in the code below it seems that SQL is performing a calculation with a variable that is still not defined in the current context:
Abs([MVE_UP_100]/([MARKET_VALUE]*0.01)) AS MODIFIED_DURATION,
Sum(cst_sum_crosstab_intereses2.MVE_UP_100) AS MVE_UP_100,
As you see MVE_UP_100 is defined after the first line is executed, so I don't know why the code still does the calculation.
Any help?
Because MVE_UP_100 is a field name in cst_sum_crosstab_intereses2, so it is defined already but its content would be different that the contents of your aliased field
Related
Really just a curious question.
Here are a few examples of the same concern that I have since they are being exported to the FM "REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY" for parameter "it_fieldcat".
ls_fieldcat-seltext_l = 'Material number'(052).
ls_fieldcat-seltext_m = 'Material'(053).
ls_fieldcat-seltext_s = 'Mat.'(054).
I tried removing the numbers on the right and executed the program but I didn't see any differences and I also tried to see what happens inside debug mode but it only fills the field with the string value, am I missing something or is there something that I wasn't able to notice?
I've been tasked to create a copy of a program which originally joins multiple tables and filters them according to the Parameters from the SELECTION-SCREEN and then shows the results in an ALV Grid Report, but for the use case of the copy it should instead populate a table in ECC that we will then be replicating to BW side. I have successfully copied and modified it accordingly but I can't seem to understand what the numbers beside the strings are doing.
Can someone please explain what their use is, would be very grateful to see a few examples.
Thanks!
The number in the brackets is a text symbol defined as a part of the text elements of the program. Using the syntax 'Literal'(idf) replaces these literals in the program if the symbol is in the currently loaded text pool.
I am trying to add a formal parameter in the FORM and PERFORM in an existing code, as I will be need it the extra parameter in a new function that I have to call. The idea is that when executing the new code it keeps showing the error: Different parameter count in FORM and PERFORM (routine: CM_SHOW_CRC, number of formal parameters: 2, number of actual parameters: 3).
The code that I have for the form part is as follows:
FORM cm_show_crc
USING
civ_matnr TYPE matnr
civ_charg TYPE charg_d
civ_werks TYPE werks_d. "The parameter that I added
And the perform code is:
PERFORM cm_show_crc
USING
pis_sdow_alv-matnr
pis_sdow_alv-charg
pis_sdow_alv-werks. "The parameter that I added
The table pis_sdow_alv is type of a structure that also includes the variable WERK(Component type WERKS_D)
Before adding the new parameter WERK the code was working fine.
May anyone know what the problem in this part of the code may be?
There was also another similar question in: Different number of parameters in FORM and PERFORM, however I am not using the syntax CHANGING in my code, as it was also not used prior.
Please do tell me if you need additional information.
Thank you all in advance!
This problem can occur when FORM and PERFORM are in different includes and you only activate one but not the other.
When you activate an include, then it is checked against the active version of all other repository objects it depends on. Not the saved version. This can lead to an annoying catch-22 situation. You can not activate A because it does not match the previous version of B, and you can not activate B because it does not match the previous version of A.
The solution to this conundrum is to activate both objects together. When you activate something in SE80 and you have multiple inactive objects, you get a window where you can select multiple objects to activate together:
In Eclipse, you get a similar list by clicking on the "activate multiple" button:
I am doing a simulation of a production line, which is built through Excel.
Now there is one, which needs free setting of worker shifts for each machine, three shifts in total.
My idea is to create three different Schedules, representing each of the three shifts, and then in the ResourcePool, use the If statement to set up the use of each shift. As shown in the picture enter image description here
But it didn't work. If it is possable, Could you please tell me if there is something wrong with the Java statement or the idea is wrong.
If possible, could you please tell me how to set multiple schedules in ResourcePool?
Additions to the question：
The model is to do the evaluation of the production system and the shift of the workers is an important evaluation parameter. What I want to do is to enter the shift of the workers directly in the Excel sheet and ResourcePool recognizes and uses the corresponding Schedule.
I tried to generate the corresponding Schedule by code, but the Schedule of Resourcepool cannot be set dynamically. So I would like to try to manually input multiple Schedules into the model and then set the corresponding Schedule in ResourcePool by If statement like the image.
Thanks in advance
The first thing you need to know is that the location where you placed the code is a static parameter, thus it is only evaluated once, when the object is created and not checked continuously.
This is indicated by the little popup when you hover over the button that change the entry field from code to value
If it was dynamic it would state Dynamic Value instead of Static Value
Secondly, inside that field you must use a ternary operator, not an if statement, so that the result of the formula is a scheduled object, else you will get a "misplaced construct(s)" error
If you changed the code to
v_Shift == "Shift1" ?
s_Shift1 : v_Shift == "Shift2" ? s_Shift2 : s_Shift3
It will work BUT:
It will only be evaluated when the object is created and not again
Rather not use == on Strings, always use .equals(), on Strings it might work, and sometimes it might not. You can do some research as to why ;-)
Solution: You will have to use a function to change the schedule of the resource pool. Call this function whenever the v_Shift variable changes
I want to put one condition for the columns in the report. I am passing a parameter called "TEMPLATE", I want to make some of the columns in report visible only if the values of passed parameter lies IN ["A","B",C","D"]. I am putting it like:
=IF([TEMPLATE]IN("A";"B";"C";"D";"E");TRUE();FALSE());
But it says syntax error every time and doesn't work. Can someone please help me in making it correct.
This is the correct syntax:
=IF(IN([TEMPLATE];"a";"b";"c");TRUE();FALSE())
where is
IN(<condition>;<sample1>;<sample2>;...)
returns true if <condition> equals to one of the <sampleX>. Otherwise return false.
I'm having a problem when working with multivalue parameters between reports.
I have a main report in which I have defined a multivalue paramer, which I use to run a SQL query to populate its dataset. The parameter is used in the WHERE clause in the following way:
WHERE values IN (#parameter)
It's working fine and it retreives the expected data.
Then this main report passes this parameter to a subreport. The parameter is also defined as multivalue in the subreport and, as far as I can see in the parameter's dropdownlist it receives the values in the right way. Something like this: A, B, C
The thing is that the query that populates the subreport's dataset returns nothing.
It also has a WHERE clause defined as in the main report (which is already working)
WHERE values IN (#parameter)
If I run the query manually, hardcoding the values to something like this:
WHERE values IN ('A', 'B', 'C')
it works, but when I try to use the parameter it doesn't. So, somehow it's losing the format or the values in the way.
I tried this solution in the subreport's dataset definition, which was proposed in another thread:
=join(Parameters!<your param name>.Value,",")
But it doesn't work for me, the dataset is still empty.
Any ideas about what I'm missing?
Thanks! :)
This should "just work." Make sure that the Parameter in the subreport is set up as multivalue, and I usually use the exact same query as in the parent report to provide "Available Values."
Check that you are passing the entire parameter to the subreport: In subreport properties on the parent report, the parameter's value should read [#MyParamName] not <<Expr>>. If it reads as the latter, edit the expression and make sure it doesn't have a (0) at the end. but =Parameters!MyParamName.Value is correct, not =Parameters!MyParamName.Value(0)
Just created the report from scratch again and it worked. I must have forgotten something in the middle.
Anyway, just in case somebody needs it, the two parameters, the one in the main report and the one in the subreport , must be defined as multivalue.
Then in your query you should use IN in your WHERE clase, something like this:
WHERE field IN (#parameter)
And nothing else is needed. I didn't need to do the following:
=join(Parameters!<your param name>.Value,",")
It just worked for me
I think I know what you did, as I was drawn here by having the same problem.
The subreports were setup fine, but when entering the parameter binding in the parent report, the Value drop down did not offer my parameter, so I used expression builder to select it. This left the grey << Expr >> marker in the value and would only work when I had only one value selected from the list. When I replaced this with [#MyParam] it worked fine regardless of the number of values selected. When I had a look at the value expression builder had created a bit closer it had =Parameters!MyParam.Value(0). Removing the (0) also fixes it.