We are using the self test suite provided by sonos (latest version from website) in order to test our service implementation. The test fails when checkiong if our server support SSL and TLS 1.0.
Failed ssl_validation test_support_tls_10 Instance Messages: Fail:
The partner must support at least one of the following cipher
suites:AES128, AES256, RC4-MD5 and RC4-SHA.The server does not support
TLS1.0 (expression is False)
Stopped ssl_validation test_support_secure_renegotiation Instance
Messages: Stop: One sessionRegegotiation element should be returned,
indicating that api.anghami.com supports secure session renegotiation
(expression is False)
Failed ssl_validation test_certificate_expiration Instance Messages:
Fail: A notBefore and notAfter element should be returned, indicating
that api.anghami.com has a date range for validity.
Stopped ssl_validation test_DNS_has_valid_x509_certificate Instance
Messages: Stop: A X.509_certificate element should be returned,
indicating that api.anghami.com has a valid X.509 certificate for the
DNS name (expression is False)
Please note that we have checked our server using:
the online certificate checking tool provided by Symantec and the results show that the certificate is valid and installed correctly and that our server clearly supports: TLS 1.2 | TLS 1.1 | TLS 1.0, along with 2 of the required ciphers (please check error message above).
In addition, test results with some screenshots and additional log files were posted on Basecamp.
Waiting for your feedback.
Regards
Based on the above your certificate is not set up for secure renegotiation and does not have a valid date range; these are both required in order for us to accept the certificate. We will follow up on basecamp.
Related
I understand "certificate chain provided by the peer", if certificate provided by the peer is in the X509TrustManager, the certificate is trusted, so is it just need a checkTrusted instead of checkClientTrusted and checkServerTrusted, i don't understand what's the difference? Can anyone explains?
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/javax/net/ssl/X509TrustManager.html
void checkClientTrusted(X509Certificate[] chain, String authType):
Given the partial or complete certificate chain provided by the peer, build a certificate path to a trusted root and return if it can be validated and is trusted for client SSL authentication based on the authentication type.
void checkServerTrusted(X509Certificate[] chain, String authType):
Given the partial or complete certificate chain provided by the peer, build a certificate path to a trusted root and return if it can be validated and is trusted for server SSL authentication based on the authentication type.
In the early SSL/TLS protocols that existed when JSSE was designed, there was a significant difference between the constraints on and thus validation of server cert (linked to the key_exchange portion of the ciphersuite) versus client cert (mostly independent of key_exchange but controlled by CertReq); see rfc2246 7.4.2 and 7.4.4 (modified by rfc4492 2 and 3). Although authType is a String in both checkServer and checkClient, the values in it and the processing of them in the default TrustManager were significantly different.
TLS1.2, implemented (along with 1.1) by Java 7 and early 8, changed the cert constraints to also use a new signature_algorithms extension (from client) and field (from server) in combination with the prior fields. As a result in Java 7 up the interface you link is functionally replaced by a subtype class https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/javax/net/ssl/X509ExtendedTrustManager.html which in addition to the new constraint checks also moves to the JSSE layer only in checkServer the hostname checking aka endpoint identification formerly done at a higher level like HttpsURLConnection (if at all). The extended class additionally takes an SSLSocket or SSLEngine argument (as applicable) which allows access to the additional information for sigalgs and hostname.
Finally TLS1.3, implemented in java 11 up and backported to 8u261 up, uses only extensions, now two of them, and not the ciphersuite at all, for cert selection and checking. In 1.3 the extended API is still called but the value in authType is meaningless and must not be used, and in at least some cases I have looked at is in fact empty, so the actual (rfc5280) validation is in fact the same for both directions. But as above checkServer does endpoint identification if applicable while checkClient does not.
See an actual difference in https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/158339/ssl-tls-certificate-chain-validation-result-in-invalid-authentication-type-d (note: 2017 was before TLS1.3 existed)
and compare javax.net.ssl.SSLContext to trust everything sslContext.init(keyManagerFactory.getKeyManagers(), ???, new SecureRandom()); .
I am stuck at using SSL in IBM Websphere MQ (9.2).
I am building a client library for MQ and to get more familiar with MQ on the server side I have installed IBM MQ Developer edition and ran the supplied scripts to create a 'default' MQ server instance.
Created an client connection for the DEV.APP.SVRCONN server connection
Created a personal certificate by using the IBM Key management tool and named it ibmwebspheremq
Enabled SSL on the Queue Manager (QM1) and labelled it ibmwebspheremq
Updated the SSL configuration for the DEV.APP.SVRCONN channel and set the cipherspec property to TLS 1.2, 256-bit Secure Hash Algorithm, 128-bit AES encryption (TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) and made SSL required.
Tested my settings with:
amqssslc -l ibmwebspheremq -k C:\ProgramData\IBM\MQ\qmgrs\QM1\ssl\key -c DEV.APP.SVRCONN -x 127.0.0.1 -s TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 -m QM1
And that gave me:
Sample AMQSSSLC start
Connecting to queue manager QM1
Using the server connection channel DEV.APP.SVRCONN
on connection name 127.0.0.1.
Using SSL CipherSpec TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256
Using SSL key repository stem C:\ProgramData\IBM\MQ\qmgrs\QM1\ssl\key
Certificate Label: ibmwebspheremq
No OCSP configuration specified.
MQCONNX ended with reason code 2035
Error details (from log):
The active values of the channel were 'MCAUSER(app) CLNTUSER(Wilko)
SSLPEER(SERIALNUMBER=61:9B:A4:3E,CN=DESKTOP-ROH98N2,C=NL)
SSLCERTI(CN=DESKTOP-ROH98N2,C=NL) ADDRESS(DESKTOP-ROH98N2)'. The
MATCH(RUNCHECK) mode of the DISPLAY CHLAUTH MQSC command can be used to
identify the relevant CHLAUTH record.
ACTION:
Ensure that the application provides a valid user ID and password, or change
the queue manager connection authority (CONNAUTH) configuration to OPTIONAL to
allow client applications to connect which have not supplied a user ID and
password.
----- cmqxrmsa.c : 2086 -------------------------------------------------------
22/11/2021 15:51:37 - Process(15880.45) User(MUSR_MQADMIN) Program(amqrmppa.exe)
Host(DESKTOP-ROH98N2) Installation(Installation1)
VRMF(9.2.3.0) QMgr(QM1)
Time(2021-11-22T14:51:37.594Z)
CommentInsert1(DEV.APP.SVRCONN)
CommentInsert2(15880(1112))
CommentInsert3(127.0.0.1)
AMQ9999E: Channel 'DEV.APP.SVRCONN' to host '127.0.0.1' ended abnormally.
EXPLANATION:
The channel program running under process ID 15880(1112) for channel
'DEV.APP.SVRCONN' ended abnormally. The host name is '127.0.0.1'; in some cases
the host name cannot be determined and so is shown as '????'.
ACTION:
Look at previous error messages for the channel program in the error logs to
determine the cause of the failure. Note that this message can be excluded
completely or suppressed by tuning the "ExcludeMessage" or "SuppressMessage"
attributes under the "QMErrorLog" stanza in qm.ini. Further information can be
found in the System Administration Guide.
----- amqrmrsa.c : 630 --------------------------------------------------------
I am kind of stuck, I also saw in the log that there is PEER related info dumped, but I am not sing the SSLPEER settings (I just want to let everyone connect with the same certificate).
EDIT 2:
Output from RUNMQSC QM1 and command DISPLAY QMGR CONNAUTH:
1 : DISPLAY QMGR CONNAUTH
AMQ8408I: Display Queue Manager details.
QMNAME(QM1) CONNAUTH(DEV.AUTHINFO)
Output from RUNMQSC QM1 and command DISPLAY AUTHINFO(name-from-previous-command):
3 : DISPLAY AUTHINFO(DEV.AUTHINFO)
AMQ8566I: Display authentication information details.
AUTHINFO(DEV.AUTHINFO) AUTHTYPE(IDPWOS)
ADOPTCTX(YES) DESCR( )
CHCKCLNT(REQDADM) CHCKLOCL(OPTIONAL)
FAILDLAY(1) AUTHENMD(OS)
ALTDATE(2021-11-18) ALTTIME(15.09.20)
Output from DISPLAY CHLAUTH(*):
4 : DISPLAY CHLAUTH(*)
AMQ8878I: Display channel authentication record details.
CHLAUTH(DEV.ADMIN.SVRCONN) TYPE(USERMAP)
CLNTUSER(admin) USERSRC(CHANNEL)
AMQ8878I: Display channel authentication record details.
CHLAUTH(DEV.ADMIN.SVRCONN) TYPE(BLOCKUSER)
USERLIST(nobody)
AMQ8878I: Display channel authentication record details.
CHLAUTH(DEV.APP.SVRCONN) TYPE(ADDRESSMAP)
ADDRESS(*) USERSRC(CHANNEL)
CHCKCLNT(REQUIRED)
AMQ8878I: Display channel authentication record details.
CHLAUTH(SYSTEM.ADMIN.SVRCONN) TYPE(ADDRESSMAP)
ADDRESS(*) USERSRC(CHANNEL)
AMQ8878I: Display channel authentication record details.
CHLAUTH(SYSTEM.*) TYPE(ADDRESSMAP)
ADDRESS(*) USERSRC(NOACCESS)
I was expecting not having to provide username and password when using certificates. What am I missing here?
Your queue manager is configured to mandate passwords for any client connections that are trying to run with a resolved MCAUSER that is privileged. That is what CHCKCLNT(REQDADM) on your AUTHINFO(DEV.AUTHINFO) does.
In addition, your CHLAUTH rule for the DEV.APP.SVRCONN channel has upgraded this further to mandate passwords for ALL connections using that channel.
If your intent is to have channels that supply a certificate not be subject to this mandate, then you should add a further, more specific, CHLAUTH rule, something along these lines:-
SET CHLAUTH(DEV.APP.SVRCONN) TYPE(SSLPEERMAP) +
SSLPEER('SERIALNUMBER=61:9B:A4:3E,CN=DESKTOP-ROH98N2,C=NL') +
SSLCERTI('CN=DESKTOP-ROH98N2,C=NL') CHCKCLNT(ASQMGR) USERSRC(CHANNEL)
Bear in mind that if this connection is asserting a privileged user id, it will still be required to supply a password from the system-wide setting of CHCKCLNT(REQDADM).
Remember, if you are ever unsure which CHLAUTH rule you are matching against, all those details you saw in the error message can be used to form a DISPLAY CHLAUTH command to discover exactly which rule you have matched. Read more about that in I’m being blocked by CHLAUTH – how can I work out why?
I have been learning with WebSocket++ and built some of the server examples (Windows 10 Visual Studio 2019). The non-TLS examples work without issues, however, the TLS-enabled examples (echo_server_both.cpp and echo_server_tls.cpp) can't do the handshake. I am very new to web development in general so I know I must be doing something wrong with regards to the certificate and keys.
I am testing the servers with WebSocket King client, an extension of Google Chrome that connects correctly to other websocket servers like wss://echo.websocket.org and to my own localhost when I don't use TLS.
The echo_server_both example comes with a server.pem file, and the echo_server_tls example comes with server.pem and dh.pem. I have used the same files that come with the samples, and I have also tried generating and registering my own .pem files using openSSL. In both cases I get this when the client tries to connect:
[2021-06-29 20:51:21] [error] handle_transport_init received error: sslv3 alert certificate unknown
[2021-06-29 20:51:21] [fail] WebSocket Connection [::1]:63346 - "" - 0 asio.ssl:336151574 sslv3 alert certificate unknown
[2021-06-29 20:51:21] [info] asio async_shutdown error: asio.ssl:336462231 (shutdown while in init)
I discovered these errors after I edited handle_init() in tls.hpp, following a suggestion in another site, to look like this:
void handle_init(init_handler callback,lib::asio::error_code const & ec) {
if (ec) {
//m_ec = socket::make_error_code(socket::error::tls_handshake_failed);
m_ec = ec;
} else {
m_ec = lib::error_code();
}
callback(m_ec);
}
This change let the actual openSSL error to show in the console, otherwise it would show a generic "handshake failed" error.
I know I'm not doing what I should with the certificates, but I have no idea where else to look or what to do next. Can anyone here help please? Should I use the .pem files that come with the examples, or should I generate my own? in case I should generate my own, what would be the openSSL command to do that correctly and how do I tell my PC to recognize these as valid so that the server works?
Found the problem: WebSocket++ will not accept a self-signed certificate (the ones you can create directly in your own PC using OpenSSL or the Windows utilities). There is no way around it. You must have a valid, authority-validated and endorsed certificate. You can get such a certificate for free (valid only for 90 days) from https://zerossl.com/. The site has detailed instructions on how to request, obtain and install a certificate. After getting a valid certificate and installing it on my server, everything worked as it should.
I'm working on a soap server, that will serve some old embedded computers with an legacy soap protocol.
I write it in go and so far used just plain http, but in production it must use ssl encryption. So I've just created a key and a cert (from this site) and used the http.ListenAndServeTLS function.
But now the computers cannot connect and the server is just printing a handshake error:
server.go:2848: http: TLS handshake error from [::1]:38790: tls: no cipher suite supported by both client and server
In the docs, for the computers, isn't the supported ssl version or the ciphers. So I wanted to know, how to find out the client's ssl version, and also the available cipher suites that the client supports.
And then how can I configure the golang http server so it will support the selected ciphers.
There seems to be two questions here, so let's do this in two parts:
Finding the client's TLS version and supported cipher suites:
To do this, you need to set the GetConfigForClient field of the tls.Config object.
This field takes a method with signature:
func(*ClientHelloInfo) (*Config, error)
It is called on receipt of a Client Hello message with a ClientHelloInfo struct. This struct contains the following fields of interest to you:
// CipherSuites lists the CipherSuites supported by the client (e.g.
// TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA).
CipherSuites []uint16
// SupportedVersions lists the TLS versions supported by the client.
// For TLS versions less than 1.3, this is extrapolated from the max
// version advertised by the client, so values other than the greatest
// might be rejected if used.
SupportedVersions []uint16
Please read the comments around GetConfigForClient and ClientHelloInfo for exactly how GetConfigForClient should behave, and for field details.
Specifying server-supported version and cipher suites:
This is also done through the tls.Config object using the following fields:
// CipherSuites is a list of supported cipher suites. If CipherSuites
// is nil, TLS uses a list of suites supported by the implementation.
CipherSuites []uint16
// MinVersion contains the minimum SSL/TLS version that is acceptable.
// If zero, then TLS 1.0 is taken as the minimum.
MinVersion uint16
// MaxVersion contains the maximum SSL/TLS version that is acceptable.
// If zero, then the maximum version supported by this package is used,
// which is currently TLS 1.2.
MaxVersion uint16
For example, you could set your tls.Config with the following fields:
CipherSuites: []uint16{
tls.TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,
tls.TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,
tls.TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,
etc...
tls.TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA,
},
MinVersion: tls.VersionTLS12,
The full list of supported cipher suites is in the tls docs.
I want to find out the protocols supported by a target but the problem is that their are quite a number websites which are not supporting a particular version but when i performed handshake it was successful becz target surpassed the version that i gave and perform handshake on the supported version
[ it happened on only 1 website]
example : i passed a version :TLSVersion.TLS_1_2 but the handshake is performed using TLSv1_0 becz it is not supporting TLSVersion.TLS_1_2
Because of the above issue i want to check the version on handshake and i dont want to use scapy.ssl_tls
version = [SSL.SSLv23_METHOD,
SSL.TLSv1_METHOD,
SSL.TLSv1_1_METHOD,
SSL.TLSv1_2_METHOD]
context = OpenSSL.SSL.Context(version)
soc = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
soc.settimeout(CONNECTION_TIMEOUT)
connection = OpenSSL.SSL.Connection(context,soc)
connection.connect((host,port))
connection.do_handshake()
#wants to check version here
i want to check the version on handshake
The relevant functions to check the version both client and server use for the remaining session in pyOpenSSL are get_protocol_version_name or get_protocol_version:
connection.do_handshake()
#wants to check version here
print(connection.get_protocol_version_name())
Note that these functions are only available since pyOpenSSL 0.16.0
Please not also that you cannot specify a list of TLS methods when creating the context but only a single method which essentially specifies the minimal TLS version supported by the client. Thus
context = OpenSSL.SSL.Context(SSL.TLSv1_METHOD)
allows the client to use TLS 1.0 and better. If you instead use SSL.TLSv1_2_METHOD the client would be restricted to TLS 1.2 and better and thus could not establish a SSL connection with a server supporting only TLS 1.0.
Find SSL Version after Handshake in OpenSSL...
If I am parsing what you want correctly... you want the protocol version like printed by openssl s_client:
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.0b 26 Sep 2016
$ openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443 -servername www.google.com
CONNECTED(00000005)
depth=2 C = US, O = GeoTrust Inc., CN = GeoTrust Global CA
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
Server did acknowledge servername extension.
---
...
---
New, TLSv1.2, Cipher is ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305
Server public key is 2048 bit
Secure Renegotiation IS supported
No ALPN negotiated
SSL-Session:
Protocol : TLSv1.2
...
The first message of "New, TLSv1.2" tells you about the cipher. That is, when is ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 first arrived in TLS. In the case of ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305, the cipher suite was first seen in TLS 1.2.
The source code for s_client is located at <openssl src>/apps/s_client.c. The code responsible in OpenSSL 1.0.2 is around line 2210:
/* line 2210 */
c = SSL_get_current_cipher(s);
BIO_printf(bio, "%s, Cipher is %s\n",
SSL_CIPHER_get_version(c), SSL_CIPHER_get_name(c));
...
The second message of "Protocol: TLSv1.2" tells you the protocol version used during key exchange and subsequent cipher selection and bulk transfer.
The code responsible in OpenSSL 1.0.2 is <openssl src>/ssl/ssl_txt.c around line 105:
/* line 105 */
int SSL_SESSION_print(BIO *bp, const SSL_SESSION *x)
{
unsigned int i;
const char *s;
if (x == NULL)
goto err;
if (BIO_puts(bp, "SSL-Session:\n") <= 0)
goto err;
if (x->ssl_version == SSL2_VERSION)
s = "SSLv2";
else if (x->ssl_version == SSL3_VERSION)
s = "SSLv3";
else if (x->ssl_version == TLS1_2_VERSION)
s = "TLSv1.2";
else if (x->ssl_version == TLS1_1_VERSION)
s = "TLSv1.1";
else if (x->ssl_version == TLS1_VERSION)
s = "TLSv1";
else if (x->ssl_version == DTLS1_VERSION)
s = "DTLSv1";
else if (x->ssl_version == DTLS1_2_VERSION)
s = "DTLSv1.2";
else if (x->ssl_version == DTLS1_BAD_VER)
s = "DTLSv1-bad";
else
s = "unknown";
if (BIO_printf(bp, " Protocol : %s\n", s) <= 0)
goto err;
...
}
I want to find out the protocols supported by a target but the problem is that their are quite a number websites which are not supporting a particular version but when i performed handshake ...
This is a different problem. You should look at the source code for sslscan at SSLScan - Fast SSL Scanner to see how it works. The Sourceforge one seems abandoned. It lacks SNI and other new features, like secure negotiation and ALPN.
You might try this sslscan from GitHub: rbsec/sslscan. The GitHub one is actively maintained and seems to be more up to date.
example : i passed a version :TLSVersion.TLS_1_2 but the handshake is performed using TLSv1_0 becz it is not supporting TLSVersion.TLS_1_2
This will not happen. TLS specifies one protocol version only. The idea is your try TLS 1.2. If it fails, then you fall back to TLS 1.1. If it fails, then you fall back to TLS 1.0. Ad infinitum.
The try-and-fallback approach is the reason for RFC 7504, TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade Attacks. This was an awful band-aide from the Browser crowd. See, for example, Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-downgrade-scsv-03.txt> (TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade Attacks) to Proposed Standard.
TLS does not accept a range of protocol versions like many folks think. We have tried to get it changed a few times. See, for example, A new TLS version negotiation mechanism.