Postgresql function auto add 's' character to the end of string - sql

I have a function in PostgreSQL database. However, every time I run the function in PostgreSQL, it auto-adda the character s behind of the query, therefore, I receive an error when it executes.
An example query ends up looking like this:
WHAT IN HERE: query SELECT uom_id FROM ps_quantity where id = 11s
My version is PostgreSQL 9.2.13. How can I solve this? Thanks.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION select_field(
selected_table text,
selected_field text,
field_type_sample anyelement,
where_clause text DEFAULT ''::text)
RETURNS anyelement AS
$BODY$ DECLARE
-- Log
ME constant text := 'selected_field()';
-- Local variables
_qry varchar := '';
_result_value ALIAS FOR $0;
where_clause1 varchar := 'asdasdsad';
BEGIN
RAISE NOTICE 'FUNCTION: SELECT_FIELD';
-- BANGPH
RAISE NOTICE 'BANGPH - CHANGE 11s to 11';
_qry := 'SELECT uom_id FROM ps_quantity where id = 11';
RAISE NOTICE 'WHERE = %s', where_clause1;
RAISE NOTICE 'WHAT IN HERE: query %s', _qry;

As the manual explains:
instead of:
RAISE NOTICE 'WHAT IN HERE: query %s', _qry;
you need to use:
RAISE NOTICE 'WHAT IN HERE: query %', _qry;
Placeholders for the RAISE statement don't have a "type modifier", it's a plain %

Related

PostgreSQL 11 - using format to assign to variable

I have been awake for well beyond my schedule and I have been stuck with this issue for a long time, I don't even know what I am looking for to solve, but I wish to use format to insert values that I'll be using for column names, and then executing it... but it keeps giving me errors no matter how much I try changing it :c
Heres the part that im trying to do something that doesnt work, but i think you get the idea what im trying to achieve
ratelimit := EXECUTE format('(SELECT %I
FROM users.ratelimits
WHERE user_id = $2)
', $1);
and heres the full code for the brave
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION users.consume_ratelimit(_name text,__user_id integer)
RETURNS boolean
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
VOLATILE
PARALLEL UNSAFE
COST 100
AS $BODY$DECLARE
ratelimit INTEGER;
reset_timeout timestamptz;
premium BOOLEAN;
BEGIN
ratelimit := EXECUTE format('(SELECT %I
FROM users.ratelimits
WHERE user_id = $2)
', $1);
reset_timeout := EXECUTE format('(SELECT %I_refresh
FROM users.ratelimits
WHERE user_id = $2)
', $1);
premium := (SELECT users.is_premium($2));
IF premium THEN
RETURN TRUE;
ELSIF reset_timeout <= NOW() THEN
UPDATE users.ratelimits
SET image_refresh = NOW() + '1 hour'::interval,
image = DEFAULT
WHERE user_id = $2;
RAISE NOTICE 'reset';
RETURN TRUE;
ELSE
IF ratelimit > 0 THEN
EXECUTE format('UPDATE users.ratelimits
SET %I = %I - 1
WHERE user_id = $2', $1, $1);
RAISE NOTICE 'decrement';
RETURN TRUE;
ELSIF ratelimit <= 0 THEN
RAISE NOTICE 'out of credits';
RETURN FALSE;
ELSE
EXECUTE format('INSERT INTO users.ratelimits(user_id) VALUES ($2)
ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE SET
%I = excluded.%I,
%I_refresh = excluded.%I_refresh', $1, $1, $1, $1);
RAISE NOTICE 'create';
RETURN TRUE;
END IF;
END IF;
END;$BODY$;
As documented in the manual you need to use into together with EXECUTE to store the result into a variable. This can handle multiple columns/variables as well, so you only need a single EXECUTE to get both values.
For clarity you should reference parameters by name, not by position.
EXECUTE format('SELECT %I, %I_refresh
FROM users.ratelimits WHERE user_id = $1'),
_name, _name)
USING __user_id
INTO ratelimit, reset_timeout;
Note the $1 inside the string for format() is a parameter placeholder used when the SQL statement is executed, and will be replaced with the value of the variable specified in the USING clause.
Variable assignment is also more efficient without a SELECT:
premium := users.is_premium(__user_id);
It seems some_var := EXECUTE ... will not work. Additionally, params inside of an EXECUTE statement are not the same as those in the function - you need to supply them to the execute statement.
I have not tested this, but perhaps
-- q declared above as text
q := format('
SELECT %I
FROM users.ratelimits
WHERE user_id = %s;
', $1, $2);
EXECUTE q INTO ratelimit;
will work? I also removed the parens from the query, those are unnecessary and may the problem themselves.
I have tested the function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_sum (a int, b int)
RETURNS int
AS $$
DECLARE
q text;
result int;
BEGIN
q := FORMAT ('SELECT %s + %s', $1, $2);
EXECUTE q INTO result;
RETURN result;
END
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql
and that does work. If my suggestion above does not work, perhaps you can use the above as a starting point.

PostgreSQL how to disable plan caching to fix my base62 hashing?

From the documentation i gather, that PostgreSQL somehow employs its own cache and prepares satements ahead...
This is really bad for my base62 hash values. At some point, after 2-3 tries, they start returning the same number:
LOG: base62_id.val 1501145675089
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 23 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: copied_article_id QQZCFzm | article_count 1
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 37 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: base62_id.val 1501145675089
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 23 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: copied_article_id QQZCFzm | article_count 1
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 37 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: base62_id.val 1501145675089
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 23 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: copied_article_id QQZCFzm | article_count 1
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function copy_article(text) line 37 at RAISE
STATEMENT: select to_json("public"."copy_article"($1)) as value
LOG: base62_id.val 1501145675089
Here is my function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION base62_id() RETURNS character varying
LANGUAGE plpgsql IMMUTABLE
AS $$
DECLARE
chars char[];
ret varchar;
val bigint;
BEGIN
chars := ARRAY['0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9'
,'A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J','K','L','M'
,'N','O','P','Q','R','S','T','U','V','W','X','Y','Z'
,'a','b','c','d','e','f','g','h','i','j','k','l','m'
,'n','o','p','q','r','s','t','u','v','w','x','y','z'];
val := (CEIL(EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM now()) * 1000))::bigint;
RAISE LOG 'base62_id.val %', val;
ret := '';
IF val < 0 THEN
val := val * -1;
END IF;
WHILE val != 0 LOOP
ret := chars[(val % 62)+1] || ret;
val := val / 62;
END LOOP;
RETURN ret;
END;$$;
In theory, this should work...
Any ideas?
Edit: How i use the function:
DECLARE
copied_article_id text := base62_id();
duplication_check int := 1;
copied_article articles;
BEGIN
WHILE duplication_check IS NOT NULL LOOP
SELECT COUNT(*) INTO duplication_check FROM articles WHERE id = copied_article_id;
END LOOP;
INSERT ... INTO ... SELECT ...
FROM
articles
WHERE
id = base_id;
SELECT * INTO copied_article FROM articles WHERE id = copied_article_id LIMIT 1;
Your explanation is pretty bogus. Plan caching has nothing to do with this outcome, the plancache doesn't care about individual function outputs.
There's at least two giant gaping bugs in the function:
You declare it IMMUTABLE but you call now() which is not immutable. IMMUTABLE functions must return the same result for every call with the same inputs. In fact, your function must be declared VOLATILE if it's allowed to return a different value for each call with the same inputs.
now() is STABLE. It actually returns the same value for each call within a transaction. So presumably using it when you want unique values makes no sense at all. I imagine you actually want clock_timestamp().
The latter problem with now() (a.k.a. current_timestamp) being STABLE across a transaction is likely the cause for the results you report.
BTW, the function will also probably be amazingly slow implemented in plpgsql. If you can turn it into a set operation plus string_agg it might be more tolerable, but still slow.

Invalid Identifier When Trying to Use Package Function in Summation Expression

I'm trying to use the sum function with a package function but running into an "invalid identifier" bug. Here's some example code with the error causing function commented
create or replace type numType as object
(
myNum number
)
;
/
create or replace type numTypes is table of numType;
/
create or replace package testNumberPackage as
function ReturnNum(in_numType numType) return number;
end;
/
create or replace package body testNumberPackage as
function ReturnNum(in_numType numType) return number is
begin
return in_numType.myNum;
end;
end;
/
declare l_numTypes numTypes;
l_count number;
begin
l_numTypes := numTypes();
for i in 1 .. 100 loop
l_numTypes.extend(1);
l_numTypes(l_numTypes.last) := numType(i);
end loop;
select sum(n.myNum) into l_count from table(l_numTypes) n;
select sum(testNumberPackage.ReturnNum(n)) into l_count from table(l_numTypes) n; --causes the error
dbms_output.put_line(l_count);
end;
/
The exact error for this code is
ORA-06550: line 11, column 42
PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "N": invalid identifier
ORA-6550: line 11, column 3:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
Thanks for any help.
The first issue is that you can't pass a table into a parameter by using its alias. It doesn't even make sense to try doing that.
The next issue is how to get the column mynum that is returned from the table(l_numTypes) into the correct format to pass into testNumberPackage.ReturnNum, since it's of NUMBER datatype, and the function is expecting a numtype parameter.
To do that, you need to pass in an object with that column, like so: numtype(n.mynum).
The following works for me:
declare
l_numTypes numTypes;
l_count number;
begin
l_numTypes := numTypes();
for i in 1 .. 100 loop
l_numTypes.extend(1);
l_numTypes(l_numTypes.last) := numType(i);
end loop;
select sum(n.myNum) into l_count from table(l_numTypes) n;
select sum(testNumberPackage.ReturnNum(numtype(n.mynum))) into l_count from table(l_numTypes) n; --causes the error
dbms_output.put_line(l_count);
end;
/
5050
Clear as mud?

Adding Many (UDFs) Validation Functions to Oracle - Which Method Run Fastest

I have to move around 50+ validation functions into Oracle. I'm looking for the approach that runs fastest, but also would like to get around a boolean issue if possible. The return object for them all needs to be the same so that the application can react off the result in a consistent fashion and alert the user or display whatever popups, messages we may need. I created a valObj for this, but not sure yet if that is the best approach. The return format can be changed because the front-end that reacts off of it is not developed yet. In the end it will contain many different validation functions, from integer, number, phone, email, IPv4, IPv6, etc... This is what I have so far...
/***
This is the validation object.
It stores 1 for valid, 0 for not valid and some helper text that can be relayed back to the user.
***/
create or replace type valObj as object (
result number(1),
resultText varchar(32000)
);
/***
Coming from ColdFusion this seems clean to me but the function
will end up being a couple thousand lines long.
***/
create or replace function isValid(v in varchar2, format in varchar2)
return valObj
is
test number;
begin
if format = 'number' then
begin
test := to_number(v);
return valObj(1,null);
exception when VALUE_ERROR then return valObj(0,'Invalid number. Valid formats are: 12345, 12345.67, -12345, etc...');
end;
elsif format = 'integer' then
null; --TO DO
elsif format = 'email' then
null; --TO DO
elsif format = 'IPv4' then
null; --TO DO
elsif format = 'IPv6' then
null; --TO DO
end if;
--dozens of others to follow....
end;
/
/* Example Usage in SQL */
select isValid('blah','number') from dual; -- returns: (0, Invalid number. Valid formats are: 12345, 12345.67, -12345, etc...)
select isValid('blah','number').result from dual; -- returns: 0
select isValid('blah','number').resulttext from dual; -- returns: Valid formats are: 12345, 12345.67, -12345, etc...
select isValid(1234567890.123,'number') from dual; -- returns: 1,{null}
select isValid(1234567890.123,'number').result from dual; -- returns: 1
select isValid(1234567890.123,'number').resulttext from dual; -- returns: {null}
/* Example Usage in PL/SQL */
declare
temp valObj;
begin
temp := isValid('blah','number');
if (temp.result = 0) then
dbms_output.put_line(temp.resulttext);
else
dbms_output.put_line('Valid');
end if;
end;
/
My questions are:
When using it in PL/SQL I would love to be able to do boolean checks instead like this: if (temp.result) then but I can't figure out a way, cause that won't work in SQL. Should I just add a 3rd boolean attribute to the valObj or is there another way I don't know of?
These validation functions could end up being called within large loops. Knowing that, is this the most efficient way to accomplish these validations?
I'd appreciate any help. Thanks!
UPDATE: I forgot about MEMBER FUNCTIONS. Thanks #Brian McGinity for reminding me. So I'd like to go with this method since it keeps the type and its functions encapsulated together. Would there be any speed difference between this method and a stand-alone function? Would this be compiled and stored the same as a stand-alone function?
create or replace type isValid as object (
result number(1),
resulttext varchar2(32000),
constructor function isValid(v varchar, format varchar) return self as result );
/
create or replace type body isValid as
constructor function isValid(v varchar, format varchar) return self as result as
test number;
begin
if format = 'number' then
begin
test := to_number(v);
self.result := 1;
self.resulttext := null;
return;
exception when VALUE_ERROR then
self.result := 0;
self.resulttext := 'Invalid number. Valid formats are: 12345, 12345.67, -12345, etc...';
return;
end;
elsif format = 'phone' then
null; --TO DO
end if;
--and many others...
end;
end;
/
/* Example Usage in SQL */
select isValid('a','number') from dual;
/* Example Usage in PL/SQL */
declare
begin
if (isValid('a','number').result = 1) then
null;
end if;
end;
/
TEST RESULTS:
/* Test isValid (the object member function), this took 7 seconds to run */
declare
begin
for i in 1 .. 2000000 loop
if (isValid('blah','number').result = 1) then
null;
end if;
end loop;
end;
/* Test isValid2 (the stand-alone function), this took 16 seconds to run */
declare
begin
for i in 1 .. 2000000 loop
if (isValid2('blah','number').result = 1) then
null;
end if;
end loop;
end;
Both isValid and isValid2 do the same exact code, they just run this line test := to_number(v); then do the exception if it fails and return the result. Does this appear to be a valid test? The Object member function method is actually faster than a stand-alone function???
The stand-alone function can be much faster if you set it to DETERMINISTIC and if the data is highly repetitive. On my machine this setting decreased run time from 9 seconds to 0.1 seconds. For reasons I don't understand that setting does not improve performance of the object function.
create or replace function isValid2(v in varchar2, format in varchar2)
return valObj
deterministic --<< Hit the turbo button!
is
test number;
begin
if format = 'number' then
begin
test := to_number(v);
return valObj(1,null);
exception when VALUE_ERROR then return valObj(0,'Invalid number. Valid formats are: 12345, 12345.67, -12345, etc...');
end;
end if;
end;
/
May also want to consider utilizing pls_integer over number. Don't know if it will buy you much, but documents suggest some gain will be had.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B10500_01/appdev.920/a96624/03_types.htm states,
"You use the PLS_INTEGER datatype to store signed integers. Its magnitude range is -2*31 .. 2*31. PLS_INTEGER values require less storage than NUMBER values. Also, PLS_INTEGER operations use machine arithmetic, so they are faster than NUMBER and BINARY_INTEGER operations, which use library arithmetic. For efficiency, use PLS_INTEGER for all calculations that fall within its magnitude range."

How fix double encoding in PostgreSQL?

I have a table in PostgreSQL with words, but some words have invalid UTF-8 chars like 0xe7e36f and 0xefbfbd.
How I can identify all chars inside words that are invalid and replace they with some symbol like ??
EDIT: My database is in UTF-8, but I think there are double encoding from various other encodings. I think this because when I tried to convert to one type as LATIN1, I get an error saying that some char don't exists in that encoding, when I change to LATIN2 I get
the same error, but with another character.
So, what is possible to do to solve this?
Usage
It's a solution for my specific case, but maybe with some modifications can help another people.
Usage
SELECT fix_wrong_encoding('LATIN1');
Function
-- Convert words with wrong encoding
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fix_wrong_encoding(encoding_name VARCHAR)
RETURNS VOID
AS $$
DECLARE
r RECORD;
counter INTEGER;
token_id INTEGER;
BEGIN
counter = 0;
FOR r IN SELECT t.id, t.text FROM token t
LOOP
BEGIN
RAISE NOTICE 'Converting %', r.text;
r.text := convert_from(convert_to(r.text,encoding_name),'UTF8');
RAISE NOTICE 'Converted to %', r.text;
RAISE NOTICE 'Checking existence.';
SELECT id INTO token_id FROM token WHERE text = r.text;
IF (token_id IS NOT NULL) THEN
BEGIN
RAISE NOTICE 'Token already exists. Updating ids in textblockhastoken';
IF(token_id = r.id) THEN
RAISE NOTICE 'Token is the same.';
CONTINUE;
END IF;
UPDATE textblockhastoken SET tokenid = token_id
WHERE tokenid = r.id;
RAISE NOTICE 'Removing current token.';
DELETE FROM token WHERE id = r.id;
END;
ELSE
BEGIN
RAISE NOTICE 'Token don''t exists. Updating text in token';
UPDATE token SET text = r.text WHERE id = r.id;
END;
END IF;
EXCEPTION WHEN untranslatable_character THEN
--do nothing
WHEN character_not_in_repertoire THEN
--do nothing
END;
counter = counter + 1;
RAISE NOTICE '% token converted', counter;
END LOOP;
END
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;