I opened a demo xsp page and a window popped up asking me to input the name and password to login to the domino server. Then I entered my own id and password created in domino, but it didn't work. Only the Administrator name and its password worked. Anybody knows what's the problem? I already edited the corresponding ACL entries.
Thanks!
In order to use a database in a browser (no matter if classic notes web development or Xpages) one needs to meet several requirements.
First of all you need access to all NSF files that are used in the process.
As mentioned by Richard you either need to be mentioned in the ACL (namely or by group membership, or by setting -Default- and/or Anonymous to a level greater than No access).
AND the ACL has to allow Web- Access by not setting the Maximum Internet Name and Password to No Access
But this is not enough.
To be able to do authentication you do not have an ID- file in the browser.
You need a username and password. This password is NOT the password of your ID- file unless the admins choose to synchronize them using a policy.
It is the password stored in your person document in the names.nsf on the server.
But still these points are not enough yet: If you have access to the server with your username and internet password (can be tested by just trying to login to http://yourServer/names.nsf?open&login), then you might still not be able to access the application if -as umeli pointed out in the comment- the signer of the Xpage- application does not have enough rights to sign the XPages (Server document - security).
You see: There is a lot stuff to check. But if all of these points are OK, then access to the database will not be a problem anymore.
I omitted one reason for not beeing able to login because of your error description: If the Session Authentication on your server is configured for Multiple Servers (SSO) then you need to use the fully qualified internet host name of the server in the URL (or at least a hostname, that contains the SSO- domain), otherwise you will be redirected to the loginpage over and over again, even after supplying the right username / password. But as you wrote about a "Window popping up" I am quite sure, that Session authentication on that server is set to "Disabled"
You could be being rejected because of the
ACL of the NSF file not having the level of access required for operations performed in the code on the Xpage. I know you said you edited the ACL, but bear in mind that access also depends on the 'Maximum Internet Name and Password' setting for the NSF.
ACL in other NSF files that are accessed in the code of the Xpage not having the level of access required for operations performed on it by the code. This also includes the 'Maximum Internet Name and Password' setting.
Related
I have IIS 7.5 site:
Authentication = Windows Aythentication enabled
Application Pool = DefaultAppPool
DefaultAppPool Identity = ApplicationPoolIdentity
Load User Profile = True
On the filesystem,
DefaultAppPool has Read and Execute privileges to the entire site.
Also added a security group with Read and Execute privileges to the entire site.
With these settings, only users in the security group are able to access the site. All others get a AD login window, which has no affect. I'm not understanding this behaviour.
From research, it looks like I don't need to add the DefaultAppPool to the filesystem, if users are only executing, but still doesn't explain why they get the login challenge.
I'm also unclear if i need to set the AuthenticatedUserOverride (in Config Editor) from UseAuthenticatedUser to UseWorkerProcessUser if i want to use the filesystem security of DefaultAppPool. When i set this, i get an access error, not even the login challenge.
Note: site is not in the Default Web Site, but on a specific port number.
I'm unclear why i seem to need users listed in an ACL rather than using the generic DefaultAppPool.
Windows authentication determines how you determine who is who. Impersonation means which user account the security context runs under. Because you are loading the user profile, the context is taking on the AD user's security. Your DefaultAppPool identity is now out of the picture which is why you need ACL's on your files / folder.
Users will continue to receive the login prompt who are not cleared at the ACL level because IIS doesn't know what to do until an account that can access the files is provided. Watch in fiddler and you'll continue to see challenge messages from the server.
Using the Jenkins OpenID plugin I'm able to configure Jenkins to use my Google Apps OpenID as a provider. Anonymous users are still able to access that application (they have read access only), but I want to have it so that users are forced to login using the Google App domain or they are denied access.
I'm currently using the Jenkins Authorization setting of "Logged in users can do anything", I've tried using the "Matrix based authentication" and denying anonymous users, assuming logged in users would still have permissions, is there a special group value I can use for "logged in users" in matrix based authentication?
It seems like "Matrix-based security" will only work for specific users when using Google Apps OpenID (I don't believe Google apps for domains has support for OpenIDTeam extension
Yes there is a special group you can use to do this but finding the information about how to do it isn't obvious.
If you hover over the 'Overall - Read' column on the Matrix-based security table you'll get the solution.
It states
The read permission is necessary for viewing almost all pages of Jenkins. This permission is useful when you don't want unauthenticated users to see Jenkins pages - revoke this permission from the anonymous user, then add "authenticated" pseudo-user and grant the read access.
I use the following technique in combination with the OpenID plugin which allows me to specify a Google Apps for Business domain to secure Jenkins with
Warning: Make sure you've got a backup of your installation before you start because if you get something wrong you may lock yourself out of your Jenkins. Unpicking the plugins and settings would take longer than just restoring from a backup.
Ensure your choice of OpenID provider is still working ok with your current 'Logged in users can do anything' setting
Select the 'Matrix based-security' mode for Authorization
Add a new 'authenticated' group (lower case 'a') to the Matrix-based security table.
Use the 'check all' icon at the right hand end of the new 'authenticated' row to tick all the permission boxes.
Use the 'check all' icon at the right hand end of the 'Anonymous' row to untick all the permission boxes.
Save the settings
Reload Jenkins
Now each time a user wants to see Jenkins they have to be already signed into their Google Account and no-one can get to see any Job names or views without login.
Hope this helps.
I'm trying to use the RavenDB server web/silverlight UI to create databases and test data, and am being asked for a username/password. This is fine, and the documentation on http://blogs.hibernatingrhinos.com/5/ravendb-in-practice-part-1-an-introduction-to-ravendb says that I should use my Windows credentials:
Be default RavenDB allow anonymous access only for read requests (HTTP GET), and since we creating data, we need to specify a username and password. You can control this by changing the AnonymousAccess setting in the server configuration file.
Enter your username and password of your Windows account and a sample data will be generated for you.
However the dialog reappears instantly. A few tries later and it fails with an authorisation error.
I'm using the Raven Silverlight client through Google Chrome Windows XP Home SP3, and haven't changed RavenDB's settings (I want it to work with authentication, rather than dodging the issue).
1) Make sure you give user permissions to read/write in the directory where raven is installed.
2) Make sure that you have set in web.config
3) Check this thread RavenDB Network Access
We have our own web server hosting our website that is open to the public outside of our network.
I have a request to make our "Internal Postings" link on our Careers page to authenticate the user against our network's Active Directory list.
I currently have it setup so the link hits a page inside the directory structure of the website, and this page's folder is set to "Integrated Windows Authentication". Anonymous access is turned off for this page. If the user is authenticated (ie: logged into our network or supplies proper credentials) it passes them on to an external careers website which hosts our job postings. If they fail to authenticate, it displays a custom 401 error page.
This works fine, but there is a problem with it. Using IE, people cannot just enter their username. They (of course) are required to enter the domain name as well. Unfortunately the default 'domain' is set to the URL of our website (www.xyz.com/username). I would like it to automatically choose the name of our internal domain (aaa/username) but am unsure of how to do this.
Another option would be to use LDAP and a little ASP scripting to authenticate the user. I have this code already, but am unsure of the security consequences of doing so. Basically, the page will be setup for anonymous authentication, and if the user isn't logged into our network, they will be prompted for a username/password using standard textboxes. This is then passed to an ASP script that does an LDAP lookup against our Active Directory. Is there any security issues with this method?
Which method would you choose to do?
Thanks.
EDIT: It seems I cannot authenticate to ActiveD via LDAP using a username/password combo. So forget about that option.
My question now is, how can I change the default 'domain' that IWA uses? Is that at all possible? IE seems to default to 'www.xyz.com\username' (my website) rather than 'aaa\username' (my domain name). Of course, www.xyz.com\username fails because that is not where our ActiveD resides... Is this possible? I want to make it as simple as possible for our employees.
You cannot authenticate an user with a script that looks up the user in LDAP. You need to know that the user is who it claims it is, and the only way to do that is to let NTLM/Kerberos authenticate the user (ie. establish proof that the user knows a secret stored in the AD, the password).
The URL of the web site to the set of sites considered be in the local intranet zone for IE browsers running on the internal network. By default sites consider to local intranet will be sent the current logged on users credentials when challanged with NTLM/Kerberos. Hence your internal users shouldn't even see a network logon box.
I hate to dredge up an old thread, but the answers are a bit misleading, if I understand the question. The thread Remus refers to is about authenticating via LDAP with a username only. As he points out, that isn't possible. But it looks like what Kolten has in mind is authenticating via LDAP with a username and password both. That's a standard practice called binding.
I would like to use an LDAP server (probably Apache directory) to manage logins and credentials for an application. From time to time the application needs to work offline (on a laptop) without a connection to the LDAP server.
What is the best way to replicate the credentials localy?
I have already thought about:
Using Mitosis to replicate the LDAP server on the laptop.
But it would be a quite "heavy" and complicated solution. Moreover Mitosis seems not be be finished yet.
Exporting the credentials as LDIF file that could be stored on the laptop.
But I would need a way to check that the LDIF file actually comes from the LDAP server (The file should include a kind of signature). Moreover I would like to reject LDIF files that haven't be updated for more than a week. It would be nice if I could avoid implementing signing and age check myself.
Any other ideas or tools that could help me?
Edited Edit: I had a look at Kerberos because the documentation of the Java-Kerberos-API seems to say that it is possible to use a cached ticket in a local cache and I thought this might be a solution for me. Moreover Kerberos can be added as plugin to Apache Directory.
But the Kerberos cache stores decrypted tickets (aiming at sharing them with other applications). I would need the crypted version of the ticket to be able to check the user password during an offline session. Conclusion: Kerberos doesn't offer a simple solution to my problem.
Knowing that it will be probably ok if the user have to log on once online before being able to log on offline, consider the following algorithm:
user provides your application with a (username + password)
application attempts to contact LDAP for authentication
working online? (e.g. connection successful)
application authenticates against LDAP using (username + password)
authentication succesful?
application stores or updates hash(password) as (cached_credentials) for (username) into local secure storage
application proceeds as authenticated [[STOP]]
authentication failed?
application proceeds as non-authenticated (incorrect credentials) [[STOP]]
working offline? (e.g. network error)
application attempts retrieve (cached_credentials) for (username) from local secure storage
(cached_credentials) exists AND more recent than (1 week)?
application compares (cached_credentials) against hash(password)
match?
application proceeds as authenticated [[STOP]]
no match?
application proceeds as non-authenticated (incorrect credentials) [[STOP]]
(cached_credentials) does not exist OR less recent than (1 week)?
application proceeds as non-authenticated (network error) [[STOP]]
This is (or was, IIRC), by the way, the same model employed by Windows NT+ for user authentication against domain controllers. Upon login an attempt is made to authenticate against the domain controller and create or update the local (cached) version of the user profile. If the domain controller is not available, the user is prompted to proceed with authentication against the credentials captured in the local (cached) profile (if one exists.)
EDIT
Yes, this is, in spirit, the same solution as copying an ldif file locally, except that you do not have to parse ldif when you're offline. :)
It is understood that you can store any additional attributes (permissions, etc.) in your cache
It is also understood that 'secure storage' is at least signed. :) You can do this easily enough with a SHA-1 hash and a secret, or you can use full-fledged cryptographic providers available on your platform (or in Java, if using Java.) You do not need to crypt it as long as no secret information is stored inside.
Here is the solution I decided to use (I have already described it in an edit to my question, but I would like to able to accept an answer to "close" the question):
As I have not found another solution, I decided to use an LDIF export, add a timestamp as comment at the beginning of the file and then sign the file. To sign the file I calculate an hash value (SHA-1) of the file + a secret key. The signature is added as comment at the beginning of the file. To check the signature I remove the first line of the signed file and recalculate the hash value.