I ask early about notification on client here.
Now I am interesting in notification for server side. In particular I am interesting in fact that notification inform all servers.
My problem is cluster of servers. I have some database elements cashed on all servers. If some user on any server update database element cash need to be refresh. Notification could do the job.
Or is there another way to deal with cluster of servers ?
Marko
There is no complete tutorial on this topic, I'm afraid.
Scout however does have the functionality you are looking for in the form of the IClusterSynchronizationService.
You can use it to register listeners and send messages between Eclipse Scout servers.
For it to work, you'll need a message passing system (message queue) such as ApacheMQ or RabbitMQ. You simply have to install the necessary connector from the Eclipse Marketplace and register them for integration in your application. A detailed explanation is in this tutorial. (You need to add the new connector as dependencies to your product files, register the cluster synchronization service, and configure it with properties for host, port, ...).
The "BahBah" Demo chat application on GitHub has an implementation of these listeners and how to register them.
The (inofficial) fork of the BahBah Chat demo has some of these changes already built in.
Related
Being new to the RabbitMQ I was wondering how to deal with an offline target node.
As an example this scenario:
1 log recording application that stores logs to some persistent storage
N log publishing applications that want their logs to be written to the persistent storage via the log recording server.
There would be two options:
Each publishing application publishes it's log messages to it's local RabbitMQ instance and the log recording server must subscribe to each of these
The log recording application has it's local RabbitMQ instance on which each log publishing application delivers it's messages.
Option 1 would require me to reconfigure/recode/notify the recording application each time a new application appears or moves. Therefore I would think Option 2 is the right one, each new publishing application simply writes to the RabbitMQ Node of the recording application.
The only thing I am struggling with is how to deal with a situation in which the Node of the recording application is down. Do I need to build my own system to store the messages until it's back online or can I use some functionality of RabbitMQ to deal with that? I.e. could the local RabbitMQ of each of the publishing applications just receive the messages and forward them to the recording application RabbitMQ as soon as it's back online?
I found something about the Federated plugin be couldn't understand if that's the solution. Maybe I need something different or maybe I have to write my own local queueing system (which I hope I don't have to) to queue messages when the target Node is offline.
Any links to architectural examples or solutions are more than welcome.
BTW: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/easynetq/nILIKSjxyMg states that you shouldn't be installing a RabbitMQ Node for each application, so maybe I should resort to something like MSQM or ZeroMQ (?)
From experience in what sounds like a similar situation, I would suggest using something other than a queue to store the messages locally, when offline.
Years ago, I built a system that had to work offline - no network connection at all - and then had to push messages through a message queue to the central server, when the laptop was brought back to the office.
I solved this by using a local database (sqlite at the time) to store my messages when the message queue was not available.
You should do something similar. Use a local database or even a plain text file or CSV file to store your messages when RabbitMQ is offline. When it reconnects, read the messages from your local file system and send them through RabbitMQ.
This is a good strategy to use, even if you do not expect RabbitMQ to go offline. Frankly, it will go offline at some point and you will have to deal with it. You should be prepared for that situation, and having a local store for your messages will help that.
...
regarding rqm node per application: bad idea. this adds a ton of complexity to your system. You want as few RabbitMQ nodes as you can get away with. Meaning, 1 per system (a system being comprised of many applications) when possible... with the exception of RabbitMQ clusters for availability - but that's another line of questions and design, entirely.
...
I did an interview with Aria Stewart about designing for failure with RabbitMQ and messaging systems, and have a small excerpt where she talks about how networks fail.
The point is, the network or RabbitMQ or something will fail and you will need a solution like a local datastore so that you can recover when RabbitMQ comes back online.
I am totally new to spring framework. I am trying to create a project where I can have the connectivity to the rabbitMq and I even before I publish the message, I want to check if the queues are alive or not. Is this possible to ping the queue to see if it is alive or not?
RabbitMQ have the management API. You can use it to check the status of queue,exchange,binding.
If you are working on PHP. Then here is the libarary which can be used.
Right now we have a queuing system(activemq) which is storing the messages. And we have written a separate java application that will read the queue and then trigger a exe to do some processing. But we want to do away with this extra application that is linking our activemq and exe. So i want to know whether any queuing system houses a code which will help me run the exe without any extra code written by me.
Any inputs regarding which queuing system can get me this done will be greatly appreciated.
This isn't really how Message Brokers work. You could however embed a broker inside your own application or create a broker plugin to do something. In the end though the best way to do this is to create your own client that can implement your business logic and let the Message Broker do what it was designed to do, route message traffic.
If you want more of a 'push' solution rather than a producer-consumer solution (which sounds to me like you are) you could look into the use of WebSockets. That would be another way of dealing with messages.
As others have said it doesn't look like using a message broker is the solution you want if you don't want to have some additional middleware to provide asynchronous communication.
So you just need something to launch an EXE on message arrival?
Message Queuing Triggers
Just some additional information for you... Triggered applications are natively supported in IBM Websphere MQ via a Trigger Monitor application that runs as a service (in windows implementations) or a daemon (in UNixish implementations).
When a message arrives in a queue, the MQ software will generate another message ("Trigger" message and send it to the "Trigger" queue, which is being monitored by the Trigger Manager app. The app then starts the required application.
So your implementation of an "app to start an app" is not odd ball or strange at all.. IBM do it in their implementation. I see nothing wrong with your implementation and if you can integrate it tighter to activeMQ then you are on a winner.
What about IBM MQ's triggering feature ?
WebSphere MQ provides a feature that enables an application or channel to be started automatically when there are messages available to retrieve from a queue. A message is put to a queue defined as triggered. If a series of conditions are met, the queue manager sends a trigger message to an initiation queue.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSFKSJ_9.0.0/com.ibm.mq.dev.doc/q026940_.htm
I'm attempting to set up a pub/sub system. My technical director has suggested using Rabbitmq and STOMP for the project I've been assigned.
In this system I want exchanges to be created on the server side and passed to the user to subscribe to. I want a user to subscribe to an exchange and receive information as it becomes available. I do not want the client to have the ability to subscribe to arbitrary exchanges (or routing keys for topic exchanges, I'm not sure what system I want to use yet).
For example, if someone works for a company widgetInk, when they logged in to our website they would receive a connection to the widgetInk.whatever exchange and AllUsers.whatever exchange, but that's it. if the Client side attempted to subscribe to something else they'd get an error.
I've gone through all of the RabbitMQ tutorials and I've looked through their how to section. I found this basic article on access control, but having read it three times now I still don't know if rabbitmq is a good fit for my requirements.
Can Rabbitmq be configured for my requirements? What resources can I use to learn about Rabbitmq's permission system? Has anyone build or used a system like this? Would it be in my best interest to switch to ZeroMQ or ActiveMQ?
I'd like to mention another platform you might use: Autobahn (Open-Source) or WebMQ (based on Autobahn).
WebMQ provides these features (besides a lot of other out of the box):
PubSub over WebSocket (WAMP)
Authentication of client sessions (WAMP-CRA)
fine-grained configurable authorization for topics
If you want to go the Open-source/build-your-own road, here are some tutorials. If you want an integrated, commercially supported product with Web UI for configuration/administration, please get in contact.
Disclaimer: I am creator of Autobahn/WAMP and work for Tavendo.
What is the best way to combine a single instance WCF service that uses ActiveMQ and runs within IIS/AppFabric?
Our Services need to support both HTTP transports and ActiveMQ (listening and sending messages). We've elected not to use MSMQ, and will use Spring.Net.NMS. The fundamental issue I have now is that ActiveMQ needs to connect to the queue(s) at startup and remain connected, but WAS is getting in the way with it's message-activation feature. If the service is not activated until a message arrives (HTTP/MSMQ, etc) then there is no trigger to have the connection to AMQ occur.
I know I can disable the recycling behavior, and I know I can do self-hosting with a Windows Service. But I want to take advantage of the monitoring and other features in AppFabric. I've already been down the route with IServiceBehavior and will use that for other nice things. But that interface is not called until a (non-AMQ) message arrives. So it won't work for this. What I was hoping for was something along the line of how ServletContextListeners work in Java, where you get both the start up and shutdown events. But it seems no such thing exists in WAS... it is driven only by messages arriving.
I've scoured every inch of web info for 3 days and the only thing I came across was to use a static class construction (C#) trick as the trigger. That's a hack, but i can live with it. It still leaves the issue of cleanly shutting down, which I can figure out later.
Anyone have a solid solution to this?
The direct WCF support for ActiveMQ that Ladislav mentions is still being supported. There just hasn't been an official release for the module in a while. However, you can still get the latest version of it from the 1.5.x branch or trunk and compile it yourself.
1.5.x branch for use with Apache.NMS 1.5.0:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet/Apache.NMS.WCF/branches/1.5.x/
Check out instructions:
http://activemq.apache.org/nms/source.html
There was direct WCF support for ActiveMQ but I guess it is not developed anymore. Your problem actually is the IIS / WAS (provides hosting for non-http protocols) hosting architecture. Services in WAS are always activated when message arrives - there is no global startup. The reason for this is that WAS hosting expects that there is separate process (windows service) running the listener all the time and this process has adapter which calls WAS and uses message level activation. I guess you don't have such process for ActiveMQ and because of that you will have trouble to use ActiveMQ endpoint hosted in WAS. Developing such listener can be challenging task (example for UDP).
Creating custom listener can be probably avoided by using IIS 7.5 / AppFabric auto start feature. There is also not very well documented way to run the code when the application starts.