How can I rename the alias in calculated field? I have calculated field "area" which display the integer values of the areas. I want to display each area as string as a data type, naming as "area coordinate A" and "area coordinate B" and so on. The values of each area coordinated are dynamic thus the naming should change automatically. Do I need to change function in calculated field?
If I understood correctly, you'll want to filter the "coordinate A" and the "coordinate B" in your formula, doing something like that:
You'll have to do it twice, so you'll have two fields, one for each coordinate. And then you'll be able to have different aliases.
PS: For asking a good question on Stack Overflow, I recommend reading their guidelines.
Related
For some time now I have the impression that a field and a column are the same thing in SQL server but today I stumbled across the statement that they are not actually the same thing. It was stated that a field is the intersection of a row and a column, so if a table has 10 rows and 10 columns it will have 100 fields in total.
I looked at Microsoft Docs and this is what it says:
A column is collection of cells aligned vertically in a table. A field is an element in which one piece of information is stored, such as the eceived field. Usually, a column in a table contains the values of a single field.
In this case then it looks like they are not the same thing.
I would highly appreciate it if someone can clarify this! Thank you in advance!
A field is part of a row, not a table, a "column of a row", if you will.
However, a lot of people use these terms interchangeably, and you can (read: have to) often deduce what they actually meant by the context of the sentence.
In some contexts, a field may refer to an element within a data value, where a column contains the entire data value. A common example is a date data type, where the month, day, and year are fields within the column. Spatial data types (e.g., the PostGIS data type in Postgres) is another example, where the x coordinate, y coordinate, and spatial reference ID are all fields within the column. Some kinds of identifiers have application-specific fields within them, where, for example, the first two characters carry some information, the next four characters convey some other information, etc. In cases like these, the distinction between column and field is important.
So, it's my first time trying to make my own data visualization, and what I want to do is something like a heat map or highlighted table like the original Kohonen (but using squares rather than hexagons) research about countries, but I don't know how to apply it to the map I've got from training the network.
I've read a few links about making a highlighted table and heat map on Tableau, but what I get is always just a table mainly because I'm not using a measure (i just want every country of one color), so, my question is: is it possible to use Tableau for this situation and if so, how could I do it? Thanks!
Original SOM visualization from Dr. Kohonen
Table from Tableau
Yes it is possible to make visualizations like you describe in Tableau - but the question you posed is a bit vaguely specified to give you much more detailed guidance than first take some Tableau training.
For instance, how do you want to determine which row and column to place a country? You may need to write a table calc for row and col positions, which means learning about table calcs. Or you can assign them in a data column.
For square country marks, you'll want a discrete field on the rows shelf, a discrete field on the columns shelf, possible a dimension like Country name on the details shelf. Choose a square mark type, and (important) choose a square cell size from the format menu. Then adjust the size of your squares from the size button and the format menu, and colors and borders from the color button and format pane.
Lots to play with.
I have a group of trellis graphs on some data, in there you can see a numeric variable on the Y axis and a series of cell dishes on the X axis. Not all the numeric values are present on all the series of cells. Because of this the visualization results in a graph with empty spaces:
This is OK most of the time but the thing is I would like to avoid the "empty spaces, only in these graph series, that you can see between the bars. I would like to see showing only the pattern of the cell dishes where I have data.
Trying to do so I tried creating a calculated column to use it as a ordering index (https://docs.tibco.com/pub/sfire-bauthor/7.9.0/doc/html/en-US/GUID-8CAA18D0-CF28-4707-9945-041BDFD99E99.html) (Sorting Filter values asc/desc on Tibco Spotfire), after that "Limit data by expression" using a "[MyColumn] is not null" on it (https://community.tibco.com/questions/can-i-automatically-make-spotfire-ignore-empty-values-categories-charts) (How to show the top 10 column values in Spotfire) with no luck and I tried also (https://docs.tibco.com/pub/spotfire/6.5.1/doc/html/ncfe/ncfe_details_on_custom_expression.htm) create a custom expression, which I think it would be a good solution because I understand it will only affect these graphs and not the complete set of visualizations but no, I don't reach the point to change it. Last that it should work but it doesn't is to "Show/Hide Items" under a Boolean expression that it would include that "[Axis.Value] is not NULL" and "Apply individually for each trellis panel" of the numeric column which sound terrific but... nope, it didn't work either...
Any help would be appreciated, now I will select one by one on individual graphs extracting them and plotting them in other place but this is not very useful as a "large scale" solution. I am sure there is a way to insert a proper expression to avoid the null values of the cross of both variables, the numeric and the cell dishes.
this is because you are trellising data, not the axis. you won't be able to filter out values on the x axis; it's simply not how trellis works.
using multiple visualizations is the solution, but I assume you've got n sets of categories that you want to separate out without creating a ton of charts on the page and perhaps you can't guarantee the number of categories or their names, so you want to build a flexible solution.
please check out an answer I just wrote over here which illustrates how to use a document property and a property control to limit a visualization. your property control can be linked to automatically and dynamically display unique values in your "category" column (the one you are trellising by). maybe this can be a solution for you?
Noob here, I have a table with different entries (rows) per different (repeating) regions.
I'd like to be able to display the data rows filtered - matching that particular region thanks - so I get those particular fields related to each region as a tooltip on a map. (I know how to build the map)
Thank you
Just dragging the fields you want to Details or Tooltip is not doing the trick?
Putting a measure on a shelf (other than filter shelf) includes that field in the visualization query results -- i.e. applies the chosen aggregation function to yield an aggregate result value for each partition of the data (as specified by the unique combination of dimensions)
Putting a dimension on a shelf (other than the filter shelf) also includes that field in the query results, but since the dimensions define how data rows are partitioned, it can affect the level of detail of the query. You'll notice this often as suddenly getting many more marks in your visualization after you add a dimension to a shelf. If you are familiar with SQL, dimensions define the fields that follow the GROUP BY keyword.
EDIT
Thanks for the addition, #AlexBlakemore. I've never said dragging a dimension would not work, only that it wouldn't work as the OP wanted it to (basically the same as you're saying).
And though everything you said (above) is true, it's particularly not exact when it comes to maps. Yes, dragging a dimension will further partition the data, but it will not create additional marks on a map (unless it has also geographical properties). Rather, the tooltip will get the first occurrence of that dimension, and display data for that only. For instance, if you drag "Product" to details, and the possible values are "Bread", "Coffee" and "Milk", it will probably just show "Product: Bread", and the measures for "Bread" only. So yes, it will partition, but no, it won't create additional marks.
Back to OP problem. What I believe you want is a tool tip with all values of the dimension (in my poor example you'd like to see "Bread, Coffee, Milk"). Tableau does not have functions to aggregate strings yet, so it's hard to do so.
What I would suggest is to create a separate sheet, and just drag the dimensions and measures you want to rows. Then put it side by side with the map on a dashboard, and use the map as a filter. Then, when you click on a country/region/city, you'll see the data of that region on the other chart.
Refer to: http://kb.tableausoftware.com/articles/knowledgebase/creating-filter-actions-dashboards
or https://www.tableausoftware.com/learn/tutorials/on-demand/authoring-interactivity
I have 2 questions here, please help me.
First one, i would like to know on what basis Chart Web part y-axis columns are taken. why i could not get my own site columns in Y-axis. Please refer the below image.
Second question, i have created a list but when i add Description & Comments (multiple text) fields, the text color is coming differently. The text color is not matching with the other list column names. Please let me know how to correct this..??
Thanks for your guidance & help.
Y field will have to be numeric. X field can be any type. This would make sense, because if it is not numeric how will you show it in the chart? if the column is a choice column, etc. you can create a calculated column that reflects the original column but outputs a number.
Description and Comments are coming up as different because they cannot be sorted or filtered. They are there to provice a visual indication to the end user. you can ofcourse change them usign CSS/jquery...