I have a simple design
id | grpid | main
-----------------
1 | 1 | 1
2 | 1 | 0
3 | 1 | 0
4 | 2 | 0
5 | 2 | 1
6 | 2 | 0
The question to answer is
What is the "id" of the main in each group?
The result should be
id
---
1
5
Seriously at the moment, I'm not able to answer it on my own. Pls assist me.
Maybe i'm oversimplifying it here but couldn't you just do this:
select id,
grpid
from table
where main = 1;
The simplest way you can do this with:
select id from <table_name> where main=1
but as you have mentioned you want id with group by grpid below query will work.
select id from <table_name> group by grpid, main having main = 1
You have to apply group by on your group id and based on that check the value of main as 1. You will get the desired result.
If you want to add a column for its corresponding "MainId" then you can do this perhaps?
SELECT f.id, f.grpid, f.main, t.MainId
FROM foo f
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT grpid, id AS MainId
FROM foo f1
WHERE main = 1
AND f.grpid = f1.grpid) t
Related
Hello I have the following problem.
I have a table like the one in this sql fiddle
This table defines a relationship and it contains IDs from two other tables
example values
| FirstID | SecondID |
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 |
| 2 | 5 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 |
I want to select all the FirstIDs that satisfy the following criteria.
Their corresponding SecondIDs are in the range 1-3 AND NOT in the range 4-5
For example in this case we would want FirstIDs 1 and 3.
I have tried the following queries
SELECT FirstID from table
WHERE SecondID IN (1,2,3) AND SecondID NOT IN (4,5)
SELECT FirstID,SecondID
FROM(
SELECT FirstID, SecondID
FROM table
WHERE SecondID in (1,2,3,4,5) )
WHERE SecondID NOT IN (4,5)
but I don't get the correct results I am aiming for.
What is the correct query to get the data I want?
SELECT FirstID
FROM table
WHERE SecondId in (1,2,3) --Included values
AND FirstID NOT IN (SELECT FirstID FROM test
WHERE SecondId IN (4,5)) --Excluded values
How about min() and max():
select firstid
from t
group by firstid
having min(secondId) between 1 and 3 and
max(secondid) between 1 and 3;
Assuming 1 is the minimum, then this can be simplified to:
having max(secondid) <= 3;
For arbitrary ranges, you can use sum(case):
having sum(case when secondId between 1 and 3 then 1 else 0 end) > 0 and
sum(case when secondId between 4 and 5 then 1 else 0 end) = 0;
I think Gonzalo Lorieto proably has the best answer to this question already, but depending on the size of your data, SELECT statements in a WHERE clause can get really slow, and the below might be significantly faster (although it's not clear it's worth it for the reduced readability...)
SELECT inrange.FirstId FROM
t inrange
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(SELECT FirstID FROM t
WHERE SEcondId IN (4,5)) outrange
ON inrange.firstID = outrange.firstId
WHERE SecondID IN (1,2,3)
AND outrange.firstId IS NULL
GROUP BY inrange.FirstId
You will want to use the EXISTS clause to exclude the FirstIDs that have an invalid SecondID. here is an example:
SELECT FirstID from test Has123
WHERE SecondID IN (1,2,3)
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM test Not45
WHERE Has123.FirstID = Not45.FirstID
AND Not45.SecondID IN (4,5)
)
GROUP BY FirstID
SqlFiddle
I have a table structure with columns similar to the following:
ID | line | value
1 | 1 | 10
1 | 2 | 5
2 | 1 | 6
3 | 1 | 7
3 | 2 | 4
ideally, i'd like to pull the following:
ID | value
1 | 5
2 | 6
3 | 4
one solution would be to do something like the following:
select a.ID, a.value
from
myTable a
inner join (select id, max(line) as line from myTable group by id) b
on a.id = b.id and a.line = b.line
Given the size of the table and that this is just a part of a larger pull, I'd like to see if there's a more elegant / simpler way of pulling this directly.
This is a task for OLAP-functions:
select *
from myTable a
qualify
rank() -- assign a rank for each id
over (partition by id
order by line desc) = 1
Might return multiple rows per id if they share the same max line. If you want to return only one of them, add another column to the order by to make it unique or switch to row_number to get an indeterminate row.
after some transformation I have a result from a cross join (from table a and b) where I want to do some analysis on. The table for this looks like this:
+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+
| id | 10_1 | 10_2 | 11_1 | 11_2 | id | 10_1 | 10_2 | 11_1 | 11_2 |
+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+
| 111 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 222 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 111 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 111 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 444 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 112 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 222 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
+-----+------+------+------+------+-----+------+------+------+------+
The ids in the first column are different from the ids in the sixth column.
In a row are always two different IDs that are matched with each other. The other columns always have either 0 or 1 as a value.
I am now trying to find out how many values(meaning both have "1" in 10_1, 10_2 etc) two IDs have on average in common, but I don't really know how to do so.
I was trying something like this as a start:
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN a.10_1 = 1 AND b.10_1 = 1 then 1 end)
But this would obviously only count how often two ids have 10_1 in common. I could make something like this for example for different columns:
SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN (a.10_1 = 1 AND b.10_1 = 1)
OR (a.10_2 = 1 AND b.10_1 = 1) OR [...] then 1 end)
To count in general how often two IDs have one thing in common, but this would of course also count if they have two or more things in common. Plus, I would also like to know how often two IDS have two things, three things etc in common.
One "problem" in my case is also that I have like ~30 columns I want to look at, so I can hardly write down for each case every possible combination.
Does anyone know how I can approach my problem in a better way?
Thanks in advance.
Edit:
A possible result could look like this:
+-----------+---------+
| in_common | count |
+-----------+---------+
| 0 | 100 |
| 1 | 500 |
| 2 | 1500 |
| 3 | 5000 |
| 4 | 3000 |
+-----------+---------+
With the codes as column names, you're going to have to write some code that explicitly references each column name. To keep that to a minimum, you could write those references in a single union statement that normalizes the data, such as:
select id, '10_1' where "10_1" = 1
union
select id, '10_2' where "10_2" = 1
union
select id, '11_1' where "11_1" = 1
union
select id, '11_2' where "11_2" = 1;
This needs to be modified to include whatever additional columns you need to link up different IDs. For the purpose of this illustration, I assume the following data model
create table p (
id integer not null primary key,
sex character(1) not null,
age integer not null
);
create table t1 (
id integer not null,
code character varying(4) not null,
constraint pk_t1 primary key (id, code)
);
Though your data evidently does not currently resemble this structure, normalizing your data into a form like this would allow you to apply the following solution to summarize your data in the desired form.
select
in_common,
count(*) as count
from (
select
count(*) as in_common
from (
select
a.id as a_id, a.code,
b.id as b_id, b.code
from
(select p.*, t1.code
from p left join t1 on p.id=t1.id
) as a
inner join (select p.*, t1.code
from p left join t1 on p.id=t1.id
) as b on b.sex <> a.sex and b.age between a.age-10 and a.age+10
where
a.id < b.id
and a.code = b.code
) as c
group by
a_id, b_id
) as summ
group by
in_common;
The proposed solution requires first to take one step back from the cross-join table, as the identical column names are super annoying. Instead, we take the ids from the two tables and put them in a temporary table. The following query gets the result wanted in the question. It assumes table_a and table_b from the question are the same and called tbl, but this assumption is not needed and tbl can be replaced by table_a and table_b in the two sub-SELECT queries. It looks complicated and uses the JSON trick to flatten the columns, but it works here:
WITH idtable AS (
SELECT a.id as id_1, b.id as id_2 FROM
-- put cross join of table a and table b here
)
SELECT in_common,
count(*)
FROM
(SELECT idtable.*,
sum(CASE
WHEN meltedR.value::text=meltedL.value::text THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) AS in_common
FROM idtable
JOIN
(SELECT tbl.id,
b.*
FROM tbl, -- change here to table_a
json_each(row_to_json(tbl)) b -- and here too
WHERE KEY<>'id' ) meltedL ON (idtable.id_1 = meltedL.id)
JOIN
(SELECT tbl.id,
b.*
FROM tbl, -- change here to table_b
json_each(row_to_json(tbl)) b -- and here too
WHERE KEY<>'id' ) meltedR ON (idtable.id_2 = meltedR.id
AND meltedL.key = meltedR.key)
GROUP BY idtable.id_1,
idtable.id_2) tt
GROUP BY in_common ORDER BY in_common;
The output here looks like this:
in_common | count
-----------+-------
2 | 2
3 | 1
4 | 1
(3 rows)
I am attempting to select distinct (last updated) rows from a table in my database. I am trying to get the last updated row for each "Sub section". However I cannot find a way to achieve this.
The table looks like:
ID | Name |LastUpdated | Section | Sub |
1 | Name1 | 2013-04-07 16:38:18.837 | 1 | 1 |
2 | Name2 | 2013-04-07 15:38:18.837 | 1 | 2 |
3 | Name3 | 2013-04-07 12:38:18.837 | 1 | 1 |
4 | Name4 | 2013-04-07 13:38:18.837 | 1 | 3 |
5 | Name5 | 2013-04-07 17:38:18.837 | 1 | 3 |
What I am trying to get my SQL Statement to do is return rows:
1, 2, and 5.
They are distinct for the Sub, and the most recent.
I have tried:
SELECT DISTINCT Sub, LastUpdated, Name
FROM TABLE
WHERE LastUpdated = (SELECT MAX(LastUpdated) FROM TABLE WHERE Section = 1)
Which only returns the distinct row for the most recent updated Row. Which makes sense.
I have googled what I am trying, and checked relevant posts on here. However not managed to find one which really answers what I am trying.
You can use the row_number() window function to assign numbers for each partition of rows with the same value of Sub. Using order by LastUpdated desc, the row with row number one will be the latest row:
select *
from (
select row_number() over (
partition by Sub
order by LastUpdated desc) as rn
, *
from YourTable
) as SubQueryAlias
where rn = 1
Wouldn't it be enough to use group by?
SELECT DISTINCT MIN(Sub), MAX(LastUpdated), MIN(NAME) FROM TABLE GROUP BY Sub Where Section = 1
I have table with data something like this:
ID | RowNumber | Data
------------------------------
1 | 1 | Data
2 | 2 | Data
3 | 3 | Data
4 | 1 | Data
5 | 2 | Data
6 | 1 | Data
7 | 2 | Data
8 | 3 | Data
9 | 4 | Data
I want to group each set of RowNumbers So that my result is something like this:
ID | RowNumber | Group | Data
--------------------------------------
1 | 1 | a | Data
2 | 2 | a | Data
3 | 3 | a | Data
4 | 1 | b | Data
5 | 2 | b | Data
6 | 1 | c | Data
7 | 2 | c | Data
8 | 3 | c | Data
9 | 4 | c | Data
The only way I know where each group starts and stops is when the RowNumber starts over. How can I accomplish this? It also needs to be fairly efficient since the table I need to do this on has 52 Million Rows.
Additional Info
ID is truly sequential, but RowNumber may not be. I think RowNumber will always begin with 1 but for example the RowNumbers for group1 could be "1,1,2,2,3,4" and for group2 they could be "1,2,4,6", etc.
For the clarified requirements in the comments
The rownumbers for group1 could be "1,1,2,2,3,4" and for group2 they
could be "1,2,4,6" ... a higher number followed by a lower would be a
new group.
A SQL Server 2012 solution could be as follows.
Use LAG to access the previous row and set a flag to 1 if that row is the start of a new group or 0 otherwise.
Calculate a running sum of these flags to use as the grouping value.
Code
WITH T1 AS
(
SELECT *,
LAG(RowNumber) OVER (ORDER BY ID) AS PrevRowNumber
FROM YourTable
), T2 AS
(
SELECT *,
IIF(PrevRowNumber IS NULL OR PrevRowNumber > RowNumber, 1, 0) AS NewGroup
FROM T1
)
SELECT ID,
RowNumber,
Data,
SUM(NewGroup) OVER (ORDER BY ID
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS Grp
FROM T2
SQL Fiddle
Assuming ID is the clustered index the plan for this has one scan against YourTable and avoids any sort operations.
If the ids are truly sequential, you can do:
select t.*,
(id - rowNumber) as grp
from t
Also you can use recursive CTE
;WITH cte AS
(
SELECT ID, RowNumber, Data, 1 AS [Group]
FROM dbo.test1
WHERE ID = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT t.ID, t.RowNumber, t.Data,
CASE WHEN t.RowNumber != 1 THEN c.[Group] ELSE c.[Group] + 1 END
FROM dbo.test1 t JOIN cte c ON t.ID = c.ID + 1
)
SELECT *
FROM cte
Demo on SQLFiddle
How about:
select ID, RowNumber, Data, dense_rank() over (order by grp) as Grp
from (
select *, (select min(ID) from [Your Table] where ID > t.ID and RowNumber = 1) as grp
from [Your Table] t
) t
order by ID
This should work on SQL 2005. You could also use rank() instead if you don't care about consecutive numbers.