We have a large app built using VB.NET VS2012. Every now and then when closing the app an unhandled exception occurs. Very random, sometimes it does it sometimes it doesn't.
The error is below.
System.InvalidOperationException was unhandled
HResult=-2146233079
Message=Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.
Source=System.Windows.Forms
StackTrace:
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
at System.Windows.Forms.Control.BeginInvoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
at System.Windows.Forms.WindowsFormsSynchronizationContext.Post(SendOrPostCallback d, Object state)
at System.Windows.Forms.AxHost.ConnectionPointCookie.Finalize()
InnerException:
We produce a dump file to try and find where this is originating but have had no luck. The debugger just shows No source code available. We are using some third-party controls. At this point we just want to find what is trying to create the control. If its a problem with the third party control and if we don't have that code, we can't fix it but maybe we can work around it. But we can't find what is trying to create control (when shutting down).
We have reviewed many web posts describing how to utilize the crash dump files but have had no luck identifying the control (or even the control type) that is generating this.. Just knowing the type would help narrow it down.
Any ideas how we can at least get the type of control or the originating caller or?
If enough info isn't provided please let me know and I will post what I can.
Posting code is not an option because we have no idea where the message is coming from.
Thanks in advance!
I should have added that we do use try catch blocks for just about everything. We also do have a logging procedure but we arent seeing any of these exceptions in the log file.
Related
My main program is an ASP.Net Core Web API that has a third party library in a hosted service. The third party library is initializing fine but then it throws some errors sometime throughout its lifecycle.
It supplies a way of hooking into the object via an event and will let me know what the error is so that I can handle it but it still throws in the third party library..
Since I am handling the event myself, I want to completely ignore these errors that are occurring in this library. Is there anyway that I can do that?
I have already tried to add a global exception handler and the strange thing is, this exception handler never gets hit. The only way I can get the exception is to set my exception settings to break when CLR exceptions happen like in the picture above
This does not crash my program. For some reason, the program just hangs. When I turn off CLR exceptions in the "Break when thrown" window, then the program runs just fine. It is almost like visual studio is doing something special to handle these types of exceptions that a console version cannot do
The only way that I can seem to get a console version of this running, is attach a visual studio debugger to the process and when the exception is hit, press the green play button "Continue" in visual studio. Otherwise the application just seems to hang on the exception being thrown by the third party library.
The application will run fine as long as visual studio is attached and the CLR break exceptions are not checked
Does anyone know how to make sure that these types of exceptions do not hang the program when released?
Additional Info:
The third party library is a .NET Framework 4 library
The Asp.Net project is targetting "net5.0-windows"
The 3rd party class is probably using multi-threading
if it helps, this is how I am creating the third party class
Handling NullReferenceException in release code（Official advice）
It's usually better to avoid a NullReferenceException than to handle it after it occurs. Handling an exception can make your code harder to maintain and understand, and can sometimes introduce other bugs. A NullReferenceException is often a non-recoverable error. In these cases, letting the exception stop the app might be the best alternative.
However, there are many situations where handling the error can be useful:
1.Your app can ignore objects that are null. For example, if your app retrieves and processes records in a database, you might be able to ignore some number of bad records that result in null objects. Recording the bad data in a log file or in the application UI might be all you have to do.
2.You can recover from the exception. For example, a call to a web service that returns a reference type might return null if the connection is lost or the connection times out. You can attempt to reestablish the connection and try the call again.
3.You can restore the state of your app to a valid state. For example, you might be performing a multi-step task that requires you to save information to a data store before you call a method that throws a NullReferenceException. If the uninitialized object would corrupt the data record, you can remove the previous data before you close the app.
4.You want to report the exception. For example, if the error was caused by a mistake from the user of your app, you can generate a message to help them supply the correct information. You can also log information about the error to help you fix the problem. Some frameworks, like ASP.NET, have a high-level exception handler that captures all errors to that the app never crashes; in that case, logging the exception might be the only way you can know that it occurs.
So after days of research I've finally found an event to hook into to give you error messages from ANY source no matter how many level deep you go in threads.
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FirstChanceException += CurrentDomain_FirstChanceException;
Hooking into this event it will allow you to see errors from every library and every thread. Simply place the above into you program.cs (or whatever startup file you have) and magically you will be flooded with all of the unknown errors from all of the 3rd party libraries you thought were once flawless.
private static void CurrentDomain_FirstChanceException(object sender, System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.FirstChanceExceptionEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.Exception.Message, e.Exception.StackTrace);
}
I've done so with the following method and low and behold. The third party library was trying to reference another project in an unsafe way and throwing an error. Since I didn't need this other project reference the built exe did not have a reference to this assembly because I had no direct reference to it in the project (darn smarty pants who need to optimize everything). I was able to run correctly because in my visual studio solution, I had a reference to this other project. So the third party library would pick up on it as soon as visual studio connected with the debugger through some sort of dark magic.
Anyways, I made a throw away object that used the project that was required and the issue was solved.
I really hope that this helps someone else and saves them the days it took me to find this.
I have a function in vb.net that is shared. At one point it throws an error that says an 'open datareader already exists'. But this function is called from several different places in the program. How can I find out which part of the program called the function when it errors out?
You go to the Debug menu, show the Exceptions window, put a tick next to CLR exceptions and then run your program until it errors. As soon as the exception is raised VS will break, you will be able to see the call stack, and find out where the code was before. Note that this causes VS to stop on every exception, handled or not; it can become tedious to get to where you want to be - untick the "always break when this type of exception is thrown" in the exception helper if you just keep getting irrelevant exceptions breaking before this error you're trying to chase
It sounds like you're perhaps not creating/disposing of your DB access resources properly, especially if this is a static/shared context. Are you trying to reuse one DB connection? It wouldn't hurt to post the code of the faulting module
My goal is to influence the error descriptions that appear in BizTalk Administration Console in the Error Information tab of suspended instance windows, after errors occur in my custom functoids. If possible, I would also like the ErrorReport.Description promoted property to display this error description on the failed message.
I've read everything I can find about custom functoid development, but I can't find much about error handling within them. In particular, whenever my functoids throw exceptions, I see the boilerplate "Exception has been thrown at the target of an invocation" message that occurs whenever exceptions occur through reflection, rather than the message on the exception itself.
I had hoped to find something within the BaseFunctoid class framework that would allow me to submit an error string, so as to traverse the reflection boundary. Is there some way to pass error information from within a custom functoid, such that the BizTalk Administration Console will display it?
If I emulate the approach taken by DatabaseLookupFunctoid and DatabaseErrorExtractFunctoid, is there some way I can fail the map with the extracted error, rather than mapping it to a field on the destination schema as is shown in its examples?
The simplest way to do this is using custom C#, writing something like this in your code:
System.Diagnostics.EventLog.WriteEntry("EVENT_LOG_SOURCE", "Error message...", System.Diagnostics.EventLogEntryType.Error);
As Johns-305 mentions, you need to make sure your event source is registered (e.g. System.Diagnostics.EventLog.CreateEventSource("EVENT_LOG_SOURCE", "Application") - but this should really be done as part of your installation steps with an EventLogInstaller or some kind of script to set up the environment). It's certainly true that error handling in BizTalk is just .NET error handling, but one thing to keep in mind is that maps are actually executing as XSLT, and the context in which their executing can have a major impact on how exceptions and errors will be handled, particularly unhandled exceptions.
Orchestrations
If you're executing a transform in an orchestration that has exception handling in it, the exception thrown will be handled and may even fall into additional logging you have in the orchestration - in other words, executing a throw from a C# functiod will work the way you'd think it would work elsewhere in C#. However, I try to avoid this since you never know if a map will at some point be used else where and because exception handling in XSLT doesn't always work the way you'd think (see below).
Send/Receive Ports
Unfortunately, if you're executing a map on a send or receive port and throw an exception within it, you will almost definitely get very unhelpful error message in the event log and a suspended instance in the group hub. There is no easy, straightforward way to simple "cancel" a transform - XSLT 1.0 doesn't have any specified way of doing that (see for example Throwing an exception from XSLT). That leaves you with outputting an error string to a particular node in the output (and/or to the EventLog), or writing lots of completely custom XSLT to try to validate input, or designing your schemas properly and using a validating component where necessary. For example, if you have a node that must match a particular regex, or should never be empty, or should never repeat more than X times, make sure you set those restrictions on the schema and then make sure you pass it through the XmlValidator or similar before attempting to map.
The simplest answer is, you just do.
Keep in mind, there is nothing special at all about error handling in BizTalk apps, it's just regular plain old .Net error handling.
So, what you do is catch the error in you code, write the details to the Windows Event Log (be sure to create a custom Event Source) and...that's it. That is all I do. I don't worry about what appear in BT Admin specifically.strong text
Could someone provide info about error-handling in wxWidgets or a pointer to documentation?
Specifically, I discovered this behavior: I try to create a wxImage from a file. This is in an event-handler. The file is not present. The call to the image constructor does not throw an exception. (I understand that no wxWidgets code throws exceptions.) A call to image.Ok() returns false. Fine. But after my event-handler exits, wxWidgets gratuitously pops up an error message dialog. That's okay for this particular application, but I wonder how to stop that from happening if I want to handle the error myself. I suspect that the dialog is coming from an event-handler, but I search for things like EVT_ERROR, and came up empty.
There is the class wxLogNull for suppressing those log messages. See http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxlognull.html#wxlognull where also an example is given.
Read the wxLog overview for more details on how wxWidgets handles this.
You can define your own log target which would throw an exception if an error message is logged. Of course, then you'd probably need to catch it in your event handler anyhow as you probably don't want to just give the user a relatively useless "File couldn't be opened" message but rather a "Image couldn't be opened" one. And if you do this, then why not just test for file.IsOk() directly and use wxLogError() yourself? IOW you can do what you want but I don't really see how is it better than the traditional exception-less way of doing things in this particular case.
've been running through the MSDN help documents to get a hang of Visual Basic. After trying out the example using timers --one drags a label and timer component into the designer and adds the following to the components subroutine
Label1.Text = My.Computer.Clock.LocalTime.ToLongTimeString
The output for the immediate window during debug is the following
A first chance exception of type
'System.InvalidCastException' occured
in Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
A first
chance exception of type
'System.InvalidCastException' occured
in Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
The same error occurs on a previous MSDN example using a context menu component. Should I Try...Catch...Finally this error and try to move on? Or, am I dealing with something much more serious?
When you see something about a first chance exception, it only means that an exception was caught within the code you called but does not necessarily mean that the code failed. If the code runs without causing your program to crash and returns a valid value, then do not have a problem. You will also see output in the debug window about first chance exceptions when you implement your own try/catch blocks.
In the Debug menu -> Exceptions, you can enable the debugger to stop when an Exception is first thrown, even if it would be caught later; if you want to find out what's happening, this is the easiest way to do it
In the first chance exception examine the details of the exception. You should see a stack frame/trace property. In there you should see what line the error occurs on. This should help you.
In the IDE try going to Tools > Options > Projects and Solutions > VB Defaults and setting Option Strict to 'On' - this may help catch casting problems when you compile your project rather than when you run it.
A 'first chance execption' does not necessarily mean you have a problem in your code. It could mean the IDE or the compiler or any other involved component encountered and handled an error and in the process the debugger is notified and the exception is being reported to the immediate window. This is an excellent post on the topic:
http://blogs.msdn.com/davidklinems/archive/2005/07/12/438061.aspx
A quick and easy solution for debug and diag of First Chance Exception is :
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FirstChanceException += CurrentDomainOnFirstChanceException;
and then
private void CurrentDomainOnFirstChanceException(object sender, FirstChanceExceptionEventArgs firstChanceExceptionEventArgs)
{
if (firstChanceExceptionEventArgs.Exception is NullReferenceException)
{
// do your handling and debugging :)
}
}
Multiple First Chance Exception during the runtime can cripple the performance of your application because exception handling is expensive. Especially in web apps. You can add this handler and look at specific first chance exceptions and try to avoid/correct them.