I'm trying to find an object by checking for several of its relations.
Loan.joins(:credit_memo_attributes)
.where(credit_memo_attributes: {name: 'pr2_gtx1_y', value: '2014'})
.where(credit_memo_attributes: {name: 'pr1_gtx1_y', value: '2013'})
.where(credit_memo_attributes: {name: 'tx1_y', value: '2014'})
Calling to_sql on that gives:
"SELECT `loans`.* FROM `loans` INNER JOIN `credit_memo_attributes`
ON `credit_memo_attributes`.`loan_id` = `loans`.`id`
WHERE `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'pr2_gtx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2014'
AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'pr1_gtx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2013'
AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'tx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2014'"
So, I'm checking for Loans that have credit_memo_attributes with all of those attributes. I know at least 1 of our 20,000 loans meets this criteria, but this query returns an empty set. If I only use 1 of the where clauses, it returns several, as I'd expect, but once I add even 1 more, it's empty.
Any idea where I'm going wrong?
Update:
Based on comments I believe you want multiple joins in your criteria. You can do that like this:
attr_1 = {name: 'pr2_gtx1_y', value: '2014'}
attr_2 = {name: 'pr1_gtx1_y', value: '2013'}
attr_3 = {name: 'tx1_y', value: '2014'}
Loan.something_cool(attr_1, attr_2, attr_3)
class Loan < ActiveRecord::Base
...
def self.something_cool(attr_1, attr_2, attr_3)
joins(sanitize_sql(["INNER JOIN credit_memo_attributes AS cma1 ON cma1.loan_id = loans.id AND cma1.name = :name AND cma1.value = :value", attr_1]))
.joins(sanitize_sql(["INNER JOIN credit_memo_attributes AS cma2 ON cma2.loan_id = loans.id AND cma2.name = :name AND cma2.value = :value", attr_2]))
.joins(sanitize_sql(["INNER JOIN credit_memo_attributes AS cma3 ON cma3.loan_id = loans.id AND cma3.name = :name AND cma3.value = :value", attr_3]))
end
If you look at the SQL generated (that you included in your question, thank you) you'll see that all those conditions are being ANDed together. There are NO rows for which name = 'pr2_gtx1_y' AND name = 'pr1_gtx1_y' (and so forth). So you are getting the result I would expect (no rows).
You can put all names and values into array like ids and years and pass those into where clause like this. Active Record will query all the values in the array.
Loan.joins(:credit_memo_attributes)
.where(credit_memo_attributes: {name: ids, value: years})
Personally I'm still learning active record, in this concern i don't think active record supports multiple where clauses.
Notice how the SQL version is returning your code: it is joining the requirements with an AND.
"SELECT `loans`.* FROM `loans` INNER JOIN `credit_memo_attributes`
ON `credit_memo_attributes`.`loan_id` = `loans`.`id`
WHERE `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'pr2_gtx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2014'
AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'pr1_gtx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2013'
AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`name` = 'tx1_y' AND `credit_memo_attributes`.`value` = '2014'"
Now, this is next to impossible. An Object.name can never be all pr2_gtx1_y, pr1_gtx1_y, and tx1_y. Same goes for the value attributes.
What you need here is an OR as opposed to the AND.
To this effect, try to change your query to the following:
Loan.joins(:credit_memo_attributes)
.where(
"credit_memo_attributes.name = ? and credit_memo_attributes.value = ?
OR credit_memo_attributes.names = ? and credit_memo_attributes.value = ?
OR credit_memo_attributes.name = ? and credit_memo_attributes.value = ?",
'pr2_gtx1_y', '2014',
'pr1_gtx1_y', '2013',
'tx1_y', '2014'
)
Related
Update: See the "Update" section below for the latest.
I have been working with Knex.js to build SQL queries in Node.js, and have the following code. This code works on a sort of graph data model (nodes and links), where there is a links table which has everything (links link to links). Given this code, I am wondering how I can make it one query instead of one query per attribute which is how it is now. The getTableName() function returns a string_links table for string values, and <x>_links tables for the other datatypes, while the "basic" links table is just called links.
Essentially how this works is, first query the top level where the parent_id is equal to some "type" ID, say we are querying "user" objects, the type would be "user". So let instance = ... is getting all the instance links from this user type. Then we go through each field of a query (a query for now is just boolean-valued map, like { email: true, name: true }). For each field of the query, we make a query to find all those nodes, linked off the instance, as so-called property links.
There are two types of properties, but don't need to go into too much detail on that. Essentially there are complex properties with audit trails and simple properties without audit trails. That is what is meant by the interactive branch in the logic.
How can I make this into one SQL query? The SQL query it prints out for an example is like this:
select "id" from "links" where "parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330c' and "name" = 'link' limit 1
select "value" from "string_links" where "parent_id" = (select "value" from "links" where "parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330cv' and "name" = 'name' limit 1) and "name" = 'value' limit 1
select "value" from "text_links" where "parent_id" = (select "value" from "links" where "parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330cv' and "name" = 'website' limit 1) and "name" = 'value' limit 1
select "value" from "integer_links" where "parent_id" = (select "value" from "links" where "parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330cv' and "name" = 'revenue' limit 1) and "name" = 'value' limit 1
select "value" from "boolean_links" where "parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330' and "name" = 'verified' limit 1
The original Node.js for Knex.js is here, but really I'm just concerned with how to write this as one regular SQL query, and I can figure out how to make it in Knex.js from there:
async function selectInteractiveInstance(user, name, query) {
const type = model.types[name]
const typeId = await baseSchemaController.selectType(name)
let instance = await knex.from(`links`)
.select('id')
.where('parent_id', typeId)
.where('name', 'instance')
.first()
// { id: 123, props: { ... } }
instance.props = {}
for (let field in query) {
let data = query[field]
let attrSchema = type[field]
const tableName = baseSchemaController.getTableName(attrSchema.type)
if (attrSchema.interactive) {
const query1 = knex
.from(`links`)
.select('value')
.where('parent_id', instance.link)
.where('name', field)
.first()
const record = await knex
.from(tableName)
.select('value')
.where('home', query1)
.where('name', 'value')
.first()
if (record) {
instance.props[field] = record.value
}
} else {
const record = await knex
.from(tableName)
.select('value')
.where('parent_id', instance.id)
.where('name', field)
.first()
if (record) {
instance.props[field] = record.value
}
}
}
return instance
}
The reason for asking is because the number of queries of this function is equal to the number of properties on the object, and I would like to avoid that, but not really that great at SQL yet. I don't see a straightforward or clear path on how to make this into one query, or know if it's possible.
It's also an issue for the following reason. If I want to grab 100 links, and their "fields" (in the primitive link tables), such that the primitive link values match a certain value, then you need to query all field tables simultaneously to see if the query can be satisfied.
Update
I finally landed on a query that works in the optimistic case:
select
"x"."id" as "id",
"s1"."value" as "name",
"s2"."value" as "inc_id",
"s3"."value" as "website",
"s4"."value" as "revenue",
"s5"."value" as "verified"
from "links" as "x"
inner join "links" as "c1" on "c1"."parent_id" = "x"."id"
inner join "string_links" as "s1" on "s1"."parent_id" = "c1"."value"
inner join "links" as "c2" on "c2"."parent_id" = "x"."id"
inner join "string_links" as "s2" on "s2"."parent_id" = "c2"."value"
inner join "links" as "c3" on "c3"."parent_id" = "x"."id"
inner join "text_links" as "s3" on "s3"."parent_id" = "c3"."value"
inner join "links" as "c4" on "c4"."parent_id" = "x"."id"
inner join "integer_links" as "s4" on "s4"."parent_id" = "c4"."value"
inner join "boolean_links" as "s5" on "s5"."parent_id" = "x"."id"
where "x"."parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330'
and "x"."name" = 'link'
and "c1"."name" = 'name'
and "s1"."name" = 'value'
and "c2"."name" = 'inc_id'
and "s2"."name" = 'value'
and "c3"."name" = 'website'
and "s3"."name" = 'value'
and "c4"."name" = 'revenue'
and "s4"."name" = 'value'
and "s5"."name" = 'verified'
This returns an object similar to what I am looking for, joining the same table several times, along with the primitive tables.
However, if any of the values are not linked (are socalled "null" in this context), then the inner join will fail and it will return nothing. How can I still have it return a subset of the object properties, whatever it can find? Is there anything like optional inner joins or anything like that?
Use LEFT JOIN and move possibly unsatisfied predicates to ON clause. Kind of
select
"x"."id" as "id",
"s1"."value" as "name",
"s2"."value" as "inc_id",
"s3"."value" as "website",
"s4"."value" as "revenue",
"s5"."value" as "verified"
from "links" as "x"
left join "links" as "c1" on "c1"."parent_id" = "x"."id" and "c1"."name" = 'name'
left join "string_links" as "s1" on "s1"."parent_id" = "c1"."value" and "s1"."name" = 'value'
left join "links" as "c2" on "c2"."parent_id" = "x"."id" and "c2"."name" = 'inc_id'
left join "string_links" as "s2" on "s2"."parent_id" = "c2"."value" and "s2"."name" = 'value'
left join "links" as "c3" on "c3"."parent_id" = "x"."id" and "c3"."name" = 'website'
left join "text_links" as "s3" on "s3"."parent_id" = "c3"."value" and "s3"."name" = 'value'
left join "links" as "c4" on "c4"."parent_id" = "x"."id" and "c4"."name" = 'revenue'
left join "integer_links" as "s4" on "s4"."parent_id" = "c4"."value" and "s4"."name" = 'value'
left join "boolean_links" as "s5" on "s5"."parent_id" = "x"."id" and "s5"."name" = 'verified'
where "x"."parent_id" = '47c1956bz31330'
and "x"."name" = 'link'
I have a situation where two tables should be joined with multiple columns with or condition. Here, I have a sample of sql query but i was not able to convert it into linq query.
select cm.* from Customer cm
inner join #temp tmp
on cm.CustomerCode = tmp.NewNLKNo or cm.OldAcNo = tmp.OldNLKNo
This is how i have write linq query
await (from cm in Context.CustomerMaster
join li in list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel
on new { OldNLKNo = cm.OldAcNo, NewNLKNo = cm.CustomerCode } equals new { OldNLKNo = li.OldNLKNo, NewNLKNo = li.NewNLKNo }
select new CustomerInfoViewModel
{
CustomerId = cm.Id,
CustomerCode = cm.CustomerCode,
CustomerFullName = cm.CustomerFullName,
OldCustomerCode = cm.OldCustomerCode,
IsCorporateCustomer = cm.IsCorporateCustomer
}).ToListAsync();
But this query doesn't returns as expected. How do I convert this sql query into linq.
Thank you
You didn't tell if list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel is some information in the database, or in your local process. It seems that this is in your local process, your query will have to transfer it to the database (maybe that is why it is Tmp in your SQL?)
Requirement: give me all properties of a CustomerMaster for all CustomerMasters where exists at least one PortalCustomerDetailViewModel where
customerMaster.CustomerCode == portalCustomerDetailViewModel.NewNLKNo
|| customerMaster.OldAcNo == portalCustomerDetailViewModel.OldNLKNo
You can't use a normal Join, because a Join works with an AND, you want to work with OR
What you could do, is Select all CustomerMasters where there is any PortalCustomerDetailViewModel that fulfills the provided OR:
I only transfer those properties of list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel to the database that I need to use in the OR expression:
var checkProperties = list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel
.Select(portalCustomerDetail => new
{
NewNlkNo = portalCustomerDetail.NewNlkNo,
OldNLKNo = portalCustomerDetail.OldNLKNo,
});
var result = dbContext.CustomerMasters.Where(customerMaster =>
checkProperties.Where(checkProperty =>
customerMaster.CustomerCode == checkProperty.NewNLKNo
|| customerMaster.OldAcNo == checkProperty.OldNLKNo)).Any()))
.Select(customerMaster => new CustomerInfoViewModel
{
Id = customerMaster.Id,
Name = customerMaster.Name,
...
});
In words: from each portalCustomerDetail in list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel, extract the properties NewNKLNo and OldNLKNo.
Then from the table of CustomerMasters, keep only those customerMasters that have at least one portalCustomerDetail with the properties as described in the OR statement.
From every remaining CustomerMasters, create one new CustomerInfoViewModel containing properties ...
select cm.* from Customer cm
inner join #temp tmp
on cm.CustomerCode = tmp.NewNLKNo or cm.OldAcNo = tmp.OldNLKNo
You don't have to use the join syntax. Adding the predicates in a where clause could get the same result. Try to use the following code:
await (from cm in Context.CustomerMaster
from li in list.PortalCustomerDetailViewModel
where cm.CustomerCode == li.NewNLKNo || cm.OldAcNo = li.OldNLKNo
select new CustomerInfoViewModel
{
CustomerId = cm.Id,
CustomerCode = cm.CustomerCode,
CustomerFullName = cm.CustomerFullName,
OldCustomerCode = cm.OldCustomerCode,
IsCorporateCustomer = cm.IsCorporateCustomer
}).ToListAsync();
var result=_db.Customer
.groupjoin(_db.#temp ,jc=>jc.CustomerCode,c=> c.NewNLKNo,(jc,c)=>{jc,c=c.firstordefault()})
.groupjoin(_db.#temp ,jc2=>jc2.OldAcNo,c2=> c2.OldNLKNo,(jc2,c2)=>{jc2,c2=c2.firstordefault()})
.select(x=> new{
//as you want
}).distinct().tolist();
I have this freeform SQL that when run returns the name of a product, name of the associate attribute and the value for that attribute. What I am trying to work out is how I can use the with Ruby on Rails and Active Record
Freeform Query
select menu_items.name, menu_attributes.name, menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_value from menu_attributes, menu_items, menu_attributes_items, venues
where menu_items.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_item_id
and menu_attributes.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_id
and venues.id = menu_attributes_items.venue_id
and menu_attributes.name = 'Price'
This is my current HAMl Template, though it only returns a list of the attributes i.e. Price, Size and not the values like the SQL does
- for item in #venue.menu_items
.grid-content
.card
= image_tag("drinks/#{item.name.titlecase.tr(' ','-')}.png")
%img{:src => "http://placehold.it/400x200?text=Coffee"}
.card-divider
= item.name
.card-section
%h4
- for attr in item.menu_attributes
= attr.name
= MenuItem.joins({ menu_attributes: :menu_attributes_items }, :venues).where('menu_items.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_item_id AND menu_attributes.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_id AND menu_attributes.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_id AND venues.id = menu_attributes_items.venue_id AND menu_attributes.name = ?', 'Price').select('menu_items.name, menu_attributes.name, menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_value')
Updates
Price # Size # Size #
Depending on the associations among your models and still with a slight touch of SQL, your query can be written with ActiveRecord this way:
MenuItem.joins({ menu_attributes: :menu_attributes_items }, :venues)
.where('menu_items.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_item_id AND menu_attributes.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_id AND menu_attributes.id = menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_id AND venues.id = menu_attributes_items.venue_id AND menu_attributes.name = ?', 'Price')
.select('menu_items.name, menu_attributes.name, menu_attributes_items.menu_attribute_value')
I need help designing a query via Active Record & Postgresql.
• The query must search across all of the following columns...
The Model looks like this:
Collection
item_id1: String
item_id2: String
item_id3: String
item_id4: String
item_id5: String
item_id6: String
• The query needs to pass in an array of strings that need to be searched across all of the item_id fields.
• The query must also only return results of Records containing all of the strings within the array.
Note: I also have the Textacular Full Text Search gem installed. However, I tested a search that I believe is supposed to search and return matches only if the records include all of the passed in strings, and the search came up with nothing, despite records with those strings existing in my database. Like this: Collection.advanced_search('B0066AJ5TK&B0041KJSL2')
Just to clarify: You want records where each of the strings in the array are found somewhere within the six item_id fields?
There's probably a more elegant way to do this, but here's what I've got off the top of my head:
terms = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz']
conditions = []
values = {}
terms.each_with_index do |t,i|
arg_id = "term#{i}".to_sym
conditions << "(item_id1 = :#{arg_id} OR item_id2 = :#{arg_id} OR item_id3 = :#{arg_id} OR item_id4 = :#{arg_id} OR item_id5 = :#{arg_id} OR item_id6 = :#{arg_id})"
values[arg_id] = t
end
Collection.where(conditions.join(' AND '), values)
This should produce a query like this:
SELECT "collections".* FROM "collections" WHERE ((item_id1 = 'foo' OR item_id2 = 'foo' OR item_id3 = 'foo' OR item_id4 = 'foo' OR item_id5 = 'foo' OR item_id6 = 'foo') AND (item_id1 = 'bar' OR item_id2 = 'bar' OR item_id3 = 'bar' OR item_id4 = 'bar' OR item_id5 = 'bar' OR item_id6 = 'bar') AND (item_id1 = 'baz' OR item_id2 = 'baz' OR item_id3 = 'baz' OR item_id4 = 'baz' OR item_id5 = 'baz' OR item_id6 = 'baz'))
Which is long and ugly, but should get the results you want.
If you meant that the fields might contain the strings to be searched for, rather than be equal to them, you could instead use
item_id1 LIKE #{arg_id}
and
values[arg_id] = "%#{t}%"
I need a list of ACTIVE products from the magento database with the following information.
If there are additional information that is fine, but the following information need to be there.
SKU:
PRODUCT NAME:
PRODUCT CATEGORY:
SHORT DESCRIPTION:
LONG DESCRIPTION:
WEIGHT:
What is the way to write a query for this. I just need to get the data. No php, just sql query.(Db structure is bit complex)
try that, it works to get the product data: (status = 2 = product disabled, status = 1 = product enabled)
SELECT `e`.*, IF(_table_status.value_id > 0, _table_status.value, _table_status_default.value) AS `status
FROM `mage_catalog_product_entity` AS `e`
INNER JOIN `mage_catalog_product_entity_int` AS `_table_status_default`
ON (`_table_status_default`.`entity_id` = `e`.`entity_id`)
AND (`_table_status_default`.`attribute_id` = '80')
AND `_table_status_default`.`store_id` = 0
LEFT JOIN `mage_catalog_product_entity_int` AS `_table_status`
ON (`_table_status`.`entity_id` = `e`.`entity_id`)
AND (`_table_status`.`attribute_id` = (SELECT attribute_id FROM mage_eav_attribute WHERE attribute_code = 'status' AND entity_type_id = 4))
AND (`_table_status`.`store_id` = '1')
WHERE (IF(_table_status.value_id > 0, _table_status.value, _table_status_default.value) = '2')
For the category you will need some extra work. I get this sql query by doing the following in PHP and the Magento collection:
/* #var $productCollection Mage_Catalog_Model_Resource_Eav_Mysql4_Product_Collection */
$productCollection = Mage::getModel('catalog/product')->getCollection();
$productCollection->addFieldToFilter('status', array('eq' => '2'))->load(true);