First, I do this select:
SELECT TOP 1 ID FROM Person where Name=${NAME} AND YOB=${YOB};
I need to do SQL request in JMeter:
select * from Person where ID=${ID}, where ${ID} is global variable returned in first select. First select returns collection, but there is only 1 value. How to extract this value and assign it to variable?
As per JDBC Request Sampler Documentation you can refer the value as $A1
A_#=2 (number of rows)
A_1=column 1, row 1
A_2=column 1, row 2
C_#=2 (number of rows)
C_1=column 3, row 1
C_2=column 3, row 2
See The Real Secret to Building a Database Test Plan With JMeter for more tips and tricks on database testing with Apache JMeter.
You can use one of the many post-processor components to extract values from your response. In your case the Regular Expression extractor is likely most suitable.
Related
I had one simple table ItemMapping, 2 Field, one Field is single Item List Field SingleSelectField With value "A",
Other for Multiple Item List Field MultiSelectField with Value ("B", "C", "D").
I Wanna get This mapping relationship By "B", I tried to set up one dataset, And try some single SuiteQL like before, But I always get empty results returned.
SELECT *
FROM ItemMapping
WHERE ItemMapping.MultiSelectField IN ('B')
Any tips may Help me.
Thank you in advance.
As was pointed out, Marty Zigman's article describes how Boban D. located an undocumented "feature" of SuiteQL which can be used.
I will leave most of the explaining to the article but to summarize, NetSuite automatically creates a relationship table named map_sourcTableId_fieldId which contain two columns: mapone and maptwo. mapone is the record id from the source table and maptwo is record id for the joined table.
This method seems to work well and maybe the most straight forward if you are accustomed to working in SQL.
As an alternative, I constructed a native SuiteScript Query object with a condition on a multiple select field. Then I used the toSuiteQL() method to convert it into SuiteQL to see how NetSuite natively deals with this. What I found was another undocumented "feature". The resulting query used a BUILTIN.MNFILTER function. So for example if you've got a custom transaction body field, custbody_link_type, that is a multiple select field and want to get transactions where one of te values in custbody_link_type is 4 then here is the generated SuiteQL:
SELECT T.tranid, T.custbody_link_types
FROM "transaction" as T
WHERE BUILTIN.MNFILTER(T.custbody_link_types , 'MN_INCLUDE', '', 'FALSE', NULL, 4) = 'T'
And if you want transactions where the custbody_link_types does not contain all of the following: 1, 2, 3 ...
SELECT T.tranid, T.custbody_link_types
FROM "transaction" as T
WHERE BUILTIN.MNFILTER(T.custbody_link_types , 'MN_EXCLUDE_ALL', '', 'FALSE', NULL, 1, 2, 3) = 'T'
OR T.custbody_link_types IS NULL
To wrap it up, the undocumented BUILTIN.MNFILTER function is used by NetSuite's query module to filter multiple select fields. It accepts the multiple select column, the internal string value of the query.Operator enum, some other stuff I don't know anything about, and finally one or more the values to compare. It appears to return a string of either 'T' for when the condition is met otherwise 'F'.
Ultimately, I'm not sure whether this is a "better" way to address the need but I thought it was worth documenting.
I have the following question!
I have a table like this:
Data Source
I want to create a field(i suppose it's a field) that i can take the apl_ids,
that have as service_offered some that i want.
Example from the above table. If i want the apl_ids that have ONLY the service_offered
Pending 1, Pending 2 and Pending 7.
In that case, I want to get the apl_id = "13" since apl_id = "12" got one more service that i don't need.
Which is the best way to get that?
Thank you in advance!
Add a calculated field which gives 1 for desired values and 0 for other values. Add another calc field with fixed LOD to apl_id to sum of calcF1. Filter all ids with values=3 only. I think that should work.
Else tell me I will post screenshots
You can create a set based on the field api_id defined by the condition
max([service_offering]=“Pending 1”) and
max([service_offering]=“Pending 2”) and
max([service_offering]=“Pending 7”) and
min([service_offering]=“Pending 1” or [service_offering]=“Pending 2” or [service_offering]=“Pending 7”)
This set will contain those api_ids that have at least one record where service_offering is “Pending 1” and at least one record with Pending 2 ... and where every record has a service offering of 1, 2 or 7 (I.e. no others)
The key is to realize that Tableau treats True as greater than False, so min() and max() for boolean expressions correspond to every() and any().
Once you have a set of api_ids() you can use it on shelves and in calculated fields in many different ways.
After I run an async task
tasks.add.apply_async( (10, 10))
I checked the result backends database table celery_taskmeta and noticed the result containing something like gAJLBC4=
I couldn't find in the docs what that result implies and whether I can store the actual result of the function call ( ie, the return value ) in the table as is.
For this instance where I am executing a task which adds two numbers : 10 and 10 , the result column in celery_taskmeta should have 20 as per my understanding ( which is probably wrong ) .
How should I achieve that ?
I'm assuming that result is also serialized? I'm using a redis broker and not clear which configuration I need to set to be able to retrieve the actual return value.
the best way to get the result is not to query the database directly and instead to use the result api
result = tasks.add.apply_async( (10, 10))
result.ready
> True
result.result
> 20
I have a table with following structure
ID FirstName LastName CollectedNumbers
1 A B 10,11,15,55
2 C D 101,132,111
I want a boolean value based on CollectedNumber Range. e.g. If CollectedNumbers are between 1 and 100 then True if Over 100 then False. Can anyone Suggest what would be best way to accomplish this. Collected Numbers won't be sorted always.
It so happens that you have a pretty simple way to see if values are 100 or over in the list. If such a value exists, then there are at least three characters between the commas. If the numbers are never more than 999, you could do:
select (case when ','+CollectedNumbers+',' not like '%,[0-9][0-9][0-9]%' then 1
else 0
end) as booleanflag
This happens to work for the break point of 100. It is obviously not a general solution. The best solution would be to use a junction table with one row per id and CollectedNumber.
Just make a function, which will return true/False, in the database which will convert the string values(10,11,15,55) into a table and call that function in the Selection of the Query like this
Select
ID, FirstName, LastName,
dbo.fncCollectedNumbersResult(stringvalue) as Result
from yourTableName
I think the easiest you can do is build a C# function and use the builtin sqlclr to load it as a custom function you can then call.
Inside the C# function, you can then sort your numbers and make simple logic to return your true/false.
This should be rather simple but I don't know why I get Row Count as Zero when I use ROW COUNT transformation in Data Flow Task. I have created a variable(NoOfRecords) with Package scope.
Variable name set to variable NoOfRecords in Row Count Transformation.
Used a Derived column to assign the row count.
The package runs successfully and shows record count 265
But the Derived column shows record count as 0 instead of 265 rows.
After the Row Count, add an Aggregate Taks and select count option in the Operation tab in the Aggregate task properties.
Then you can use the row count variable for further operation where it holds the total row count of the input file.
Row Count is processed after rows has passed.
You're adding the variable to each row as they pass through the Derived Column step, but at this time, the variable has not been updated (as it happens after all rows has passed) - so the value 0 is correct.
You -might- be able to achieve this by using an asynchronous task before your derived (but i'm not sure this'll work, it just popped to my mind). Add a Sort or Aggregate step before your Derived and try again.
I used this in the query as an efficient way of getting the row count:
count(all SnapshotDate) over () as nRowCount
Here's the successful technique for recording rows that worked in my situation.
The scenario is I want to log the rows migrated between tables. The RowCount doesn't get populated until you exit the DataFlow.
[Control Flow]
1. Data Flow Task
a. read origin data - Source control
b. Add RowCount transformation. Link a to b.
Right-click RowCount and map to UserVariable (int64)
c. Add Destination control for loading table.
d. Link b to c.
2. Add Execute SQL Task to ControlFlow. right click, edit
INSERT SQL statement: Insert Into LogTable(rowcount) Values(?)
Parameter Mapping
Variable Direction DataType ParameterName ParameterSize
User::RowCount INPUT LONG 0 -1