I got some code of Laravel where confide (https://github.com/Zizaco/confide) is used. Now I would like to add CSS in these Web Pages of Laravel.
Can anyone say how can I do that ??
Unless I am mistaken I'm pretty sure the question the poster was trying to ask is how to style the forms that reside outside of the app\viewsfolder. The forms confide uses by default are in the \vendor\zizaco\confide\src\views folder.
You can change the default forms and use custom ones by editing the config.php and style them like any other view.
Change this
*\vendor\zizaco\confide\src\config\config.php
'login_form' => 'confide::login',
'signup_form' => 'confide::signup',
'forgot_password_form' => 'confide::forgot_password',
'reset_password_form' => 'confide::reset_password',
To this
*\vendor\zizaco\confide\src\config\config.php
'login_form' => 'user.login',
'signup_form' => 'user.register',
'forgot_password_form' => 'user.password',
'reset_password_form' => 'user.reset',
I think you misunderstood what confide is or how laravel works.
Confide is a package to manage the authentication process in your website it has nothing to do with the front-end design of your website. It serves the back end operations to authenticate a model.
You must first pass the model through a controller and in to a view.
After that you can use blade templating to present the models and their attributes
and you can use whatever styling you want in your views.
Those are basic principles of the MVC design pattern if you don't understand what I'm trying to explain to you should read the laravel documentation
Related
I'm trying to make an Ajax-call to my Controller.
I placed a hidden link in my form like this:
<f:link.action action="ajaxCheckEmailExistsFE" controller="Profiles" class="hidden" id="checkEmailExistsAjaxLink"></f:link.action>
In my Javascript, I extract the href from this link:
var target = $('#checkEmailExistsAjaxLink').attr('href');
And then send my request with jQuery's $.post method.
When the link is called, I get the infamous error
The action \"ajaxCheckEmailExistsFE\" (controller \"Profiles\") is not allowed by this plugin. Please check TYPO3\\CMS\\Extbase\\Utility\\ExtensionUtility::configurePlugin() in your ext_localconf.php
But the action is clearly set in ext_localconf.php!
\TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Utility\ExtensionUtility::configurePlugin(
'MyVendor.MyExt',
'MyPlugin',
[
'Profiles' => 'editFE, showFE, updateFE, ajaxCheckEmailExistsFE'
],
// non-cacheable actions
[
'Profiles' => 'editFE, showFE, updateFE, ajaxCheckEmailExistsFE'
]
);
The same workflow works perfectly in BE-Mode.
I had the same problem with the updateFE-Action. When the form was submitted, I got the same error like above. I had to add it to the switchable-controller-actions in my flexform (-> <numIndex index="1">Profiles->editFE;Profiles->updateFE</numIndex>) - which is equally odd.
Why is this happening???
This is TYPO3 9.5
[Edit] For the time being, I ended up adding the action to the switchable-controller-actions just like I did for the updateFE-Action.
This is VERY cumbersome, though, since I have to set the plugin-action on the page every time I add a new action.
If anybody has a better solution, I'd be extremely thankful!
Indeed, this IS cumbersome, but it is also the only working way for switchable actions in TYPO3 extbase controllers. This check is intended to ensure that specific actions are only callable when you are in the "correct" plugin, as you may have several plugins inside one extension, which then may utilize different actions. So in the end, this feature prevents one plugin to call an action which should only be callable inside another plugin of the same extension.
If you do not need the editor to switch action sets of your plugins though, you can remove this config part from your flexform, which will solve the need to edit this for new actions.
As a famous example, take a look into the config of the news extension. There is one plugin which allows list+detail view, and different ones for just list or just detail view. So as an admin, you have to choice of structuring your website (routing and templates) for different news setups.
Even in the TYPO3 community, there are voices to get rid of this feature, so maybe it will be solved in future versions.
I'm new to web development and ASP.NET MVC 4
My question is: Is it possible to replace the content of div tag without needing to refresh the whole page?
If so, what is the best practice of it (best use of MVC 4)?
In order to refresh partial content of a page, you have to use AJAX. There are plenty of resources available online describing how to implement this in ASP.NET MVC. One of the possibilities is using partial views, on which you can find a good tutorial here. However, if you're comfortable with javascript/jQuery a partial view might be overkill if you're just looking to update one div.
Use javascript and make an ajax call. MVC has a JsonResult for the controller you can use if you like.
Not 100% sure but if I remember right, jQuery is bundled with MVC4. Correct me if I'm wrong.
// Javascript code
$('#mydiv').load('/Content/html/mySnippet.html');
Would replace the contents of a <div id="mydiv"></div> with the contents of the /Content/html/mySnippet.html.
You can also call an action and return a partial view if you wish to have dynamic content instead of a static html template.
I was recently tasked with loading a portion of my Rails application within an iframe on another website. The relevant pages should be using a different layout file, but only if they're being rendered inside of the iframe. There was a solution proposed here Detect iframe request in a rails app that involved passing a query string parameter.
For example the requesting website could call my application through an iframe with the src of http://foo.com/bar?iframe=true. Then in our controller we could simply check:
def bar
render :template => "iframe" if params[:iframe]
end
This seems like a good solution, but sadly that only works for the initial request as the original query string is completely static. Assuming we have accessible links to other routes within the iframe is there any way of easily relaying the iframe=true request parameter to maintain the correct iframe layout without having to repeat code? Basically I would like to take the DRYest approach possible without breaking any existing functionality. I considered creating another link_to helper which included the logic to relay this parameter if it exists and replacing all of my link_to calls throughout my application; I was wondering if anybody had a better approach though.
I decided to tackle this problem using JavaScript and added the following to my haml layout file:
:javascript
for(i = 0; i< $('a').length; i++)
{
if($('a')[i].href.match(document.domain))
{
$('a')[i].href = $('a')[i].href + "?iframe=true";
}
}
This coupled with my server-side checks for the iframe param will ensure that the appropriate layout is loaded. I decided to only cater this functionality to users who enable JavaScript so it might not be the best solution. The only other problem with this approach lies in controller redirects and forms where I have to manually check for the iframe param and then forward it accordingly - not DRY at all, but I was at least able to put the logic into a controller method. If somebody knowns of a better solution please feel free to leave an answer.
I'm writing a Rails 3.2 app with backbone, and since I only need rails to render one page, I have no need for a controller to back the index page.
Is there a way to render the layout (application.html.erb) without a controller? I imagine it would be a configuration in the routes.rb file?
My first thought was to move it to index.html in the /public directory, but I need to take advantage of erb for javascript includes and CSRF helpers, etc.
I get that you don't need the controller to do anything, but Rails is "opinionated" software; it expects a controller and a view, because that is the way it was designed, and trying to work around that is going to give you a lot of trouble.
Just
create an empty controller class in /app/controllers/main_controller.rb
create an empty view file /app/views/main/index.html.erb
set up a route like :root => 'main#index'
Easy peasy.
Am currently using Rails 3.0 to develop my app.
How to handle a form in the public/index.html file which I'm planning to use as my Home page.
Usually a view's action buttons gets paired with the corresponding method of its controller.
But how to handle this in case the index file in public directory?
This is possible, so long as the form's action attribute is pointing at an action of a Rails controller. However, it is not the norm in Rails to use a static HTML page to capture data. The norm is to use the MVC architecture of Rails.
I have to ask: Have you read the documentation provided on the Ruby on Rails website? Check out http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org and read the Getting Started section.
Now, I think you might be using public/index.html because you don't know how to use a controller to serve the root of your website. Here's a quick example of how to use a controller instead of public/index.html:
Create a controller (i.e., home via rails g controller Home index)
Modify routes.rb and add root :to=>"home#index"
Delete public/index.html
The above is actually in the Edge Guides, Getting Stated section. So again, I strongly recommend you read the documentation. It will honestly save you a lot of trouble.