I cannot figure out how to return JSONP in RestXQ. After adding
let $x := util:declare-option("exist:serialize", fn:concat("method=json jsonp=",request:get-parameter("callback", "callback")))
to the function, I get the error message:
err:XPTY0004:It is a type error if, during the static analysis phase, an expression is found to have a static type that is not appropriate for the context in which the expression occurs, or during the dynamic evaluation phase, the dynamic type of a value does not match a required type as specified by the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
The beginning of the GET function is:
declare
%rest:GET
%rest:path("/demo/contacts/submit")
%rest:query-param("email", "{$email}", '')
%rest:query-param("nomail", "{$nomail}", 0)
%rest:produces("application/javascript")
%output:media-type("application/javascript")
%output:method("json")
function contacts:submit($email as xs:string*, $nomail as xs:integer*)
{
try
{
let $x := util:declare-option("exist:serialize", fn:concat("method=json jsonp=",request:get-parameter("callback", "callback")))
As discussed on the eXist-open mailing list (I'd suggest joining!), the request module's get-parameter() function is not available inside a RestXQ function. Instead, you can get your callback parameter via the %rest:query-param annotation. Add %rest:query-param("callback", "{$callback}", '') to your contacts:submit() function, and I think you'll be a step closer.
#joewiz is correct. Your initial problem is related to the use of eXist request module from RESTXQ, which is unsupported.
Also, RESTXQ does not currently support JSONP serialization. If you want to use JSONP serialization, your best bet at the moment is to manage the serialization to JSON yourself, perhaps using the xqjson library or similar and then wrapping the result in a JSON function using concat or similar.
Related
Find the example here.
def a = condition ? " karate match statement " : "karate match statement"
Is it possible to do something like this??
This is not recommended practice for tests because tests should be deterministic.
The right thing to do is:
craft your request so that the response is 100% predictable. do not worry about code-duplication, this is sometimes necessary for tests
ignore the dynamic data if it is not relevant to the Scenario
use conditional logic to set "expected value" variables instead of complicating your match logic
use self-validation expressions or schema-validation expressions for specific parts of the JSON
use the if keyword and call a second feature file - or you can even set the name of the file to call dynamically via a variable
in some cases karate.abort() can be used to conditionally skip / exit early
That said, if you really insist on doing this in the same flow, Karate allows you to do a match via JS in 0.9.6.RC4 onwards.
See this thread for details: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/1202#issuecomment-653632397
The result of karate.match() will return a JSON in the form { pass: '#boolean', message: '#string' }
If none of the above options work - that means you are doing something really complicated, so write Java interop / code to handle this
Example:
data class T(val flag: Boolean) {
constructor(n: Int) : this(run {
// Some computation here...
<Boolean result>
})
}
In this example, the custom constructor needs to run some computation in order to determine which value to pass to the primary constructor, but the compiler does not accept the run, citing Cannot access 'run' before superclass constructor has been called, which, if I understand correctly, means instead of interpreting it as the non-extension run (the variant with no object reference in https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/scope-functions.html#function-selection), it construes it as a call to this.run (the variant with an object reference in the above table) - which is invalid as the object has not completely instantiated yet.
What can I do in order to let the compiler know I mean the run function which is not an extension method and doesn't take a scope?
Clarification: I am interested in an answer to the question as asked, not in a workaround.
I can think of several workarounds - ways to rewrite this code in a way that works as intended without calling run: extracting the code to a function; rewriting it as a (possibly highly nested) let expression; removing the run and invoking the lambda (with () after it) instead (funnily enough, IntelliJ IDEA tags that as Redundant lambda creation and suggests to Inline the body, which reinstates the non-compiling run). But the question is not how to rewrite this without using run - it's how to make run work in this context.
A good answer should do one of the following things:
Explain how to instruct the compiler to call a function rather than an extension method when a name is overloaded, in general; or
Explain how to do that specifically for run; or
Explain that (and ideally also why) it is not possible to do (ideally with supporting references); or
Explain what I got wrong, in case I got something wrong and the whole question is irrelevant (e.g. if my analysis is incorrect, and the problem is something other than the compiler construing the call to run as this.run).
If someone has a neat workaround not mentioned above they're welcome to post it in a comment - not as an answer.
In case it matters: I'm using multi-platform Kotlin 1.4.20.
Kotlin favors the receiver overload if it is in scope. The solution is to use the fully qualified name of the non-receiver function:
kotlin.run { //...
The specification is explained here.
Another option when the overloads are not in the same package is to use import renaming, but that won't work in this case since both run functions are in the same package.
Find the example here.
def a = condition ? " karate match statement " : "karate match statement"
Is it possible to do something like this??
This is not recommended practice for tests because tests should be deterministic.
The right thing to do is:
craft your request so that the response is 100% predictable. do not worry about code-duplication, this is sometimes necessary for tests
ignore the dynamic data if it is not relevant to the Scenario
use conditional logic to set "expected value" variables instead of complicating your match logic
use self-validation expressions or schema-validation expressions for specific parts of the JSON
use the if keyword and call a second feature file - or you can even set the name of the file to call dynamically via a variable
in some cases karate.abort() can be used to conditionally skip / exit early
That said, if you really insist on doing this in the same flow, Karate allows you to do a match via JS in 0.9.6.RC4 onwards.
See this thread for details: https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/1202#issuecomment-653632397
The result of karate.match() will return a JSON in the form { pass: '#boolean', message: '#string' }
If none of the above options work - that means you are doing something really complicated, so write Java interop / code to handle this
static setItem(key: string, value: string, callback?: ?(error: ?Error) => void)
This is the declaration of setitem in AsyncStorage. the third parameter is a callback. Could some one explain the use of question marks here. I am familiar with how to use promise but couldn't get a handle of question mark.
AsyncStorage uses flow - Facebook's open-sourced static type checker. You will find #flow at the beginning of the file and it marks flow-enabled source. Flow does a lot of checking on the variable types (including automated type inference) but it also lets you specify the types for variables and parameters. In the example above 'key: string' for example indicates that key should be string type (it's not a valid javascript construct - you cannot specify type in javascript). React has built in transformers that transform it to pure javascript (so all the types are stripped) but before that flow checks if types are passed around properly and find things like passing null or undefined and using it later as object and many other checks. You can read the specs in http://flowtype.org/.
So answering your detailed questionmark question:
'?Error' indicates that error parameter is a "Maybe" type - i.e. it CAN be null and flow will not complain if null or undefined is passed here elsewhere in the code callback (http://flowtype.org/docs/nullable-types.html#type-annotating-null)
'callback?' indicates an optional parameter - so it might be skipped http://flowtype.org/docs/functions.html#function-based-type-annotations
'?(error...)' is another "Maybe" type - it simply indicates that the callback function might take one parameter ('error') or no parameters at all.
Consider the following line of code:
private void DoThis() {
int i = 5;
var repo = new ReportsRepository<RptCriteriaHint>();
// This does NOT work
var query1 = repo.Find(x => x.CriteriaTypeID == i).ToList<RptCriteriaHint>();
// This DOES work
var query1 = repo.Find(x => x.CriteriaTypeID == 5).ToList<RptCriteriaHint>();
}
So when I hardwire an actual number into the lambda function, it works fine. When I use a captured variable into the expression it comes back with the following error:
No mapping exists from object type
ReportBuilder.Reporter+<>c__DisplayClass0
to a known managed provider native
type.
Why? How can I fix it?
Technically, the correct way to fix this is for the framework that is accepting the expression tree from your lambda to evaluate the i reference; in other words, it's a LINQ framework limitation for some specific framework. What it is currently trying to do is interpret the i as a member access on some type known to it (the provider) from the database. Because of the way lambda variable capture works, the i local variable is actually a field on a hidden class, the one with the funny name, that the provider doesn't recognize.
So, it's a framework problem.
If you really must get by, you could construct the expression manually, like this:
ParameterExpression x = Expression.Parameter(typeof(RptCriteriaHint), "x");
var query = repo.Find(
Expression.Lambda<Func<RptCriteriaHint,bool>>(
Expression.Equal(
Expression.MakeMemberAccess(
x,
typeof(RptCriteriaHint).GetProperty("CriteriaTypeID")),
Expression.Constant(i)),
x)).ToList();
... but that's just masochism.
Your comment on this entry prompts me to explain further.
Lambdas are convertible into one of two types: a delegate with the correct signature, or an Expression<TDelegate> of the correct signature. LINQ to external databases (as opposed to any kind of in-memory query) works using the second kind of conversion.
The compiler converts lambda expressions into expression trees, roughly speaking, by:
The syntax tree is parsed by the compiler - this happens for all code.
The syntax tree is rewritten after taking into account variable capture. Capturing variables is just like in a normal delegate or lambda - so display classes get created, and captured locals get moved into them (this is the same behaviour as variable capture in C# 2.0 anonymous delegates).
The new syntax tree is converted into a series of calls to the Expression class so that, at runtime, an object tree is created that faithfully represents the parsed text.
LINQ to external data sources is supposed to take this expression tree and interpret it for its semantic content, and interpret symbolic expressions inside the tree as either referring to things specific to its context (e.g. columns in the DB), or immediate values to convert. Usually, System.Reflection is used to look for framework-specific attributes to guide this conversion.
However, it looks like SubSonic is not properly treating symbolic references that it cannot find domain-specific correspondences for; rather than evaluating the symbolic references, it's just punting. Thus, it's a SubSonic problem.