I'm breaking my head here where I'm going wrong.
The following query:
SELECT SUM(table1.col1) FROM table1
returns value x.
And the following query:
SELECT SUM(table1.col1) FROM table2 RIGHT OUTER JOIN table1 ON table2.ID = table1.ID
returns value y. (I need the Join for the other data of table2). Why is the 2nd example returning a different value than in the first?
Make life easier on yourself, your colleagues that will support your code, and your clients by temporarily ignoring the existence of RIGHT OUTER JOIN. Use Table1 as the "from table" instead of table2.
Then, If aggregating, you will often find it necessary to do this BEFORE joining, so that the numbers are accurate. e.g.
SELECT T1.SUMCOL1
FROM (
SELECT id, SUM(col1) as SUMCOL1 FROM Table1 GROUP BY id
) T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 T2 on T1.id = T2.ID
Obvious answer is because table2 is many to table1's one. That is, there are multiple rows in table2 for one id in table1. You may also be eliminating rows from table1 if the id isn't present in table2.
Compare:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table1
To:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table2 RIGHT OUTER JOIN table1 ON table2.ID = table1.ID
If you get different results, you're aggregating duplicates or eliminating rows from table1.
If you want to avoid this, you'll need to use a subquery.
Related
I want to get a value from an IN subquery with two columns, without needing to do two queries.
Sample:
SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE id IN(SELECT id, flags FROM table2);
Now I want to get flags directly. Is it possible, and if yes, how?
Any help is appreciated :)
It sounds like you are trying to achieve one of two things:
1) Select every field of records in table1 (and the associated table 2 flag) where the record's id is also found in the id column of table2. If that is the case, then yes, a join will accomplish what you want:
SELECT t1.*,
t2.flags
FROM table1 t1
JOIN table2 t2
ON t1.id = t2.id;
Note that JOIN is used here (rather than other types of joins such as LEFT JOIN) because JOIN will return only table1 records with a match in table2.id. LEFT JOIN, on the other hand, would return every table1 record, and table1 ids without a match in table2 would simply have null in the flags column of your returned table.
2) Select every field of records in table1 where the record's id is also found in either the id column of table2 or the flags column of table2. If that is the case, there are a few ways you could get the desired result, but achieving this using a subquery similar to the question
SELECT *
FROM table1
WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM table2 UNION DISTINCT SELECT flags FROM table2)
You do this using join:
SELECT t1.*, t2.flags
FROM table1 t1 JOIN
table2 t2
ON t1.id = t2.id;
I have two tables where each one contains columns with numbers. I need to compare columns in both tables and extract the number that does exist in first table, and does not exist in second one. I don't need unique value.
I wrote this query:
SELECT Table1.Numbers, Table1.Name
FROM Table1, Table2
WHERE Table1.Numbers != Table2.numbers
Since I am working on several million records can someone recommend more efficient query which would provide me with identical results?
I would use NOT EXISTS:
SELECT Table1.Numbers, Table1.Name
FROM Table1
WHERE NOT EXISTS(
SELECT 1 FROM Table2
WHERE Table1.Numbers=Table2.Numbers
)
Other approaches:
Should I use NOT IN, OUTER APPLY, LEFT OUTER JOIN, EXCEPT, or NOT EXISTS?
You can do this easily by checking for the existance on the number in Table2.
SELECT T1.Numbers
,T1.Name
FROM Table1 T1
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Table2 T2 WHERE T2.Numbers = T1.Numbers)
Try this (assuming that your Numbers column are not nullable)
SELECT T1.Numbers, T1.Name
FROM Table1 AS T1
LEFT JOIN Table2 AS T2 ON T1.Numbers = T2.Numbers
WHERE T2.Numbers IS NULL;
SELECT
Table1.Numbers, Table1.Name
FROM
Table1, Table2
GROUP BY
Table1, Table2
HAVING
COUNT(*) > 1
I have two datasets on two seperate servers. They both pull one column of information each.
I would like to build a report showing the values of the rows that only appear in one of the datasets.
From what I have read, it seems I would like to do this on the SQL side, not the reporting side; I am not sure how to do that.
If someone could shed some light on how that is possible, I would really appreciate it.
You can use the NOT EXISTS clause to get the differences between the two tables.
SELECT
Column
FROM
DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table1
WHERE
NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT
Column
FROM
LinkedServerName.DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table2
WHERE
Table1.Column = Table2.Column --looks at equalities, and doesn't
--include them because of the
--NOT EXISTS clause
)
This will show the rows in Table1 that don't appear in Table2. You can reverse the table names to find the rows in Table2 that don't appear in Table1.
Edit: Made an edit to show what the case would be in the event of linked servers. Also, if you wanted to see all of the rows that are not shared in both tables at the same time, you can try something as in the below.
SELECT
Column, 'Table1' TableName
FROM
DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table1
WHERE
NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT
Column
FROM
LinkedServerName.DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table2
WHERE
Table1.Column = Table2.Column --looks at equalities, and doesn't
--include them because of the
--NOT EXISTS clause
)
UNION
SELECT
Column, 'Table2' TableName
FROM
LinkedServerName.DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table2
WHERE
NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT
Column
FROM
DatabaseName.SchemaName.Table1
WHERE
Table1.Column = Table2.Column
)
You can also use a left join:
select a.* from tableA a
left join tableB b
on a.PrimaryKey = b.ForeignKey
where b.ForeignKey is null
This query will return all records from tableA that do not have corresponding records in tableB.
If you want rows that appear in exactly one data set and you have a matching key on each table, then you can use a full outer join:
select *
from table1 t1 full outer join
table2 t2
on t1.key = t2.key
where t1.key is null and t2.key is not null or
t1.key is not null and t2.key is null
The where condition chooses the rows where exactly one match.
The problem with this query, though, is that you get lots of columns with nulls. One way to fix this is by going through the columns one by one in the SELECT clause.
select coalesce(t1.key, t2.key) as key, . . .
Another way to solve this problem is to use a union with a window function. This version brings together all the rows and counts the number of times that key appears:
select t.*
from (select t.*, count(*) over (partition by key) as keycnt
from ((select 'Table1' as which, t.*
from table1 t
) union all
(select 'Table2' as which, t.*
from table2 t
)
) t
) t
where keycnt = 1
This has the additional column specifying which table the value comes from. It also has an extra column, keycnt, with the value 1. If you have a composite key, you would just replace with the list of columns specifying a match between the two tables.
I am a little confused as to how to approach this SQL query.
I have two tables (equal number of records), and I would like to return a column with which is the division between the two.
In other words, here is my not-working-correctly query:
SELECT( (SELECT v FROM Table1) / (SELECT DotProduct FROM Table2) );
How would I do this? All I want it a column where each row equals the same row in Table1 divided by the same row in Table2. The resulting table should have the same number of rows, but I am getting something with a lot more rows than the original two tables.
I am at a complete loss. Any advice?
It sounds like you have some kind of key between the two tables. You need an Inner Join:
select t1.v / t2.DotProduct
from Table1 as t1
inner join Table2 as t2
on t1.ForeignKey = t2.PrimaryKey
Should work. Just make sure you watch out for division by zero errors.
You didn't specify the full table structure so I will assume a common ID column to link rows in the tables.
SELECT table1.v/table2.DotProduct
FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2
ON (Table1.ID=Table2.ID)
You need to do a JOIN on the tables and divide the columns you want.
SELECT (Table1.v / Table2.DotProduct) FROM Table1 JOIN Table2 ON something
You need to substitue something to tell SQL how to match up the rows:
Something like: Table1.id = Table2.id
In case your fileds are both integers you need to do this to avoid integer math:
select t1.v / (t2.DotProduct*1.00)
from Table1 as t1
inner join Table2 as t2
on t1.ForeignKey = t2.PrimaryKey
If you have multiple values in table2 relating to values in table1 you need to specify which to use -here I chose the largest one.
select t1.v / (max(t2.DotProduct)*1.00)
from Table1 as t1
inner join Table2 as t2
on t1.ForeignKey = t2.PrimaryKey
Group By t1.v
I am building an application which dynamically generates sql to search for rows of a particular Table (this is the main domain class, like an Employee).
There are three tables Table1, Table2 and Table1Table2Map.
Table1 has a many to many relationship with Table2, and is mapped through Table1Table2Map table. But since Table1 is my main table the relationship is virtually like a one to many.
My app generates a sql which basically gives a result set containing rows from all these tables. The select clause and joins dont change whereas the where clause is generated based on user interaction. In any case I dont want duplicate rows of Table1 in my result set as it is the main table for result display. Right now the query that is getting generated is like this:
select distinct Table1.Id as Id, Table1.Name, Table2.Description from Table1
left outer join Table1Table2Map on (Table1Table2Map.Table1Id = Table1.Id)
left outer join Table2 on (Table2.Id = Table1Table2Map.Table2Id)
For simplicity I have excluded the where clause. The problem is when there are multiple rows in Table2 for Table1 even though I have said distinct of Table1.Id the result set has duplicate rows of Table1 as it has to select all the matching rows in Table2.
To elaborate more, consider that for a row in Table1 with Id = 1 there are two rows in Table1Table2Map (1, 1) and (1, 2) mapping Table1 to two rows in Table2 with ids 1, 2. The above mentioned query returns duplicate rows for this case. Now I want the query to return Table1 row with Id 1 only once. This is because there is only one row in Table2 that is like an active value for the corresponding entry in Table1 (this information is in Mapping table).
Is there a way I can avoid getting duplicate rows of Table1.
I think there is some basic problem in the way I am trying to solve the problem, but I am not able to find out what it is. Thanks in advance.
Try:
left outer join (select distinct YOUR_COLUMNS_HERE ...) SUBQUERY_ALIAS on ...
In other words, don't join directly against the table, join against a sub-query that limits the rows you join against.
You can use GROUP BY on Table1.Id ,and that will get rid off the extra rows. You wouldn't need to worry about any mechanics on join side.
I came up with this solution in a huge query and it this solution didnt effect the query time much.
NOTE : I'm answering this question 3 years after its been asked but this may help someone i believe.
You can re-write your left joins to be outer applies, so that you can use a top 1 and an order by as follows:
select Table1.Id as Id, Table1.Name, Table2.Description
from Table1
outer apply (
select top 1 *
from Table1Table2Map
where (Table1Table2Map.Table1Id = Table1.Id) and Table1Table2Map.IsActive = 1
order by somethingCol
) t1t2
outer apply (
select top 1 *
from Table2
where (Table2.Id = Table1Table2Map.Table2Id)
) t2;
Note that an outer apply without a "top" or an "order by" is exactly equivalent to a left outer join, it just gives you a little more control. (cross apply is equivalent to an inner join).
You can also do something similar using the row_number() function:
select * from (
select distinct Table1.Id as Id, Table1.Name, Table2.Description,
rowNum = row_number() over ( partition by table1.id order by something )
from Table1
left outer join Table1Table2Map on (Table1Table2Map.Table1Id = Table1.Id)
left outer join Table2 on (Table2.Id = Table1Table2Map.Table2Id)
) x
where rowNum = 1;
Most of this doesn't apply if the IsActive flag can narrow down your other tables to one row, but they might come in useful for you.
To elaborate on one point: you said that there is only one "active" row in Table2 per row in Table1. Is that row not marked as active such that you could put it in the where clause? Or is there some magic in the dynamic conditions supplied by the user that determines what's active and what isn't.
If you don't need to select anything from Table2 the solution is relatively simply in that you can use the EXISTS function but since you've put TAble2.Description in the clause I'll assume that's not the case.
Basically what separates the relevant rows in Table2 from the irrelevant ones? Is it an active flag or a dynamic condition? The first row? That's really how you should be removing duplicates.
DISTINCT clauses tend to be overused. That may not be the case here but it sounds like it's possible that you're trying to hack out the results you want with DISTINCT rather than solving the real problem, which is a fairly common problem.
You have to include activity clause into your join (and no need for distinct):
select Table1.Id as Id, Table1.Name, Table2.Description from Table1
left outer join Table1Table2Map on (Table1Table2Map.Table1Id = Table1.Id) and Table1Table2Map.IsActive = 1
left outer join Table2 on (Table2.Id = Table1Table2Map.Table2Id)
If you want to display multiple rows from table2 you will have duplicate data from table1 displayed. If you wanted to you could use an aggregate function (IE Max, Min) on table2, this would eliminate the duplicate rows from table1, but would also hide some of the data from table2.
See also my answer on question #70161 for additional explanation