use pdo in try/catch clause on the live site - pdo

Should I use try/catch clause to write the PDO on the live site?
If I use try/catch clause to write it, all the errors details will appear on the web page. To prevent this happened, how do I know what errors are made without showing it on the web page?

That's a very good question, and - to my utter surprise - an extremely rare one. As though there are no developers running a live site around. And all the answers we have here is a mere proof for this surprising statement.
Should I use try/catch clause to write the PDO on the live site?
Of course no.
If I use try/catch clause to write it, all the errors details will appear on the web page.
It is not actually because of try-catch but because you're echoing them in that block yourself. But anyway, you shouldn't use that block either.
To prevent this happened, how do I know what errors are made without showing it on the web page?
You have to let them to be logged. To do so, you shouldn't use try-catch in the first place. Despite of all the wrong examples over the net, this operator has very little to do with reporting errors, and have to be used to handle errors, not to report them.
Surprisingly, PHP is very good at error logging. You won't believe me, but it can handle such a laborous task itself. Instead of wrapping each and every sql statement in try-catch, just leave them alone. In case of error, an exception will be thrown, yet uncaught exception is a fatal error. And for a live site you should have set error logging mode already. Means your PDO error will be logged as well.
As a result, to let yourself know what happened, all you need is to peek into error log.
In a nutshell, you shouldn't treat PDO error as something special. In either way, it's yet another error that happened in your code. Exactly the same as memory overflow error, or file not found error, or permission denied error. There is no special meaning in PDO errors and there is not a single reason to handle them in any special way. Just treat them as any other error in your site. In dev environment happily echo them on the screen for easy debugging, while on the live site disable error displaying and enable error logging, and you're set. I.e.
for a dev server:
error_reporting(E_ALL);
ini_set('display_errors',1);
ini_set('log_errors',1);
while for a live one
error_reporting(E_ALL);
ini_set('display_errors',0);
ini_set('log_errors',1);

Related

How can I display exception messages from custom functoid errors in the BizTalk Administration Console?

My goal is to influence the error descriptions that appear in BizTalk Administration Console in the Error Information tab of suspended instance windows, after errors occur in my custom functoids. If possible, I would also like the ErrorReport.Description promoted property to display this error description on the failed message.
I've read everything I can find about custom functoid development, but I can't find much about error handling within them. In particular, whenever my functoids throw exceptions, I see the boilerplate "Exception has been thrown at the target of an invocation" message that occurs whenever exceptions occur through reflection, rather than the message on the exception itself.
I had hoped to find something within the BaseFunctoid class framework that would allow me to submit an error string, so as to traverse the reflection boundary. Is there some way to pass error information from within a custom functoid, such that the BizTalk Administration Console will display it?
If I emulate the approach taken by DatabaseLookupFunctoid and DatabaseErrorExtractFunctoid, is there some way I can fail the map with the extracted error, rather than mapping it to a field on the destination schema as is shown in its examples?
The simplest way to do this is using custom C#, writing something like this in your code:
System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry("EVENT_LOG_SOURCE", "Error message...", System.Diagnostics.EventLogEntryType.Error);
As Johns-305 mentions, you need to make sure your event source is registered (e.g. System.Diagnostics.EventLog.CreateEventSource("EVENT_LOG_SOURCE", "Application") - but this should really be done as part of your installation steps with an EventLogInstaller or some kind of script to set up the environment). It's certainly true that error handling in BizTalk is just .NET error handling, but one thing to keep in mind is that maps are actually executing as XSLT, and the context in which their executing can have a major impact on how exceptions and errors will be handled, particularly unhandled exceptions.
Orchestrations
If you're executing a transform in an orchestration that has exception handling in it, the exception thrown will be handled and may even fall into additional logging you have in the orchestration - in other words, executing a throw from a C# functiod will work the way you'd think it would work elsewhere in C#. However, I try to avoid this since you never know if a map will at some point be used else where and because exception handling in XSLT doesn't always work the way you'd think (see below).
Send/Receive Ports
Unfortunately, if you're executing a map on a send or receive port and throw an exception within it, you will almost definitely get very unhelpful error message in the event log and a suspended instance in the group hub. There is no easy, straightforward way to simple "cancel" a transform - XSLT 1.0 doesn't have any specified way of doing that (see for example Throwing an exception from XSLT). That leaves you with outputting an error string to a particular node in the output (and/or to the EventLog), or writing lots of completely custom XSLT to try to validate input, or designing your schemas properly and using a validating component where necessary. For example, if you have a node that must match a particular regex, or should never be empty, or should never repeat more than X times, make sure you set those restrictions on the schema and then make sure you pass it through the XmlValidator or similar before attempting to map.
The simplest answer is, you just do.
Keep in mind, there is nothing special at all about error handling in BizTalk apps, it's just regular plain old .Net error handling.
So, what you do is catch the error in you code, write the details to the Windows Event Log (be sure to create a custom Event Source) and...that's it. That is all I do. I don't worry about what appear in BT Admin specifically.strong text

User exit for production order confirmation in CO11N?

I've watched quite a few videos on YouTube and have a basic understanding of how to find user-exits (enhancements?) and implement them. However when I try to replicate what I've seen it doesn't appear to be working.
I'm looking to create a user-exit that would execute when a production order has been confirmed (closed/finished) via CO11N. Someone suggested that I put in a line of code "BREAK username." So that I could verify that my code was firing. Nothing breaks. I've tried putting in a message from code found on the internet
MESSAGE s208(00) WITH 'TEST'.
No message is shown. I've activated the include and the project. I've tried different exits/includes and no matter what I do, nothing seems to break or show a message.
Is there something simple I'm missing? I've tried CONFPI05 and CONFPM05.
CONFPI05 is for process orders. CONFPM05 is for plant maintenance orders. First you need to check which kind of order you use. I assume you use production orders. You should check User-Exit CONFPP05 than.
Anyway, I would recommend using BAdI WORKORDER_CONFIRM. Within this BAdI there are methods available where you can raise an error message.
From the BAdI documentation:
Note that in the methods, no system messages may be sent. The only
exceptions are the AT_SAVE and AT_CANCEL_CHECK methods. Within these
methods, a system message may be issued, but only if you trigger the
exception ERROR_WITH_MESSAGE (for AT_SAVE method) or NOT_ALLOWED (for
AT_CANCEL_CHECK method) at the same time.
Note also that within the methods, the "commit work" instruction may
not be carried out because this would lead to incorrect data in the
database.
I strongly recommend not to use MESSAGE statement in any User-Exit or BAdI implementation. The MESSAGE statement will implicit call a COMMIT WORK which could cause database inconsistencies (happens very often by the way).
One additional note. You should check using Checkpoint Groups instead of using BREAK-POINT or BREAK username directly.
I checked the documentation:
CONFPI05 to update your own data after saving the confirmation
In another documentation I found another warning:
In this customer enhancement it is strictly forbidden to send error messages or other messages because otherwise there is the danger that data will be inconsistent. SAP cannot be held responsible for this!!
This sounds like changes in update task. By default breakpoints in update task are not enabled.
Should your code be processed after you pushed save?
If yes, what you can try:
Set anywhere a breakpoint. Or try /h during data insertion.
In debug screen activate the update debugging:
Continue the process with F8.
Hopefully you stop at your break-point.

When programming, do you show all errors as message boxes or do you put them in a log file

I am trying to develop a standard when I code applications.
I was curious as to what other developers did when it comes to sql errors or general program errors. Do you output the error to the screen, write to a log file, or something else?
It really depends on the severity of the error.
Is it a show stopper?
Can the software automatically retry and get away with no message?
Can it be ignored?
You can log every exception, or just certain ones, or none. I have a custom Exception class which logs every exception created (of that type).
I have an unhandled exception handler which emails me when there is one.
I'd only send a message to the user when it will change the way the application works from the user's point of view.
Your question is a bit subjective and you would get opinion-based answers if the entire community bothered to answer.
If the error is relevant and important to the user (e.g.: invalid username/password) display it to the user using a message box.
If the error is relevant to the developer, or can be used in the debugging process, use a log or a console output.
The trick is to identify which and how the errors should be displayed to the user. You don't want to bombard the user with exceptions and complicated errors on which the user has no idea on how to act upon.

Dojo console error objects empty

All of a sudden the errors that Dojo (1.8.3 from Google CDN) is spitting out empty errors, which makes debugging impossibly hard. For example, if I forget to require a dependent before using it, I get the usual
> dojo/parser::parse() error ReferenceError {}
... in the error console, but I remember getting more information in the ReferenceError (spindown arrow was present), giving me the arguments of the error as well as the message making it easy to figure out what I had done wrong.
I have isDebug : true in my dojoConfig, but it just doesn't want to tell me anything anymore.
What gives?
I've been having the same problem using Dojo 1.8.3 as well. When I close my developer tool's console and then re-open it the Error had the spindown and more details as expected. Seems stupid, but give it a try and see if that at "fixes" it for you. I planned on digging a little further into this later, so if I find any additional details I will make sure to update my answer with them.

Classic ASP - Error Catching

I'm working on a site and to help catch errors that we may not hear about, I've created a custom 500 error page.
This page basically records information about the current situation and logs it including the following:
Request.Servervariables("URL")
But, the log seem to actually be providing information about the location of the error.asp file instead of the actual file causing the error. And it doesn't seem to pick up Server.GetLastError().
Any ideas on how to ensure these scripts pick up the errors and deatils about the page causing the error and not the page that is used for 500 errors?
NOTE: When there's an error, the url in the address bar is always the address fo the page causing the error, but the log shows the error handler page 'error.asp'.
I would follow what Dee said, but also be aware that there was something finicky with IIS7 (or 7.5). I can't remember exactly, but you have to do something special to make sure it works on IIS7. Check out this article. IIS7 breaks the server.getlasterror and there is a workaround provided.
Also a cool thing to do is to email yourself those errors. So in your custom 500 asp script just fire off an email with the details. Depends on how critical errors are to your program, but it's good to be in the loop rather than have another log to worry about.