Can't createAnswer from peer - webrtc

I'm facing a problem where createAnswer() is not being called.
I'm looking for a way where a new user connects to the website and all other peers get an offer from the new peer and should create an answer. Where is my problem?
function onMessage (topic, event) {
console.log(event);
if(event.session_id == session._session_id)
return;
if(event.sdp) {
console.log(event.sdp.type);
if(event.type == "offer"){
pc.setRemoteDescription(new RTCSessionDescription(event.sdp));
pc.createAnswer(function(offer) {
debugger;
pc.setLocalDescription(offer);
session.publish("http://example.com/webrtc", { session_id: session._session_id ,sdp: offer, type: offer.type});
});
}
}
if(event.candidate)
pc.addIceCandidate(new RTCIceCandidate(event.candidate));
}
For the signalling channel I use Web-sockets an the wamp protocol.
I have deployed the application here,
the source code is available here.

Related

Web app that runs in Microsoft Teams (personal tab) doesn't always work on Desktop version

I have a Web app built in Vuejs and has SSO authentification using microsoftTeams.authentication.getAuthToken when running in Teams, or microsoftAuthLib when running in the browser.
Inside the company's network or when connected to the VPN everything works absolutely fine.
We recently opened it outside of the VPN and we created a public certificate for it. So when I disconnect the VPN, it works:
In any browser (outside of Teams).
Teams browser version.
Teams on Android/iPhone.
But it doesn't work on Teams Windows Desktop version, it fails with the following error:
Refused to display
'https://login.microsoftonline.com/.../oauth2/authorize?...' in a
frame because it set 'X-Frame-Options' to 'deny'.
Anybody has an idea what could be the issue? And why would it work on the company's VPN but not outside?And only on specific cases? I am lost, any help would be appreciated.
Thank you
*** EDIT / ADDED SSO REDIRECT CODE ***
import * as microsoftTeams from "#microsoft/teams-js";
import * as microsoftAuthLib from "msal";
import settings from './settings.js';
var msalConfig = {
auth: {
clientId: settings.sso.id,
authority: settings.sso.authority
},
cache: {
cacheLocation: "localStorage",
storeAuthStateInCookie: true
}
};
var requestObj = {
scopes: settings.sso.scopes
};
var myMSALObj = new microsoftAuthLib.UserAgentApplication(msalConfig);
myMSALObj.handleRedirectCallback(authRedirectCallBack);
function authRedirectCallBack(error, response) {
if (error) {
console.log(error);
} else {
console.log("token type is:" + response.tokenType);
}
}
function loginRedirect(requestObj) {
let account = myMSALObj.getAccount();
if (!account) {
myMSALObj.loginRedirect(requestObj);
return false;
} else {
return true;
}
}
function acquireMsalToken() {
return new Promise(function (resolve) {
resolve(myMSALObj.acquireTokenSilent(requestObj).then(token => {
return token.accessToken;
}).catch(error => {
acquireMsalTokenRedirect(error);
}));
})
}
function acquireTeamsToken() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
microsoftTeams.authentication.getAuthToken({
successCallback: (result) => {
resolve(result);
},
failureCallback: (error) => {
reject(error);
}
});
});
}
function acquireMsalTokenRedirect(error) {
if (error.errorCode === "consent_required" ||
error.errorCode === "interaction_required" ||
error.errorCode === "login_required") {
myMSALObj.acquireTokenRedirect(requestObj);
}
}
var msal = {
autoSignIn: function () {
return loginRedirect(requestObj);
},
acquireToken: async function () {
if (settings.sso.inTeams) {
microsoftTeams.initialize();
microsoftTeams.enterFullscreen();
return acquireTeamsToken();
} else {
let signedIn = msal.autoSignIn();
if (signedIn) {
return acquireMsalToken();
}
}
}
}
export default msal
This error means that you are trying to redirect your tab's iframe to the AAD login flow which in turn is unable to silently generate an auth token for you and is attempting to show an interactive flow (e.g. sign in or consent):
Refused to display
'https://login.microsoftonline.com/.../oauth2/authorize?...' in a
frame because it set 'X-Frame-Options' to 'deny'.
To avoid this issue you need to try and acquire a token silently and if that fails use the microsoftTeams.authentication.authenticate API to open a popup window and conduct the AAD login flow there.
Replacing the acquireTeamsToken() function with the following resolved the issue.
function acquireTeamsToken() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
microsoftTeams.initialize(() => {
microsoftTeams.authentication.authenticate({
url: window.location.origin + "/ms-teams/auth-start",
width: 600,
height: 535,
successCallback: (result) => {
resolve(result);
},
failureCallback: (error) => {
reject(error);
}
});
});
});
}
I found this documentation very helpful on how to create the Authentication pop up and how to create a Callback window with the Token in it.
You might also want to cache the token and only create a popup when it expires.
This might be because you're using the auth popup option instead of the redirect option in whichever auth library you're using (hopefully MSAL 2.0). Teams is a little different because it's actually launching a popup for you when necessary, so although it sounds a bit strange, you actually want to use the redirect option, inside the popup that is launched. What might help is to look at the new SSO Sample app in the Teams PnP samples.
Go to: %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Teams
Open the file hooks.json (if it's not there, create it)
Add the following to it: {"enableSso": false, "enableSsoMac": false}
That's it, now Teams desktop has the same authentication workflow as the browser version. Have a nice day.

Can't get click_action to work on FCM notifications with web app / PWA

I'm trying to get my "click_action" to take users to specific URLs on notifications that I'm sending to clients, but whatever I do it either does nothing (desktop) or just opens the PWA (android). The messages are coming through fine (checked in Chrome console) but clicking just doesn't seem to work.
I have the following in my service worker, cribbed from various places including other answers provided on this site:
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/7.14.3/firebase-app.js');
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/7.14.3/firebase-messaging.js');
// importScripts('/__/firebase/init.js');
/* An empty service worker! */
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
/* An empty fetch handler! */
});
var firebaseConfig = {
//REDACTED
};
// Initialize Firebase
firebase.initializeApp(firebaseConfig);
const messaging = firebase.messaging();
messaging.setBackgroundMessageHandler(function(payload) {
console.log('[firebase-messaging-sw.js] Received background message ', payload);
// Customize notification here
notificationTitle = payload.notification.title;
notificationOptions = {
body: payload.notification.body,
icon: payload.notification.icon,
click_action: payload.notification.click_action
};
return self.registration.showNotification(notificationTitle,
notificationOptions);
});
self.addEventListener('notificationclick', function(event) {
let url = event.notification.click_action;
// I've also added a data.click_action field in my JSON notification, and have tried using that
// instead, but that didn't work either
console.log('On notification click: ', event.notification.tag);
event.notification.close(); // Android needs explicit close.
event.waitUntil(
clients.matchAll({ includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window' }).then( windowClients => {
// Check if there is already a window/tab open with the target URL
for (var i = 0; i < windowClients.length; i++) {
var client = windowClients[i];
// If so, just focus it.
if (client.url === url && 'focus' in client) {
return client.focus();
}
}
// If not, then open the target URL in a new window/tab.
if (clients.openWindow) {
return clients.openWindow(url);
}
})
);
});
self.onnotificationclick = function(event) {
let url = event.notification.click_action;
console.log('On notification click: ', event.notification.tag);
event.notification.close();
// This looks to see if the current is already open and
// focuses if it is
event.waitUntil(clients.matchAll({ includeUncontrolled: true, type: 'window' }).then(function(clientList) {
for (var i = 0; i < clientList.length; i++) {
var client = clientList[i];
if (client.url == url && 'focus' in client)
return client.focus();
}
if (clients.openWindow)
return clients.openWindow(url);
}));
};
The notifications come through fine on both android (installed PWA) and chrome, and the message payload in the developer console is well formatted and received fine. In the message I'm sending from the server I have a URL with a custom parameter on the end (e.g. https://[domain]/list.php?userid=123) but, as above, clicking on the notification doesn't do anything on windows/chrome, and on the android it opens the PWA successfully but then doesn't go to the URL in the payload, it just goes to wherever the PWA was when last open. The "userid" changes depending on the message trigger.
Sample JSON of message payload:
{data: {…}, from: "xxx", priority: "high", notification: {…}, collapse_key: "do_not_collapse"}
collapse_key: "do_not_collapse"
data: {gcm.notification.badge: "[logo URL]", click_action: "https://[URL]/list.php?userid=33"}
from: "xxx"
notification:
body: "'5' has just been added"
click_action: "https://[URL]/list.php?userid=33"
icon: "https://[logo URL]"
title: "alert "
I also saw something about "webpush": { "fcm_options": { "link": "https://dummypage.com"}} on https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/js/receive but couldn't figure out if that was relevant or needed also.
Am very surprised just providing a URL in the click_action doesn't seem to just do that action when you click the notificaiton! Is anything needed in the service worker at all?!?!
Could one of the problems be that the PWA doesn't update the SW regularly, and so if my code above should work (a big if!) then i just need to wait for the SW to update on the installed android app? If so, is there a way to speed up its updating?!?
Thanks so much in advance for any assistance. Am tying myself in knots here!
I spent a lot of time looking for a solution for the same problem. Maybe this can help :
if you send notification with firebase messaging, you can use webpush field. firebase messaging client library execute self.registration.showNotification() ... No more need messaging.onBackgroundMessage in your service worker.
// firebabse-coud-function.js
app.messaging().send({
webpush: {
notification: {
title: notification?.title || "Default title",
icon: notification?.icon || "/icon.png",
badge: notification?.icon || "/icon.png",
},
fcmOptions: {
link: `${BASE_URL || ""}${notification?.clickAction || "/"}`,
}
},
data: {
userID: notification.userID,
link: notification?.clickAction || "/",
},
topic
});
Most importantly, in your service worker add a 'notificationclick' event listener before calling firebase.messaging()
so my service worker looks like:
// firebase-messaging-sw.js
// ...
self.addEventListener('notificationclick', function (event) {
console.debug('SW notification click event', event)
const url = event.notification?.data?.FCM_MSG?.data?.link;
// ...
})
const messaging = firebase.messaging();
messaging.onBackgroundMessage(function (payload) {
// received others messages
})
For me, clicking on the event does not go to the correct url. So i add this:
// background client - service worker
const channel = new BroadcastChannel('sw-messages');
self.addEventListener('notificationclick', function (event) {
console.debug('SW notification click event', event)
const url = event.notification?.data?.FCM_MSG?.data?.link;
channel.postMessage({
type: 'notification_clicked',
data: {
title: event.notification.title,
clickAction: url
}
});
})
// foreground client
const channel = new BroadcastChannel('sw-messages');
channel.addEventListener("message", function (event) {
// go the page
})
I hope this helps someone.
This question and other answers seems to be related to the legacy FCM API, not the v1.
In those case, I needed the SW to open any url sent by FCM, which is by default not possible because host differs (see here).
Also, the notification object as changed, and the url for the webpush config is there now: event.notification.data.FCM_MSG.notification.click_action
So adapting others answers to get the correct field and open the url by only editing the firebase-messaging-sw.js:
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/8.2.10/firebase-app.js');
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/8.2.10/firebase-messaging.js');
// Initialize the Firebase app in the service worker by passing in
// your app's Firebase config object.
// https://firebase.google.com/docs/web/setup#config-object
firebase.initializeApp({
...
})
self.addEventListener('notificationclick', function(event) {
event.notification.close();
// fcp_options.link field from the FCM backend service goes there, but as the host differ, it not handled by Firebase JS Client sdk, so custom handling
if (event.notification && event.notification.data && event.notification.data.FCM_MSG && event.notification.data.FCM_MSG.notification) {
const url = event.notification.data.FCM_MSG.notification.click_action;
event.waitUntil(
self.clients.matchAll({type: 'window'}).then( windowClients => {
// Check if there is already a window/tab open with the target URL
for (var i = 0; i < windowClients.length; i++) {
var client = windowClients[i];
// If so, just focus it.
if (client.url === url && 'focus' in client) {
return client.focus();
}
}
// If not, then open the target URL in a new window/tab.
if (self.clients.openWindow) {
console.log("open window")
return self.clients.openWindow(url);
}
})
)
}
}, false);
const messaging = firebase.messaging();
(register the addEventListener before initializing messaging)
Just add addeventlistner notification click event before calling firebase.messaging()
Everything will work fine.
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/8.4.1/firebase-app.js');
importScripts('https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/8.4.1/firebase-messaging.js');
self.onnotificationclick = function(event) {
console.log('On notification click: ', event.notification.tag);
event.notification.close();
// This looks to see if the current is already open and
// focuses if it is
event.waitUntil(clients.matchAll({
type: "window"
}).then(function(clientList) {
for (var i = 0; i < clientList.length; i++) {
var client = clientList[i];
if (client.url == '/index' && 'focus' in client)
return client.focus();
}
if (clients.openWindow)
return clients.openWindow('/index');
}));
};
var firebaseConfig = {
apiKey: "xcxcxcxcxcxc",
authDomain: "xcxcxc.firebaseapp.com",
projectId: "fdsfdsdfdf",
storageBucket: "dfsdfs",
messagingSenderId: "sdfsdfsdf",
appId: "sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf"
};
// Initialize Firebase
firebase.initializeApp(firebaseConfig);
const messaging = firebase.messaging();

Laravel echo listen for whisper function not working

I'm building a live chat app, but I found that listenforwhisper function is not working, but .whisper() function works fine, pusher also received client typing event.
Here is my code:
For listen whisper:
Echo.private(`messages.${this.user.id}`)
.listen("NewMessage", (e) => {
this.handleIncoming(e.message);
})
.listenForWhisper("typing", (e) => {
if(e.name !='') {
this.typeStatus = 'typing .........'
}
else {
this.typeStatus = ''
}
console.log(this.typeStatus);
});
For whisper:
watch: {
message() {
Echo.private(`messages.${this.user.id}`)
.whisper("typing", {
name: this.message
});
}
}
For channel:
Broadcast::channel('messages.{id}', function ($user, $id) {
return (int) $user->id === (int) $id;
});
Theoretically, my console will return the typeStatus, but I got nothing in my console.
Whisper works like broadcastToOthers. You're now trying to listen for the current users whispers. You should have a room where the whisper goes to and there should be multiple clients there to recieve. Now your channel is tied to the user and no-one else can see the messages that go through that channel.
Ok, I step in same issue. I got 2 channels and 2 users. I set a interval with wisper
setInterval(() => {
channel.whisper('typing', {
message: 'hola!'
});
}, 3000);
channel.listenForWhisper('typing', (e) => {
console.log('Typing');
console.log(e);
})
The thing was that I was receving events but won't be able to see the output from listenForWhisper until I connect the second user to the channel.
Once the second user is connected, it's works just fine. So I leaved her if you got same issue.

Chrome on Android not connecting to peer over WebRTC

I'm building a WebRTC app with a central electron app that browsers connect to. The scenario I'm testing is running the electron app on my computer (Ubuntu 16.04) and connecting from chrome (69) on Android (7.0). Following the debugging the offer, answer and candidate are passed, but fails on the last stop of generating the connection. The ice connection state switchs to "checking" then "failed". I'm able to load the browser app on my laptop and connect to an electron app on the same computer.
Should I be using a collection of ice servers? What do I need to make the WebRTC connection more robust? Should I not write my own signaling process and use something pre-made? Is their anyway to debug the reason why the connection failed? For debugging I've tried the webrtc debugging tab on chrome but all it says is connection failled at the bottom of the stack.
The configuration for my RTCPeerConnection is:
const configuration = {
"iceServers": [{ "urls": "stun:stun.1.google.com:19302" }]
};
This is the code I use to form iniate the connection to the electron app from the browser app (The function are attached to a ts class which are called in order: setupPeerConnection, setupDataChannel, makeOffer):
setupPeerConnection(gameID:string) {
this.gameID = gameID;
let configuration:RTCConfiguration = {
"iceServers": [{ "urls": "stun:stun.1.google.com:19302" }]
};
this.connection = new RTCPeerConnection(configuration);
const that:PeerConnection = this;
//Definition of the data channel
this.connection.ondatachannel = function(ev:RTCDataChannelEvent) {
};
//When we get our own ICE Candidate, we provide it to the other Peer.
this.connection.onicecandidate = function(event:RTCPeerConnectionIceEvent) {
if (event.candidate && that.connectedToGame) {
that.serverConnection.send({
type: "candidate",
candidate: event.candidate
});
}
};
this.connection.oniceconnectionstatechange = function(e:Event) {
let iceState:RTCIceConnectionState = this.iceConnectionState;
console.log("Changing connection state:", iceState)
if (iceState == "connected") {
console.log("Connection established with server");
} else if (iceState =="disconnected" || iceState == "closed") {
// We lost the user
that.connectedToGame = false;
that.onLeave();
}
};
}
setupDataChannel(onopen:(error:ErrorEvent)=>void, onmessage:(message:MessageEvent)=>void) {
let dataChannelOptions:RTCDataChannelInit = <RTCDataChannelInit>{
reliable: true
};
this.dataChannel = this.connection.createDataChannel(this.gameID + "-dataChannel", dataChannelOptions);
this.dataChannel.onerror = function (error:ErrorEvent) {
console.log("Error on data channel:", error);
};
this.dataChannel.onmessage = onmessage.bind(this);
this.dataChannel.onopen = onopen;
this.dataChannel.onclose = function() {
console.log("Channel closed.");
};
}
makeOffer() {
let that:PeerConnection = this;
this.connection.createOffer().then(function (offer:RTCSessionDescriptionInit) {
that.serverConnection.send({
gameID: that.gameID,
type: "offer",
offer: offer
});
that.connection.setLocalDescription(offer);
}, function (error) {
console.log("Error contacting remote peer: ", error);
});
}

Node.js + socket.io + node-amqp and queue binginds when "re" connecting thru socket.io

I have one scenario which is very close to this sample:
One main screen:
this screen (client side) will connect to the socket.io server thru server:9090/scope (io.connect("http://server:9090/scope)) and will send one event "userBindOk" (socket.emit("userBindOk", message)) to the socket.io server;
the server receives the connection and the "userBindOk". At this moment, the server should get the active connection to rabbitmq server and bind the queue to the respective user that just connected to the application thru socket.io. sample:
socket.on("connection", function(client){
//client id is 1234
// bind rabbitmq exchange, queue, and:
queue.subscribe(//receive callback);
})
So far, no problem - I can send/receive messages thru socket.io without problems.
BUT, If I refresh the page, all those steps will be done again. As consequence, the binding to the queue will occur, but this time related to another session of the socket.io client. This means that if I send a message to the queue which is related to the first socket.io session (before the page refresh), that bind should (I think) receive the message and send it to a invalid socket.io client (page refresh = new client.id on the socket.io context). I can prove this behaviour because every time I refresh the page I need to send x times more messages. For instance: I`ve connected for the first time: - so, 1 message - one screen update; refresh the page: I need to send 2 messages to the queue and only the second message will be received from the "actual" socket.io client session - this behaviour will occur as many as I refresh the page (20 page refreshs, 20 messages to be sent to a queue and the server socket.io "last" client will send the message to the client socket.io to render into the screen).
The solutions I believe are:
Find a way to "unbind" the queue when disconnecting from the socket.io server - I didn`t see this option at the node-amqp api yet (waiting for it :D)
find a way to reconnect the socket.io client using the same client.id. This way I can identify the client that is coming and apply some logic to cache the socket.
Any ideas? I tried to be very clear... But, as you know, it`s not so eaey to expose your problem when trying to clarify something that is very specific to some context...
tks
I solved it like this:
I used to declare the rabbitMq queue as durable=true,autoDelete=false,exclusive=false and in my app there was 1 queue/user and 1 exchange(type=direct) with the routing_key name=queueName, my app also used the queue for other client diffent to browsers like android app or iphone app as push fallback, so i use to crear 1 queue for earch user.
The solution to this problem was to change my rabbitMQ queue and exchange declaration. Now i declare the exchange/user as fanout and autoDelete=True, and the user is going to have N queues with durable=true, autoDelete=true, exclusive=true (No. queue = No. clients) and all the queues are bind to the user-exchange(multicast).
NOTE: my app is wirten in django, and i use node+socket+amqp to be able to comunicate with the browser using web.scokets, so i use node-restler to query my app api to get the user-queue info.
thats the rabbitMQ side, for the node+amqp+socket i did this:
server-side:
onConnect: the declaration of the user exchange as fanout, autoDelete, durable. then declaration of the queue as durable, autodelete and exclusive, then the queue.bind to the user-exchange and finaly the queue.subscribe and the socket.disconnect will destroy the queue so there are going to exist queue as client connected the app and this solve the problem of the refresh and allow the user to have more than 1 window-tab with the app:
Server-side:
/*
* unCaught exception handler
*/
process.on('uncaughtException', function (err) {
sys.p('Caught exception: ' + err);
global.connection.end();
});
/*
* Requiere libraries
*/
global.sys = require('sys');
global.amqp = require('amqp');
var rest = require('restler');
var io = require('socket.io').listen(8080);
/*
* Module global variables
*/
global.amqpReady = 0;
/*
* RabbitMQ connection
*/
global.connection = global.amqp.createConnection({
host: host,
login: adminuser,
password: adminpassword,
vhost: vhost
});
global.connection.addListener('ready',
function () {
sys.p("RabbitMQ connection stablished");
global.amqpReady = 1;
}
);
/*
* Web-Socket declaration
*/
io.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
socket.on('message', function (data) {
sys.p(data);
try{
var message = JSON.parse(data);
}catch(error){
socket.emit("message", JSON.stringify({"error": "invalid_params", "code": 400}));
var message = {};
}
var message = JSON.parse(data);
if(message.token != undefined) {
rest.get("http://dev.kinkajougames.com/api/push",
{headers:
{
"x-geochat-auth-token": message.token
}
}).on('complete',
function(data) {
a = data;
}).on('success',
function (data){
sys.p(data);
try{
sys.p("---- creating exchange");
socket.exchange = global.connection.exchange(data.data.bind, {type: 'fanout', durable: true, autoDelete: true});
sys.p("---- declarando queue");
socket.q = global.connection.queue(data.data.queue, {durable: true, autoDelete: true, exclusive: false},
function (){
sys.p("---- bind queue to exchange");
//socket.q.bind(socket.exchange, "*");
socket.q.bind(socket.exchange, "*");
sys.p("---- subscribing queue exchange");
socket.q.subscribe(function (message) {
socket.emit("message", message.data.toString());
});
}
);
}catch(err){
sys.p("Imposible to connection to rabbitMQ-server");
}
}).on('error', function (data){
a = {
data: data,
};
}).on('400', function() {
socket.emit("message", JSON.stringify({"error": "connection_error", "code": 400}));
}).on('401', function() {
socket.emit("message", JSON.stringify({"error": "invalid_token", "code": 401}));
});
}
else {
socket.emit("message", JSON.stringify({"error": "invalid_token", "code": 401}));
}
});
socket.on('disconnect', function () {
socket.q.destroy();
sys.p("closing socket");
});
});
client-side:
The socket intance with options 'force new connection'=true and 'sync disconnect on unload'= false.
The client side use the onbeforeunload and onunload windows object events to send socket.disconnect
The client on socket.connect event send the user token to node.
proces message from socket
var socket;
function webSocket(){
//var socket = new io.Socket();
socket = io.connect("ws.dev.kinkajougames.com", {'force new connection':true, 'sync disconnect on unload': false});
//socket.connect();
onSocketConnect = function(){
alert('Connected');
socket.send(JSON.stringify({
token: Get_Cookie('liveScoopToken')
}));
};
socket.on('connect', onSocketConnect);
socket.on('message', function(data){
message = JSON.parse(data);
if (message.action == "chat") {
if (idList[message.data.sender] != undefined) {
chatboxManager.dispatch(message.data.sender, {
first_name: message.data.sender
}, message.data.message);
}
else {
var username = message.data.sender;
Data.Collections.Chats.add({
id: username,
title: username,
user: username,
desc: "Chat",
first_name: username,
last_name: ""
});
idList[message.data.sender] = message.data.sender;
chatboxManager.addBox(message.data.sender, {
title: username,
user: username,
desc: "Chat",
first_name: username,
last_name: "",
boxClosed: function(id){
alert("closing");
}
});
chatboxManager.dispatch(message.data.sender, {
first_name: message.data.sender
}, message.data.message);
}
}
});
}
webSocket();
window.onbeforeunload = function() {
return "You have made unsaved changes. Would you still like to leave this page?";
}
window.onunload = function (){
socket.disconnect();
}
And that's it, so no more round-robing of the message.