I couldn't get a response here. So I figured I'd ask on good ol' reliable stackoverflow.
When you do a call to WHMCS, you can override prices for products:
"priceoverride[0]" = 333;
However, this does not work for domains. The documentation states:
"priceoverride - allows you to pass in a custom price override for the product (domains are not products)"
So, how is one supposed to override the domain price. I have certain "premium domains" that cost most than normal domains and I need to be able to include them on an order with their own price.
Therefore... this wont work:
- Creating an invoice for the domain only means there will be two invoices
- Merging the invoices without sending them sounds like a lot of effort for a field that should just be supported for domains as well
How can I get around this?
Hook OrderDomainPricingOverride can help:
http://docs.whmcs.com/Hooks:OrderDomainPricingOverride
As the cart page is being displayed, this hook is run separately for each Domain added to the cart. You can change price for each of them
Related
Requirement:
The business provides a URL in the format as (":category/:name") and against this format, system will have an SKU defined for which PDP needs to be opened without changing the URL.
e.g. for a defined URL -- https://example.com/categoryName/baseProductName and SKU (SKU123) will be configured in backend.
When a customer opens the above URL, the PDP of SKU123 should load where the URL remains the same.
Spartacus code has a constraint that PDP cannot be opened without providing a product code (SKU number) to it. We have tried to override the routing configurations but internally spartacus is redirecting to a 404 page.
In Spartacus Docs(https://sap.github.io/spartacus-docs/route-configuration/) it is mentioned that it is not allowed otherwise functionality will break.
I am looking for a workaround on the same to allow routing config as (":category/:name") and (":category/:name/:productCode") both which seems to be a constraint from Spartacus end. We can feed in the productCode but the URL needs to be as is.
The current PDP functionality should not break.
Spartacus: 1.4.4
SAP Commerce: 1905
that's an interesting question, and not straightforward to solve actually. I'll give you a few pointers to workaround.
First off, Spartacus uses the product code as a unique key in all layers of the application. The code is used in the routing logic, in the store and to load the product from the backend.
Moreover, the code is passed to the CMS, as the CMS is capable to resolve custom page structure per product; you can configure a specific CMS page structure for a specific product code or product category; therefor the product code is passed as an id to the CMS when loading.
To workaround these features you need to configure and override a number of things:
Bring product name into the routing configuration
You can easily do this with the routing configuration, or just by provide a paramsMapping from product.code to product.name. More on this can be found at the docs. Additionally, you could prettify the product name (avoid spaces and other characters to avoid ugly encoding)
Bring the category name into the routing configuration
Before you can configure the router (see 1) for the category name, you need to get the category from the backend. You can do this by normalising the (first) category from the product model. However, by default the product doesn't contain the categories, which is why you'd need to configure the OCC field configuration. It's all described at https://sap.github.io/spartacus-docs/connecting-to-other-systems/. Special attention is required for the SOLR results, as they also need to expose the categories.
Additionally, you could prettify the product name (avoid spaces and other characters to avoid ugly encoding)
Change the product key internally
To ensure that the category name and product name are used instead of the product code to store (ngrx) and load (OCC) the product, you need to trick the system. You can provide a custom implementation of the CurrentProductService, where you'd evaluate if the Router state contains the category name and product name parameters. If those parameters are available, you would concatenate them so that they can later on be reconstructed.
Load product data by category and product name
You could introduce a custom adapter to resolve the product code by it's category and product name, but i'd not recommend this. It would involve an additional API call, and that's expensive. Instead, I would implement a custom backend endpoint, that takes the the category and product name. You could still provide a custom adapter in Spartacus, for deconstructing the concatenated category and product name from step 3, as this would result in a cleaner code base.
Load CMS product page by category and product name
The CMS uses the product code (id) as well to load the right cms structure. You could do 2 things here:
a. use the same pattern from step 4; create custom OCC endpoint to resolve the product code and then load the right CMS product page structure
b. use a static (but existing) product code in a customer OccCmsPageAdapter, to load the same CMS structure for all product pages. This will obviously block existing CMS functionality, but it might be ok. Or at least for your first implementation you can get it to work with this workaround.
Hope that gives you an idea or 2.
All of this being said, I believe this is quite an uncommon requirement. Not that you need pretty URLs and want to use the product name as a unique "code". But using both the category name and product name as a unique key. If possible, I'd try to move into this pattern:
use the product category and product name in the title for SEO purposes (exactly as you require)
only depend on the product code as being the unique property
change the product code structure in the backend; the product.code there are various ways to do this, the idea is that the actual product code could be stored in an alternative field, and the generated (based on name) product.code in the native code field.
all application logic (UIs, APIs, SOLR, Spartacus) will transparently use the product name as the unique key.
I am thinking of modifying the authorization feature of Prestashop, wherein multiple shops can share customers even when shops are not within the same group. For example, when a customer logs in the default shop, after checking out his cart he can go to the next shop without the need to relogin again. More convenient for the customers, I think.
My question is, will that pose any security threat or any other disadvantage to my shops and to my customers? As of now I can't think of any, but I want to know the point of view of PS experts first before I dive into the codes.
And btw, if I am to start editing my shop, is there any method that I can use so that I dont need to edit the core codes?
Use prestashop's override if you really need to change core
http://doc.prestashop.com/display/PS15/Overriding+default+behaviors
I'm planning a new Shopify project, and the site requires a different shipping cost depending on the postal area of a postcode (e.g. SE1, N7). The plan was to manually add different shipping options inside of Shopify, then AJAX GET /cart/shipping_rates.json, and manually filter to the correct shipping rate by matching the name to postal area.
But my question is -- is there any way to carry over this shipping method to the Checkout as a selected option, and hide the Shipping Method drop-down from the checkout to prevent them choosing a different the shipping cost?
... Or, ideally, is there a way for me to directly override shipping costs through the API?
I don't know of any onboard functionality, which can facilitate this.
But there is a quite hacky workaround, that I use to filter the shipping rates in the checkout page.
Through the "Additional Google Analytics Javascript" field you can sneak a JS on every page of the shop, including the checkout. Here you can basically manipulate the shipping rates as you like.
In your case, the code must be aware of the shipping_address zip code. You can try to set a cookie on the first checkout page and then read the same cookie on the second.
Unfortunately, this isn’t possible with Shopify’s existing checkout.
I'm working on a store that has two types of products: perishable food and general merchandise. The food must always be shipped overnight via FedEx, and the other merchandise must always be shipped via USPS. If somebody orders products from both categories, they must be shipped separately.
Do you know of an existing module or configuration settings that would allow for this?
If not, it sounds like a custom module would be the other solution. In this case, what is the best approach? I'm thinking it would be splitting the order into a multi-address shipment, using the same address for both but with different shipping methods. Unfortunately I'm not sure how to do this programatically, so any tutorials/samples/resources would be greatly appreciated.
Probably the sanest way to handle this would be to create two orders per product type, each shipping with a different carrier to the same address. This also IMO makes more sense from a stores tracking perspective as you can handle each independently from each other.
To get you on the right track(since Magento is especially cryptic in this part of itself) you should read the Inchoo programmatically create order in Magento post and by the same author Programatically create customer and order in Magento with full blown one page checkout.
Basically as I see this going is:
Get the customer order
Itinerate through each product inside the order and split it up in two arrays for each product type
Create a separate order for each product type and use the different shipping methods for each.
You will probably have to extend a some controllers OR do it the non-standard way and use helper functions for this, the hard parts will be integrating the payment/shipping modules inside your order process. Going this way will have you creating the full checkout process as the one page checkout Magento provides won't really work and is too much pain to get to work because of the way it uses AJAX.
Also another alternative is to hook in to Magento's pre-create order events and create the orders there using already defined order data split it up in two orders, but this is something I never heard or saw implemented at the moment so you'd have to do it "blindfolded" so to speak.
An easier approach would be to use a custom field that defines your product's shipping method, this way you just add that and don't care about custom orders. You just react with that, however tracking will become mostly impossible IMO.
Over-ride the Free Shipping module.
You can setup a sales rule that applies to certain products and makes them 'Free Shipping', leaving the other products to your chosen main shipment provider.
You will need to see how this works, however, the point is that Magento does have something built in to split an order into two shipping categories, albeit only a sales rule on free shipping. But you have source code...
I am implementing Google analytics onto a ecommerce site. We are already tracking events like adding to cart, removing etc using the event tracking. I would like to know what is the ideal time to use the ecommerce tracking apis (addTrans & addItem). Here are my questions:
Should I call these functions for each product being added to cart?
Should I call these functions only when the payment is complete and them while displaying receipt screen?
What is the ideal way of implementation? please provide best practices if possible.
Thanks in advance
I would track few things,
1.How many got into payment form and failed to buy, which can indicate to you that something wrong with payments or page itself. Count number of visitors in checkout - number of orders.
2.How many users got into site and haven't added at least one product, which will indicate that something wrong with advertisement, landing page or website layout in general. Number of unique visitors - those who added at least one item.
Adding statistics for each product added to cart shows you what? If users buy certain product you can get that this product is most wanted but in cart means noting imho. As for your second question, i would implement my solutions written above.
I wonder if your customers should go to an externally hosted page to make a payment. If they do, then GA tracking will not show you the real source of your profitable traffic - it will show you the payment processor page as the source.
It is recommended, or at least suggested, that you place the eCommerce tracking that includes the _trackTrans call on the "Thank You" or "Confirmation" stage of your checkout process.
Also, it's worth noting that if the user refreshes that page that the tracking is on then the code will be fired again and you may see skewed figures in Google Analytics.
I was like you, I also implemented the event tracking first but I wanted to get a chance to implement the ecommerce tracking to get some $ data in there to browse. So, on the developers page. One of the examples is on the reciept page, but on my implementation that wasn't going to work since I am use a payment API. So, On my checkout page I setup the parent transaction. using :
_gaq.push(['_addTrans',
'1234', // transaction ID - required
'Acme Clothing', // affiliation or store name
'11.99', // total - required
'1.29', // tax
'5', // shipping
'San Jose', // city
'California', // state or province
'USA' // country
]);
Then when I am listing my items in the cart, I use PHP and a foreach to dump each item, sku, price per item and quantity into the parent level transaction like this :
_gaq.push(['_addItem',
'1234', // transaction ID - required
'DD44', // SKU/code - required
'T-Shirt', // product name
'Green Medium', // category or variation
'11.99', // unit price - required
'1' // quantity - required
]);
For the last step in the process, I send transaction data to my merchant processing (paypal) via the SOAP api and get numerous responses back. I do different stuff based on the response I get back. If there is no error from the JSON response I get an COMPLETED response, at that point is when I fire the :
_gaq.push(['_trackTrans']);
I'm not really sure if this is the true way to go about it, but it makes sense to me.