I have a large log file which I loaded in to HDFS. HDFS will replicate to different nodes based on rack awareness.
Now I load the same file into a hive table. The commands are as below:
create table log_analysis (logtext string) STORED AS TEXTFILE
LOCATION '/user/hive/warehouse/';
LOAD DATA INPATH '/user/log/apache.log' OVERWRITE INTO TABLE log_analysis;
Now when I go and see the '/user/hive/warehouse/' directory there is a table file and copying it to local, it has all the log file data.
My question is: the existing file in HDFS is replicated. Then loading that file in hive table, stored on HDFS also gets replicated.
Is that not the same file stored 6 times (assuming that replication factor is 3) ? That would be such a waste of resources.
Correct, In case you are loading the data from HDFS , the data moves from HDFS to the /user/hive/warehouse/yourdatabasename/tablename.
Your question indicates that you have created an INTERNAL table using hive and you are loading data into HIVE table from HDFS location.
When you load data into an internal table using LOAD DATA INPATAH command, It moves data from the primary location to another location. In your case, it should be /user/hive/warehouse/log_analysis. So basically it provides new address and new HDFS location of the data and you won't be seeing anything in the previous location.
When you move data from one location to another location on HDFS. NameNode receives a new location of the data and it deletes all old metadata for that data. Hence there won't be any duplicate information of the data and the data and there will be only 3 replication and it will be stored only 3 times.
I hope it clear to you.
Related
Currently We use orc file format to store the incoming traffic in s3 for fraud detection analysis
We did choose orc file format for following reasons
compression
and ability to query the data using athena
Problem :
As the orc files are read only as soon and we want to update the file contents constantly every 20 minutes
which implies we
need to download the orc files from s3,
read the file
write to the end of file
and finally upload it back to s3
This was not a problem but as the data grows significantly every day ~2GB every day. It is highly costly process to download 10Gb files read it and write and upload it
Question :
Is there any way to use another file format which also offers appends/inserts and can be used by athena to query?
From this article it says avro is file format, but not sure
If athena can be used for querying ?
any other issues ?
Note: My skill on big data technologies is on beginner level
If your table is not partitioned, can simply copy (aws s3 cp) your new orc files to the target s3 path for the table and they will be available instantly for querying via Athena.
If your table is partitioned, you can copy new files to the paths corresponding to your specific partitions. At the end of copying new files to the partition, you need to add or update that partition into Athena's metastore.
For example, if your table is partitioned by date, then you need to run this query to ensure your partition gets added/updated:
alter table dataset.tablename add if not exists
partition (date = YYYYMMDD)
location 's3://your-bucket/path_to_table/date=YYYYMMDD/'
as per my understanding on Hive concepts, if we load the dataset into hive table, the data file will move from source path to hive warehouse within HDFS, and HDFS was set to three replicas for the data.
these questions might look silly but as i am beginner, i want clear my doubts.
my questions are:
1) if i delete the hive table, will it delete data file from hive warehouse only or along other two replicas from HDFS also?
2)if we are processing query on hive table, will that query be done as distributed processing?
per say, one data file is of size 1GB (interns 8 blocks x 128MB), and as we have three replication factor, there would be total 24 blocks available for this file
will our hive query be distributed among all the data blocks or it would be processed on hive warehouse blocks only?
Thanks in advance..
If you do "load data inpath" from a HDFS path the data will be moved from source to destination HDFS path,
If you do "load data local inpath", it doesn't move data from local to HDFS path, instead it copies
For your question
If you delete file in HDFS all the replicas are deleted.
If you have a 1gb file (8 blocks) with 3 replication factor, when you trigger the query in hive CLI, it converts your query to MR. It process only 8 blocks, in case of the datanode failure of the triggered job, it accesses the 2nd replica on a different node and processes the data (speculative execution)
I have created an external table that in Hive that uses data from a Parquet store in HDFS.
When the data in HDFS is deleted, there is no data in the table. When the data is inserted again in the same spot in HDFS, the table does not get updated to contain the new data. If I insert new records into the existing table that contains data, no new data is shown when I run my Hive queries.
How I create the table in Hive:
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE nodes (id string) STORED AS PARQUET LOCATION "/hdfs/nodes";
The relevant error:
Error: java.io.FileNotFoundException: File does not exist: /hdfs/nodes/part-r-00038-2149d17d-f890-48bc-a9dd-5ea07b0ec590.gz.parquet
I have seen several posts that explain that external tables should have the most up to date data in them, such as here. However, this is not the case for me, and I don't know what is happening.
I inserted the same data into the database again, and queried the table. It contained the same amount of data as before. I then created an identical table with a different name. It had twice as much data in it, which was the right amount.
The issue might be with the metastore database. I am using PostgreSQL instead of Derby for the the database.
Relevant information:
Hive 0.13.0
Spark Streaming 1.4.1
PostgreSQL 9.3
CentOS 7
EDIT:
After examining the Parquet files, I found that the part files have seemingly incompatible file names.
-rw-r--r-- 3 hdfs hdfs 18702811 2015-08-27 08:22 /hdfs/nodes/part-r-00000-1670f7a9-9d7c-4206-84b5-e812d1d8fd9a.gz.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 3 hdfs hdfs 18703029 2015-08-26 15:43 /hdfs/nodes/part-r-00000-7251c663-f76e-4903-8c5d-e0c6f61e0192.gz.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 3 hdfs hdfs 18724320 2015-08-27 08:22 /hdfs/nodes/part-r-00001-1670f7a9-9d7c-4206-84b5-e812d1d8fd9a.gz.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 3 hdfs hdfs 18723575 2015-08-26 15:43 /hdfs/nodes/part-r-00001-7251c663-f76e-4903-8c5d-e0c6f61e0192.gz.parquet
These files are the files that causes Hive to error when it can't find it in the error described above. This means that the external table is not acting dynamically, accepting any files in the directory (if you call it that in HDFS), but instead is probably just keeping track of the list of parquet files inside the directory when it was created.
Sample Spark code:
nodes.foreachRDD(rdd => {
if (!rdd.isEmpty())
sqlContext.createDataFrame(rdd.map(
n => Row(n.stuff), ParquetStore.nodeSchema)
.write.mode(SaveMode.Append).parquet(node_name)
})
Where the nodeSchema is the schema and node_name is "/hdfs/nodes"
See my other question about getting Hive external tables to detect new files.
In order to get Hive to update its tables, I had to resort to using the partitioning feature of Hive. By creating a new partition during each Spark run, I create a series of directories internal to the /hdfs/nodes directory like this:
/hdfs/nodes/timestamp=<a-timestamp>/<parquet-files>
/hdfs/nodes/timestamp=<a-different-timestamp>/<parquet-files>
Then, after each Spark job completes, I run the Hive command MSCK REPAIR TABLE nodes using a HiveContext in my Spark job, which finds new partitions and updates the table.
I realize this isn't automatic, but it at least works.
Ok, so probably you need to encapsulate the file in a folder. Hive external table must be mapped on a folder where there could be more than one file.
try to write the file to: /path/to/hdfs/nodes/file
and then map the external table to /path/to/hdfs/nodes
so in the folder nodes you will have only the parquet file and it should works
I have 1 TB data in my HDFS in .csv format. When I load it in my Hive table what will be the total size of data. I mean will there be 2 copies of same data i.e 1 Copy in HDFS and other in Hive table ? Plz clarify. Thanks in advance.
If you create a hive external table, you provide a HDFS location for the table and you store that data into that particular location.
When you create a hive internal table hive create a directory into /apps/hive/warehouse/ directory.
Say, your table name is table1 then your directory will be /apps/hive/warehouse/table1
This directory is also a HDFS directory and when you load data into the table into internal table it goes into its directory.
Hive creates a mapping between table and their corresponding HDFS location and hence when you read the data its reading from the corresponding mapped directory.
Hence there wont be duplicate copy of data corresponding to table and their HDFS location.
But if in your Hadoop cluster Data Replication factor is set to 3(default replication) then it will take 3TB cluster disk space(as you have 1TB data) but there wont be any effect of your hive table data.
Please see below link to know more about Data replication.
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r1.2.1/hdfs_design.html#Data+Replication
It depends whether you are creating an internal or external table in Hive.
If you create an external table in Hive, it will create a mapping on where your data is stored in HDFS and there won't be any duplication at all. Hive will automatically pick the data where ever it is stored in HDFS.
Read more about external tables here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-ExternalTables
I am new to Hadoop and I just started working on Hive, I my understanding it provides a query language to process data in HDFS. With HiveQl we can create tables and load data into it from HDFS.
So my question is: where are those tables stored? Specifically if we have 100 GB file in our HDFS and we want to make a hive table out of that data what will be the size of that table and where is it stored?
If my understanding about this concept is wrong please correct me ..
If the table is 100GB you should consider an Hive External Table (as opposed to a "managed table", for the difference, see this).
With an external table the data itself will be still stored on the HDFS in the file path that you specify (note that you may specify a directory of files as long as they all have the same structure), but Hive will create a map of it in the meta-store whereas the managed table will store the data "in Hive".
When you drop a managed table, it drops the underlying data as opposed to dropping a hive external table which only drops the meta-data from the meta-store referencing that data.
Either way you are using only 100GB as viewed by the user and are taking advantage of the HDFS' robustness though duplication of the data.
Hive will create a directory on HDFS. If you didn't specify any location it will create a directory at /user/hive/warehouse on HDFS. After load command the files are moved to the /warehouse/tablename. You can also point to the HDFS directory if it contains partitions (if the files are partitioned), or use external table concept.