I am trying to create a plugin with a task, but I have trouble getting access to an instance of I18bean for retrieving internationalized message. Does anyone has a hint on how to do it ?
Found it. You need to add a constructor with a I18nBeanFactory parameter and use this one for retrieving an I18nBean
public class CreateFileTask implements TaskType {
public I18nBeanFactory i18nBeanFactory;
public CreateFileTask(I18nBeanFactory i18nBeanFactory) {
this.i18nBeanFactory=i18nBeanFactory;
}
#NotNull
#Override
public TaskResult execute(TaskContext taskContext) throws TaskException {
I18nBean i18nBean = i18nBeanFactory.getI18nBean();
i18Bean.getText(...);
}
}
Related
I created a project to test the dependency injection offered by Google Guice in my Jax-rs resources, using Resteasy.
My intentions are:
Use multiple #ApplicationPath for the versions of my API. In each class annotated with #ApplicationPath I load a set of classes for the specific version.
Each resource have a #Inject (from Google Guice) in his constructor to inject some services.
I created two classes annotated with #ApplicationPath: ApplicationV1RS and ApplicationV2RS. In both I added the same resources classes (UserResource and HelloResource), only for my test.
My Module is configured like this:
public class HelloModule implements Module
{
public void configure(final Binder binder)
{
binder.bind(IGreeterService.class).to(GreeterService.class);
binder.bind(IUserService.class).to(UserService.class);
}
}
When I call http://localhost:9095/v1/hello/world or http://localhost:9095/v2/hello/world, I receive the same error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: RESTEASY003190: Could not find constructor
for class: org.jboss.resteasy.examples.guice.hello.HelloResource
Well, as I expected, this not works. The Google Guice is not "smart" to instantiate the resource classes using the construtor for me.
But I can't find a way to work. To be really honest, I'm really confuse about how the Google Guice, Jetty and Resteasy play with each other in this scenario.
If I abandon the idea of use #ApplicationPath, my resources work with Google Guice configuring my HelloModule like this:
public class HelloModule implements Module
{
public void configure(final Binder binder)
{
binder.bind(HelloResource.class);
binder.bind(IGreeterService.class).to(GreeterService.class);
binder.bind(UserResource.class);
binder.bind(IUserService.class).to(UserService.class);
}
}
But in this case, I'm passing the control to register my resources (HelloResource and UserResource) to Guice. It's not flexible for me, I can't setup my multiple #ApplicationPath.
So, what I'm missing or not understanding?
I created a project with the problemetic code. Is very easy to setup and test: https://github.com/dherik/resteasy-guice-hello/tree/so-question/README.md
Thanks!
When you have getClasses method in your Application then it tries to create instance for all the registered resources using the default constructor which is missing in our Resources class. One way is to create a default constructor and Inject the dependencies through setter Injection.
And then instead of overriding getClasses in ApplicationV1RS and ApplicationV2RS you override getSingletons. Since Resources can be Singleton.
Below are the changes that I made to make it work the way you want.
ApplicationV1RS.java
#ApplicationPath("v1")
public class ApplicationV1RS extends Application {
private Set<Object> singletons = new HashSet<Object>();
public ApplicationV1RS(#Context ServletContext servletContext) {
}
#Override
public Set<Object> getSingletons() {
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new HelloModule());
HelloResource helloResource = injector.getInstance(HelloResource.class);
UserResource userResource = injector.getInstance(UserResource.class);
singletons.add(helloResource);
singletons.add(userResource);
return singletons;
}
}
ApplicationV2RS.java
#ApplicationPath("v2")
public class ApplicationV2RS extends Application {
private Set<Object> singletons = new HashSet<Object>();
public ApplicationV2RS(#Context ServletContext servletContext) {
}
#Override
public Set<Object> getSingletons() {
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new HelloModule());
HelloResource helloResource = injector.getInstance(HelloResource.class);
UserResource userResource = injector.getInstance(UserResource.class);
singletons.add(helloResource);
singletons.add(userResource);
return singletons;
}
}
HelloResource.java
#Path("hello")
public class HelloResource {
#Inject
private IGreeterService greeter;
public HelloResource() {
}
#GET
#Path("{name}")
public String hello(#PathParam("name") final String name) {
return greeter.greet(name);
}
}
UserResource.java
#Path("user")
public class UserResource {
#Inject
private IUserService userService;
public UserResource() {
}
#GET
#Path("{name}")
public String hello(#PathParam("name") final String name) {
return userService.getUser(name);
}
}
Add #Singleton to your Service Classes.
Hope it helps.
I have also pushed the code to forked repo. check it out
I'm having two routes in two separated projects :
First route is setting the header with a data format bean name as a constant :
setHeader("dataFormatBeanName", constant("myFirstList"))
First route :
public class MyTest {
#Configuration
public static class MyTestConfig extends CamelConfiguration {
#Bean(name = "myFirstList")
public DataFormat getMyFirstListDataFormat() {
return new MyFirstListDataFormat();
}
#Bean(name = "mySecondList")
public DataFormat getMySecondListDataFormat() {
return new MySecondListDataFormat();
}
#Bean
public RouteBuilder route() {
return new RouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from("direct:testFirstDataFormat").setHeader("dataFormatBeanName", constant("myFirstList")).to("direct:myRoute");
from("direct:testSecondDataFormat").setHeader("dataFormatBeanName", constant("mySecondList")).to("direct:myRoute");
}
};
}
}
}
Second route is supposed to retrieve the bean name from the header and use it as a custom marshaller. Something like :
custom(header("dataFormatBeanName"))
(doesn't compile)
Anyone knows how I'm supposed to get my bean name from the header to use it in the custom method ?
#Component
public class MyRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
final RouteDefinition routedefinition = this.from("direct:myRoute");
routedefinition.marshal().custom(??????????).to("netty4:tcp://{{route.address}}:{{port}}?textline=true&sync=true");
}
After a few more hours searching, here is the solution a found :
No changes in the first class.
Second class uses an anonymous DataFormat in which I retrieve the bean name from the header and get the spring bean from camel context before calling its marshal method.
The AbstractXxxDataFormat class belongs to project2 and is inherited by the Project1 DataFormat.
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
final RouteDefinition routedefinition = this.from("direct:myRoute");
routedefinition.marshal(new DataFormat() {
#Override
public void marshal(final Exchange exchange, final Object graph, final OutputStream stream) throws Exception {
AbstractXxxDataFormat myDataFormat = (AbstractGoalDataFormat) getContext().getRegistry().lookupByName(exchange.getIn().getHeader("dataFormatBeanName", String.class));
myDataFormat.marshal(exchange, graph, stream);
}
#Override
public Object unmarshal(final Exchange exchange, final InputStream stream) throws Exception {
return null;
}
});
routedefinition.to("netty4:tcp://{{route.address}}:{{port}}?textline=true&sync=true");
}
If there's any better solution available, I'll be interested.
Have you tried simple("${header.dataFormatBeanName}") to access the header?
Also, rather than passing the format bean name in a header in the first place, why not factor out each .marshal() call into two subroutes (one for formatBeanA and one for formatBeanB) and then call the appropriate subroute rather than setting the header in the first place? I believe this could be a cleaner approach.
If you really need to get it in the route as a variable (as opposed to a predicate to be used in the builder api) you could use an inline processor to extract it:
public class MyRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
public void configure() throws Exception {
from("someEndpoint")
.process(new Processor() {
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
String beanName = exchange.getHeader("beanNameHeader");
}
});
}
}
Just be careful of scope and concurrency when storing the extracted beanName however.
A collegue of mine (thanks to him) found the definite solution :
set bean name in the exchange properties :
exchange.setProperty("myDataFormat", "myDataFormatAutowiredBean");
retrieve the dataFormat bean with RecipientList pattern and (un)marshal :
routedefinition.recipientList(simple("dataformat:${property.myDataFormat}:marshal"));
routedefinition.recipientList(simple("dataformat:${property.myDataFormat}:unmarshal"));
Very concise and works just fine.
When I add a property in the application.properties files, this can be access from the main class without any problem.
#SpringBootApplication
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.example.*")
public class MailTestApplication implements CommandLineRunner {
#Value("${admin.mail}")
String email;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(MailTestApplication.class, args);
}
#Override
public void run(String... strings) throws Exception {
System.out.println(email);
Email email = new Email();
email.sendMail();
}
}
However, when I try to access it from any other class it is never retrieved.
#Component
public class Email {
#Autowired
private MailSender sender;
#Value("${admin.mail}")
String email;
public Email() {
}
public void sendMail() {
SimpleMailMessage msg = new SimpleMailMessage();
System.out.println(email);
msg.setTo("sample#email.com");
msg.setSubject("Send mail by Spring Boot");
msg.setText("Send mail by Spring Boot");
sender.send(msg);
}
}
I was reading some of the previous questions other users posted without a clear result for me. I even tried to find some examples with similar resutl.
Could someone give me any clue about this?
Thanks a lot in advance.
The #Value should work (Im asuming your class is under the com.example.* package since you are scanning that package) but if you want to do it another way this is what im using :
public class JpaConfiguration {
public static final String TRANSACTION_MANAGER_NAME = "jpaTransactionManager";
#Autowired
Environment applicationProperties;
Then to use it
#Bean
public DriverManagerDataSource driverManagerDataSource() {
DriverManagerDataSource driverConfig = new DriverManagerDataSource();
driverConfig.setDriverClassName(applicationProperties.getProperty("data.jpa.driverClass"));
driverConfig.setUrl(applicationProperties
.getProperty("data.jpa.connection.url"));
driverConfig.setUsername(applicationProperties
.getProperty("data.jpa.username"));
driverConfig.setPassword(applicationProperties
.getProperty("data.jpa.password"));
return driverConfig;
}
UPDATE AFTER GETTING THE GITHUB REPO
I Don't really know what you are trying to build but :
If you do this:
#Override
public void run(String... strings) throws Exception {
//System.out.println(email);
Email email = new Email();
email.sendMail();
}
Then you are creating the instance of the class, and not spring. so you shouldn't be creating the instance yourself there it should be spring.
That said, i dont know if you are creating a web application a command line application or both.
That said ill give you a minor solution to show you that the dependency injection is in fact working.
1_ add a getter to your email on email class. remove the CommandLine interface (If you want to implement this i would recomend you to put CommandLine implmentations on another package say Controller);
And then run your app like this:
#SpringBootApplication
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.example")
public class MailTestApplication {
#Value("${admin.mail}")
String email;
public static void main(String[] args) {
// SpringApplication.run(MailTestApplication.class, args);
final ConfigurableApplicationContext context = new SpringApplicationBuilder(MailTestApplication.class).run(args);
Email e = context.getBean(Email.class);
System.out.println(e.getEmail());
}
The Key thing I want to show is that the instance is created by spring thats why the wiring works. and the email gets printed in the console.
Regarding the email class :
#Component
public class Email {
// #Autowired
// private MailSender sender;
#Value("${admin.mail}")
String email;
public Email() {
}
public void sendMail() {
SimpleMailMessage msg = new SimpleMailMessage();
System.out.println(email);
msg.setTo("sample#email.com");
msg.setSubject("Send mail by Spring Boot");
msg.setText("Send mail by Spring Boot");
// sender.send(msg);
}
public String getEmail() {
return email;
}
}
I Comment out the MailSender since I think you need to configure that too, i have made a custom mailSender that uses gmail and other for mailChimp that i can share with you if you need. but again I dont really know what your intent with the app is.
Hope the info helps you.
I've created this code:
public class AddonsModule : Ninject.Modules.NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
this.Bind(b => b.FromAssembliesMatching("*")
.SelectAllClasses()
.InheritedFrom(typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon))
.BindWith(new AddonBindingGenerator())
);
}
private class AddonBindingGenerator : IBindingGenerator
{
public System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Ninject.Syntax.IBindingWhenInNamedWithOrOnSyntax<object>> CreateBindings(System.Type type, Ninject.Syntax.IBindingRoot bindingRoot)
{
if (type.IsInterface || type.IsAbstract)
yield break;
yield return bindingRoot.Bind(type).ToProvider(typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon));
}
}
private class AddonProvider : IProvider<UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon>
{
public object Create(IContext context)
{
return null;
}
public Type Type
{
get { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
}
}
AddonProvider seems be avoided. This is never performed.
When I perform:
kernel.GetAll<UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon>(), AddonProvider.Create method is never performed.
Could you tell me what's wrong?
I'll appreciate a lot your help.
Thanks for all.
AddOnProvider is inheriting from IProvider<T> instead of UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon.
also, you may have issues binding to private inner classes. make AddOnProvider a public top level class.
You're binding a specific type which inherits from typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon) to a provider. For example, there could be a class Foo : UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon.
Now your convention binding translates to this:
Bind<Foo>().ToProvider<AddonProvider>();
Now, kernel.GetAll<UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon>() however is looking for bindings made like:
Bind<UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon>().To...
Fix It
So what you need to do is change the line
bindingRoot.Bind(type).ToProvider(new AddonProvider());
to:
bindingRoot.Bind(typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon)).ToProvider<AddonProvider>();
Furthermore
you're line object f = bindingRoot.Bind(type).ToProvider(new AddonProvider()); is never returning the binding (object f).
does UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon implement IProvider?
Thanks for your answer and comments.
I believe the trouble is on I'm not quite figuring out how this "generic" binding process works.
I'm going to try writing my brain steps process out:
I need to bind every AbstractAddon implementation inside addons assemblies folder. So, I think this code is right, but I'm not sure at all.
this.Bind(b => b.FromAssembliesMatching("*")
.SelectAllClasses()
.InheritedFrom(typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon))
.BindWith(new AddonBindingGenerator())
);
My AbstractAddon is like:
public abstract class AbstractAddon : IAddon
{
private object configuration;
public AbstractAddon(object configuration)
{
this.configuration = configuration;
}
// IAddon interface
public abstract string PluginId { get; }
public abstract string PluginVersion { get; }
public abstract string getCaption(string key);
public abstract Type getConfigurationPanelType();
public abstract System.Windows.Forms.UserControl createConfigurationPanel();
}
I guess I need to:
foreach implementation of `AbstractAddon` found out,
I need to "inject" a configuration object ->
So, I guess I need to set a provider and provide this configuration object.
This would be my main way of thinking in order to solve this problem.
I've changed a bit my first approach. Instead of using a IBindingGenerator class, I've used the next:
public class AddonsModule : Ninject.Modules.NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
this.Bind(b => b.FromAssembliesMatching("*")
.SelectAllClasses()
.InheritedFrom(typeof(UIExtensibility.AbstractAddon))
.BindAllBaseClasses()
.Configure(c => c.InSingletonScope())
);
this.Bind<object>().ToProvider<ConfigurationProvider>()
.WhenTargetHas<UIExtensibility.ConfigurationAttribute>();
}
So, My ConfigurationProvider is:
private class ConfigurationProvider : IProvider<object>
{
public object Create(IContext context)
{
return "configuration settings";
}
}
And now, my AbstractAddon constructor contains the parameter annotated with ConfigurationAttribute as:
public AbstractAddon([Configuration]object configuration)
{
this.configuration = configuration;
}
The problem now, NInject seems to ignore the configuration object provider. NInject generates a dump object, however, not perform ConfigurationProvider.Create method...
What I'm doing wrong, now?
Is this approach really better than the last one?
Thanks for all.
I am trying to bind a repository to property using Ninject but always get null reference of binding object. I will explain the problem using code below.
public interface IServiceRepository
{
User GetUser(string email);
IQueryable<Statistic> GetStatisticForCurrentMonth(string ip);
void InsertStatistic(ConversionModel conversionModel);
class ServiceRepository : IServiceRepository
{
//Implementation of the Interface
}
I am would like to bind the repository above to class below while the class is created. Unfortunately Repository object is always null. Maybe I have misunderstood how Ninject is working? How to solve the problem?
public class Converter
{
[Inject]
public static IServiceRepository Repository { get; set; }
private static Converter _converter;
public static Converter Instance
{
get { return _Converter ?? (_Converter = new Converter ());
}
}
Ninject activator code
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().ToMethod(context => Converter.Repository);
}
Update
I have tried to rewrite code like this
public class Converter
{
private readonly IServiceRepository _repository;
public Converter(IServiceRepository repository)
{
_repository = repository;
}
//skip code
}
The test...
[TestMethod]
public void ConverterInstanceCreated()
{
using (IKernel kernel = new StandardKernel())
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().To<ServiceRepository>();
Assert.IsNotNull(kernel.Get<Converter>());
}
}
gives exception
Test method PC.Tests.NinjectTest.ConverterInstanceCreated threw exception:
Ninject.ActivationException: Error activating IServiceRepository
No matching bindings are available, and the type is not self-bindable.
Activation path:
2) Injection of dependency IServiceRepository into parameter repository of constructor of type Converter
1) Request for Converter
I just lost, I am trying to understand how Ninject is working for about week without any success. In my case why this exception is thrown?
Also please someone post working example with one repository injection to singleton class.
Ninject does not inject statics. Change the coynverter to a non-static class and configure it as Singleton in ninject. Also use constructor injection and make the repo a private field.
Now you can inject the converter to the constructors where you need it.
Even though you are using Property injection and not Constructor injection I think it would still be
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IServiceRepository>().To<ServiceRepository>();
}
As ninject still just needs to know what concrete type to map to the Interface
I haven't tested this so apologies if it's wrong.