Can I pass #Html.Partial("_PartialTest") from summernote editor?
Is there any process to set Partial View from from summernote editor?
Like:
View Example
Potentially, but you'd need something like RazorEngine to process it as a template manually and then just render the HTML somewhere in your view. If you just drop it into your view, it will be treated as text and not evaluated.
If your CMS or whatever is only going to be used by technically adept individuals this may not be an issue, but you're probably better off using something more akin to shortcodes in Wordpress. You essentially just have some syntax that a non-technical user would be capable of working with and then you replace this with the appropriate real code when rendering. You'd still need RazorEngine, but this way, if someone fat fingers the Razor syntax, you can recover more gracefully instead of just being stuck with unparsable garbage.
Also be aware that you'll need to be careful with Razor syntax in general. For example, if someone includes an # sign somewhere in the text, Razor will try to parse this and fail. As a result, you should escape any # sign in the content before actually feeding it to RazorEngine. That's another reason to use a shortcode-type system, as you'll have a real hard time trying to determine the difference between something like #Html.Partial(...) and foo#email.com and knowing which should be escaped and which shouldn't.
Related
I want to evaluate my content blocks before running my test suite but the closures' property names is in bytecode already. I'm ooking for the cleanest solution (compared with parsing source manually).
Already tried solution outlined in this post (and I'd still wind up doing some RegEx/parsing) but could only get it to work via script execution engine. It failed in IDE and GroovyConsole. Rather than embedding a Groovy script in project's code, I thought I'd try using Geb's native classes.
Is building on the suggestion about extending Geb Navigators here viable for Geb's PageContentSupport class whose contentTemplates contain a LinkedHashMap of exactly what I need? If yes, would someone provide guidance? If no, any suggestions?
It is currently not possible to get hold of all content elements for a given page/module. Feel free to create an issue for this in Geb's bug tracker, but remember that all that Geb can provide is either a list of content element names or a map from these names to closures that create these elements.
Having that information isn't a generic solution to your problem because it's possible for content elements to take parameters and there are situations where your content elements will be available on the page only after some other actions are performed (for example you have to click on button to reveal a section of a page that uses ajax to retrieve it's content). So I'm afraid that simply going over all elements and checking if they don't throw any errors will not cut it.
I'm still struggling to see what would "evaluating" all content elements prior to running the suite buy you. Are you after verifying that your content elements still work to get a faster feedback than running the whole suite? I'm pretty sure that you won't be able to fully automate detection of content definitions that don't work anymore. In my view it will be more effort than it's worth.
Can image resizer output image paths that don't contain query strings? Could not find this anywhere in documentation or googling it.
This page (http://imageresizing.net/docs/extend/extending) says that custom plugins can "Perform URL rewriting or query string expansion by registering an event handler."
Is there such a plugin, ready to be used? If so, anyone have a link?
FolderResizeSyntax is one such plugin (which simply adds and event handler to Config.Current.Pipeline.Rewrite), but you probably shouldn't use it.
Ask yourself: Why does pingdom say to remove query strings? Does it even make sense? Is there any logic behind the rule?
Query strings are often added to static resources as cache breakers and for development purposes; often they're forgotten and make it into production.
In the case of ImageResizer, they're an essential, meaningful part of the URL. Rewriting consistent name/value pairs (the querystring) into a custom URL syntax might be trendy and hip, but it adds brittleness and complexity for no actual added value.
If you have a real-world, known issues with querystrings, try the CloudFront plugin. It lets you express querystrings as image.jpg;width=100;height=100 instead of image.jpg?width=100&height=100. You still lose compatibility with all kinds of RIAPI-compliant front-end and back-end tooling, so make sure this is a real, not theoretical, issue.
I am trying to trim the leading "the" in a query that returns the titles of articles in Joomla, so that results are displayed in alphabetical order and the leading "the", if present, is disregarded. The module responsible for this is the Article Category (which is Joomla core module) and the file I think I should modify is helper.php in modules/mod_articles_category.
I replace the following line:
$articles->setState('list.direction', $params->get('article_ordering_direction',
'ASC'));
With this:
$articles->setState('list.direction', $params->get('article_ordering_direction',
'TRIM(LEADING \'THE \' FROM a.title) ASC'));
However, if I enable the debug mode, the TRIM is not showing. SO I guess, that I need to make the change somewhere else. Sorry but I am not familiar with Joomla so don't really know where this query is coming from. Any pointer is very much appreciated.
Okay, the short answer is no, I don't believe you can modify a query from a module, just like this. I haven't worked with modules, but I have some experience with components, so I would suggest two approaches:
Try to query the database yourself from the module, not by using setState, but building the query yourself.
You can cheat. Since Joomla has already done the heavy lifting for you, you could just manipulate the result object (i.e. $list) rearranging it and stripping off whatever you don't want. I would also suggest that you treat your code as a layout override, that way you'll be able to update your site without overriding the changes you have made.
I'm trying to port pydoctor to twisted.web.template and have hit a pretty basic problem: pydoctor uses epydoc to render docstrings into HTML but I can't see a way to include this HTML in the generated page without escaping. What can I do?
There is, somewhat intentionally, no way to insert HTML into the page without parsing; twisted.web.template is a bit more of a stickler about producing correct output than nevow was.
There are a couple of ways around this.
Ultimately, your HTML is going to some kind of output stream. You could simply insert a renderer that returns a pair of Deferred objects, and does a .write to the underlying stream after the first one fires but before the second. Kind of gross, but it effectively expresses your intent :).
You can simply re-parse the output of epydoc into HTML using XMLString or similar, so that twisted.web.template can write it out correctly. This will "waste" a little bit of CPU, but in my opinion it will be worth it for (A) the stress-test it will give t.w.t and (B) the guarantee - presuming that t.w.t is correct - that it will give you that you're emitting valid HTML.
As I was writing this answer, however, I realized that point 2 isn't generally possible with arbitrary HTML with the current public API of twisted.web.template. Ideally, you could use html5lib to parse this stuff, and then just dump the parsed input into your document tree.
If you don't mind mucking around with private API, you could probably hook up html5lib's SAX support to the internal SAX parser that we use to load templates.
Of course, the real solution is to fix the ticket you already filed, so you don't have to use private API outside of Twisted itself...
I have started an application in YII, I want to use proper standards of YII but am just bit curious about the use of its CHTML Class. I think that using CHtml::link() or CHtml::image() instead of normal HTML code <a></a> and <img src... /> will cost more time to application on server side. I tried to look for some reason to use it but yet not success in finding any good resource on why should I use it and how its beneficial then traditional HTML. Like I can use all those methods for defining paths to actions in normal HTML code then why use it
any help or reference for clarification would be appreciated
Thanks
Let's talk about CHtml::link(). Its main advantage is that you can indicate a controller route and send some get variables by simply passing an array as paramater. Lets say you wanna go to the eat() action of your LivingController, with the variable 'meal' and its value being 'hamburgers'. It could simply be done like this:
> CHtml::link(array('LivingController/eat', 'meal'=>'hamburgers'));
If you want to express this using <a></a> only, then I don't need to tell you how much harder it would be. In addition, we should remember that a link generated using CHtml::link() will always work, even if you change the url format. That wouldn't happen with <a></a>: you would have to rewrite the url every time you change the url format.
The advantages of CHtml::image() are less clear, at least to me. Sincerely, I think it's just a matter of encapsulation.