I need assistance with batch processing, especially in adding tax codes to items.
I'm experimenting with the square batch processing feature and my sample cases are create 2 items and add the tax code to them. In all 4 requests - 2 for creating item, 2 to 'put' the tax code. I have tried the following orders:
1. create the two items; add the taxes
2. create one item; add tax code to that item; create second item, add code to the second item.
In both instances, the result is the same - the taxes are applied to only one item. For the second item, the response I get is:
{
"status_code":404,
"body":{
"type":"not_found",
"message":"NotFound"
},
"request_id":4
}
To help with the investigation, here's the sample json that I use in the cURL request.
{
"requests":[
{
"method":"POST",
"relative_path":"\/v1\/me\/items",
"access_token":"XXX-YYY",
"body":
{
"id":126,
"name":"TestItem",
"description":"TestItemDescription",
"category_id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"variations":[
{
"name":"var1",
"pricing_type":"FIXED_PRICING",
"price_money":
{
"currency_code":"CAD",
"amount":400
},
"sku":"123444:QWEFASDERRG"
}
]},
"request_id":1
},
{
"method":"PUT",
"relative_path":"\/v1\/me\/items\/126\/fees\/7F2D50D8-43C1-4518-8B8D-881CBA06C7AB",
"access_token":"XXX-YYY",
"request_id":2
},
{
"method":"POST",
"relative_path":"\/v1\/me\/items",
"access_token":"XXX-YYY",
"body":
{
"id":127,
"name":"TestItem1",
"description":"TestItemDescription1",
"category_id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"variations":[
{
"name":"var1",
"pricing_type":"FIXED_PRICING",
"price_money":
{
"currency_code":"CAD",
"amount":400
},
"sku":"123444:QWEFASDERRG1"
}
]
},
"request_id":3
},
{
"method":"PUT",
"relative_path":"\/v1\/me\/items\/127\/fees\/7F2D50D8-43C1-4518-8B8D-881CBA06C7AB",
"access_token":"XXX-YYY",
"request_id":4
}
]
}
Below is the full response that I receive indicating successful creation of two items and only one successful tax push.
[
{
"status_code":200,
"body":
{
"visibility":"PUBLIC",
"available_online":false,
"available_for_pickup":false,
"id":"126",
"description":"TestItemDescription",
"name":"TestItem",
"category_id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"category":
{
"id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"name":"Writing Instruments"
},
"variations":[
{
"pricing_type":"FIXED_PRICING",
"track_inventory":false,
"inventory_alert_type":"NONE",
"id":"4c70909b-90bd-4742-b772-e4fabe636557",
"name":"var1",
"price_money":
{
"currency_code":"CAD",
"amount":400
},
"sku":"123444:QWEFASDERRG",
"ordinal":1,
"item_id":"126"
}
],
"modifier_lists":[],
"fees":[],
"images":[]
},
"request_id":1
},
{
"status_code":200,
"body":{},
"request_id":2
},
{
"status_code":200,
"body":
{
"visibility":"PUBLIC",
"available_online":false,
"available_for_pickup":false,
"id":"127",
"description":"TestItemDescription1",
"name":"TestItem1",
"category_id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"category":
{
"id":"DF1F51FB-11D6-4232-B138-2ECE3D89D206",
"name":"Writing Instruments"
},
"variations":[
{
"pricing_type":"FIXED_PRICING",
"track_inventory":false,
"inventory_alert_type":"NONE",
"id":"6de8932f-603e-4cd9-99ad-67f6c7777ffd",
"name":"var1",
"price_money":
{
"currency_code":"CAD",
"amount":400
},
"sku":"123444:QWEFASDERRG1",
"ordinal":1,
"item_id":"127"
}
],
"modifier_lists":[],
"fees":[],
"images":[]
},
"request_id":3
},
{
"status_code":404,
"body":
{
"type":"not_found",
"message":"NotFound"
},
"request_id":4
}
]
I have checked through going for the list of items and both items with their item ID's are present in the inventory. So the questions I have are, Why the tax is applied to one item and not to the other? How to resolve it?
From the Square docs:
Note the following when using the Submit Batch endpoint:
You cannot include more than 30 requests in a single batch.
Recursive
requests to the Submit Batch endpoint are not allowed (i.e., none of
the requests included in a batch can itself be a request to this
endpoint).
There is no guarantee of the order in which batched
requests are performed.
(emphasis mine).
If you want to use the batch API, you will have to create parent entities like items first, then in a separate batch request apply any child entities like fees, discounts, etc... Alternately, you can just make separate requests. There may not be much benefit from using the batch API in this case.
Related
I am pretty new to CloudWatch unfortunately, and have a rather complex task. So after some extensive work, we have some logs that break down all of our clicks into reasons that it was tossed or did not work as good as it could have. It comes in with a title of "Successful Parse Report".
Successful Parse Report: {
"<IDENTIFIER>": {
"b39fjoa...................................................": {
"errorCounts": {},
"recordCounts": {
"optouts": 0,
"clicks": 100
},
"warningCounts": {
"<FIELD 1>": {
"<REASON1>": 1
},
"<FIELD2>": {
"<REASON2>": 100
},
"<FIELD3>": {
"<REASON3>": 100
},
"<FIELD4>": {
"<REASON4>": 12
},
"<FIELD5>": {
"<REASON5>": 9
},
"<FIELD6>": {
"<REASON6>": 14
}
}
}
}
}
As you can see, there are a few fields. This means 100 clicks happened, and each "REASON" is a different thing I need aggregated with the "FIELD" as the identifier on the graph.I also need this done on all logs for each of the lambdas I am using this for.
My question is, knowing each log I am trying to aggregate starts with the same "Successful Parse Report", how can I possibly aggregate all of the clicks from all of my logs, have each "REASON" aggregate across all the same logs, have the "FIELD" be the identifier for each "REASON", and graph it to be able to visualize these counts in real time as they come in.
For the below data structure:
{
"sprints": [
{
"id": 17193,
"name": "Sprint 12"
},
{
"id": 16510,
"name": "Sprint 11"
}
],
"velocityStatEntries": {
"16510": {
"estimated": {
"value": 49
},
"completed": {
"value": 36
}
},
"17193": {
"estimated": {
"value": 52
},
"completed": {
"value": 70
}
}
}
}
Given this, I want to be able to produce an Elasticsearch object that's easier to handle, by adding the values of the Estimated and Completed fields to the sprints with their matching IDs.
Ideally, I would like to handle this without writing Ruby, but I am not finding a logstash-native solution that handles this scnenario.
First, I split the data on the sprints field using split, so, I only have a single sprints object, and can use [sprints][id] to know what sprint I'm processing.
Then, I have attempted to work with the mutate filter, in one of two ways:
- using merge to add the [velocityStateEntries][] object to the
current sprint
- using add_field to add the two fields I need
Syntactically, is this possible? Ideally, I would want to be able to do a 'double substitution' of sorts, obtaining the estimated time for the current sprint something like:
add_field => {
"estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][%{[sprints][id]}][estimated][value]}"
}
but this only seems to work with a hardcoded format such as "estimatedTime" => "%{[velocityStatEntries][1234][estimated][value]}"
Do I have to use the Ruby format for this?
For what it's worth, the Ruby solution is very simple:
ruby {
code => "
sprintId = event.get('[sprints][id]');
estimated = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][estimated][value]');
completed = event.get('[velocityStatEntries]['+(sprintId).to_s+'][completed][value]');
event.set('[sprints][estimatedUnits]', estimated);
event.set('[sprints][completedUnits]', completed);
"
}
I'm playing around with the Google Datastore API (runQuery method), and I am trying to run the gQuery String
'Select * from Transaction Where User = "[Me]" ORDER BY Start[date] ASC'
Sending that JSON Object gives me the following error:
400
- Show headers -
{
"error": {
"code": 400,
"message": "no matching index found. recommended index is:\n- kind: Transaction\n properties:\n - name: User\n - name: Start\n",
"status": "FAILED_PRECONDITION"
}
}
Alternatively, If I run this string:
{
"gqlQuery":
{
"allowLiterals":
"queryString":"
SELECT * FROM Transaction WHERE User = "[Me]"
"
}
}
I get a 200 Response
200
- Show headers -
{
"batch": {
"entityResultType": "FULL",
"entityResults": [
{
"entity": {
"key": {
"partitionId": {
"projectId": "project-id-5200999099906492774"
},
"path": [
{
"kind": "Transaction",
"id": "4693202737039992"
}
]
},....
or if I run this one to just order all the results:
'Select * from Transaction ORDER BY Start[date] ASC'
I get a 200 Response as well:
200
- Show headers -
{
"batch": {
"entityResultType": "FULL",
"entityResults": [
{
"entity": {
"key": {
"partitionId": {
"projectId": "project-id-5200707080506492774"
},
"path": [
{
"kind": "Transaction",
"id": "5641081148407808"
}
]
},...
So how can I do both operations in one line?
UPDATE:
As recommended below, I have used the google cloud platform to update the indexes manually. You create a valid yaml file in notepad and then use the upload tool (three vertical dots button on the right side of the cloud control command line tool) to place it on the server and direct to it with the comand line. Here are my results so far:
nathaniel#project-id-5200707080555492774:~$ gcloud datastore create-indexes /home/nathaniel/index.yaml
Configurations to update:
descriptor: [/home/nathaniel/index.yaml]
type: [datastore indexes]
target project: [project-id-5200707044406492774]
Do you want to continue (Y/n)? y
nathaniel#project-id-5200707080506492774:~$
This is the Yaml file I used:
indexes:
- kind: Transaction
properties:
- name: User
direction: asc
- name: Period
direction: asc
- name: Status
direction: asc
- name: auditStatus
direction: asc
- name: role
direction: asc
- name: Start
direction: desc
- name: End
direction: asc
Still unable to complete the query, but it may take time to populate. I'll check back through the day and update my results. As of 1:35PM EST, The indexes still don't seem to have updated, as shown below:
Like the error message says - in order to run the query with a WHERE and ORDER, you need a composite index on User and Start properties for Transaction kind. You can learn more about the indexes at https://cloud.google.com/datastore/docs/concepts/indexes.
You can create indexes using the gcloud command line tool. Refer to the documentation at - https://cloud.google.com/sdk/gcloud/reference/datastore/create-indexes
Once your index is created/active, which may take a while depending on the amount of data you have, you should be able to run the first query.
I am trying to do BPM and SoftLayer integration using Java REST client. On my initial analysis(as well as help form stack overflow),I found
Step 1) we to get getPriceItem list to have all IDs for next request.
https://username:api_key#api.softlayer.com/rest/v3/SoftLayer_Product_Package/2/getItemPrices?objectMask=mask[id,item[keyName,description],pricingLocationGroup[locations[id, name, longName]]]
and then do verify and place order POST call using respective APIs.
I am stucked on Step 1) as filtering here seems to be bit tricky. I am getting a json response of over 20000 lines.
I wanted to show similar data(just like SL Performance storage UI ) on my custom BPM UI . (One drop down to select type of storage, 2nd to show location, 3rd to show size and 4th would be IOPS) where user can select the items and place request.
Here I found, SL is something similar to this for populating the drop downs-
https://control.softlayer.com/sales/productpackage/getregions?_dc=1456386930027&categoryCode=performance_storage_iscsi&packageId=222&page=1&start=0&limit=25
Can't we have implementation where we can use control.softlayer.com just like SL instead of api.softlayer.com? In that case we can use similar logic to display data on UI.
Thanks
Anupam
Here, using the API, the steps for performance storage. For endure storage the steps are similar you just need to review the value for categoryCode and modify if it needed
you can get the locations using this method:
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Package/getRegions
you just need to know the package of the storage e.g.
GET https://api.softlayer.com/rest/v3.1/SoftLayer_Product_Package/222/getRegions
then, you can get the storage size for that you can use the SoftLayer_Product_Package::getItems or SoftLayer_Product_Package::getItemPrices methods and a filter e.g.
GET https://api.softlayer.com/rest/v3.1/SoftLayer_Product_Package/222/getItemPrices?objectFilter={"itemPrices": {"categories": {"categoryCode": {"operation": "performance_storage_space"}},"locationGroupId": { "operation": "is null"}}}
Note: We are filtering the data to get the prices whose category code is "performance_storage_space" and we want the standard price locationGroupId = null
then, you can get the IOPS, you can use the same approach like above, but there is a dependency between the IOPS and storage space e.g.
GET https://api.softlayer.com/rest/v3.1/SoftLayer_Product_Package/222/getItemPrices?objectFilter={"itemPrices": { "attributes": { "value": { "operation": 20 } }, "categories": { "categoryCode": { "operation": "performance_storage_iops" } }, "locationGroupId": { "operation": "is null" } } }
Note: In the example we assume that selected storage space was "20", the prices for IOPS have an record called atributes, this record tell us the valid storage spaces of the IOPS, then we have other filters to get only the IOPS prices categoryCode = performance_storage_iops and we want only the standard prices locationGroupId=null
To selecting the storage type I do not think there is a method the only way I see is that you call the SoftLayer_Product_Package::getAllObjects method and filter the data to get the packages for endurance, performance and portable storage.
Just in case here an example using the Softlayer's Python client to order
"""
Order a block storage (performance ISCSI).
Important manual pages:
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Order
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Order/verifyOrder
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Order/placeOrder
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Package
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Product_Package/getItems
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Location
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Location/getDatacenters
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Network_Storage_Iscsi_OS_Type
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/services/SoftLayer_Network_Storage_Iscsi_OS_Type/getAllObjects
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/datatypes/SoftLayer_Location
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/datatypes/SoftLayer_Container_Product_Order_Network_Storage_Enterprise
http://sldn.softlayer.com/reference/datatypes/SoftLayer_Product_Item_Price
http://sldn.softlayer.com/blog/cmporter/Location-based-Pricing-and-You
http://sldn.softlayer.com/blog/bpotter/Going-Further-SoftLayer-API-Python-Client-Part-3
http://sldn.softlayer.com/article/Object-Filters
http://sldn.softlayer.com/article/Python
http://sldn.softlayer.com/article/Object-Masks
License: http://sldn.softlayer.com/article/License
Author: SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. <sldn#softlayer.com>
"""
import SoftLayer
import json
# Values "AMS01", "AMS03", "CHE01", "DAL05", "DAL06" "FRA02", "HKG02", "LON02", etc.
location = "AMS01"
# Values "20", "40", "80", "100", etc.
storageSize = "40"
# Values between "100" and "6000" by intervals of 100.
iops = "100"
# Values "Hyper-V", "Linux", "VMWare", "Windows 2008+", "Windows GPT", "Windows 2003", "Xen"
os = "Linux"
PACKAGE_ID = 222
client = SoftLayer.Client()
productOrderService = client['SoftLayer_Product_Order']
packageService = client['SoftLayer_Product_Package']
locationService = client['SoftLayer_Location']
osService = client['SoftLayer_Network_Storage_Iscsi_OS_Type']
objectFilterDatacenter = {"name": {"operation": location.lower()}}
objectFilterStorageNfs = {"items": {"categories": {"categoryCode": {"operation": "performance_storage_iscsi"}}}}
objectFilterOsType = {"name": {"operation": os}}
try:
# Getting the datacenter.
datacenter = locationService.getDatacenters(filter=objectFilterDatacenter)
# Getting the performance storage NFS prices.
itemsStorageNfs = packageService.getItems(id=PACKAGE_ID, filter=objectFilterStorageNfs)
# Getting the storage space prices
objectFilter = {
"itemPrices": {
"item": {
"capacity": {
"operation": storageSize
}
},
"categories": {
"categoryCode": {
"operation": "performance_storage_space"
}
},
"locationGroupId": {
"operation": "is null"
}
}
}
pricesStorageSpace = packageService.getItemPrices(id=PACKAGE_ID, filter=objectFilter)
# If the prices list is empty that means that the storage space value is invalid.
if len(pricesStorageSpace) == 0:
raise ValueError('The storage space value: ' + storageSize + ' GB, is not valid.')
# Getting the IOPS prices
objectFilter = {
"itemPrices": {
"item": {
"capacity": {
"operation": iops
}
},
"attributes": {
"value": {
"operation": storageSize
}
},
"categories": {
"categoryCode": {
"operation": "performance_storage_iops"
}
},
"locationGroupId": {
"operation": "is null"
}
}
}
pricesIops = packageService.getItemPrices(id=PACKAGE_ID, filter=objectFilter)
# If the prices list is empty that means that the IOPS value is invalid for the configured storage space.
if len(pricesIops) == 0:
raise ValueError('The IOPS value: ' + iops + ', is not valid for the storage space: ' + storageSize + ' GB.')
# Getting the OS.
os = osService.getAllObjects(filter=objectFilterOsType)
# Building the order template.
orderData = {
"complexType": "SoftLayer_Container_Product_Order_Network_PerformanceStorage_Iscsi",
"packageId": PACKAGE_ID,
"location": datacenter[0]['id'],
"quantity": 1,
"prices": [
{
"id": itemsStorageNfs[0]['prices'][0]['id']
},
{
"id": pricesStorageSpace[0]['id']
},
{
"id": pricesIops[0]['id']
}
],
"osFormatType": os[0]
}
# verifyOrder() will check your order for errors. Replace this with a call to
# placeOrder() when you're ready to order. Both calls return a receipt object
# that you can use for your records.
response = productOrderService.verifyOrder(orderData)
print(json.dumps(response, sort_keys=True, indent=2, separators=(',', ': ')))
except SoftLayer.SoftLayerAPIError as e:
print("Unable to place the order. faultCode=%s, faultString=%s" % (e.faultCode, e.faultString))
I'm attempting to follow the provided add site flow with the DAG dummy accounts and the MFA flow for siteId 16486 (Security QA) always returns a 522 regardless of the answers provided to the questions.
Here's an outline of the API calls I'm making with their responses.
addSiteAccount1
{
"siteAccountId":11070119,
"isCustom":false,
"credentialsChangedTime":1425920373,
"siteRefreshInfo":{
"siteRefreshStatus":{
"siteRefreshStatusId":1,
"siteRefreshStatus":"REFRESH_TRIGGERED"
},
"siteRefreshMode":{
"refreshModeId":1,
"refreshMode":"MFA"
},
"updateInitTime":1425920374,
"nextUpdate":1425921274,
"code":801,
"suggestedFlow":{
"suggestedFlowId":2,
"suggestedFlow":"REFRESH"
},
"noOfRetry":0
},
"siteInfo":{
"popularity":0,
"siteId":16486,
"orgId":1148,
"defaultDisplayName":"Dag Site SecurityQA",
"defaultOrgDisplayName":"Demo Bank",
"enabledContainers":[
{
"containerName":"bank",
"assetType":1
}
],
"baseUrl":"http://192.168.210.152:9090/dag/dhaction.do",
"loginForms":[
],
"isHeld":false,
"isCustom":false,
"mfaType":{
"typeId":4,
"typeName":"SECURITY_QUESTION"
},
"siteSearchVisibility":true,
"isAlreadyAddedByUser":true,
"isOauthEnabled":false
},
"created":"2015-03-09T09:59:33-0700",
"retryCount":0
}
getMFAResponseForSite
{
"isMessageAvailable":true,
"fieldInfo":{
"questionAndAnswerValues":[
{
"question":"What is the name of your state?",
"questionFieldType":"label",
"responseFieldType":"text",
"isRequired":"true",
"sequence":1,
"metaData":"QUESTION_1"
},
{
"question":"What is the name of your first school",
"questionFieldType":"label",
"responseFieldType":"text",
"isRequired":"true",
"sequence":2,
"metaData":"QUESTION_2"
}
],
"numOfMandatoryQuestions":-1
},
"timeOutTime":99060,
"itemId":0,
"memSiteAccId":11070119,
"retry":false
}
putMFAResponseForSite
{
"primitiveObj":true
}
getMFAResponseForSite
{
"isMessageAvailable":false,
"timeOutTime":150000,
"itemId":0,
"errorCode":522,
"memSiteAccId":11070119,
"retry":false
}
Problem solved. It turns out that my parameters for the call to putMFAResponseForSite were invalid.