How to change the legend values - keen-io

Generally I am having a hard time understanding how to construct the data item that i feed into the parseRawData. But here I am having a much simpler problem...I am unable to change the chart legend. I created this visualization:
var appRetentionAndroidFunnelQry = new Keen.Query("funnel", {
steps: [
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Create"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "android"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": periodRefStart.toISOString(),
"end": periodRefEnd.toISOString()
}
},
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Update"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "android"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": period1Start.toISOString(),
"end": period1End.toISOString()
}
},
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Update"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "android"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": period2Start.toISOString(),
"end": period2End.toISOString()
}
}
]
});
var appRetentionIosFunnelQry = new Keen.Query("funnel", {
steps: [
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Create"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "ios"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": periodRefStart.toISOString(),
"end": periodRefEnd.toISOString()
}
},
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Update"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "ios"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": period1Start.toISOString(),
"end": period1End.toISOString()
}
},
{
event_collection: "devices",
actor_property: "activationCode",
filters: [
{
"property_name": "action",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "Update"
},
{
"property_name": "platform",
"operator": "eq",
"property_value": "ios"
}
],
timeframe: {
"start": period2Start.toISOString(),
"end": period2End.toISOString()
}
}
]
});
var steps = [
periodRefStart.toISOString().slice(0, 10) + ' - ' + periodRefEnd.toISOString().slice(0, 10),
period1Start.toISOString().slice(0, 10) + ' - ' + period1End.toISOString().slice(0, 10),
period2Start.toISOString().slice(0, 10) + ' - ' + period2End.toISOString().slice(0, 10)
];
var combinedFunnel = new Keen.Dataviz()
.el(document.getElementById('app-retention-chart'))
.chartType('columnchart')
.chartOptions({
orientation: 'horizontal'
})
.height(250)
.prepare(); // start spinner
client.run([appRetentionAndroidFunnelQry, appRetentionIosFunnelQry], function (err, response) {
var output = {
result: [],
steps: []
};
// Combine results
Keen.utils.each(response[0].result, function (stepResult, i) {
output.result.push([
steps[i],
response[0].result[i],
response[1].result[i]
]);
});
// Draw custom data object
combinedFunnel
.parseRawData(output)
.render();
});
The output looks like this:
How can I please change the legend and the column labels to say Android and iOS instead of 1 and 2? Also...any help in better understanding how the data parser works will be appreciated. I tried reading the parseRawData.js source code but it seems it is beyond my not-so-great JavaScript ability.
Regards,
Khaled

In the very last piece of your code, you can choose what the labels are:
// Draw custom data object
combinedFunnel
.parseRawData(output)
.labels(["Android", "iOS"])
.render();
I got this from: https://github.com/keen/keen-js/blob/master/docs/visualization.md#funnels

Ok, so I played around with this a bit, and to get what you want, you're going to have to completely over ride the dataset that gets passed to the Dataviz component.
Here is an example jsfiddle that shows you the format for the data to get what you're looking for:
http://jsfiddle.net/hex337/16av86as/2/
The key component is this:
.call(function () {
this.dataset.output([
["index", "iOS", "Android"],
["r1", 1000, 900],
["r2", 750, 700]
]);
})
Instead of hard coding the numbers, you'll want to use the results from the queries that you run, but this should give you the "iOS" and "Android" legend keys, and you can set the "r1" and "r2" to be the steps in your funnel.
I hope this solves the problem!

You can use the .labelMapping() function. Especially when using grouping for the data the order of labels in the data can change, so .labelMapping() is safer than just setting labels with .labels().
chart.data(res).labelMapping({
'741224f021ca7f': 'Sensor A',
'a1a9e6253e16af': 'Sensor B'
}).render();

Related

MongoDB get fieldvalue based on fieldname

I'm new to MongoDB, and I'm not sure if what I'm trying to do is possible at all. I've exhausted my Google skills, so I'm hoping someone here can give me a push in the right direction.
My data is structured like this:
db={
"people": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Pete",
"occupation": "baker"
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Mike",
"occupation": "painter"
}
],
"activity": [
{
"baker": "bakes",
"painter": "paints"
}
]
}
Although this is just sample data, my "activity" is a single large document with unique keys that I'm trying to get the value from, based on key name (when it matches value from the "people" document).
What I'm trying to achieve is this output:
[
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Pete",
"occupation": "baker”,
“activity:” “bakes”
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Mike",
"occupation": "painter”,
“activity”: “paints”
}
]
Is this possible at all?
If I understand your database and data model, it seems like a poor model.
If the data model was different (see below), the query would be quite simple. Given that, here's one way you could generate your desired output with your model.
db.people.aggregate([
{ "$lookup": {
"from": "activity",
"let": { occ: "$occupation" },
"pipeline": [
{
"$replaceWith": {
"$arrayToObject": {
"$filter": {
"input": { "$objectToArray": "$$ROOT" },
"as": "kv",
"cond": { "$eq": [ "$$kv.k", "$$occ" ] }
}
}
}
}
],
"as": "activity"
}
},
{ "$set": {
"activity": {
"$getField": {
"field": "v",
"input": {
"$first": {
"$objectToArray": { "$first": "$activity" }
}
}
}
}
}
},
{ "$unset": "_id" }
])
Try it on mongoplayground.net.
If your activity collection has this model...
[
{
"occupation": "baker",
"activity": "bakes"
},
{
"occupation": "painter",
"activity": "paints"
}
]
... then the query could be:
db.people.aggregate([
{ "$lookup": {
"from": "activity",
"localField": "occupation",
"foreignField": "occupation",
"as": "activity"
}
},
{ "$set": { "activity": { "$first": "$activity.activity" } } },
{ "$unset": "_id" }
])
Try it on mongoplayground.net.

Mongoose Schema - How to add an order attribute for sorting

I am currently building a web application where you can create setlists (arrays) with an array of lyric objectId's inside, that you can then sort / order into how you want it. So if you would like the 3rd list item to become the first, then you simply drag and drop it to the first line.
I now have a problem in my mongoose schema. I am looking for a way to implement an order attribute or something that would allow me to add a order value such as 0 or 1 depending on the position of the lyrics. Does any of you know how to best implement such order?
Here is a copy of my schema. Currently lyrics is an array of lyric objectId's. But in there i would need an "Order" as well, so that i can sort the array according to the order value.
const mongoose = require("mongoose");
const SetlistSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
setlistName: { type: String, required: true },
lastEdited: { type: Date },
createdAt: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
lyrics: [{
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'Lyric'
}],
author: {
id: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: "User"
},
username: String
}
});
module.exports = mongoose.model("Setlist", SetlistSchema);
Here is the Lyrics schema.
const mongoose = require("mongoose");
const LyricSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
lyricName: { type: String, required: true },
lyricContent: { type: String, required: true },
lastEdited: { type: Date },
createdAt: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
author: {
id: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: "User"
},
username: String
}
});
module.exports = mongoose.model("Lyric", LyricSchema);
If adding an order number isn't the best practice, what can you then recommend as a way of keeping track of which order the user would like the lyrics to show up?
You can use aggregation framework to sort lyrics by order field. You first need to add a sort field with Number type.
Setlist.aggregate([
{
$unwind: "$lyrics"
},
{
$lookup: {
from: "lyrics", // MUST be the PHYSICAL collection name
localField: "lyrics",
foreignField: "_id",
as: "lyrics"
}
},
{
$sort: {
"lyrics.order": 1
}
},
{
"$group": {
"_id": "$_id",
"lyrics": {
"$push": "$lyrics"
},
"allFields": {
"$first": "$$ROOT"
}
}
},
{
"$replaceRoot": {
"newRoot": {
"$mergeObjects": [
"$allFields",
{
"lyrics": "$lyrics"
}
]
}
}
}
])
Playground
Sample documents:
db={
"lists": [
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000000"),
"setlistName": "list1",
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-18T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-15T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"lyrics": [
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002")
]
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000001"),
"setlistName": "list2",
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-11T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-11T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"lyrics": [
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004")
]
}
],
"lyrics": [
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
"name": "Lyric 1",
"order": 3
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
"name": "Lyric 2",
"order": 1
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002"),
"name": "Lyric 3",
"order": 2
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
"name": "Lyric 4",
"order": 2
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004"),
"name": "Lyric 5",
"order": 1
}
]
}
Output: (as you see lyrics are sorted by order field value)
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000000"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-15T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-18T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lyrics": [
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
"name": "Lyric 2",
"order": 1
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002"),
"name": "Lyric 3",
"order": 2
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
"name": "Lyric 1",
"order": 3
}
]
],
"setlistName": "list1"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000001"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-11T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-11T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lyrics": [
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004"),
"name": "Lyric 5",
"order": 1
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
"name": "Lyric 4",
"order": 2
}
]
],
"setlistName": "list2"
}
]

Replace specific values in the array using dwl 1.0

Problem with using mapObject function properly.
Trying to retain existing array structure but calculate number of vehicles and properties and update the existing array that contains the value.
GENERAL data comes from one source, VEHICLE data comes from another source, PROPERTY data comes from another source. So when merging, I have to update GENERAL data with count of other source data.
Also GENERAL is an array object, it will always have 1. So using GENERAL[0] is safe and fine.
Original Payload
[
{
"commId": "1",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "TODO",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
]
}
]
Tried using map to loop through the payload and tried modifying 2 attribute but only managed to map one but even that is showing wrong output.
test map (item, index) -> {
(item.GENERAL[0] mapObject (value, key) -> {
(key): (value == sizeOf (item.VEHICLE)
when (key as :string) == "VEHICLE_COUNT"
otherwise value)
})
}
Expected output:
[
{
"commId": "1",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "2",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "1"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "1",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "2"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": "3",
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "0"
}
],
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
]
}
]
Getting totally wrong output so far:
[
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
},
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
},
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": false,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": "TODO"
}
]
Edited: Update for dynamic transform
The below dataweave transform is not particularly attractive, but it might work for you.
Thanks to Christian Chibana for helping me find a dynmaic answer by answering this question: Why does Mule DataWeave array map strip top level objects?
%dw 1.0
%output application/json
---
payload map ((item) ->
(item - "GENERAL") ++
GENERAL: item.GENERAL map (
$ - "VEHICLE_COUNT"
- "PROPERTY_COUNT"
++ { VEHICLE_COUNT: sizeOf (item.VEHICLE default []) }
++ { PROPERTY_COUNT: sizeOf (item.PROPERTY default []) }
)
)
It is dynamic, so everything should be copied across as it comes in, with only the two fields you want being updated.
The output for this transform with the input you supplied is below. Only difference from your desired is that the counts are shown as numbers rather than strings. If you really need them as strings you can cast them like (sizeOf (comm.VEHICLE default [])) as :string,
[
{
"commId": "1",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V1-1"
},
{
"ID": "V1-2"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P1-1"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G1",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 2,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 1
}
]
},
{
"commId": "2",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V2-1"
}
],
"PROPERTY": [
{
"ID": "P2-1"
},
{
"ID": "P2-2"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G2",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 1,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 2
}
]
},
{
"commId": "3",
"VEHICLE": [
{
"ID": "V3-1"
},
{
"ID": "V3-2"
},
{
"ID": "V3-3"
}
],
"GENERAL": [
{
"ID": "G3",
"VEHICLE_COUNT": 3,
"PROPERTY_COUNT": 0
}
]
}
]

Perform sort on field that's not primary index

Error:
No index exists for this sort, try indexing by the sort fields.
I've tried creating indexes on anotherValue, _id+anotherValue, but no difference.
This is my query:
{
"selector": {
"_id": { "$gt": null },
"$or": [
{ "_id": "10" },
{ "value": "10", "anotherValue": "1234" }]
},
"sort": [{"anotherValue": "desc"}]
}
Indexes setup:
Your available Indexes:
special: _id
Try adding a desc index on anotherValue:
{
"index": {
"fields": [
{"anotherValue":"desc"}
]
},
"type": "json"
}
and change your query to this:
{
"selector": {
"anotherValue": { "$gt": null },
"$or": [
{ "_id": "10" },
{ "value": "10", "anotherValue": "1234" }
]
},
"sort": [{"anotherValue": "desc"}]
}
Note: Your original query would also work if you added a text index on all fields:
{
"index": {},
"type": "text"
}

How to use a nested json-based formation value in the jQuery.dataTables?

Now suppose I have a json data formation like this following:
{
"ServiceName": "cacheWebApi",
"Description": "This is a CacheWebApiService",
"IsActive": true,
"Urls": [{ "ServiceAddress": "http://192.168.111.210:8200", "Weight": 5, "IsAvailable": true },
{ "ServiceAddress": ",http://192.168.111.210:8200", "Weight": 3, "IsAvailable": true }]
}
Now what worries me is that the "Urls" is another nested json formation. So how to bind this value to the datatables? And have you got any good ideas (e.g:something like I only wanna show all the ServiceAddress)...
This should do what you need:
var data = [{
"ServiceName": "cacheWebApi",
"Description": "This is a CacheWebApiService",
"IsActive": true,
"Urls": [
{
"ServiceAddress": "http://192.168.111.210:8200",
"Weight": 5,
"IsAvailable": true
},
{
"ServiceAddress": ",http://192.168.111.210:8200",
"Weight": 3,
"IsAvailable": true
}
]
}];
$(function() {
var table = $('#example').dataTable({
"data": data,
"columns": [
{
"data": "ServiceName"
}, {
"data": "Description"
}, {
"data": "IsActive"
}, {
"data": "Urls[0].ServiceAddress"
}, {
"data": "Urls[0].Weight"
}, {
"data": "Urls[0].IsAvailable"
}, {
"data": "Urls[1].ServiceAddress"
}, {
"data": "Urls[1].Weight"
}, {
"data": "Urls[1].IsAvailable"
}
],
});
});
You should put your data in an array though. Working JSFiddle
EDIT
IF the number of Urls isn't defined then you could do something like this:
var table = $('#example').dataTable({
"data": data,
"columns": [
{
"data": "ServiceName"
}, {
"data": "Description"
}, {
"data": "IsActive"
}, {
"data": "Urls",
"render": function(d){
return JSON.stringify(d);
}
}
],
});
I guess that that isn't brilliant but you could do almost anything to that function, for instance:
var table = $('#example').dataTable({
"data": data,
"columns": [
{
"data": "ServiceName"
}, {
"data": "Description"
}, {
"data": "IsActive"
}, {
"data": "Urls",
"render": function(d){
return d.map(function(c){
return c.ServiceAddress
}).join(", ");
}
}
],
});