I am using PhantomJS for printing pdf from my web page and then storing the resultant pdf to S3 if the pdf is generated successfully.
My problem is PhantomJS is returning exit code 0 i.e. success even after a network error occur and the resultant pdf is not which I want.
So I want to know is there any way to abort PhantomJS when error occur with an exit code .
Currently the error in which this happening is NETWORK Error : 101
But even though PhantomJS do not abort and return with exit code 0
The only time that PhantomJS exits on its own is when it encounters a Syntax Error of your script (PhantomJS 2.0.0 has a bug and simply freezes and doesn't print anything at this point).
For everything else you need to call phantom.exit() to exit. phantom.exit() takes an optional argument which is the exit code. So when you encounter an error for example by checking the success argument of the page.open() callback or when onResourceError or onResourceTimeout events are triggered, you can exit PhantomJS with your own intended exit code such as
phantom.exit(1);
Related
To test the integrity of PostScript files, I'd like to run Ghostscript in the following way:
Return 1 (or other error code) on error
Return 0 (success) at EOF if stack is empty
Return 1 (or other error code) otherwise
I could run gs in the background, and use a timeout to force termination if gs hangs with items left on the stack. Is there an easier solution?
Ghostscript won't hang if you send files as input (unless you write a program which enters an infinite loop or otherwise fails to reach a halting state). Having items on any of the stacks won't cause it to hang.
On the other hand, it won't give you an error if a PostScript program leaves operands on the operand stack (or dictionaries on the dictionary stack, clips on the clip stack or gstates on the graphics state stack). This is because that's not an error, and since PostScript interpreters normally run in a job server loop its not a problem either. Terminating the job returns control to the job server loop which does a save and restore round the total job, thereby clearing up anything left behind.
I'd suggest that if you really want to do this you need to adopt the same approach, you need to write a PostScript program which executes the PostScript program you want to 'test', then checks the operand stack (and other stacks if required) to see if anything is left. Note that you will want to execute the test program in a stopped context, as an error in the course of the program will clearly potentially leave stuff lying around.
Ghostscript returns 0 on a clean exit and a value less than 0 for errors, if I remember correctly. You would need to use signalerror in your test framework in order to raise an error if items are left at the end of a program.
[EDIT]
Anything supplied to Ghostscript on the command line by either -s or -d is defined in systemdict, so if we do -sInputFileName=/test.pdf then we will find in systemdict a key /InputFileName whose value is a string with the contents (/test.pdf). We can use that to pass the filename to our program.
The stopped operator takes an executable array as an argument, and returns either true or false depending on whether an error occurred while executing the array (3rd Edition PLRM, p 697).
So we need to run the program contained in the filename we've been given, and do it in a 'stopped' context. Something like this:
{InputFileName run} stopped
{
(Error occurred\n) print flush
%% Potentially check $error for more information.
}{
(program terminated normally\n) print flush
%% Here you could check the various stacks
} ifelse
The following, based 90% on KenS's answer, is 99% satisfactory:
Program checkIntegrity.ps:
{Script run} stopped
{
(\n===> Integrity test failed: ) print Script print ( has error\n\n) print
handleerror
(ignore this error which only serves to force a return value of 1) /syntaxerror signalerror
}{
% script passed, now check the stack
count dup 0 eq {
pop (\n===> Integrity test passed: ) print Script print ( terminated normally\n\n) print
} {
(\n===> Integrity test failed: ) print Script print ( left ) print
3 string cvs print ( item(s) on stack\n\n) print
Script /syntaxerror signalerror
} ifelse
} ifelse
quit
Execute with
gs -q -sScript=CodeToBeChecked.ps checkIntegrity.ps ; echo $?
For the last 1% of satisfaction I would need a replacement for
(blabla) /syntaxerror signalerror
It forces exit with return code 1, but is very verbous and distracts from the actual error in the checked script that is reported by handleerror. Therefore a cleaner way to exit(1) would be welcome.
I am trying to run the following script:
on run proUrl
tell application "Safari"
make new document with properties {URL:proUrl}
end tell
end run
This is how I try to run it: osascript script.scpt http://google.com.
I receive the following error:
script.scpt: execution error: Safari got an error: AppleEvent handler failed. (-10000)
In case I substitue the proUrl variable to "http://google.com" then it works.
How can I fix this?
proUrl is a list of items, even if there's only 1 item you are sending to the applescript. So the actual url is "item 1 of proURL". Here's how I would write your script...
on run proUrlList
open location (item 1 of proUrlList)
end run
To open a URL in your default browser from the command line, just use open:
open http://google.com
See man open for more.
I am looking for a complete list of all possible jvm exit codes (not java System.exit(x)). The only thing I could find by using a search engine is a list of SIGTERM exit codes: http://journal.thobe.org/2013/02/jvms-and-kill-signals.html . I want to know if there are specific exit codes for uncatched Exceptions?
Argument passed to System.exit(x) -> becomes the JVM exit code.
Exit code 0 is used to indicate normal exit.
Unique positive exit code to indicate specific problem.
I want to know if there are specific exit codes for uncatched
Exceptions?
No. If all non-daemon threads exit normally(presence/absence of exception does not matter), JVM terminates with 0.
Exit code between 1 and 127 are specific codes used to indicate error in JVM. e.g. mismatched jdk/jre versions, incorrect memory configuration/command-line options, etc.
About the link
http://journal.thobe.org/2013/02/jvms-and-kill-signals.html
JVM exit due to specific signal would be
128+signal-id
List of signal-id can be found using kill -l
I have a test script I'm running that generates some errors,shown below, I expect these errors. Is there anyway I can prevent them from showing on the screen however? I use the
$ write sys$output
to display if there is an expected error.
I tried to use
$ DEFINE SYS$ERROR ERROR.LOG
but this then changed my entire error output log to this, if this is the correct way to handle it can I unset this at the end of my script somehow?
[error example]
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT; as input
-RMS-E-FNF, file not found
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT; as input
-RMS-E-FNF, file not found
%DCL-W-UNDFIL, file has not been opened by DCL - check logical name
DEFINE/USER creates a logical name that disappears when the next image exits.
So if you use that just before a command just to protect that command, then fine.
Otherwise I would prefer SET MESSAGE to control the output.
And of course yoy want to grab $STATUS and verify it after the command for success or for the expected error, reporting any unexpected error.
Better still... if you expect certain error conditions to occur,
then why not test for them?
For example:
$ file = F$SEARCH("TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT")
$ IF file.NES."" THEN TYPE 'file'
Cheers,
Hein
To suppress Error message inside a script. try this command
$ DEFINE/USER SYS$ERROR NL:
NL: is a null device, so you don`t see any error messages displayed on your terminal.
good luck
This works interactively and in batch.
$ SET MESSAGE /NOTEXT /NOSEV /NOFAC /NOID
$ <DCL_Command>
$ SET MESSAGE /TEXT /SEV /FAC/ ID
What is the meaning of return value 127 from $? in UNIX.
Value 127 is returned by /bin/sh when the given command is not found within your PATH system variable and it is not a built-in shell command. In other words, the system doesn't understand your command, because it doesn't know where to find the binary you're trying to call.
Generally it means:
127 - command not found
but it can also mean that the command is found,
but a library that is required by the command is NOT found.
127 - command not found
example: $caat
The error message will
bash:
caat: command not found
now you check using echo $?
A shell convention is that a successful executable should exit with the value 0. Anything else can be interpreted as a failure of some sort, on part of bash or the executable you that just ran. See also $PIPESTATUS and the EXIT STATUS section of the bash man page:
For the shell’s purposes, a command which exits with a zero exit status has succeeded. An exit status
of zero indicates success. A non-zero exit status indicates failure. When a command terminates on a
fatal signal N, bash uses the value of 128+N as the exit status.
If a command is not found, the child process created to execute it returns a status of 127. If a com-
mand is found but is not executable, the return status is 126.
If a command fails because of an error during expansion or redirection, the exit status is greater than
zero.
Shell builtin commands return a status of 0 (true) if successful, and non-zero (false) if an error
occurs while they execute. All builtins return an exit status of 2 to indicate incorrect usage.
Bash itself returns the exit status of the last command executed, unless a syntax error occurs, in
which case it exits with a non-zero value. See also the exit builtin command below.
It has no special meaning, other than that the last process to exit did so with an exit status of 127.
However, it is also used by bash (assuming you're using bash as a shell) to tell you that the command you tried to execute couldn't be executed (i.e. it couldn't be found). It's unfortunately not immediately deducible though, if the process exited with status 127, or if it couldn't found.
EDIT:
Not immediately deducible, except for the output on the console, but this is stack overflow, so I assume you're doing this in a script.
If you're trying to run a program using a scripting language, you may need to include the full path of the scripting language and the file to execute. For example:
exec('/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/lib/node_modules/uglifycss/uglifycss in.css > out.css');
This error is also at times deceiving. It says file is not found even though the files is indeed present. It could be because of invalid unreadable special characters present in the files that could be caused by the editor you are using. This link might help you in such cases.
-bash: ./my_script: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
The best way to find out if it is this issue is to simple place an echo statement in the entire file and verify if the same error is thrown.
If the IBM mainframe JCL has some extra characters or numbers at the end of the name of unix script being called then it can throw such error.
In addition to the given answers, note that running a script file with incorrect end-of-line characters could also result in 127 exit code if you use /bin/sh as your shell.
As an example, if you run a shell script with CRLF end-of-line characters in a UNIX-based system and in the /bin/sh shell, it is possible to encounter some errors like the following I've got after running my script named my_test.sh :
$ ./my_test.sh
sh: 2: ./my_test.sh: not found
$ echo $?
127
As a note, using /bin/bash, I got 126 exit code, which is in accordance with gnu.org documentation about the bash :
If a command is not found, the child process created to execute it returns a status of 127. If a command is found but is not executable, the return status is 126.
Finally, here is the result of running my script in /bin/bash :
arman#Debian-1100:~$ ./my_test.sh
-bash: ./my_test.sh: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
arman#Debian-1100:~$ echo $?
126
go to C:\Program Files\Git\etc
open gitconfig with notepad
change
[core]
autocrlf = true
To
[core]
autocrlf = false