I need to create a result set in phalcon and use it as it was an array.
Im trying to find an example or more info on the documentation but it seems it's not possible.
On the API you can see the contructor params, this one is for a Resultset/Simple
public function __construct($columnMap, $model, $result, \Phalcon\Cache\BackendInterface $cache=null, $keepSnapshots=null){ }
an example:
$robot = new Robot();
$robots = new Resultset(null, $robot, $robot->getReadConnection()->query($sql, $params));
You must take in consideration that the Resultset is not a collection, it is a traversable pointer to the database conecction. There is a post where the team will consider to add more "collection" functionalities to the object: https://github.com/phalcon/cphalcon/issues/10580
Related
NOTE: If you do know that the below is not possible, this information is just as valuable.
Im checking out HotChocolate and Ive looked into the dynamic schemas
I have taken the code in your Github-example This works ok. I have extended our Product-type like so:
//Same json as in your Github-sample, new properties are "color" and some more
foreach (var field in type.GetProperty("fields").EnumerateArray())
{
string name = field.GetString();
typeDefinition.Fields.Add(new ObjectFieldDefinition(field.GetString()!, type: TypeReference.Parse("String"), pureResolver: ctx =>
{
var product = ctx.Parent<Product>();
return product.SubTypeSpecific.ContainsKey(name) ? product.SubTypeSpecific[name] : null;
}));
}
now I have "moved out" dynamic properties from a Dictionary (That is a sub-object in my documentDb) to own properties. Works well.
BUT:
How can I extend my ProductFilter in the same fashion?
I would like to extend my current Product-filter so its possible to search on the new dynamic property "color"
getProducts(where : color : {eq :"blue" }}) {...}
I can create new FilterInputDefinition, but not extend existing filter (because there is no FilterInputTypeExtensions.CreateUnsafe()
If I manage to create the new filter, is there any way to update the IQueryable-generation so that the inputed color ("blue")
So the query to my CosmosDb will be created automatically?
Many thanks in advance.
I've set up Yii2 REST API with custom actions and everything is working just fine. However, what I'm trying to do is return some data from the API which would include database relations set by foreign keys. The relations are there and they are actually working correctly. Here's an example query in one of the controllers:
$result = \app\models\Person::find()->joinWith('fKCountry', true)
->where(..some condition..)->one();
Still in the controller, I can, for example, call something like this:
$result->fKCountry->name
and it would display the appropriate name as the relation is working. So far so good, but as soon as I return the result return $result; which is received from the API clients, the fkCountry is gone and I have no way to access the name mentioned above. The only thing that remains is the value of the foreign key that points to the country table.
I can provide more code and information but I think that's enough to describe the issue. How can I encode the information from the joined data in the return so that the API clients have access to it as well?
Set it up like this
public function actionYourAction() {
return new ActiveDataProvider([
'query' => Person::find()->with('fKCountry'), // and the where() part, etc.
]);
}
Make sure that in your Person model the extraFields function includes fKCountry. If you haven't implemented the extraFields function yet, add it:
public function extraFields() {
return ['fKCountry'];
}
and then when you call the url make sure you add the expand param to tell the action you want to include the fkCountry data. So something like:
/yourcontroller/your-action?expand=fKCountry
I managed to solve the above problem.
Using ActiveDataProvider, I have 3 changes in my code to make it work.
This goes to the controller:
Model::find()
->leftJoin('table_to_join', 'table1.id = table_to_join.table1_id')
->select('table1.*, table_to_join.field_name as field_alias');
In the model, I introduced a new property with the same name as the above alias:
public $field_alias;
Still in the model class, I modified the fields() method:
public function fields()
{
$fields = array_merge(parent::fields(), ['field_alias']);
return $fields;
}
This way my API provides me the data from the joined field.
use with for Eager loading
$result = \app\models\Person::find()->with('fKCountry')
->where(..some condition..)->all();
and then add the attribute 'fkCountry' to fields array
public function fields()
{
$fields= parent::fields();
$fields[]='fkCountry';
return $fields;
}
So $result now will return a json array of person, and each person will have attribute fkCountry:{...}
I am new to Dojo, I am using QueryReadStore as the store for loading my TreeGrid, working fine. But the QueryReadStore appends some paramters to the url, parameters like parentId, count, sort etc., I have looked at this link http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.7/dojox/data/QueryReadStore.html, but not able to understand.
Parameters are getting passed like this servlet/DataHandler?start=0&count=25
How to manipulate the parameters, like I want to set the value for parentId paramters so that I only get that particular row details.
In theory you wold have to create a new class by extending the "dojox.data.QueryReadStore", in the link you posted have an example for doing exactly what you want. See if you get it now(changed a bit):
dojo.require("dojox.data.QueryReadStore");
dojo.declare("custom.MyReadStore", dojox.data.QueryReadStore, {
fetch:function(request){
//append here your custom parameters:
var qs = {p1:"This is parameter 1",
q:request.query.name
}
request.serverQuery = qs;
// Call superclasses' fetch
return this.inherited("fetch", arguments);
}
});
So When come to create the QueryReadStore you actually create a object with the class you defined. something like this:
var queryReadStore = new custom.MyReadStore({args...})
Explore the request parameter passed to the function to see what else you can do.
More specifically in Raven DB, I want to create a generic method with a signature like;
public void Clear<T>() {...
Then have Raven DB clear all documents of the given type.
I understand from other posts by Ayende to similar questions that you'd need an index in place to do this as a batch.
I think this would involve creating an index that maps each document type - this seems like a lot of work.
Does anyone know an efficient way of creating a method like the above that will do a set delete directly in the database?
I assume you want to do this from the .NET client. If so, use the standard DocumentsByEntityName index:
var indexQuery = new IndexQuery { Query = "Tag:" + collectionName };
session.Advanced.DocumentStore.DatabaseCommands.DeleteByIndex(
"Raven/DocumentsByEntityName",
indexQuery,
new BulkOperationOptions { AllowStale = true });
var hilo = session.Advanced.DocumentStore.DatabaseCommands.Get("Raven/Hilo/", collectionName);
if (hilo != null) {
session.Advanced.DocumentStore.DatabaseCommands.Delete(hilo.Key, hilo.Etag);
}
Where collectionName is the actual name of your collection.
The first operation deletes the items. The second deletes the HiLo file.
Also check out the official documentation - How to delete or update documents using index.
After much experimentation I found the answer to be quite simple, although far from obvious;
public void Clear<T>()
{
session.Advanced.DocumentStore.DatabaseCommands.PutIndex(indexName, new IndexDefinitionBuilder<T>
{
Map = documents => documents.Select(entity => new {})
});
session.Advanced.DatabaseCommands.DeleteByIndex(indexName, new IndexQuery());
}
Of course you almost certainly wouldn't define your index and do your delete in one go, I've put this as a single method for the sake of brevity.
My own implementation defines the indexes on application start as recommended by the documentation.
If you wanted to use this approach to actually index a property of T then you would need to constrain T. For example if I have an IEntity that all my document classes inherit from and this class specifies a property Id. Then a 'where T : IEntity' would allow you to use that property in the index.
It's been said in other places, but it's also worth noting that once you define a static index Raven will probably use it, this can cause your queries to seemingly not return data that you've inserted:
RavenDB Saving to disk query
I had this problem as well and this is the solution that worked for me. I'm only working in a test project, so this might be slow for a bigger db, but Ryan's answer didn't work for me.
public static void ClearDocuments<T>(this IDocumentSession session)
{
var objects = session.Query<T>().ToList();
while (objects.Any())
{
foreach (var obj in objects)
{
session.Delete(obj);
}
session.SaveChanges();
objects = session.Query<T>().ToList();
}
}
You can do that using:
http://blog.orangelightning.co.uk/?p=105
i want to use zend_db standalone cos zend framework is too much for my project but i'm new with it,
is it correct to do this:
$pdoParams = array(PDO::MYSQL_ATTR_INIT_COMMAND => 'SET NAMES
UTF8;');
$params = array(
'host' => 'localhost',
'username' => 'ss_fraat',
'password' => 'jos10',
'dbname' => '_a2hDB',
'driver_options' => $pdoParams
);
try {
$db = Zend_Db::factory('PDO_MYSQL', $params);
//set default adapter
Zend_Db_Table_Abstract::setDefaultAdapter($db);
} catch (Exception $e) {
exit($e->getMessage());
}
//save Db in registry for later use
Zend_Registry::set('dbAdapter', $db);
then in any class do this:
$db = Zend_Registry::get('db');
/** quote to avoid sql injection */
$date = $db->quote('1980-01-01');
$sql = 'SELECT * FROM product WHERE name = ' . $date;
$result = $db->query($sql);
$db->query(); //run a query
i really need to do this
Zend_Db_Table_Abstract::setDefaultAdapter($db);
i get this code from a website,
is it necessary to use Zend_Db_Table_Abstract if i'm not using the full zend framework,
or it is better for example to use this:
$db = Zend_Db::factory( ...options... );
$select = new Zend_Db_Select($db);
what i want is to setup a pdo/mysql connexion in my bootstrap php page and be able to get that db instance in any class without starting a new connexion to execute queries but i'm not sure how to do that use Zend_Db_Table_Abstract or Zend_Db_Select use the registry Zend_Registry::set('dbAdapter', $db) or not
thanks a lot
The purpose of Zend_Db_Table_Abstract is so you can create your own model classes based around the Table Data Gateway design pattern. The idea of that pattern is that you have a class that encapsulates all the sql you would need for interfacing with a table. So the assumption is that you will be creating model classes that extend Zend_Db_Table_Abstract for each table. If you are going to do that, then you will want to call Zend_Db_Table_Abstract::setDefaultAdapter($db) in your setup/bootstrap. Recent versions of ZF provide as an alternative a quick way of getting basic functionality without having to create a custom class definition by just instantiating Zend_Db_Table:
$userTable = new Zend_Db_Table('users');
In summary, none of this particularly has to do with the MVC part of the framework, although some people choose to use Zend_db as the basis for db connections and models, instead of using a more fully featured ORM like Doctrine or Propel.
The other code you provided simply illustrates that you do not need to use Zend_Db_Table_Abstract either -- you can simply setup an instance of a Zend_Db_Adapter and use that instance to call query() or its other methods.