I have a m.request call like this:
mCmdName = "cn:cmd:list:deselectAll";
m.request({
method : "POST",
url : "/testing/cmd/" + mCmdName,
data: data
});
Now m.request calls
xhrOptions.url = parameterizeUrl(xhrOptions.url, xhrOptions.data);
and tries to replace all ':[name]' parts with data[name] which results in 'undefined' as data doesn't contain any of the keys. Data is just the data object of the XHR request.
Is there a way to prohibit this default behavior?
Thanks, Stefan
PS: I'm asking here and not in mithril mailing list because I can't post there for incomprehensible reasons. Maybe somebody can give me a hint on this.
Have you tried
encodeURIComponent("cn:cmd:list:deselectAll")
which gives you
cn%3Acmd%3Alist%3AdeselectAll
If necessary you can decode on the server.
Related
Expected Response:
{"data":{
{"assignments":[{"locationId":"1186755","locationName":"X.11.11"},{"locationId":"1186756","locationName":"X.11.12"}]}}}
Response:
{"data":{
{"assignments":[{"locationId":"1186756","locationName":"X.11.12"},{"locationId":"1186755","locationName":"X.11.11"}]}}}
I saw a SO post stating to use karate.sort(response, x=>x.locationId), when i tried it's giving me empty response. Is there any simple way i can achieve do the comparison of whole response file irrespective of order?
Note: I even tried contains only, but it's failing the assertion.
Just use contains deep: https://stackoverflow.com/a/64373344/143475
* def response = {"assignments":[{"locationId":"1186755","locationName":"X.11.11"},{"locationId":"1186756","locationName":"X.11.12"}]}}}
* match response contains deep {"assignments":[{"locationId":"1186756","locationName":"X.11.12"},{"locationId":"1186755","locationName":"X.11.11"}]}}}
What I had till today:
I have get_jwt.feature and I call it as a part of karate-config.js. Since I have used one account test#test.com I needed only one jwt and I can reuse it across scenarios. callSingle worked as a charm in this case.
Today:
Suddenly I have need for jwt's from two accounts which I dont want to generate for each scenario, callSingle falls short of this task as it does exactly what its supposed to be doing. Now I have hacky idea, I can simply make two files, get_jwt.feature and get_jwt_user2.feature, and single call them each.
So my question: Is there a better way of doing this?
You can use "2 levels" of calls. So point the callSingle() to a JS function that calls get_jwt.feature 2 times, maybe with different arguments and then return a JSON. Pseudo-code below. First is get_jwts.js:
function fn(users) {
var jwt1 = karate.call('get_jwt.feature', users.user1);
var jwt2 = karate.call('get_jwt.feature', users.user2);
return { jwt1: jwt1, jwt2: jwt2 };
};
Then in karate-config.js
config.jwts = karate.callSingle('classpath:get_jwts.js', users);
And now you should be able to do this:
* print jwts.jwt1
* print jwts.jwt2
You can also do a feature-->feature call chain. Do let me know if this works !
EDIT: see Babu's answer in the comments, looks like you can pass an array to callSingle() ! so that may be quite convenient :)
var myArray = [1,2,3,4];
If I post to 'api/myArray' and I want to retrieve these values, the following does not work:
'api/:var'
field : {blah: req.params.var[0], blah2: req.params.var[1]}
This does not work, and after console I realized it is no longer an array. Instead, var is now 1,2,3,4 instead of [1,2,3,4]. How do I solve this?
My excuses. I should really have tried harder to find out how to do this.
req.params.var.split(',') would do this
1st:
while sending you can serialize it
JSON.stringify(var)
and recieve it as
JSON.parse(var)
2nd:
Post with formdata instead
you can use req.body instead of params
then you can access like
req.body.var[0]
How can I get the absolute URL in play 2.2 scala when doing the following:
val promoLink = routes.Promotions.promotionsCategory(DOCID, slug)
//routes file
GET /promotions/:DOCID:/slug controllers.Promotions.promoCat(DOCID, slug)
As it stands I get a "found : play.api.mvc.Call" type mismatch on expecting a string
thanks
I suppose your promoLink should be a String containing an URL? Your question sounds a bit unclear.
If so then you probably need this:
val promoLink = routes.Promotions.promotionsCategory(DOCID, slug).absoluteURL(false)(request)
false in the .absoluteURL(false) stands for the isSecure parameter which will give you http or https url.
If you have an implicit request in scope you may omit the last (request) part
I was wondering how I would go about checking to see if a table contains a value in a certain column.
I need to check if the column 'e-mail' contains an e-mail someone is trying to register with, and if something exists, do nothing, however, if nothing exists, insert the data into the database.
All I need to do is check if the e-mail column contains the value the user is registering with.
I'm using the RedBeanPHP ORM, I can do this without using it but I need to use that for program guidelines.
I've tried finding them but if they don't exist it returns an error within the redbean PHP file. Here's the error:Fatal error: Call to a member function find() on a non-object in /home/aeterna/www/user/rb.php on line 2433
Here's the code that I'm using when trying this:
function searchDatabase($email) {
return R::findOne('users', 'email LIKE "' . $email . '"');
}
My approach on the function would be
function searchDatabase($email) {
$data = array('email' => $email);
$user = R::findOne('users', 'email LIKE :email, $data);
if (!empty($user)) {
// do stuff here
} // end if
} // end function
It's a bit more clean and in your function
Seems like you are not connected to a database.
Have you done R::setup() before R::find()?
RedBeanPHP raises this error if it can't find the R::$redbean instance, the facade static functions just route calls to the $redbean object (to hide all object oriented fuzzyness for people who dont like that sort of thing).
However you need to bootstrap the facade using R::setup(). Normally you can start using RB with just two lines:
require('rb.php'); //cant make this any simpler :(
R::setup(); //this could be done in rb.php but people would not like that ;)
//and then go...
R::find( ... );
I recommend to check whether the $redbean object is available or whether for some reason the code flow has skipped the R::setup() boostrap method.
Edited to account for your updated question:
According to the error message, the error is happening inside the function find() in rb.php on line 2433. I'm guessing that rb.php is the RedBean package.
Make sure you've included rb.php in your script and set up your database, according to the instructions in the RedBean Manual.
As a starting point, look at what it's trying to do on line 2433 in rb.php. It appears to be calling a method on an invalid object. Figure out where that object is being created and why it's invalid. Maybe the find function was supplied with bad parameters.
Feel free to update your question by pasting the entirety of the find() function in rb.php and please indicate which line is 2433. If the function is too lengthy, you can paste it on a site like pastebin.com and link to it from here.
Your error sounds like you haven't done R::setup() yet.
My approach to performing the check you want would be something like this:
$count = count(R::find('users', 'email LIKE :email', array(':email' => $email)));
if($count === 0)
{
$user = R::dispense('users');
$user->name = $name;
$user->email = $email;
$user->dob = $dob;
R::store($user);
}
I don't know if it is this basic or not, but with SQL (using PHP for variables), a query could look like
$lookup = 'customerID';
$result = mysql_fetch_array(mysql_query("SELECT columnName IN tableName WHERE id='".$lookup."' LIMIT 1"));
$exists = is_null($result['columnName'])?false:true;
If you're just trying to find a single value in a database, you should always limit your result to 1, that way, if it is found in the first record, your query will stop.
Hope this helps