/deploy/sdk/
If for any reason you prefer meta-toolchain-qt5 take into account that it will build the entire qt5 toolchain and qtwebkit is huge, takes quite a lot to build and is prone to errors (and will also pull a lot more dependencies).
After setting up your Yocto Environment
bitbake meta-toolchain-qt5
This will generate a SDK use for Qt5 Creator located in build/tmp/deploy/sdk
You can find more information about setting up Qt5 Creator here http://wiki.hioproject.org/index.php?title=HIO_Wiki:Set_Up_Qt_Creator_for_Yocto_Device
Related
I'm a *nix user, installing LLVM is easy for me, just download the precompiled file, set LLVM_DIR, and you're done. But I'm having a lot of problems with Windows ...
I downloaded LLVM-<version>-win64.exe from the GitHub release, but I can't find LLVMConfig.cmake file. Then I tried to compile LLVM from the source following this documentation.
When I started compiling my own project, I got this error:
'C:/<...>/Debug/libLLVMSupport.lib', needed by '<...>.exe', missing and no known rule to make it
I guess maybe I'm missing some compile options. but I can't find the documentation for LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS or BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, not even a list of component names.
I tried to add -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON but CMake told me BUILD_SHARED_LIBS option is not supported on Windows.
I'm trying to have my recipe be compiled and linked against the arm libraries. I'm using cmake. I can't seem to figure out the right work flow, after having read trough multiple documents on the yocto site and reference materials. My approach right now is:
Set the source
Build my target minal image, without the layer that I want to use
Try to build my specific recipe: bitbake Test
I have downloaded the arm toolchain from the Yocto site, and prepared it in my sources/poky. Here I can see the systroots and all the libraries that I would need. My recipe bb file is the following:
# This file was derived from the 'Hello World!' example recipe in the
# Yocto Project Development Manual.
#
SUMMARY = "Project"
SECTION = "examples"
LICENSE = "MIT"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COMMON_LICENSE_DIR/MIT;md5=0835ade698e0bcf8506ecda2f7b4f302"
SRC_URI = "file://."
S = "${WORKDIR}/project/src"
inherit pkgconfig cmake externalsrc
And my CMake file contains, among more:
link_directories(/media/traffic/Yocto/QorIQ-SDK-V2.0-20160527-yocto/sources/poky/sysroots/aarch64-poky-linux/usr/lib)
I'm able to compile a hello world project fine, but as soon as external libraries take a role, it goes wrong.
cannot find /usr/lib/libpthread_nonshared.a
/media/traffic/Yocto/QorIQ-SDK-V2.0-20160527-yocto/build_ls2084abluebox/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/aarch64-fsl-linux/../../libexec/aarch64-fsl-linux/gcc/aarch64-fsl-linux/4.9.3/ld: cannot find /usr/lib/libpthread_nonshared.a
It seems to look in the wrong folder. Are the steps that I'm taking correctly? Or am i missing something?
Elmar
Which poky version are you using? I got exactly the same issue recently with another package. There are 2 issues here:
It cannot find the pThread library. I added a FindThreads.cmake in the tree and imported it. But then the linker could not make it. I went to the conclusion, cmake itself had an issue with this library and ended changing the poky commit to have a different version of CMake. Note that you can also keep the new poky versions and have the custom CMake in your layer.
CMake 3.7 and 3.8.2 were not working properly but the 3.7.1 was for me (hash c9a512b6408d4cc11c1b36f7bc1b9b1c31056ce1). To find out which commit, you can execute
git log --pretty=oneline | grep cmake:
I'm relitavely new to embedded development and I have a question, or more of a feedback, on building and linking the µIP library on an embedded device. For what it's worth, the following is using a FOX G20 V board with an ATMEL AT91SAM9G20 processor with no OS.
I have done some research, and the way I see myself building and linking the library on the board is one of the following two options.
Option 1: The first option would be to compile the whole library (the .c files) in order to have a built static library in the form of a .a file. Then, I can link the created static library with my application code, before loading it on the device. Of course, the device driver will have to be programmed in order to allow the library to work on the platform (help was found here). This first option is using a Linux machine. For this first option as well, in order to load the static library linked with my application code, do I do so with an "scp"?
Option 2: The second option would be to compile and link the library to my application code directly without going through an intermediate static library. However, since my platorm does not contain an OS, I would need to install an appropraite GCC compiler in order to compile and link (if anyone has any leads for such an installation, that would be very helpful as well). However I'm quite unfamilier with the second option, but I've been told that it is easier to implement so if anyone as an idea on how to implement it, it would be very helpful.
I would appreciate some feedback along with the answers as to whether these options seem correct to you, and to be sure that I have not mentioned something that is false.
There is no real difference between these options. In any case, the host toolchain is responsible for creating a binary file that contains a fully linked executable with no external dependencies, so you need a cross compiler either way, and it is indeed easiest to just compile uIP along with the rest of the application.
The toolchain will typically have a cross compiler (if you use gcc, it should be named arm-eabi-gcc or arm-none-eabi-gcc), cross linker (arm-eabi-ld), cross archiver (arm-eabi-ar) etc. You would use these instead of the native tools. For Debian, you can find a cross compiler for ARM targets without an OS in testing/unstable.
Whether you build a static library
arm-eabi-gcc -c uip.c
arm-eabi-ar cru uip.a uip.o
arm-eabi-ranlib uip.a
arm-eabi-gcc -o executable application.c uip.a
or directly link
arm-eabi-gcc -c application.c
arm-eabi-gcc -c uip.c
arm-eabi-gcc -o executable application.o uip.o
or directly compile and link
arm-eabi-gcc -o executable application.c uip.c
makes no real difference.
If you use an integrated development environment, it is usually easiest to just add uip.c as a source file.
I am using CMake to build a Qt5 project on OS X. I need to create a build process that is as simple as possible for others.
By default Qt5 installs to the home folder on OS X. However, it then places its files within a directory named after the exact version number, e.g. 5.2.1.
At the moment I am using these lines in my CMake file:
set(QT5_PATH $ENV{HOME}/Qt5.2.1/5.2.1/clang_64/ CACHE PATH "Path to Qt5")
set(QT5_MODULE_PATH ${QT5_PATH}/lib/cmake)
set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH ${CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH} ${QT5_MODULE_PATH})
This works, but unfortunately breaks with each minor update of Qt as the 5.2.1 needs to be changed to 5.2.2, etc.
In Windows there are environment variables that can be used to find Qt. Is there anything similar in OS X that I can use within CMake to find a Qt installation?
Use find_package instead of juggling with the paths yourself. Then your users can rely on standard CMake mechanism instead of figuring out your own CMake code.
Use find_package(Qt5Widgets) to get targets like Qt::Widgets to link against and for the includes.
Similar for Qt5Core and whatever part of Qt 5 you need.
See Qt's documentation: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/cmake-manual.html
I'm wondering how i can make a portable build system (step-by-step), i currently use cmake because it was easy to set up in the first place, with only one arch target, but now that i have to package the library I'm developing I'm wondering how is the best way to make it portable for arch I'm testing.
I know I need a config.h to define things depending on the arch but I don't know how automatic this can be.
Any other way to have a build system are warmly welcome!
You can just use CMake, it's pretty straightforward.
You need these things:
First, means to find out the configuration specifics. For example, if you know that some function is named differently on some platform, you can use TRY_COMPILE to discover that:
TRY_COMPILE(HAVE_ALTERNATIVE_FUNC
${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}
${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/alternative_function_test.cpp
CMAKE_FLAGS -DINCLUDE_DIRECTORIES=xxx
)
where alternative_function_test.cpp is a file in your source directory that compiles only with the alternative definition.
This will define variable HAVE_ALTERNATIVE_FUNC if the compile succeeds.
Second, you need to make this definition affect your sources. Either you can add it to compile flags
IF(HAVE_TR1_RANDOM)
ADD_DEFINITIONS(-DHAVE_TR1_RANDOM)
ENDIF(HAVE_TR1_RANDOM)
or you can make a config.h file. Create config.h.in with the following line
#cmakedefine HAVE_ALTERNATIVE_FUNCS
and create a config.h file by this line in CMakeLists.txt (see CONFIGURE_FILE)
CONFIGURE_FILE(config.h.in config.h #ONLY)
the #cmakedefine will be translated to #define or #undef depending on the CMake variable.
BTW, for testing edianness, see this mail
I have been using the GNU autoconf/automake toolchain which has worked well for me so far. I am only really focussed on Linux/x86 (and 64bit) and the Mac, which is important if you are building on a PowerPC, due to endian issues.
With autoconf you can check the host platform with the macro:
AC_CANONICAL_HOST
And check the endianness using:
AC_C_BIGENDIAN
Autoconf will then add definitions to config.h which you can use in your code.
I am not certain (have never tried) how well the GNU autotools work on Windows, so if Windows is one of your targets then you may be better off finding similar functionality with your existing cmake build system.
For a good primer on the autotools, have a look here:
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/books/autotools_a_guide_to_autoconf_automake_libtool