after upgrading to Safari 9 I'm getting this error in the browser:
[Warning] [blocked] The page at https://localhost:8443/login was not allowed to run insecure content from http://localhost:8080/assets/static/script.js.
Anyone knows how to enable the running of insecure content on the new Safari?
According to the Apple support forums Safari does not allow you to disable the block on mixed content.
Though this is frustrating for usability in legitimate cases like yours, it seems to be part of their effort to force secure content serving / content serving best practices.
As a solution for you you can either upgrade the HTTP connection to HTTPS (which it seems you have done) or proxy your content through an HTTPS connection with an HTTPS-enabled service (or, in your case, port).
You can fix the HTTPS problem by using HTTPS locally with a self signed SSL certificate. Heroku has a great how-to article about generating one.
After setting up SSL on all of your development servers, you will still get an error loading the resource in Safari since an untrusted certificate is being used(self signed SSL certificates are not trusted by browsers by default because they cannot be verified with a trusted authority). To fix this, you can load the problematic URL in a new tab in Safari and the browser will prompt you to allow access. If you click "Show Certificate" in the prompt, there will be a checkbox in the certificate details view to "Always allow content from localhost". Checking this before allowing access will store the setting in Safari for the future. After allowing access just reload the page originally exhibiting a problem and you should be good to go.
This is a valid use case as a developer but please make sure you fully understand the security implications and risks you are adding to your system by making this change!
If like me you have
frontend on port1
backend on port2b
want to load script http://localhost:port1/app.js from http://localhost:port2/backendPage
I have found an easy workaround: simply redirect with http response all http://localhost:port2/localFrontend/*path to http://localhost:port1/*path from your backend server configuration.
Then you could load your script directly from http://localhost:port2/localFrontend/app.js instead of direct frontend url. (or you could configure a base url for all your resources)
This way, Safari will be able to load content from another domain/port without needing any https setup.
For me disabling the Website tracking i.e. uncheck the Prevent cross-site tracking worked.
Related
I am developing a Rails application that uses SSL connection. I am currently using third party resources that are js and css files for implementing a map (OpenStreetMap) . I have already tried to import these resources (js and css) into my application, but the javascript code tries to access an external WMS via HTTP.
The problem is that Google Chrome is blocking access to third-party resources from HTTP when the application is in HTTPS.
So I disabled SSL on a certain pages of the application and tried to force the HTTP or HTTPS the way I desire.
Following this blog: http://www.simonecarletti.com/blog/2011/05/configuring-rails-3-https-ssl/ and it works.
But when I force the HTTP protocol to the page where these resources will be used using Google Chrome, it forces HTTPS connection causing infinite loop.
If I clear the Chrome cache (that have already accessed the same page with HTTPS) in order access it via HTTP it works. But if I have accessed a HTTPS page and try to access via HTTP, Chrome forces the HTTPS connection resulting in an infinite loop.
The question is: Is there something I can set in the request that causes Chrome to accept the connection?
Regards
I've been doing some research on this, and it turns out that turning on force_ssl = true on Rails 3 causes the app to send an HSTS header. There's a bit of information about it here: How to disable HTTP Strict Transport Security?
Essentially, the HSTS header tells Chrome (and Firefox) to access your site only through HTTPS for a specific amount of time.
So... the answer I have for you now is that you can clear your own HSTS setting by going to about:net-internals within your Chrome browser and removing the HSTS state.
I think the answers here can help you: Rails: activating SSL support gets Chrome confused
I'm working on a web application that uses the google earth plugin. Recently, a new requirement to have non-public users logon was added, which meant that some users were now using the site over https. Among the things that broke in testing were the custom placemark icons (They were working using http).
The icons are hosted on the same server which servers the page.
Here are the urls for each of the protocols.
http - http://localhost/Images/yellow.png
https - https://localhost/Images/yellow.png
I can follow that link and the image will appear as you would expect.
The images hrefs are declared as icon styles in dynamically generated kml.
I want to avoid loading the images over http because I think that will cause internet explorer to present the user with a mixed content warning.
How do I get the images to load properly while using https?
I have been wrestling with this myself -- the short answer is that this won't work. If the content is served off of an HTTPS site that generates any kind of error/prompt (authentication, invalid certificate, etc.) the plugin will simply not load the content.
Interestingly, the desktop client works fine and prompts the user for credentials if necessary. However, neither client will allow content to be served off of site with an untrusted certificate.
The only workaround that I have found is:
Use a trusted HTTPS certificate on the server hosting the content (either trust the certificate on the client systems or just use a real certificate.)
Do not use HTTPS basic auth as that will always generate 401/Challenge responses which the web browser client will simply ignore
If authentication is a requirement, use NTLM authentication and common (e.g., domain) logins. If you load the plugin in Interent Explorer (or in a .NET WebBrowserControl) the authentication will be handled properly and the images will show up.
I was at a Google Earth administrator's training last week and the trainer confirmed this "bug". It is supposed to be fixed in the next version of the plugin (it may actually be fixed already -- what version of the plugin are you using?)
I have a ruby on rails 3 app hosted on heroku with a custom domain. It uses oauth to allow the user to log in through Facebook. After a user logs in through Facebook, the next time they type in our domain in Firefox (tested on FF 15.0.1 on Mac) it automatically fills in https before the address (So the user is used to typing "example.com" into the address bar and pressing ENTER, but Firefox changes that to https://www.example.com). This of course shows the "This Connection is Untrusted" warning page (http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/connection-untrusted-error-message) since we do not have an SSL certificate instead of loading our page.
This only seems to happen with Firefox (tested on Chrome and Safari as well).
I've tried redirecting the rails action that we point to for root to the http protocol version using this example (http://captico.com/securing-specific-routes-in-rails-3/2011/02), but that didn't work. I've also tried adding the ssl_requirement gem (https://github.com/bartt/ssl_requirement) and excluding the action that we point to for the root domain, but then I just got a bad URI error.
We're in money saving mode right now as we test out the site and slowly grow in users. I believe the best thing to do is to pay the money for our own SSL cert, as well as the $20/month to heroku to get SSL for our custom domain. But for now, we'd like to avoid having these extra costs.
Is there a way to fix this for free?
To fix it for free, use the *.herokuapp.com domain instead of a custom domain.
I've just installed SSL on my server (shared reseller package).
Its my first time using SSL and I couldn't get it working properly in Chrome or Firefox. Obviously this was because many of the CSS/JS/etc. links were not "https", but "http".
I've modified the necessary files and now Google Chrome is displaying a nice green padlcok and confirms my pages (checkout/login/controls/accountools).php are all secure.
However, if I open up the page in Firefox, instantly I get:
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect
securely to www.domain.co.uk, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely,
sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are
going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to
this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is
trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
Contrast this to Google:
Your connection to domain.com is encrypted with 256-bit encryption.
The connection uses TLS 1.0
The connection is encrypted using AES_256_CBC, with SHA1 for message authentication and DHA_RSA as the key exchange mechanism
What's more, the other browsers (MSIE, Safari, Opera), didn't bat an eyelid even when the pages were technically "unsecure" due to the CSS/JS/images, etc.
I know I can simply add my site to the trusted list in Firefox, but this doesn't look good for me when someone comes along and sees "UNTRISTED WEB SITE" before they even get to the checkout/login pages etc.
How can I fix this?
Complain to the iSP. The SSL certificate isn't properly signed.
I have a problem with my site after implementation of SSL that images do not appear. The scenario is that images come from images.domain.com (hosted on Amazon S3) and my certificate is for www.domain.com.
This problem only seems to happen in IE and not in any other browsers.
The issue is related to "mixed content" - HTTPS pages which have HTTP resources (images, scripts, etc) embedded.
The point of using HTTPS is to ensure that only the originating server and the client have access to the secured page. However, in theory it might be possible for this security to be compromised if HTTP resources are embedded - a server might intercept an unsecured javascript file and inject some code to alter the secured page onload.
Most browsers will indicate that a secure page has mixed content by altering the "secure lock" icon, either by showing the lock as open or broken, or by making the icon red (Chrome displayed a skull and crossbones for a short time, but they realised that this was a bit serious for the potential threat level).
Internet Explorer (depending on the version) will display a message either asking whether the insecure content should be shown (IE<=7), or whether only the secure content should be shown (IE>=8). It sounds like you have somehow disabled this message to always hide the insecure content, however that's not the default behaviour.
I think the best solution for you is to replace your S3 links with HTTPS versions.
I am not a web developer, but someone who often deals with the crap experience that is IE. I am not sure what version you are using, but you do not have a wildcard SSL cert (i.e. *.domain.com), so does it have something to do with an old-school limitation in 3rd party images?
See here for what I allude to above and a very good explanation of how IE caches cross-domain HTTPS content, specifically images. I am not sure what the solution is, but I was curious so I researched a little myself and this might help.