In Onedrive I am able to use their Live SDK API and get the Access_token and the filepicker for my users is also working properly.
But, every time a user tries to attach a file I am calling the API to get the Access_token.
Is this a problem, when more number of users try to call this API every time they try to attach the files( did Microsoft has a limit for number of API call).
Also, If i try to use Refresh_token for Access_token using WL.offline_access scope how would my app know the Access_token is expired?
You'll need to add logic to your code to see if the user is already has a session occurring. You can do this this by adding WL.Event.subscribe and checking for "auth.statusChange". If the users status has changed at any point, it will call the function to check the users current status (i.e. connect, notConnected, and unknown) by calling WL.getLoginStatus. WL.getLoginStatus will also return the users session object (access_token, expires_in, etc) if you want to use any values there.
Your code will look something like this.
< script type = "text/javascript" >
WL.Event.subscribe("auth.statusChange", chkStatus);
function chkStatus() {
WL.getLoginStatus(
function(response) {
if (response.status == "connected") {
document.getElementById("info").innerText = "You're signed in";
} else {
WL.login({
"scope": "wl.skydrive_update"
});
}
More info on WL.getLoginStatus can be found at https://msdn.microsoft.com/EN-US/library/hh550842.aspx. I hope that helps.
Related
Good morning,
I've encountered a weird issue with my strapi-project.
I have a standard user model which I query for info on the user's profile page via the /users/me endpoint. This was all working fine last week but as I tried logging in this morning, the authorization appeared to not work anymore. I log my user in via this code:
....
async submitForm() {
axios.post('http://localhost:1337/auth/local', {
'identifier': this.email,
'password': this.password
})
.then((response) => {
const { jwt, user } = response.data;
window.localStorage.setItem('jwt', jwt);
window.localStorage.setItem('userData', JSON.stringify(user));
router.push('/dashboard');
})
.catch((e) => {
this.$store.commit('LOGIN_ERROR', e)
});
},
...
Which then redirects to my dashboard which queries the /users/me endpoint like so:
let token = localStorage.jwt;
axios.get(`http://localhost:1337/users/me`, {
headers: {
Authorization: `Bearer ${token}`
}
})
.then((response) => {
console.log(response.data);
})
A few days ago this was working fine, also the token variable used in the post contais the token returned from the backend after logging in. Now strapi gives me an error in the console:
[2021-10-16T07:16:52.568Z] debug GET /users/me (5 ms) 500
[2021-10-16T07:17:03.231Z] debug POST /auth/local (76 ms) 200
[2021-10-16T07:17:24.915Z] error TypeError: Cannot read property 'type' of null
at module.exports (/home/user/WebstormProjects/strapi-project/node_modules/strapi-plugin-users-permissions/config/policies/permissions.js:35:14)
at async /home/user/WebstormProjects/strapi-project/node_modules/strapi-utils/lib/policy.js:68:5
at async serve (/home/user/WebstormProjects/strapi-project/node_modules/koa-static/index.js:59:5)
at async /home/user/WebstormProjects/strapi-project/node_modules/strapi/lib/middlewares/parser/index.js:48:23
at async /home/user/WebstormProjects/strapi-project/node_modules/strapi/lib/middlewares/xss/index.js:26:9
My first guess was that maybe something with axios was wrong e.g. that the token wasn't sent correctly in the request so I tried the same thing with webstorm's http client:
POST http://localhost:1337/auth/local
Content-Type: application/json
{
"identifier": "test#test.com",
"password": "..."
}
Which returns the user and token:
"jwt": "<TOKEN>",
If I try using this token to authenticate the user, however a get a 401
GET http://localhost:1337/users/me
Authorization: "Bearer <token>"
Accept: application/json
returns
{
"statusCode": 401,
"error": "Unauthorized",
"message": "Invalid token."
}
So I tried figuring out what was going on there and after an hour I noticed that when looking at the user in the backend the user didn't have the authenticated role assigned. When I changed this manually in the backend, the request authorization works again.
So can anyone maybe tell me what is going on here? Because from my understanding, when POSTing valid credentials to /auth/local the user's role should change to Authenticated, which was working some days back.
Is there something I'm missing?
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
greetings, derelektrischemoench
Okay, so let me reply to your first part:
"Because from my understanding, when POSTing valid credentials to /auth/local the user's role should change to Authenticated"
Answer is, not really. When you send valid credentials to the auth/local, Strapi just checks the database for matching username/email and password. If a user is found, then it fetches the role assigned that user and puts all the data in ctx.state.user.role. So you could have many other roles, like Viewer, Commenter etc with each having different set of access limits.
The different roles can be created here:
http://localhost:1337/admin/settings/users-permissions/roles
So depending on the roles assigned, Strapi will just fetch and store the values in ctx.state.user.role on each request via the strapi-plugin-users-permissions plugin for your convenience, so that you can easily check which user it is and which role it has in any controller or service file using the ctx from the request to provide any additional functionality.
You can check how it does it in the following file:
node_modules/strapi-plugin-users-permissions/config/policies/permissions.js
Now coming to what could have caused it:
Well it could have been you yourself. Possibly while saving the user or viewing user details you could have removed the role from the user and saved the record.
The other possibility could be a database switch.
It can also be a Strapi version upgrade that caused, but it's highly unlikely.
You could have a update query in the your code that updates the user model, where you might have missed the role parameter. So check your code once.
Nevertheless, it can simply be solved by re-assigning the user roles via the users module.
The doc here https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/access-tokens/refreshing says "When you use the iOS, Android, or JavaScript SDK, the SDK will automatically refresh tokens if the person has used your app within the last 90 days".
I wonder what kind of "use" I should do to have the token refreshed. I tried to get last name of the user with:
FB.api('/me', {fields: 'last_name'}, function(response) {
console.log(response);
});
but it looks it is not enough to refresh the token (i.e. the call works fine, I get the last name of the user but the access token expiry date doesn't change / update).
I also tried:
FB.getLoginStatus(function(response) {
if (response.status === 'connected') {
var uid = response.authResponse.userID;
var accessToken = response.authResponse.accessToken;
}
});
but response.authResponse.accessToken has the same expiration date.
The goal is to renew / refresh expiration without asking the user to go through a full login again.
A Cognito User Pool is configured for the users to use their "email address" to sign up and sign in.
If a user signs up with the email of someone else then that email will get stuck in UNCONFIRMED state and the owner will not be able to use it appropriately.
Having said that let me provide an example with the following scenario:
User signs in with an email address the user doesn't own, let's say it is someone#mail.com. In this step (registration form) some more data is sent like organization name, and user full name.
Verification code is sent to the email
Now the user that owns someone#email.com wants to create an account (maybe some days in the future), so he goes and fills the registration form but an error is thrown by cognito {"__type":"UsernameExistsException","message":"An account with the given email already exists."}
Thinks to consider:
* If the email already exists but is in unconfirmed state then provide the user the option to resend the link. This option is not optimal because additional data might be already in the user profile as the 1st step exemplifies.
* A custom lambda can be done to delete the unconfirmed user before signup or as a maintenance process every day, but I am not sure if this is the best approach.
There is also this configuration under Policies in cognito consol: "How quickly should user accounts created by administrators expire if not used?", but as he name implies this setting will only apply to users if they are invited by admins.
Is there a proper solution for this predicament?
Amazon Cognito has provided pre-signup triggers for these functionality and auto signup also.Your thought is the same way as i have implemented that according to the cognito documentations.
Here I am using the amplify/cli which is the toolchain for my development purpose hence the lambda function used in the trigger is as below:
`
"use strict";
console.log("Loading function");
var AWS = require("aws-sdk"),
uuid = require("uuid");
var cognitoIdentityServiceProvider = new AWS.CognitoIdentityServiceProvider();
exports.handler = (event, context, callback) => {
const modifiedEvent = event;
// check that we're acting on the right trigger
if (event.triggerSource === "PreSignUp_SignUp") {
var params = {
UserPoolId: event.userPoolId,
Username: event.userName
};
cognitoIdentityServiceProvider.adminGetUser(params, function(err, data) {
if (err) {
console.log(err, err.stack);
} // an error occurred
else {
console.log("cognito service", data);
if (data.UserStatus == "UNCONFIRMED") {
cognitoIdentityServiceProvider.adminDeleteUser(params, function(
err,
data
) {
if (err) console.log(err, err.stack);
// an error occurred
else console.log("Unconfirmed user delete successful ");
// successful response
});
}
// successful response
}
});
return;
}
// Throw an error if invoked from the wrong trigger
callback('Misconfigured Cognito Trigger '+ event.triggerSource);
};
`
this will actually check and delete if the status is UNCONFIRMED using the aws-sdk methods adminGetUser and adminDeleteUser
hope this will help ;)
I got around this by setting ForceAliasCreation=True. This would allow the real email owner to confirm their account. The draw back is that you end up with 2 users. One CONFIRMED user and another UNCONFIRMED user.
To clean this up, I have a lambda function that calls list-users with filter for unconfirmed user and delete the accounts which were created before a certain period. This function is triggered daily by CloudWatch.
change to confirm from unconfirm:
aws cognito-idp admin-confirm-sign-up \
--user-pool-id %aws_user_pools_web_client_id% \
--username %email_address%
Here is my problem : In auth0 dashboard, I select a user within my users list and click on send a verification email... The user receive the mail, click on the link and get an error "User account doesn't exist or verification code is invalid" But the user exists and I do not use passwordless or sms authentication , my users have to enter their password and are also stored in mongodb. Any ideas to solve this?
-- edited precision added --
#Arcseldon
I'am actually using a customDB and here is my getUser script, but I don't know what to change, could you help me?
Thank you!
function getByEmail (email, callback) {
mongo('mongodb://user:pass#dsXXXX.mlab.com:XXXX/base', function (db) {
var users = db.collection('user');
users.findOne({ email: email }, function (err, user) {
if (err) return callback(new Error("my error message"));
if (!user) return callback(null);
var profile = {
user_id: user._id,
nickname: user.username,
email: user.email,
};
callback(null, profile);
});
});
}
Ok, just re-read your question - where you state "my users have to enter their password and are also stored in mongodb." - are you referring to your own Mongo DB? Are you using an Auth0 Custom DB Connection? Confusingly, Auth0 also uses MongoDB for its own DB storage, hence the clarification. If you are using a Custom DB connection to your own DB, then this may be a misconfiguration of one of your Custom DB Scripts. If using Custom DB Script, please double-check the implementation of your GetUser.js script.
In the event, you are using an Auth0 DB (not a custom DB) then definitely check with Auth0 support team (as per comment and your reply above).
I have implemented Fb login for my website. Also for the Fb page of my app inside approved items it shows - user_friends
Provides access to a person's list of friends that also use your app. This permission is approved by default.
How can I get the list of friends of the user who is there on my app ?
Also When I try to do this --
FB.api(
"/me/friends",
function (response) {
if (response && response.data){
alert(response.data);
} else {
console.log('Something goes wrong', response);
}
}
);
I get no response.
Thanks,
Newbie
First, you need to include and initialize the JavaScript SDK: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/javascript/quickstart/v2.2
Then, you need to authorize the user: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/javascript/FB.login/v2.0
(donĀ“t forget to use the scope parameter with the "user_friends" permission)
After that, you can call FB.api('/me/friends'... to get the friends of the user who authorized the App too.
You can also test /me/friends in the API Explorer, just select the correct App: https://developers.facebook.com/tools/explorer/?method=GET&path=me%2Ffriends&version=v2.2