I'm facing a really strange problem.
I have an application built in C++ Builder 2010. This application reads and writes a bit to the registry. Since it's a 32-bit application these keys end up in the wow6432Node. Every now and then it has appeared as though it has trouble reading the values from the registry. But only when build on the build server (using TeamCity) and never on the dev machines. Often a new commit and a rebuild would make the issue go away so it was hard to diagnose.
After some testing I noticed that I was able to reproduce it on the dev machine to. But only when building from the command line by calling msbuild manually. If the exact same project is built within the IDE there are no issues. But the exe produced when building from the command line, for some reason, can't read values from the registry.
There are no errors or warnings during builds. No files it can't find due to invalid paths or anything like that. Since msbuild is, as far as I can tell, used by the IDE when building to this has me scratching my head. I have tried to manually use different versions of msbuild etc, but nothing works.
So basically, on the same machine, my produced exe behaves differently depending on if I manually started the build from the command line or if the IDE started the build.
What on earth could this be?
After spending a lot of time trying to force the application to use specific registry views etc I was encouraged to look into the UAC manifest settings. I found that the application did in fact have a manifest file, named correctly and in the correct spot. It was also included in the .cbproj file and compiled by the resource compiler.
But, something got me thinking that perhaps it's not being used correctly. After some digging it seems like if runtime themes is enabled for the project that will create a "default" application manifest that will be used.
Disabling runtime themes will allow the compiler to actually use your custom application maniftest file (not exactly well documented, but I have found that to be the case with a lot of Embarcaderos things). By doing this I was able to set the required execution level for the application and things started to work just fine.
You can still manually enable the support for runtime themes in the maniftest file you create. You forms might look a bit strange in the ide since that will think that runtime themes are disabled.
To manually add runtime theme support you add the dependency to your custom application maniftest.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
...
<dependency>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity
type="win32"
name="Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls"
version="6.0.0.0"
publicKeyToken="6595b64144ccf1df"
language="*"
processorArchitecture="*"
/>
</dependentAssembly>
</dependency>
...
</assembly>
Save it as Foo.exe.manifest, where Foo.exe is your application name.
You then create a .rc file for your application. For instance FooManifest.rc
#define MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID 1
#define RT_MANIFEST 24
MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID RT_MANIFEST "Foo.exe.manifest"
Now you will be able to build your application using your own custom application manifest and still maintain support for runtime themes.
Related
I have a project file that should build another solution. I tried using the MSBuild task for this, like this:
<MSBuild Projects="MySolution.sln" Properties="Configuration=$(Configuration)"/>
I tried a lot of variants, like supplying hardcoded configuration, target Rebuild and so on. Building reports an error when I pass a wrong solution name, non-existing configuration or target and so on, so it definitely loads the solution and the project files. It exits relatively fast though and produces no output. According to documentation and examples, this should work though. I also tried passing an ItemGroup for the project, including project-specific properties as suggested by examples or in MSBuild - How to build a .NET solution file (in an XML task script) from pre-written command line commands , but that does not work either. It runs without error but no output.
When passing a list of project files instead (or a single project file), it builds correctly, but the problem is that dependencies between the projects are not properly resolved. At the end, I have to supply all project files in the solution and add them to the list, which is what I want to avoid.
So, why does solution building not work, even though it should? What is wrong here?
Is this a .net project? If so you probably need to pass in a platform as well as a configuration.
<MSBuild
Projects="MySolution.sln"
Targets="build"
Properties="Configuration=$(Configuration);Platform=$(Platform)" />
If the project just contains web sites and libraries then the platform should be Any CPU if your solution just contains executables then x86 or x64 or if it's a mixture of different types of platform then you can use mixed platforms
To check what are available open the solution in Visual Studio, right click on the solution in solution explorer and select "Configuration Manager" you'll then have a drop down for "Active Solution Platforms"
I am working on a vb.net application that uses SQLite and since it was compiled against the version 2 of the .net framework, i added this line to my config file
<startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0"/>
</startup>
My final objective for the application is to make it a standalone, so not a single file except the exe (well the application will generate a file for the database, but my point is i want the user to only download 1 single file).
And i noticed that when i build it, the config file is always copied, and if i run the application without the config file, i would get the uncaught exception "legacy" error..
Is there any way to either include that config during runtime? or perhaps catch some type of exception to prevent that dialog from showing up and scaring the user (i know this probably not the best approach)
I have searched and found other similar problems on SO but none of the questions i found got to a solution that worked for me so i would appreciate your help.
While it is possible to set the legacy runtime policy at runtime, I would recommend deploying as an installer.
well the application will generate a file for the database, but my point is i want the user to only download 1 single file
They could download your installer, which could take care of setting up everything correctly. This is likely to be required in any case, as SQLite will need its own DLLs as well as your .exe to be there in the deployment.
We have a ASP.NET MVC with 4-5 different build configurations. Whenever we change the build configuration, we need to delete the obj folder for the web project, since we get the 'allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' error. A pain, but we managed by deleting the folder in pre/post build events.
Now I need to configure our CI to build deployment packages. This means that I cannot delete the obj folder. Every time I compile e.g. with the following msbuild parameters
/p:CreatePackageOnPublish=true /p:DeployOnBuild=true
I recieve the error:
web.config(123): error ASPCONFIG: It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.
As far as I understand, the problem is that there's multiple .config files in the project - In our case, there's not. I could really use some help to find an explanation and find a permanent (no- hack) fix.
Edit:
This question is marked as a duplicate, but the corresponding answers and cause(s) in the 2 threads, are clearly different from each other. Not sure what is intended with this tag - I've read that particular post before posting this question, as it didn't answer my question. There's multiple causes for this error message. It is 'similar', but definitely not a duplicate!
There is a similar question here on SO with some good solutions for this issue.
The problem is that building a deployment package creates a copy of the web.config in a subfolder of /obj. That will normally be be cleared out if you do a rebuild or a clean. However, if you build a deployment package in one configuration (e.g. Debug) and then switch to another confguration (e.g. Release) the obj/Debug folder is not cleared out and the web.config file there causes problems.
The quick solution is to clean all configurations and then do a (re)build. Alternatively you could delete the /obj folder in your project.
To permanently resolve the issue you can either move the intermediate output (/obj) out of your project folder or modify the project to force a clean of all configurations on rebuild.
I too was deleting the obj folder until I had a conflict with a build script which required it. Catch-22, I used the accepted answer on the following SO link to move the location of the Obj folder to C:\Temp\BUILD. You have to do it per csproj file, but it is a great solution.
Here is the link: VisualStudio: How to save the obj folder somewhere else
Note that I am using a variable for the project name.
R:\Temp\Build\Debug\$(MSBuildProjectName)
I have the above line in both debug and release sections for all my projects, including class projects. My build path is a ram drive for speed. See this SO for more info: How to access macro variables within csproj file?
I just answered a similar question here. To recap, I ran into this problem in one of our MVC projects, and it was due to having the MvcBuildViews property in the project file set to true. Setting the property to false fixed the problem.
<MvcBuildViews>false</MvcBuildViews>
I also found this answer which outlines an alternative that does not require turning off view building.
I don't know that there is an "official" fix as it just seemed to start on multiple projects of mine for no reason that I can find in Visual Studio Premium 2012 (never happened in previous versions of VS).
As a work around to automate the deletion of the obj directory as others have said, similar to an answer by user Casual in this post VisualStudio: How to save the obj folder somewhere else, where unfortunately just moving the location of the obj folder didn't always seem to work.
Instead I added a few commands under Build Events in the Pre-build event command line:
rd "$(ProjectDir)obj" /S /Q
md "$(ProjectDir)obj"
md "$(ProjectDir)obj\Debug"
md "$(ProjectDir)obj\Release"
You can change/add/remove subfolders to match your custom build configurations using the line where buildConfigName matches the name of the build configuration you are using:
md "$(ProjectDir)obj\buildConfigName"
Hope this helps!
That error indicates that you are trying to something specific to an application at an IIS tree level that isn't defined as an application. For example if you try to do app-level functions in a web.config in a virtual directory, you will get that error. You need to find the path you are deploying to and make sure that it is defined in IIS as an application vs a folder or vdir.
Cleaning the solution (Right click Solution in VS, clean), worked for me.
I had the same error but with a deployed page.. Then realized my webserver's clock was set back to 2010 for some reason. set it to the correct date fix my problem
Clean your project
Remove the /obj folder (probably using publish and deploy? - there is a bug in it)
Althoug the problem is explained and solved in one way in the accepted answer, I wanted to show a solution which can be better for other cases. This solution has been included in some version of VS, but I can only say that I had the problem in VS 2013 Update 5. (See the "Beware" below, it could be fixed in this version, but not working only in my particular case).
I borrowed the soltuion from Error: allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level on Visual Studio Connect.
The solution consist in including these lines to the web application project (.csproj file) which handle the deletion of the offedning intermediate files (which wans't a solution for the accepted answer, as he needed those intermediate files):
<!--Deal with http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/779737/error-allowdefinition-machinetoapplication-beyond-application-level,
we will need to clean up our temp folder before MVC project starts the pre-compile-->
<PropertyGroup>
<_EnableCleanOnBuildForMvcViews Condition=" '$(_EnableCleanOnBuildForMvcViews)'=='' ">true</_EnableCleanOnBuildForMvcViews>
</PropertyGroup>
<Target Name="CleanupForBuildMvcViews" Condition=" '$(_EnableCleanOnBuildForMvcViews)'=='true' and '$(MVCBuildViews)'=='true' " BeforeTargets="MvcBuildViews">
<ItemGroup>
<_PublishTempFolderNamesToCleanup Include="Database;TransformWebConfig;CSAutoParameterize;InsertAdditionalCS;ProfileTransformWebConfig;Package;AspnetCompileMerge" />
</ItemGroup>
<!--Force msbuild to expand all the wildcard characters so to get real file paths-->
<CreateItem Include="#(_PublishTempFolderNamesToCleanup->'$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)**\%(identity)\**\*')">
<Output TaskParameter="Include" ItemName="_EvaluatedPublishTempFolderNamesToCleanup" />
</CreateItem>
<Delete Files="#(_EvaluatedPublishTempFolderNamesToCleanup)" />
</Target>
Beware: for some reason, probably because I included it myself in the project, my build target for building the views was named "BuildViews", instead of "MvcBuildViews", so I had to modify the BeforeTargets attribute accordingly.
This is not necessarily the exact same issue, and to be honest, probably down to pure lack of knowledge on my part, however I had this same error when:
I set up a standard asp.net new project actually just used for HTML5 stuff so nothing other than the usual project structure
I then (not thinking perhaps!) added a new WCF REST project (which actually was just another base asp.net project using very good examples from http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/128478/Consuming-WCF-REST-Services-Using-jQuery-AJAX-Call?fid=1597004&df=90&mpp=25&noise=3&prof=False&sort=Position&view=Quick&fr=26#xx0xx and http://geekswithblogs.net/michelotti/archive/2010/08/21/restful-wcf-services-with-no-svc-file-and-no-config.aspx
The problem was I added the WCF REST project (#2) as a SUB-DIRECTORY of the main project (#1) and then tried to build! even if I cleaned the project of course.. I also made both projects use IISexpress because I thought there was an issue using the same port or something.
Of course the build process saw the web.config from #1 and then a sub-dir with another web.config #2..
I realise this probably should be a very basic understood gotcha and it has caught me out a while ago, however sometimes it's the simplest of mistakes that are a real pain!
Might help others... who perhaps haven't had their morning coffee..
tip 1: clean & then rebuild.
tip 2: just close VS and open again.
tip 3: the downloaded project may be inside another sub folder... open the folder which has you .net files.
c:/demo1/demo/ (all files)
You should have to open demo from vs... not demo1.
I have a somewhat a similar problem, i had the main config as Copy Always so it copied the config to the bin directory. When i republished the main project, i got the MachineToApplication error. So my solution was to just change the config to Do Not Copy and remove the extra configuration in the bin folder.
Ok, so I've got a somewhat complicated problem with my build environment that I'm trying to deal with.
I have a solution file that contains multiple C# projects which is built by a NAnt script calling MSBuild - passing MSBuild the name of the solution file and a path to copy the binaries to. This is because I want my automated build environment (CruiseControl.Net) to create a folder named after the revision of each build - this way I can easily go back to previous binaries for any reason.
So idealy I have a folder layout like this
c:\build\nightly\rev1
c:\build\nightly\rev2
c:\build\nightly\rev3
...
c:\build\nightly\rev10
etc.
The problem that's arisen is I recently added the latest version of the Unity IoC container to my project, checking it directly out of MS's online SVN repository. What's happening is I have a Silverlight 3 project that references the Silverlight version of Unity but I also have other projects (namely my Unit testing project) that reference the standard (non-Silverlight) version of Unity.
So what happens is since MSBuild is dumping everything into one single folder the Silverlight version of the Unity assembly is overwriting the non-Silverlight version because they have the exact same assembly file name.
Then when CruistControl runs my unit tests they fail because they don't have the proper dependencies available anymore (they try to load the Silverlight specific Unity assembly which obviously doesn't work).
So what I want to do is:
keep my desired output directory
structure (folder\revision)
I don't want to have to manually edit
every single proj file I have as this
is error prone when adding new
projects to the solution
Idealy I would like MSBuild to put everything into a folder structure similar to this:
nightly\revision1\project1
nightly\revision1\project2
nightly\revision1\project3
...
nightly\revision2\project1
nightly\revision2\project2
nightly\revision2\project3
etc
I can't modify the Unity project to give it a different file name because it comes from another SVN repository I cannot commit changes to. I found a similar question posted here and the suggested solution was to use a "master" MSBuild file that used a custom task to extract all the project file names out of the solution then loop over each one building them. I tried that but it doesn't build them in the order of their dependencies, so it fails for my project.
Help?
Firstly I would always have the build server delete the old working copy and check out a fresh copy to avoid any problems with stale artifacts from the previous build.
Next I would have nant or msbuild build the solutions as before with the artifacts from each build going to their local working output folders.
After that I'd move the artifacts from their working paths to their output paths, this shouldn't require digging through the project files since you can just tell msbuild/nant to copy working\project1\bin\release\**\*.* to artifacts\project1\.
The script that does this should ideally be stored along with the source with the main file, e.g. build.nant or build.proj in top level of the trunk.
For third party libraries I would simple include the DLLs directory in your repository. Nothing worse than writing some code and having a third party dependency break your build because of changes on their end.
Simply document the versions of the libraries you are using, and if you must update them, you'll have a better sense of what breaks the build before you even check it in.
Also, doesn't CC.Net automatically handle the providing of releases based on revision? I'm using TeamCity and it keeps a copy of the artifacts of every build.
I highly recommend reading JP Boodhoo's Automating Builds with NAnt blog series. That's been my starting point and have made lots of changes for my own taste. I also highly recommend checking out the builds of many open sources projects for examples. I've learned a lot from the builds of the Castle/Nhibernate/Rhino-Tools stack.
We have a 32 bit mixed C/C++ application that we are trying to deploy to the world.
It naturally uses C and C++ runtime DLLs. We are using VS 2005.
The manifest constructed by VS2005 is the following:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
<dependency>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="Microsoft.VC80.CRT" version="8.0.50727.42" processorArchitecture="x86" publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b"></assemblyIdentity>
</dependentAssembly>
</dependency>
</assembly>
We ship this as a file in the same directory as the "application", named
(changed to protect the innocent) "application.exe.manifest".
On the face of it, it is sort of reasonable. But, in installing on some
systems, we get the message when "application.exe" is launched:
This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect
One way to cure this is to run VCRedist_x86.exe from MSDN. (Unfortunately,
while we can run it, we don't know exactly what it is doing.
It appears to be parking DLLs in the SxS directories. But what else
does it do?)
a) The MS docs seem to indicate that the assembly must have an assemblyIdentity
tag directly underneath the assembly tag, that names the application itself.
This is clearly missing here, but the manifest seems to partially work in that
if we remove it, the application doesn't start even if the DLLs are present.
b) Remarkably the assembly doesn't mention the C runtime DLL. Do I need to just add that by hand?
c) We dont want to be dependent on whether the right version DLL is present on the target machine. Assuming that the assembly makes it clear which DLLs to use, how is that we can ensure the DLLs we need are on the target system? (In particular, we don't want run VCRedist or ask our customer to do this). Before assemblies came along, we solved this problem by simply placing the C and C++ DLLs in the same directory as the application .exe file, and Windows would look there first to pick them up. Can we still ship the C and C++ DLLs in the same directory? I can't figure out from the MS docs I can find how the SxS finds the appropriate dependent assemblies.
Any help appreciated.
a) The manifest xml validation clearly has some problems. Depending on the version of Windows this may or may not be an issue. Since so many applications don't correctly follow the schema (and because it was never properly enforced), I doubt it will ever be strict here.
b) The C runtime DLL is referenced in the Microsoft.VC80.CRT.manifest file, pulling it in to to the loader dependency graph. Providing you have a dependency on the manifest, you will also implicitly have a dependency on the DLL.
c) Per my earlier comment, the correct thing to do (aside from installing the latest redist system wide) is to put the CRT manifest and all three DLLs in your application directory. This is poorly documented under SxS: Private Assemblies and Installing Side-by-side Assemblies as Private Assemblies. The probe order is defined in Assembly Searching Sequence.
Generally a SxS binding failure will put an entry in the Application (for Vista+) or System Event Log (pre Vista) describing the error.
Activation context generation failed for "C:\TEMP\sxs\PEVerify.exe".Error in manifest or policy file "C:\TEMP\sxs\Microsoft.VC90.CRT.MANIFEST" on line 4.
Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested.
Reference is Microsoft.VC90.CRT,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a18e3b",type="win32",version="9.0.21022.8".
Definition is Microsoft.VC90.CRT,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="9.0.30729.1".
Please use sxstrace.exe for detailed diagnosis.
You can use sxstrace.exe in (Vista+) to see what the loader is actually doing. Junfeng covers this in more detail in Diagnosing SideBySide failures.
To get a better understanding of what is happening at runtime (after the manifest has been parsed and dependencies located), enable "Show Loader Snaps" for your image file (just the filename and extension, do not enter a directory name, like so: "notepad.exe") using gflags.exe. Run your application under windbg (Visual Studio's debugger may also work) and look at the output. Make sure to disable loader snaps when you're done debugging since it will slow down the application even when no debugger is attached. Sample output looks like this:
2d6c:36b4 # 1246428223 - LdrpHandleOneOldFormatImportDescriptor - INFO: DLL "C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\Bin\PEVerify.exe" imports "MSVCR90.dll"
2d6c:36b4 # 1246428223 - LdrpMapDll - INFO: Mapping static redirected DLL "C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.vc90.crt_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.30729.4148_none_5090ab56bcba71c2\MSVCR90.dll"
ModLoad: 4fbd0000 4fc73000 C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.vc90.crt_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.30729.4148_none_5090ab56bcba71c2\MSVCR90.dll
2d6c:36b4 # 1246428285 - LdrpMapDll - INFO: Mapped DLL "C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.vc90.crt_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.30729.4148_none_5090ab56bcba71c2\MSVCR90.dll" at address 4FBD0000
2d6c:36b4 # 1246428285 - LdrpHandleOneOldFormatImportDescriptor - INFO: DLL "C:\Windows\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.vc90.crt_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.30729.4148_none_5090ab56bcba71c2\MSVCR90.dll" imports "KERNEL32.dll"
You could link the C/C++ runtime statically.
You can change the library linkage in the C/C++ compiler options in the Code Generation section. Change the entry from Multithreaded [Debug] DLL to Multithreaded [Debug].
Your DLL will then contain the required parts of the runtime, and the separate installation is not required.
I've never understood how the manifest stuff all hangs together ... but instead of placing the C runtime DLLs in the same directory as your exe try copying the whole 'Microsoft.VC90.CRT' folder from the redist folder in the Visual Studio install (C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\redist\x86\Microsoft.VC90.CRT on my machine).
I believe Microsoft encourages the use of shared libraries and running the official redist since it installs the libraries 'properly' and means they can patch security issues that may be found in them.