Behaviour of rownum in Oracle [duplicate] - sql

This question already has answers here:
How ROWNUM works in pagination query?
(3 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I observed a strange behaviour with ROWNUM in Oracle with static tables. I am trying pagination with query like below
select * from (
select the_data,rownum as seqn from the_table
) where seqn <= somenumber and seqn >= othernumber
However when I execute query multiple times I observe that the rownum value returned is not unique for a row ie if a row appears at rownum 25 for the first time it appears at rownum 125 for second execution
This issue does not appear if I do a order by like,
select * from (
select the_data,rownum as seqn from the_table order by column3
) where seqn <= somenumber and seqn >= othernumber
However order by decreases performance. Is this normal or is there any other way to improve performance.

You should check oracle documents for this question. Followed links may be helpful for you http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/functions156.htm#SQLRF06100
One example:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER () AS R, T.* FROM T ) AS TR WHERE R <= 10;
T is a table name. R is a row

Related

how to select the first N rows from a table [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How to get the top 10 values in postgresql?
(4 answers)
Closed 7 months ago.
i am using postgresql. i want to be able to select or delete the first n rows after sorting the ascendingly according to the timestamp of insertion.
i found an example but it uses a table named logtable, i do not have that logtable.
in otherwords, i want to sort the records in the table based on the time of data insertion into the table then selected the first N rows
please let me know how to achieve this task
You could use ROW_NUMBER:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ts_insertion) rn
FROM yourTable
)
SELECT *
FROM cte
WHERE rn <= N -- replace N with your actual limit value
ORDER BY ts_insertion;
If you only want the first n rows, you can use LIMIT n, a window function is not necessary.
You can also use OFFSET:
SELECT column1, column2
FROM table_name
ORDER BY column1 ASC
LIMIT row_count OFFSET row_to_skip;

Select nth row Oracle SQL [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How ROWNUM works in pagination query?
(3 answers)
How do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?
(14 answers)
how to select even records from a table in oracle?
(12 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I'm attempting to access the 3rd row from the following query:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT
OFFENSEDESC,
COUNT(*) AS num
FROM
CRIMEPROFILE
GROUP BY
OFFENSEDESC
ORDER BY num DESC) o
WHERE rownum = 3
However, it returns no rows, I am uncertain as to why that is, any help is appreciated. NOTE: ORACLE SQL
Try this
SELCT
OFFENSEDESC,
num
from
(
SELECT
OFFENSEDESC,
COUNT(*) AS num,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC) as rnk
FROM
CRIMEPROFILE
GROUP BY
OFFENSEDESC
) val
WHERE rnk = 3

where rownum between 500000 and 1000000 [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
using of rownum function with ">" sign in oracle [duplicate]
(3 answers)
How do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?
(14 answers)
how to select even records from a table in oracle?
(12 answers)
Oracle "LIMIT n,m" equivalent [duplicate]
(1 answer)
Closed 3 years ago.
I've created a table that has 1.8m rows and, while I can extract to CSV, it cannot be opened. This is not a query that is ran often and the end users have very low technical ability. Therefore I wanted a quick and dirty fix that had little time investment.
My solution was to split the query into chunks:
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN 0 AND 500000
The above works fine however,
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN 500001 AND 1000000
the next iteration does NOT.
I've checked that there are definitely 1.8m rows.
What's going on here? What am I missing?
Rownum is applied on query result, not on the table. Apply rownum to get first 1m rows and then filter out the first 0.5m.
select *
from (
SELECT t.*, rownum rn
FROM my_table t
WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN 0 AND 1000000
) where rn > 500000
Also, as pointed out by #Connor in comments, rownum filter by itself may not produce deterministic results. Use an order by clause to apply appropriate ordering. In that case, the SQL changes to:
select *
from (
SELECT t.*, rownum rn
FROM (
select *
from my_table
order by x, y, z -- apply appropriate sort order here
) t
WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN 0 AND 1000000
) where rn > 500000
This is becomes tedious to write. In Oracle 12c+, the new FETCH FIRST/NEXT syntax is much more concise:
select *
from my_table
order by x, y, z -- apply appropriate sort order here
offset 500000 rows
fetch next 500000 rows only;

using of rownum function with ">" sign in oracle [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?
(14 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I want to select the number of rows which are greater than 3 by rownum function i_e "(rownum>3)"
for example if there are 25 rows and I want to retrieve the last 22 rows by rownum function.
but when I write the
select * from test_table where rownum>3;
it retrieve no row.
can any one help me to solve this problem.
thanks in advance
In RDBMS there is no first or last rows. What you calls "raws" , actually is set(sets), they can be ordered or not. rownum is a function, which is just enumerates result set, it makes sense only after set is calculated, to order your set of data (rows) you should do it in your query before rownum call, you must tell DB what means for the order in particular select statement.
It is not working because: for the first row assumes the ROWNUM of 1 and since your WHERE clause is ROWNUM>3 then this reduces to 1>3 and the row is discarded. The subsequent row will then be tested against a ROWNUM of 1 (since the previous row is no longer in the output and now does not require a row number), which will again fail the test and be discarded. Repeat, ad nauseum and all rows fail the WHERE clause filter and are discarded.
If you want to assign the rows a ROWNUM then you need to do this is a sub-query:
SELECT * -- Finally, in the outer query, filter on the assigned ROWNUM
FROM (
SELECT t.*, -- First, in the inner sub-query, apply a ROWNUM
ROWNUM AS rn
FROM test_table t
)
WHERE rn > 3;
Or, if you want to order the results before numbering:
SELECT * -- Finally, in the outer query, filter on the assigned ROWNUM
FROM (
SELECT t.*, -- Second, in the next level sub-query, apply a ROWNUM
ROWNUM AS rn
FROM (
SELECT * -- First, in the inner-most sub-query, apply an order
FROM test_table
ORDER BY some_column
) t
)
WHERE rn > 3;
select * from (select rownum as rn, t.* from test_table t) where rn > 3
see this article for more samples
On Top-n and Pagination Queries By Tom Kyte

PL/SQL ROWNUM keyword and equality (=) [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How ROWNUM works in pagination query?
(3 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I am new in PL/SQL and I am trying the ROWNUM keyword.
If I query this:
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE ROWNUM <= 1
I am getting a result. Even in this case:
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
But if I try
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE ROWNUM = 2
I get an empty result..
But the table my_tablehas more than one tuple.
Can you help me?
Thank you!
ROWNUM is a psuedo column that has a value AFTER the result set is returned. Thus you can use where rownum < 2 but you can't select where ROWNUM equals a value because it does not have a value to compare to yet.