I get the error mentioned in the topic.
My XML file is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.runtime.remoting>
<application>
<service>
<wellknown type="SimpleRemotingAsm.RemotingMessageObject,SimpleRemotingAsm" objectUri="RemoteMsgObj.soap" mode="Singleton"/>
</service>
<channels>
<channel ref="http"/>
</channels>
</application>
</system.runtime.remoting>
</configuration>
I've read MANY thread regarding the problem, but nothing helped me at all.
I am using VS .NET 2013.
Visual Studio allows you to associate multiple DTD (Document Type Definition) files with your App.config or Web.config files. The fix for this problem is kind of wonky:
Open your Visual Studio solution
Open the config file for editing
Right-click on the config file's filename in the Solution Explorer pane
Click "Properties"
Now click back on the editor pane for that config file
The "XML Document" Properties should be visible in the Properties pane
The "Schemas" property contains a space separated list of .xsd file names that provide XML element definitions for your config file. You will need to click the ... button in the value field for this property and browse to the proper XSD file. Once you've added it, the "Could not find schema information..." warning should go away when you build the solution.
As for where the XSD file is? I'm not sure. The Remoting Example: Hosting in Internet Information Services (IIS) documentation might be a good place to start.
Related
I am following the basic starter example shown here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/desktop/modernize/host-custom-control-with-xaml-islands
I have followed it as closely as I can. I can get it working if I put my user control in with the UWP app (different to the example) but not as it is with the usercontrol in the class library.
Firstly, when I run the example as it is, I get:
"WindowsXamlManager and DesktopWindowXamlSource are supported for apps targeting Windows version 10.0.18226.0 and later. Please check either the application manifest or package manifest and ensure the MaxTestedVersion property is updated."
The only solution I can find to this was to add a manifest file to the wpf project containing:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<assembly manifestVersion="1.0" xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
<compatibility xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:compatibility.v1">
<application>
<!-- Windows 10 -->
<maxversiontested Id="10.0.18362.0"/>
<supportedOS Id="{8e0f7a12-bfb3-4fe8-b9a5-48fd50a15a9a}" />
</application>
</compatibility>
</assembly>
After that, I did not see that error, but when the wpf form loads, I see "Cannot create control of type ClassLibrary1.MyUserControl1", but no clues as to why.
Anyone know what I am doing wrong, how to find out what the problem is of know of any examples that do work?
I downloaded your project package and I found that you missed a step.
It's the forth step in Create a custom UWP control
Before the closing element, add the following XML to disable several properties and then save the project file. These properties must be enabled to host the custom UWP control in a WPF (or Windows Forms) app.
<PropertyGroup>
<EnableTypeInfoReflection>false</EnableTypeInfoReflection>
<EnableXBindDiagnostics>false</EnableXBindDiagnostics>
</PropertyGroup>
After you add this code to ClassLibrary1.csproj, clean up the class library and rebuild it, then everything will work.
Best regards.
We have a very strange problem with our VSTO Add-In.
In our Add-In there are label controls that read label text values from an app.config file and display text from the configuration file to the user:
<!-- app.config -->
<configuration>
<configSections>
...
</configSections>
<!-- start applicationSettings -->
<applicationSettings>
<OurVSTOAddIn.MySettings>
<setting name="ackMsg" serializeAs="String">
<value>Some text here that we want to display and change</value>
</setting>
...
<OurVSTOAddIn.MySettings>
</applicationSettings>
</configuration>
'vb.net code
objCheckDialog.lblAttachmentsMsg.Text = My.Settings("attachmentsAckMsg").ToString()
objCheckDialog.lblAttachmentsMsg.Visible = True
We recently updated the app.config file to replace English display information with Kanjii for our end-users in Japan.
When we rebuilt the MSI and installed on our test machine, the add-in isn't displaying Kanjii (although it display correctly in development).
Now we're wondering if the configuration file in the installation directory is being read at all or if the information is cached or the add-in is reading from another file somewhere.
What's even more strange is that we've changed other values in our app.config file that are being used in code logic, and these seem to load properly.
We're currently using Procmon in an effort to find out how the config file is loaded, however, while filtering on the following:
Process Name contains Outlook
Path Contains "OurOutlookPlugInName"
This produces over 400 results but we don't see any file handling for our config file unless I debug the code in Visual Studio.
On our installation machine, we also removed the configuration file from the installation directory thinking this might be a clue as to whether the Add-In is reading the configuration file from the installation directory, but it had no effect, and the Add-In loaded normally displaying English instead of Kanjii again.
All of the configuration settins are at the Application Level.
Is there a way for us to tell where our Add-In is loading our configuration file from?
Have we done something incorrect in our MSI build that would prevent the updated configuration file from loading?
UPDATE:
I opened the dll file in the C:\Program Files (x86)\OurVSTOAddIn installation directory using Telerik JustDecompile to see if the configuration settings were written somewhere in the dll and I can see that under OurVSTOAddIn->My Settings there are definitely DefaultSettingValues there, as shown below:
This would make sense since these are Application Scoped Settings and this would prevent a user from changing config settings.
But I'm thinking if we use Application Scoped variables, each time we'll need to rebuild the msi for release, which doesn't make sense to me since the reason we want to use configuration settings for the project is to not need to rebuild for configuration changes.
I am getting a simlar issue as below:
Load jboss-ejb3.xml file instead ejb-jar.xml in wildfly
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3189
schema location error jboss-ejb3.xml
My issue is that my xsd definition on top of my jboss-ejb3.xml is like this:
<jboss:ejb-jar xmlns:jboss="http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:s="urn:security:1.1"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.jboss.com/xml/ns/javaee http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/schema/jboss-ejb3-2_0.xsd http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ejb-jar_3_1.xsd"
version="3.1"
impl-version="2.0">
when clicking on http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/schema/jboss-ejb3-2_0.xsd it opens jboss_5_0.xsd inside a maven jar: Maven: org.jboss.metadata:jboss-metadata:1.0.0.CR162 in my intelliJ. Seems like this is an old one as it does not have this XSD. now i was under the impression that if it did not find the XSD it will download it, which is why the http link is there in my opinion. but it is not. for ejb-jar_3_1.xsd, however it is getting from intellyJ embedded javaee api lib.
how can I add the right XSD from the net in this case. is it an intelliJ issue
As far as I've ever been able to determine, you must manually add a reference to a local resource for each XSD that is unknown to Intellij Idea.
This can be configured under Preferences/Languages & Frameworks/Schemas and DTDs.
You will not need to download anything from the internet if you have a local copy of WildFly, as it provides copies of all schema in $WILDFLY_HOME/docs/schema/.
In several projects’ App.config file, there is a line
<add key="url" value="http://www.example.com/"/>
Upon each build, I want to have a task to verify that the "url" key does not have the text "http://localhost". Is there a way to do this?
I'm assuming you have a team, and some of your team members inadvertently checkin those configs, changing that value to localhost.
If this is the case, why not have transform files for each environment, where your debug configuration can set the key to localhost, and your production/test/stage/qa/whatever configuration can set it to example.com or something else.
You might not have been aware that msbuild can transform your config files. Essentially you have your main config file, and then a config file containing just the things changed, for each environment. Upon doing a build, msbuild will modify the main one with whatever the changes are in the other "transform" files.
App.Config Transformation for projects which are not Web Projects in Visual Studio 2010?
Your transform file would look like:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- For more information on using web.config transformation visit http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=125889 -->
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<appSettings>
<add key="url" value="http://www.example.com/" xdt:Locator="Match(key)" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes"/>
</appSettings>
</configuration>
The microsoft link is to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd465326(VS.100).aspx
They can easily be used on web.configs, as well as app.configs, with a little tweaking to your project file.
An alternative solution would be to integrate unit tests as part of your build, and have the test verify the key in your web.config.
Go to your builds:
Right click on your build and click on edit build definition:
Choose process:
Now we can set fail on build here:
I am created a wcf service. Everything has been working fine. Now all of a sudden with adding any logic I am getting a build error where I am consuming the wcf service saying:
I have an Ambiguous Reference.
I can fix this by qualifiing the object as part of the service and it works fine
ServiceReference1.AccountCredit=GetSomeData()
The thing is all thee other objects on the page are referencing an objectModel dll except this one.
I went further and viewed the service reference itself in the browser and see visual studio for whatever reason on this particular object added a file containing the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <!--
This file is automatically generated by Visual Studio .Net. It is
used to store generic object data source configuration information.
Renaming the file extension or editing the content of this file may
cause the file to be unrecognizable by the program.
-->
- <GenericObjectDataSource DisplayName="AccountCredit" Version="1.0" xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdatasource">
<TypeInfo>TestMethods.ServiceReference1.AccountCredit, Service References.ServiceReference1.Reference.cs, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null</TypeInfo>
</GenericObjectDataSource>
All the other objects I use dont have this and in turn this is the only object on the client that is complaining.
It may be that "MyObject" is the only name that is present in two different namespaces, where both the namespaces are referenced by a using statement at the top of the cs file.