Swift equivalent to Objective-C FourCharCode single quote literals (e.g. 'TEXT') - objective-c

I am trying replicate some Objective C cocoa in Swift. All is good until I come across the following:
// Set a new type and creator:
unsigned long type = 'TEXT';
unsigned long creator = 'pdos';
How can I create Int64s (or the correct Swift equivalent) from single quote character literals like this?
Types:
public typealias AEKeyword = FourCharCode
public typealias OSType = FourCharCode
public typealias FourCharCode = UInt32

I'm using this in my Cocoa Scripting apps, it considers characters > 0x80 correctly
func OSTypeFrom(string : String) -> UInt {
var result : UInt = 0
if let data = string.dataUsingEncoding(NSMacOSRomanStringEncoding) {
let bytes = UnsafePointer<UInt8>(data.bytes)
for i in 0..<data.length {
result = result << 8 + UInt(bytes[i])
}
}
return result
}
Edit:
Alternatively
func fourCharCodeFrom(string : String) -> FourCharCode
{
assert(string.count == 4, "String length must be 4")
var result : FourCharCode = 0
for char in string.utf16 {
result = (result << 8) + FourCharCode(char)
}
return result
}
or still swiftier
func fourCharCode(from string : String) -> FourCharCode
{
return string.utf16.reduce(0, {$0 << 8 + FourCharCode($1)})
}

I found the following typealiases from the Swift API:
typealias FourCharCode = UInt32
typealias OSType = FourCharCode
And the following functions:
func NSFileTypeForHFSTypeCode(hfsFileTypeCode: OSType) -> String!
func NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType(fileTypeString: String!) -> OSType
This should allow me to create the equivalent code:
let type : UInt32 = UInt32(NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType("TEXT"))
let creator : UInt32 = UInt32(NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType("pdos"))
But those 4-character strings doesn't work and return 0.
If you wrap each string in ' single quotes ' and call the same functions, you will get the correct return values:
let type : UInt32 = UInt32(NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType("'TEXT'"))
let creator : UInt32 = UInt32(NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType("'pdos'"))

Adopt the ExpressibleByStringLiteral protocol to use four-character string literals directly:
extension FourCharCode: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
public init(stringLiteral value: StringLiteralType) {
if let data = value.data(using: .macOSRoman), data.count == 4 {
self = data.reduce(0, {$0 << 8 + Self($1)})
} else {
self = 0
}
}
}
Now you can just pass a string literal as the FourCharCode / OSType / UInt32 parameter:
let record = NSAppleEventDescriptor.record()
record.setDescriptor(NSAppleEventDescriptor(boolean: true), forKeyword: "test")

In Swift 4 or later, I use this code - if the string is not 4 characters in size, it will return an OSType(0):
extension String {
public func osType() -> OSType {
var result:UInt = 0
if let data = self.data(using: .macOSRoman), data.count == 4
{
data.withUnsafeBytes { (ptr:UnsafePointer<UInt8>) in
for i in 0..<data.count {
result = result << 8 + UInt(ptr[i])
}
}
}
return OSType(result)
}
}
let type = "APPL".osType() // 1095782476
// check if this is OK in a playground
let hexStr = String(format: "0x%lx", type) // 0x4150504c -> "APPL" in ASCII

Swift 5 Update:
extension String {
func osType() -> OSType {
return OSType(
data(using: .macOSRoman)?
.withUnsafeBytes {
$0.reduce(into: UInt(0)) { $0 = $0 << 8 + UInt($1) }
} ?? 0
)
}
}

Here's a simple function
func mbcc(foo: String) -> Int
{
let chars = foo.utf8
var result: Int = 0
for aChar in chars
{
result = result << 8 + Int(aChar)
}
return result
}
let a = mbcc("TEXT")
print(String(format: "0x%lx", a)) // Prints 0x54455854
It will work for strings that will fit in an Int. Once they get longer it starts losing digits from the top.
If you use
result = result * 256 + Int(aChar)
you should get a crash when the string gets too big instead.

Using NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType does work, but only for 4-character strings wrapped with single quotes, aka 6-character strings. It returns 0 for unquoted 4-character strings.
So wrap your 4-character string in ' ' before passing it to the function:
extension FourCharCode: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
public init(stringLiteral value: StringLiteralType) {
switch (value.count, value.first, value.last) {
case (6, "'", "'"):
self = NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType(value)
case (4, _, _):
self = NSHFSTypeCodeFromFileType("'\(value)'")
default:
self = 0
}
}
}
Using the above extension, you can use 4-character or single-quoted 6-character string literals:
let record = NSAppleEventDescriptor.record()
record.setDescriptor(NSAppleEventDescriptor(boolean: true), forKeyword: "4444")
record.setDescriptor(NSAppleEventDescriptor(boolean: true), forKeyword: "'6666'")
It would be even better to limit the string literal to 4-character strings at compile time. That does not seem to currently be possible, but is being discussed for Swift here:
Allow for Compile-Time Checked Intervals for Parameters Expecting Literal Values

Related

Is there any way duplicated sequential string delete in kotlin

I got strings like
String1=277473—-2627272———-273-3838383-/./--asdfg-----123:12:2---
I cant take length of function because I have multiple strings with different lenghts.
I wanted to use split function to take them as a variable but I need this format
String1=277473-2627272—273-3838383-/./-asdfg-123:12:2
Is there any way to do that easily?
You are using 2 different kind of '-' characters, use this instead:
fun formatString(string: String): String {
return string.mapNotNull { char -> if (char == '—' || char == '-') '-' else char }
.joinToString(separator = "")
.replace("""-+""".toRegex(), "-")
.trimDashes()
}
fun String.trimDashes(): String = dropWhile { it == '-' }
.dropLastWhile { !it.isDigit() }
you can do something like this:
fun formatString(string: String): String {
return string.trimDashes()
.split("-")
.joinToString(separator = "-", transform = String::trimDashes)
}
fun String.trimDashes(): String = dropWhile { it == '-' }
.dropLastWhile { !it.isDigit() }

Arithmetic parser in kotlin [duplicate]

I'm trying to write a Java routine to evaluate math expressions from String values like:
"5+3"
"10-4*5"
"(1+10)*3"
I want to avoid a lot of if-then-else statements.
How can I do this?
With JDK1.6, you can use the built-in Javascript engine.
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptException;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws ScriptException {
ScriptEngineManager mgr = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine engine = mgr.getEngineByName("JavaScript");
String foo = "40+2";
System.out.println(engine.eval(foo));
}
}
I've written this eval method for arithmetic expressions to answer this question. It does addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation (using the ^ symbol), and a few basic functions like sqrt. It supports grouping using (...), and it gets the operator precedence and associativity rules correct.
public static double eval(final String str) {
return new Object() {
int pos = -1, ch;
void nextChar() {
ch = (++pos < str.length()) ? str.charAt(pos) : -1;
}
boolean eat(int charToEat) {
while (ch == ' ') nextChar();
if (ch == charToEat) {
nextChar();
return true;
}
return false;
}
double parse() {
nextChar();
double x = parseExpression();
if (pos < str.length()) throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected: " + (char)ch);
return x;
}
// Grammar:
// expression = term | expression `+` term | expression `-` term
// term = factor | term `*` factor | term `/` factor
// factor = `+` factor | `-` factor | `(` expression `)` | number
// | functionName `(` expression `)` | functionName factor
// | factor `^` factor
double parseExpression() {
double x = parseTerm();
for (;;) {
if (eat('+')) x += parseTerm(); // addition
else if (eat('-')) x -= parseTerm(); // subtraction
else return x;
}
}
double parseTerm() {
double x = parseFactor();
for (;;) {
if (eat('*')) x *= parseFactor(); // multiplication
else if (eat('/')) x /= parseFactor(); // division
else return x;
}
}
double parseFactor() {
if (eat('+')) return +parseFactor(); // unary plus
if (eat('-')) return -parseFactor(); // unary minus
double x;
int startPos = this.pos;
if (eat('(')) { // parentheses
x = parseExpression();
if (!eat(')')) throw new RuntimeException("Missing ')'");
} else if ((ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || ch == '.') { // numbers
while ((ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || ch == '.') nextChar();
x = Double.parseDouble(str.substring(startPos, this.pos));
} else if (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') { // functions
while (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') nextChar();
String func = str.substring(startPos, this.pos);
if (eat('(')) {
x = parseExpression();
if (!eat(')')) throw new RuntimeException("Missing ')' after argument to " + func);
} else {
x = parseFactor();
}
if (func.equals("sqrt")) x = Math.sqrt(x);
else if (func.equals("sin")) x = Math.sin(Math.toRadians(x));
else if (func.equals("cos")) x = Math.cos(Math.toRadians(x));
else if (func.equals("tan")) x = Math.tan(Math.toRadians(x));
else throw new RuntimeException("Unknown function: " + func);
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected: " + (char)ch);
}
if (eat('^')) x = Math.pow(x, parseFactor()); // exponentiation
return x;
}
}.parse();
}
Example:
System.out.println(eval("((4 - 2^3 + 1) * -sqrt(3*3+4*4)) / 2"));
Output: 7.5 (which is correct)
The parser is a recursive descent parser, so internally uses separate parse methods for each level of operator precedence in its grammar. I deliberately kept it short, but here are some ideas you might want to expand it with:
Variables:
The bit of the parser that reads the names for functions can easily be changed to handle custom variables too, by looking up names in a variable table passed to the eval method, such as a Map<String,Double> variables.
Separate compilation and evaluation:
What if, having added support for variables, you wanted to evaluate the same expression millions of times with changed variables, without parsing it every time? It's possible. First define an interface to use to evaluate the precompiled expression:
#FunctionalInterface
interface Expression {
double eval();
}
Now to rework the original "eval" function into a "parse" function, change all the methods that return doubles, so instead they return an instance of that interface. Java 8's lambda syntax works well for this. Example of one of the changed methods:
Expression parseExpression() {
Expression x = parseTerm();
for (;;) {
if (eat('+')) { // addition
Expression a = x, b = parseTerm();
x = (() -> a.eval() + b.eval());
} else if (eat('-')) { // subtraction
Expression a = x, b = parseTerm();
x = (() -> a.eval() - b.eval());
} else {
return x;
}
}
}
That builds a recursive tree of Expression objects representing the compiled expression (an abstract syntax tree). Then you can compile it once and evaluate it repeatedly with different values:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Map<String,Double> variables = new HashMap<>();
Expression exp = parse("x^2 - x + 2", variables);
for (double x = -20; x <= +20; x++) {
variables.put("x", x);
System.out.println(x + " => " + exp.eval());
}
}
Different datatypes:
Instead of double, you could change the evaluator to use something more powerful like BigDecimal, or a class that implements complex numbers, or rational numbers (fractions). You could even use Object, allowing some mix of datatypes in expressions, just like a real programming language. :)
All code in this answer released to the public domain. Have fun!
For my university project, I was looking for a parser / evaluator supporting both basic formulas and more complicated equations (especially iterated operators). I found very nice open source library for JAVA and .NET called mXparser. I will give a few examples to make some feeling on the syntax, for further instructions please visit project website (especially tutorial section).
https://mathparser.org/
https://mathparser.org/mxparser-tutorial/
https://mathparser.org/api/
And few examples
1 - Simple furmula
Expression e = new Expression("( 2 + 3/4 + sin(pi) )/2");
double v = e.calculate()
2 - User defined arguments and constants
Argument x = new Argument("x = 10");
Constant a = new Constant("a = pi^2");
Expression e = new Expression("cos(a*x)", x, a);
double v = e.calculate()
3 - User defined functions
Function f = new Function("f(x, y, z) = sin(x) + cos(y*z)");
Expression e = new Expression("f(3,2,5)", f);
double v = e.calculate()
4 - Iteration
Expression e = new Expression("sum( i, 1, 100, sin(i) )");
double v = e.calculate()
Found recently - in case you would like to try the syntax (and see the advanced use case) you can download the Scalar Calculator app that is powered by mXparser.
The correct way to solve this is with a lexer and a parser. You can write simple versions of these yourself, or those pages also have links to Java lexers and parsers.
Creating a recursive descent parser is a really good learning exercise.
HERE is another open source library on GitHub named EvalEx.
Unlike the JavaScript engine this library is focused in evaluating mathematical expressions only. Moreover, the library is extensible and supports use of boolean operators as well as parentheses.
You can evaluate expressions easily if your Java application already accesses a database, without using any other JARs.
Some databases require you to use a dummy table (eg, Oracle's "dual" table) and others will allow you to evaluate expressions without "selecting" from any table.
For example, in Sql Server or Sqlite
select (((12.10 +12.0))/ 233.0) amount
and in Oracle
select (((12.10 +12.0))/ 233.0) amount from dual;
The advantage of using a DB is that you can evaluate many expressions at the same time. Also most DB's will allow you to use highly complex expressions and will also have a number of extra functions that can be called as necessary.
However performance may suffer if many single expressions need to be evaluated individually, particularly when the DB is located on a network server.
The following addresses the performance problem to some extent, by using a Sqlite in-memory database.
Here's a full working example in Java
Class. forName("org.sqlite.JDBC");
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:sqlite::memory:");
Statement stat = conn.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = stat.executeQuery( "select (1+10)/20.0 amount");
rs.next();
System.out.println(rs.getBigDecimal(1));
stat.close();
conn.close();
Of course you could extend the above code to handle multiple calculations at the same time.
ResultSet rs = stat.executeQuery( "select (1+10)/20.0 amount, (1+100)/20.0 amount2");
You can also try the BeanShell interpreter:
Interpreter interpreter = new Interpreter();
interpreter.eval("result = (7+21*6)/(32-27)");
System.out.println(interpreter.get("result"));
Another way is to use the Spring Expression Language or SpEL which does a whole lot more along with evaluating mathematical expressions, therefore maybe slightly overkill. You do not have to be using Spring framework to use this expression library as it is stand-alone. Copying examples from SpEL's documentation:
ExpressionParser parser = new SpelExpressionParser();
int two = parser.parseExpression("1 + 1").getValue(Integer.class); // 2
double twentyFour = parser.parseExpression("2.0 * 3e0 * 4").getValue(Double.class); //24.0
This article discusses various approaches. Here are the 2 key approaches mentioned in the article:
JEXL from Apache
Allows for scripts that include references to java objects.
// Create or retrieve a JexlEngine
JexlEngine jexl = new JexlEngine();
// Create an expression object
String jexlExp = "foo.innerFoo.bar()";
Expression e = jexl.createExpression( jexlExp );
// Create a context and add data
JexlContext jctx = new MapContext();
jctx.set("foo", new Foo() );
// Now evaluate the expression, getting the result
Object o = e.evaluate(jctx);
Use the javascript engine embedded in the JDK:
private static void jsEvalWithVariable()
{
List<String> namesList = new ArrayList<String>();
namesList.add("Jill");
namesList.add("Bob");
namesList.add("Laureen");
namesList.add("Ed");
ScriptEngineManager mgr = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine jsEngine = mgr.getEngineByName("JavaScript");
jsEngine.put("namesListKey", namesList);
System.out.println("Executing in script environment...");
try
{
jsEngine.eval("var x;" +
"var names = namesListKey.toArray();" +
"for(x in names) {" +
" println(names[x]);" +
"}" +
"namesListKey.add(\"Dana\");");
}
catch (ScriptException ex)
{
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
if we are going to implement it then we can can use the below algorithm :--
While there are still tokens to be read in,
1.1 Get the next token.
1.2 If the token is:
1.2.1 A number: push it onto the value stack.
1.2.2 A variable: get its value, and push onto the value stack.
1.2.3 A left parenthesis: push it onto the operator stack.
1.2.4 A right parenthesis:
1 While the thing on top of the operator stack is not a
left parenthesis,
1 Pop the operator from the operator stack.
2 Pop the value stack twice, getting two operands.
3 Apply the operator to the operands, in the correct order.
4 Push the result onto the value stack.
2 Pop the left parenthesis from the operator stack, and discard it.
1.2.5 An operator (call it thisOp):
1 While the operator stack is not empty, and the top thing on the
operator stack has the same or greater precedence as thisOp,
1 Pop the operator from the operator stack.
2 Pop the value stack twice, getting two operands.
3 Apply the operator to the operands, in the correct order.
4 Push the result onto the value stack.
2 Push thisOp onto the operator stack.
While the operator stack is not empty,
1 Pop the operator from the operator stack.
2 Pop the value stack twice, getting two operands.
3 Apply the operator to the operands, in the correct order.
4 Push the result onto the value stack.
At this point the operator stack should be empty, and the value
stack should have only one value in it, which is the final result.
This is another interesting alternative
https://github.com/Shy-Ta/expression-evaluator-demo
The usage is very simple and gets the job done, for example:
ExpressionsEvaluator evalExpr = ExpressionsFactory.create("2+3*4-6/2");
assertEquals(BigDecimal.valueOf(11), evalExpr.eval());
It seems like JEP should do the job
It's too late to answer but I came across same situation to evaluate expression in java, it might help someone
MVEL does runtime evaluation of expressions, we can write a java code in String to get it evaluated in this.
String expressionStr = "x+y";
Map<String, Object> vars = new HashMap<String, Object>();
vars.put("x", 10);
vars.put("y", 20);
ExecutableStatement statement = (ExecutableStatement) MVEL.compileExpression(expressionStr);
Object result = MVEL.executeExpression(statement, vars);
Try the following sample code using JDK1.6's Javascript engine with code injection handling.
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
public class EvalUtil {
private static ScriptEngine engine = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("JavaScript");
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
System.out.println((new EvalUtil()).eval("(((5+5)/2) > 5) || 5 >3 "));
System.out.println((new EvalUtil()).eval("(((5+5)/2) > 5) || true"));
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public Object eval(String input) throws Exception{
try {
if(input.matches(".*[a-zA-Z;~`#$_{}\\[\\]:\\\\;\"',\\.\\?]+.*")) {
throw new Exception("Invalid expression : " + input );
}
return engine.eval(input);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
throw e;
}
}
}
This is actually complementing the answer given by #Boann. It has a slight bug which causes "-2 ^ 2" to give an erroneous result of -4.0. The problem for that is the point at which the exponentiation is evaluated in his. Just move the exponentiation to the block of parseTerm(), and you'll be all fine. Have a look at the below, which is #Boann's answer slightly modified. Modification is in the comments.
public static double eval(final String str) {
return new Object() {
int pos = -1, ch;
void nextChar() {
ch = (++pos < str.length()) ? str.charAt(pos) : -1;
}
boolean eat(int charToEat) {
while (ch == ' ') nextChar();
if (ch == charToEat) {
nextChar();
return true;
}
return false;
}
double parse() {
nextChar();
double x = parseExpression();
if (pos < str.length()) throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected: " + (char)ch);
return x;
}
// Grammar:
// expression = term | expression `+` term | expression `-` term
// term = factor | term `*` factor | term `/` factor
// factor = `+` factor | `-` factor | `(` expression `)`
// | number | functionName factor | factor `^` factor
double parseExpression() {
double x = parseTerm();
for (;;) {
if (eat('+')) x += parseTerm(); // addition
else if (eat('-')) x -= parseTerm(); // subtraction
else return x;
}
}
double parseTerm() {
double x = parseFactor();
for (;;) {
if (eat('*')) x *= parseFactor(); // multiplication
else if (eat('/')) x /= parseFactor(); // division
else if (eat('^')) x = Math.pow(x, parseFactor()); //exponentiation -> Moved in to here. So the problem is fixed
else return x;
}
}
double parseFactor() {
if (eat('+')) return parseFactor(); // unary plus
if (eat('-')) return -parseFactor(); // unary minus
double x;
int startPos = this.pos;
if (eat('(')) { // parentheses
x = parseExpression();
eat(')');
} else if ((ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || ch == '.') { // numbers
while ((ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') || ch == '.') nextChar();
x = Double.parseDouble(str.substring(startPos, this.pos));
} else if (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') { // functions
while (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') nextChar();
String func = str.substring(startPos, this.pos);
x = parseFactor();
if (func.equals("sqrt")) x = Math.sqrt(x);
else if (func.equals("sin")) x = Math.sin(Math.toRadians(x));
else if (func.equals("cos")) x = Math.cos(Math.toRadians(x));
else if (func.equals("tan")) x = Math.tan(Math.toRadians(x));
else throw new RuntimeException("Unknown function: " + func);
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("Unexpected: " + (char)ch);
}
//if (eat('^')) x = Math.pow(x, parseFactor()); // exponentiation -> This is causing a bit of problem
return x;
}
}.parse();
}
import java.util.*;
public class check {
int ans;
String str="7 + 5";
StringTokenizer st=new StringTokenizer(str);
int v1=Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken());
String op=st.nextToken();
int v2=Integer.parseInt(st.nextToken());
if(op.equals("+")) { ans= v1 + v2; }
if(op.equals("-")) { ans= v1 - v2; }
//.........
}
I think what ever way you do this it's going to involve a lot of conditional statements. But for single operations like in your examples you could limit it to 4 if statements with something like
String math = "1+4";
if (math.split("+").length == 2) {
//do calculation
} else if (math.split("-").length == 2) {
//do calculation
} ...
It gets a whole lot more complicated when you want to deal with multiple operations like "4+5*6".
If you are trying to build a calculator then I'd surgest passing each section of the calculation separatly (each number or operator) rather than as a single string.
You might have a look at the Symja framework:
ExprEvaluator util = new ExprEvaluator();
IExpr result = util.evaluate("10-40");
System.out.println(result.toString()); // -> "-30"
Take note that definitively more complex expressions can be evaluated:
// D(...) gives the derivative of the function Sin(x)*Cos(x)
IAST function = D(Times(Sin(x), Cos(x)), x);
IExpr result = util.evaluate(function);
// print: Cos(x)^2-Sin(x)^2
package ExpressionCalculator.expressioncalculator;
import java.text.DecimalFormat;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class ExpressionCalculator {
private static String addSpaces(String exp){
//Add space padding to operands.
//https://regex101.com/r/sJ9gM7/73
exp = exp.replaceAll("(?<=[0-9()])[\\/]", " / ");
exp = exp.replaceAll("(?<=[0-9()])[\\^]", " ^ ");
exp = exp.replaceAll("(?<=[0-9()])[\\*]", " * ");
exp = exp.replaceAll("(?<=[0-9()])[+]", " + ");
exp = exp.replaceAll("(?<=[0-9()])[-]", " - ");
//Keep replacing double spaces with single spaces until your string is properly formatted
/*while(exp.indexOf(" ") != -1){
exp = exp.replace(" ", " ");
}*/
exp = exp.replaceAll(" {2,}", " ");
return exp;
}
public static Double evaluate(String expr){
DecimalFormat df = new DecimalFormat("#.####");
//Format the expression properly before performing operations
String expression = addSpaces(expr);
try {
//We will evaluate using rule BDMAS, i.e. brackets, division, power, multiplication, addition and
//subtraction will be processed in following order
int indexClose = expression.indexOf(")");
int indexOpen = -1;
if (indexClose != -1) {
String substring = expression.substring(0, indexClose);
indexOpen = substring.lastIndexOf("(");
substring = substring.substring(indexOpen + 1).trim();
if(indexOpen != -1 && indexClose != -1) {
Double result = evaluate(substring);
expression = expression.substring(0, indexOpen).trim() + " " + result + " " + expression.substring(indexClose + 1).trim();
return evaluate(expression.trim());
}
}
String operation = "";
if(expression.indexOf(" / ") != -1){
operation = "/";
}else if(expression.indexOf(" ^ ") != -1){
operation = "^";
} else if(expression.indexOf(" * ") != -1){
operation = "*";
} else if(expression.indexOf(" + ") != -1){
operation = "+";
} else if(expression.indexOf(" - ") != -1){ //Avoid negative numbers
operation = "-";
} else{
return Double.parseDouble(expression);
}
int index = expression.indexOf(operation);
if(index != -1){
indexOpen = expression.lastIndexOf(" ", index - 2);
indexOpen = (indexOpen == -1)?0:indexOpen;
indexClose = expression.indexOf(" ", index + 2);
indexClose = (indexClose == -1)?expression.length():indexClose;
if(indexOpen != -1 && indexClose != -1) {
Double lhs = Double.parseDouble(expression.substring(indexOpen, index));
Double rhs = Double.parseDouble(expression.substring(index + 2, indexClose));
Double result = null;
switch (operation){
case "/":
//Prevent divide by 0 exception.
if(rhs == 0){
return null;
}
result = lhs / rhs;
break;
case "^":
result = Math.pow(lhs, rhs);
break;
case "*":
result = lhs * rhs;
break;
case "-":
result = lhs - rhs;
break;
case "+":
result = lhs + rhs;
break;
default:
break;
}
if(indexClose == expression.length()){
expression = expression.substring(0, indexOpen) + " " + result + " " + expression.substring(indexClose);
}else{
expression = expression.substring(0, indexOpen) + " " + result + " " + expression.substring(indexClose + 1);
}
return Double.valueOf(df.format(evaluate(expression.trim())));
}
}
}catch(Exception exp){
exp.printStackTrace();
}
return 0.0;
}
public static void main(String args[]){
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Enter an Mathematical Expression to Evaluate: ");
String input = scanner.nextLine();
System.out.println(evaluate(input));
}
}
A Java class that can evaluate mathematical expressions:
package test;
public class Calculator {
public static Double calculate(String expression){
if (expression == null || expression.length() == 0) {
return null;
}
return calc(expression.replace(" ", ""));
}
public static Double calc(String expression) {
String[] containerArr = new String[]{expression};
double leftVal = getNextOperand(containerArr);
expression = containerArr[0];
if (expression.length() == 0) {
return leftVal;
}
char operator = expression.charAt(0);
expression = expression.substring(1);
while (operator == '*' || operator == '/') {
containerArr[0] = expression;
double rightVal = getNextOperand(containerArr);
expression = containerArr[0];
if (operator == '*') {
leftVal = leftVal * rightVal;
} else {
leftVal = leftVal / rightVal;
}
if (expression.length() > 0) {
operator = expression.charAt(0);
expression = expression.substring(1);
} else {
return leftVal;
}
}
if (operator == '+') {
return leftVal + calc(expression);
} else {
return leftVal - calc(expression);
}
}
private static double getNextOperand(String[] exp){
double res;
if (exp[0].startsWith("(")) {
int open = 1;
int i = 1;
while (open != 0) {
if (exp[0].charAt(i) == '(') {
open++;
} else if (exp[0].charAt(i) == ')') {
open--;
}
i++;
}
res = calc(exp[0].substring(1, i - 1));
exp[0] = exp[0].substring(i);
} else {
int i = 1;
if (exp[0].charAt(0) == '-') {
i++;
}
while (exp[0].length() > i && isNumber((int) exp[0].charAt(i))) {
i++;
}
res = Double.parseDouble(exp[0].substring(0, i));
exp[0] = exp[0].substring(i);
}
return res;
}
private static boolean isNumber(int c) {
int zero = (int) '0';
int nine = (int) '9';
return (c >= zero && c <= nine) || c =='.';
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(calculate("(((( -6 )))) * 9 * -1"));
System.out.println(calc("(-5.2+-5*-5*((5/4+2)))"));
}
}
How about something like this:
String st = "10+3";
int result;
for(int i=0;i<st.length();i++)
{
if(st.charAt(i)=='+')
{
result=Integer.parseInt(st.substring(0, i))+Integer.parseInt(st.substring(i+1, st.length()));
System.out.print(result);
}
}
and do the similar thing for every other mathematical operator accordingly ..
It is possible to convert any expression string in infix notation to a postfix notation using Djikstra's shunting-yard algorithm. The result of the algorithm can then serve as input to the postfix algorithm with returns the result of the expression.
I wrote an article about it here, with an implementation in java
Yet another option: https://github.com/stefanhaustein/expressionparser
I have implemented this to have a simple but flexible option to permit both:
Immediate processing (Calculator.java, SetDemo.java)
Building and processing a parse tree (TreeBuilder.java)
The TreeBuilder linked above is part of a CAS demo package that does symbolic derivation. There is also a BASIC interpreter example and I have started to build a TypeScript interpreter using it.
External library like RHINO or NASHORN can be used to run javascript. And javascript can evaluate simple formula without parcing the string. No performance impact as well if code is written well.
Below is an example with RHINO -
public class RhinoApp {
private String simpleAdd = "(12+13+2-2)*2+(12+13+2-2)*2";
public void runJavaScript() {
Context jsCx = Context.enter();
Context.getCurrentContext().setOptimizationLevel(-1);
ScriptableObject scope = jsCx.initStandardObjects();
Object result = jsCx.evaluateString(scope, simpleAdd , "formula", 0, null);
Context.exit();
System.out.println(result);
}
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import javax.script.ScriptException;
public class test2 {
public static void main(String[] args) throws ScriptException {
String s = "10+2";
ScriptEngineManager mn = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine en = mn.getEngineByName("js");
Object result = en.eval(s);
System.out.println(result);
}
}
I have done using iterative parsing and shunting Yard algorithm and i have really enjoyed developing the expression evaluator ,you can find all the code here
https://github.com/nagaraj200788/JavaExpressionEvaluator
Has 73 test cases and even works for Bigintegers,Bigdecimals
supports all relational, arithmetic expression and also combination of both .
even supports ternary operator .
Added enhancement to support signed numbers like -100+89 it was intresting, for details check TokenReader.isUnaryOperator() method and i have updated code in above Link

kotlin product of odd or even integers

The problem I'm working on accepts a number string and will output the product of the odd or even numbers in the string. While the product of purely number string is working fine, my code should also accept strings that is alphanumeric (ex: 67shdg8092) and output the product. I'm quite confused on how I should code the alphanumeric strings, because the code I have done uses toInt().
Here's my code:
fun myProd(Odd: Boolean, vararg data: Char): Int {
var bool = isOdd
var EvenProd = 1
var OddProd = 1
for (a in data)
{
val intVal = a.toString().toInt()
if (intVal == 0)
{
continue
}
if (intVal % 2 == 0)
{
EvenProd *= intVal
}
else
{
OddProd *= intVal
}
}
if(bool == true) return OddProd
else return EvenProd
}
Use toIntOrNull instead of toInt. It only converts numeric string
val intVal = a.toString().toIntOrNull()
if (intVal == null || intVal == 0) {
continue
}
Starting from Kotlin 1.6 you can also use a.digitToIntOrNull().
P.S. Your method could be also rewritten in functional style
fun myProd(isOdd: Boolean, input: String): Int {
return input.asSequence()
.mapNotNull { it.toString().toIntOrNull() } // parse to numeric, ignore non-numeric
.filter { it > 0 } // avoid multiplying by zero
.filter { if (isOdd) it % 2 != 0 else it % 2 == 0 } // pick either odd or even numbers
.fold(1) { prod, i -> prod * i } // accumulate with initial 1
}

Objective-C enum value into Swift enum

Before you vote on this question I would like to how dumb what I am trying to do is. Maybe I still don't understand properly enums.
So, I am working on a project that uses an Obj-C framework. This framework contains enums:
typedef enum : NSInteger
{
kImageSizeUnknown = 0,
kImageSize75,
kImageSize110,
kImageSize170,
kImageSize220,
kImageSize300,
kImageSize450,
kImageSize720,
kImageSize1080,
/* Size aliases */
kImageSizeThumbnail = kImageSize75,
kImageSizeSmall = kImageSize170,
kImageSizeMedium = kImageSize450,
kImageSizeLarge = kImageSize720,
kImageSizeXLarge = kImageSize1080
} GnImageSize;
I want somehow be able to declare a Swift enum that returns values of the Obj-C enum (That might be the silly part).
That is how I have at the moment.
enum GNImageSize:Int, CaseIterable{
case thumbnail
case sizeSmall
func toGnImageSize() -> GnImageSize {
switch self {
case .thumbnail:
return kImageSizeThumbnail
case .sizeSmall:
return kImageSizeSmall
}
}
static func toGnImageSize(sizeType:GNImageSize) -> GnImageSize {
switch sizeType {
case .thumbnail:
return kImageSizeThumbnail
case .sizeSmall:
return kImageSizeSmall
}
}
}
However when I do:
enum GNImageSize:Int, CaseIterable{
case thumbnail = GnImageSize.kImageSizeThumbnail
case sizeSmall = GnImageSize.kImageSizeSmall
}
I get the following error message:
Raw value for enum case must be a literal
Thank you.
EDIT
Function that comunicates with Obj-c functions
func getArtworkURL(forImageType imageType:GNImageSize, shouldFindAlternatives:Bool, highQualityFirst:Bool)->URL?{
if let asset = coverArt()?.asset(GnImageSize(rawValue: imageType.rawValue)), let assetURL = asset.urlHttp(){
return URL(string:assetURL)
}
else{
if shouldFindAlternatives{
if highQualityFirst{
for size in GNImageSize.allCases.reversed(){
if let asset = coverArt()?.asset(GnImageSize(rawValue: size.rawValue)), let assetURL = asset.urlHttp(){
return URL(string:assetURL)
}
}
}
else{
for size in GNImageSize.allCases{
if let asset = coverArt()?.asset(GnImageSize(rawValue: size.rawValue)), let assetURL = asset.urlHttp(){
return URL(string:assetURL)
}
}
}
}
}
return nil
}
Where
-(nullable GnAsset*) asset: (GnImageSize)imageSize;
The five size aliases have the (raw) values 1, 3, 6, 7, 8 so declare a Swift enum
enum GNImageSize : Int {
case thumbnail = 1
case small = 3
case medium = 6
case large = 7
case xLarge = 8
}
To use the Int value in Swift use for example
GNImageSize.thumbnail.rawValue
Alternatively create a custom enum with static properties to map the types
enum GNImageSize {
static let thumbnail = GnImageSize(0)
static let small = GnImageSize(3)
static let medium = GnImageSize(6)
static let large = GnImageSize(7)
static let xLarge = GnImageSize(8)
}
I don't understand that in 2018 ObjC frameworks still use the Stone-age syntax typedef enum : NSInteger { ... } Foo; rather than Swift compliant syntax typedef NS_ENUM (NSInteger, Foo) { ... }; The latter syntax exists for 6 years (iOS 6, macOS 10.8).
That raw-value style enum grammar error.
raw-value-assignment → = raw-value-literal
raw-value-literal → numeric-literal | static-string-literal | boolean-literal
So, only numeric(numbers like -7, 0x10, 0b010), static string(characters in quotes, like "foo") and boolean(true or false) literals are allowed there.
Anything else won't work.

Trouble converting NSData Objective-C code to Swift

I've been having issues converting an Objective-C snippet to Swift that uses NSData and CoreBluetooth. I have looked at this question and a couple others dealing with NSData in Swift but haven't had any success.
Objective-C Snippet:
- (CGFloat) minTemperature
{
CGFloat result = NAN;
int16_t value = 0;
// characteristic is a CBCharacteristic
if (characteristic) {
[[characteristic value] getBytes:&value length:sizeof (value)];
result = (CGFloat)value / 10.0f;
}
return result;
}
What I have so far in Swift (not working):
func minTemperature() -> CGFloat {
let bytes = [UInt8](characteristic?.value)
let pointer = UnsafePointer<UInt8>(bytes)
let fPointer = pointer.withMemoryRebound(to: Int16.self, capacity: 2) { return $0 }
value = Int16(fPointer.pointee)
result = CGFloat(value / 10) // not correct value
return result
}
Does the logic look wrong here? Thanks!
One error is in
let fPointer = pointer.withMemoryRebound(to: Int16.self, capacity: 2) { return $0 }
because the rebound pointer $0 is only valid inside the closure and must
not be passed to the outside. Also the capacity should be 1 for a
single Int16 value. Another problem is the integer division in
result = CGFloat(value / 10)
which truncates the result (as already observed by the4kman).
Creating an [UInt8] array from the data is not necessary, the
withUnsafeBytes() method of Data can be used instead.
Finally you could return nil (instead of "not a number") if no
characteristic value is given:
func minTemperature() -> CGFloat? {
guard let value = characteristic?.value else {
return nil
}
let i16val = value.withUnsafeBytes { (ptr: UnsafePointer<Int16>) in
ptr.pointee
}
return CGFloat(i16val) / 10.0
}
You should make the return value optional and check if characteristic is nil in the beginning with a guard. You should also explicitly convert the value to CGFloat, then divide it by 10.
func minTemperature() -> CGFloat? {
guard characteristic != nil else {
return nil
  }
let bytes = [UInt8](characteristic!.value)
let pointer = UnsafePointer<UInt8>(bytes)
let fPointer = pointer.withMemoryRebound(to: Int16.self, capacity: 2) { return $0 }
let value = Int16(fPointer.pointee)
result = CGFloat(value) / 10
return result
}